Your 2020 Presidential Candidate Speculation Thread

Her views on revolvers were evolving.

And satire is always flippant, empty jokes with no real truth or meaning behind it.

― grawlix (unperson), Thursday, August 2, 2018 4:27 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

satire is always meant to convey meaning, but is not to be taken literally. unless of course you ate irish babies for breakfast this morning under the orders of jonathan swift.

they were delicious

The next president should be a tree

― President Keyes

if you were the president what kind of tree would you be?

Pretty sure Americans would vote for the tallest money tree without thinking much about it

my distrust of Gillibrand comes from the gun-lovin' centrist she was when appointed to the Senate.

jfc, that was almost 10 years ago. Her voting record since entering the senate has been very anti-NRA and Sandy Hook was a pretty hard/permanent reset for her on the issue.

Gillibrand's endorsements don't seem to be strategic outside of the Cuomo one. She endorsed Kelda Roys in WI, who's polling at less than 5% in the dem primary poll for gov.

God forbid a novice politician should appropriately represent the wishes of her constituents

Xp

my distrust of Gillibrand comes from the gun-lovin' centrist she was when appointed to the Senate.

This identifies her as a pol who knows which side her bread is buttered on. So, the best approach is to keep buttering her bread on the side you agree with.

The next president should be a tree

― President Keyes, Thursday, August 2, 2018 4:48 PM (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

how about a skeleton

They have more life experience

I fucking hate all you idiots

I come to this thread to learn about what Jeff Flake and Rudy Giuliani are up to, not to read about how some goddamn internet randos feel about BIG IDEAS that were covered to death by my fellow wind instrument players in our AD&D group in 10th fucking grade

Oh wait this is the 2020 Speculation thread not the main US politics thread. I’m still mad at everyone though. Except Morbius, he’s just doing his usual Method bullshit.

Can we vote for you?

I look forward to Morbius explaining why this is evil, and just another example of Booker serving his true corporate masters like the might-as-well-be-a-Republican he is.

i don't answer cherrypicking strawmen

scuse me i have a Method class

now i have "method man" stuck in my head, only it's "m-e-t, h-o-d, MORBS"

Or you could o the Hall & Oates route. m-e-t-h-o-d-o-f modern morbs

lol Doc

Cory Booker would rather be seen as unbelievably dumb than as sympathetic to Palestinians https://t.co/dUTeFJNMbR

— Rob (@robbryan86) August 3, 2018

To be fair his housing policy is >>>>>> Kamala harris’s

lmao

https://www.ozy.com/politics-and-power/sen-kamala-harris-cozies-up-to-the-base-but-will-they-believe/88474

https://i.imgur.com/zLxpGHI.png

hahaha

committed leftist Harry Reid

At the same time, the thousands of activists gathered are asking a similar question: Who is Harris? The former San Francisco prosecutor and California’s “top cop” as attorney general who built up a mixed record on criminal justice reform, bank regulation and environmentalism? Or a progressive who combines the pragmatism of Hillary Clinton with the promise of Barack Obama

fucking hell, political writers are the worst on earth

I look forward to Morbius explaining why this is evil, and just another example of Booker serving his true corporate masters like the might-as-well-be-a-Republican he is.

― grawlix (unperson), Friday, August 3, 2018 12:06 PM (four days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i assumed this would link to the palestine story

hey that quote got me a harassing email! it'd been a while

https://i.imgur.com/moa41bu.png

owned

MR hoos

first john cusack and now this

be careful how

always good advice

HOOS you are ubiquitous and i'm not gonna finish

here's how the rest of that thought goes

"Be careful how you refer to her and how you speak about her. We black voters are sick and fucking tired of fake allies like you putting down black candidates because of purity bullshit. We are watching and taking names. We learned our lessons from BernieOrBust and 2016 especially. You people will NOT change the makeup of black voters.You will NOT bully us into changing for you. We WON'T. WE will properly be vetting Bernie Sanders this time unlike 2016 when white liberal media gave this sucker a pass. It will be painful for him and painful for YOU as well."

there's more but yknow, nah

a perk of being in the arena

I cannot get over "You are nothing but a little Digital Communications Strategist." Was that copy-pasted off your linkedin?

...

it's my official job title on the website, which is likely also where they pulled my email

It just uh amuses me in context. Like what is belittling about being a digital communications strategist

A little one.

true believers are the worst

Odds that this is from a Russian bot?

I poked around and this person appears to have left similar challops on the Facebook pages for a couple MSNBC programs so

This sucks but mitigating factor is that I haven’t seen a single person respond to this in positive terms.

"I’m exploring a run for the presidency of the United States, and I wanted to come to Iowa and listen to people and learn about some issues that are facing the citizens of Iowa and do my homework," Avenatti told the Des Moines Register https://t.co/Wje8C2sY7E

— Mike Memoli (@mikememoli) August 9, 2018

Delusions of grandeur are a hell of a drug

AveNOT

jesus christ

what, he's running too?

damn as someone who admires him mostly for his strategic legal and psych nous, i really hope he is just trolling the fuck out of trumpists.

Damn, the hell of our trumpworld is weighing on me.

I'd be pretty conflicted about even the prospect of an Avenatti run. On the one hand, all I want more than almost anything is a return to some semblance of normalcy. On the other hand, he might be right that post-Trump, all bets are off. I wonder if a country that could or would elect Trump can ever be normal again, so by that standard I'm not sure smart policy or thoughtful discourse or gravity or anything "normal" tops personalty and/or pugnaciousness.

Anyway, I assume he's trolling. Once again worth pointing out that Trump hasn't said a peep about Avenatti, for whatever reason. Not by name, not by nickname. Even pretending to run for president you would thing would eventually attract his ire, if only to make fun of the idea, but so far ... not a word.

man, tabloids are probably itching to hit publish on "Ave-Naughty" headlines