Yougov poll.
xp
― Dom Passantino, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:09 (eighteen years ago)
graph looks like those candlestick/face illusions
― DG, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:09 (eighteen years ago)
haha no! i guess he meant that i was some kind of piecemeal reformer instead of a real revolutionary like he is??
xposts
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:10 (eighteen years ago)
squint and you can see robin carmody smoking a cigar
― DG, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:10 (eighteen years ago)
Predictable turncoat.
― Dingbod Kesterson, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:11 (eighteen years ago)
Liberal Democrat candidate Brian Paddick said: "Kate Hoey is bonkers - they make a perfect couple."
sticking it to the breeders once again
― DG, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:12 (eighteen years ago)
Image of Carmody is funny. We need him now, I suppose!
Hand, yes, it was on an old thread called something like 'What Are Your Politics?' - on which people called themselves various complex leftist terms and then some Yank came along and said 'BS - y'all are Liberals'. Maybe he was right too!
Or maybe the Momus thing was on another thread. Anyway, it was funny how Momus came out with a special term for you, which he didn't apply to anyone else (though I don't think my political views, for instance, are very different from yours, which doubtless resemble lots of other people's).
― the pinefox, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:13 (eighteen years ago)
Speaking on LBC radio, Mr Livingstone described Ms Hoey as "eccentric".
"She was one of the few Labour MPs to vote against banning fox-hunting," he told LBC Radio.
"But I'm surprised he's going to take her advice on sport because I think the reason Tony Blair sacked her at the end of his first term, was because she'd been involved in all the fiasco over Wembley.
"But I suppose she knows more about it than Boris does."
― the pinefox, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:14 (eighteen years ago)
Mr Livingston has a fine sense of irony
"Ken Livingstone said Ms Hoey had been "a sort of semi-detached member of the party in recent years"
― laxalt, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:16 (eighteen years ago)
After transferred votes have dispersed:
Barking and Dagenham - Lab Barnet - Con Bexley - Lab Brent - Lab Bromley - Con Croydon - Con Ealing - Tricky one, Lab I think Enfield - Con Greenwich - Lab Harrow - Con Havering - Con Hillingdon - Con Hounslow - Fuck knows Kingston upon Thames - Con Merton - Con Newham - Lab Redbridge - Lab Richmond upon Thames - Con Sutton - Con Waltham Forest - Con
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:16 (eighteen years ago)
Can't really see Paddick breaking into second anywhere.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:17 (eighteen years ago)
Redbridge - Lab
doubt it
― DG, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:18 (eighteen years ago)
Maybe I unwisely conflated Redbridge with Barking & Dagenham, dunno, never been.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:19 (eighteen years ago)
not missing much :(
― DG, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:22 (eighteen years ago)
but yeah i mean it contains churchill's consituency so a vote for ken is kinda unlikely
― DG, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:23 (eighteen years ago)
Monday, April 28th, 2008 8:13 pm mayoral election pop As I've often written elsewhere, the privatisation of Radio 1 (which would these days take 1Xtra with it) is as potent a right-wing obsession as it is - it was in the Daily Mail practically every day in the mid-90s, and I doubt much has changed since - because it would effectively deny any national mass media exposure to (even today, as good as silencing for many people) the voices that the right want silenced (more generally, calls for the PBS/NPR-ization - spelling deliberate - of the BBC are as potent as they are on the right because they unite the two main types of right-winger: the traditionalists who don't believe there should be *any* populist broadcasting and the Murdochites who believe there should be as much as possible, just not supplied by the public sector).
And so it is with Wiley this week at number 4, played incessantly on 1Xtra for months, played with reasonable frequency on Radio 1 almost as long, given no exposure at all by the commercial stations available where I live (and everywhere else except a few major cities) which are firmly in the hands of GCap/Global, The Local Radio Company, and a few other groups which should be grist to Paul Kingsnorth's mill. Even if you don't like "Wearing My Rolex" as a song, even if you abhor (as I certainly do) the attitude and mindset behind it (while at the same time grimly understanding the circumstances that have brought it about), you have to concede that this is an incredibly apt song to have in the Top 5 in the week a deeply divided city goes to the polls, the rawest, most *inner London* sound to have got so high since So Solid. The boroughs that will vote for Boris are *living in fear* of this sound seeping through.
It is, of course, depressing that the song that represents Livingstone's London is so blatantly aggressive-acquisitive. That things have come to this! Yet even that is far preferable to the current Real Soul mania, as much the Cameronistas' preparing-for-government music as Britpop was for the Blairites (the US success of "Bleeding Love" in this context might be analoguous to that of "Wonderwall").
― Free Peace Sweet!, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:30 (eighteen years ago)
the rawest, most *inner London* sound to have got so high since So Solid.
guess he's not talking about fulham here.
― banriquit, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:32 (eighteen years ago)
The Fulham Broadway vs. North End Road throwdown is a pretty one-sided contest I have to say.
― Dingbod Kesterson, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:34 (eighteen years ago)
Victory for Ken, pyrrhic victory for Labour then.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:35 (eighteen years ago)
Is FPS Carmody?
I live in a borough that I don't think will vote for BJ, and I have never heard or heard of this record. Carmody, here, might be overestimating the power of pop records to 'seep through'; perhaps I have done the same kind of overestimation in my time.
Wherever you are, Carmody, good day, and good luck.
― the pinefox, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:35 (eighteen years ago)
i do think ken will win (it depends on the number of usual non-voters who decide to vote, i suspect), but he's so distant from the thrust of the labour project that it won't give them much of a bump for the general election.
― banriquit, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:37 (eighteen years ago)
Also if Labour lose London they might as well concede the General Election now.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:39 (eighteen years ago)
In which event I might as well pack up and move to Canada.
― Dingbod Kesterson, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:40 (eighteen years ago)
Yes I know, MESSAGEBOARD SADDO THREATENS TO QUIT BRITAIN IF TORIES TRIUMPH isn't exactly Phil Collins but even so
Scotland's nearer
― Tom D., Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:41 (eighteen years ago)
I was more thinking that you've just swung A1ex1s Petr1d1s in favour of Boris but still...
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:42 (eighteen years ago)
I think that any Livingstone victory would be somewhat separate from any question of broader Labour electoral fortunes - he is a 'special case'.
On the other hand, I think that a BJ victory would *not* be separate from broader Con electoral fortunes: it would be hailed as a harbinger, etc
This inconsistency sounds negative and depressing, but seems to me true.
This is Carmody also:
--
Thursday, March 20th, 2008 11:54 pm it was five years ago tonight
that I realised how much wrong I had done, how dangerous some of my actions and statements and opinions had been *without my even realising it*
it was five years ago tonight that I realised I could never like *pop*, in the broadest sense, ever again. for some time my pop fandom was permanently shaken, until I realised that there was a particular sound and style I could get behind and turn into *ideology* while despising the rest of pop ever more passionately
it was five years ago tonight that my life - and everyone's life, especially in Britain, even if they don't want to admit it - changed forever
― the pinefox, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:42 (eighteen years ago)
fuck labour in the general election; i could care less at this point. there's actually a difference between the two in London.
― Upt0eleven, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:43 (eighteen years ago)
It would, as you said earlier, change the narrative a bit, though. It wouldn't necessarily give Brown a boost, but it would definitely be a blow for Cameron.
― Jamie T Smith, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:44 (eighteen years ago)
Scotland is indeed nearer; speaking of which, excellent article by Ian Jack here.
― Dingbod Kesterson, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:44 (eighteen years ago)
Well, it's down to "nice bloke, makes yer laff" which is how Boz and Caz are operating right now.
― Mark G, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:45 (eighteen years ago)
i think he's talking about that gareth gates 'spirit in the sky' cover.
― banriquit, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:47 (eighteen years ago)
Felt he missed out a lot though, like differences in education system and in attitudes to education (poor people are allowed to be educated in Scotland - even, whisper it, encouraged to be educated); attitudes to property ownership etc
― Tom D., Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:51 (eighteen years ago)
Well there's at least one very major difference in the Scottish education system which doesn't seem to have been eradicated, sadly.
― Dingbod Kesterson, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:53 (eighteen years ago)
Very striking, Ian Jack's words on Scotland's bloody tradition of militarism making it defendable in a future world.
― the pinefox, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:56 (eighteen years ago)
"Did you spill Scotland's pint?"
― Tom D., Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:57 (eighteen years ago)
In any case it's when you get out into places like Bromley and Twickenham that you're in real Tory heartland, I wouldn't say it's even a 50:50 split
The Twickenham MP is Vince Cable! The Richmond Park MP is Susan Kramer (Lib Dem), and the Kingston MP is Ed Davey (Lib Dem). Richmond council is Lib Dem controlled, as is Kingston.
I am going to vote for Paddick.
― Dr.C, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 12:59 (eighteen years ago)
Second pref?
― Ed, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 13:00 (eighteen years ago)
Green.
― Dr.C, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 13:02 (eighteen years ago)
*cue predictable gags about I didn't know Scritti Politti were running*
That's a good choice for Twickenham.
Hammersmith & Fulham, however, is untrue blue so I'll have to turn out. Despite his being Ken I'm voting for Ken with Paddick as second choice.
― Dingbod Kesterson, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 13:04 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah I acknowledged that Cable thing in the following post, Dr C.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 13:06 (eighteen years ago)
Oh yes, sorry. But I just wanted to set the recd straight wrt this mythical Tory heartland of SW London!
One of the candidates turned up at our front door to get us to sign a form allowing him to run - he needed something like 30 signatures from each London Borough.
― Dr.C, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 13:09 (eighteen years ago)
I have to combat Chingford I guess.
― Colonel Poo, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 13:15 (eighteen years ago)
Can't persuade you to put Ken second for the sake of stopping boris?
xpost to dr C?
― Ed, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 13:17 (eighteen years ago)
Feel sad for people who have to vote for Ploddick, I think he's the worst candidate for political office i've seen since Bobby Gillespie's dad
― Tom D., Tuesday, 29 April 2008 13:18 (eighteen years ago)
Ed - maybe.
― Dr.C, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 13:21 (eighteen years ago)
Well, what will it take, Doc? A gold plectrum?
― the pinefox, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 13:24 (eighteen years ago)
Much, much more than that...
― Dr.C, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 13:37 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah, I know what you mean Tom, and my heart says Left List as second preference but my STOP BORIS ESPECIALLY IN PHIL N' KIRSTIE FRIENDLY FULHAM says Ploddick.
― Dingbod Kesterson, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 13:39 (eighteen years ago)
my "STOP BORIS etc." head that should be.
― Dingbod Kesterson, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 13:40 (eighteen years ago)