abortion classic or dud?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1424 of them)

omg

TAT THY SAD EAGLE (ENBB), Saturday, 23 May 2009 15:51 (seventeen years ago)

LOL

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Saturday, 23 May 2009 15:58 (seventeen years ago)

still feelin bad for that dude :(

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Saturday, 23 May 2009 15:58 (seventeen years ago)

noone warns you about the vicious wave of regret.

You may have been warned, but did not regard it in the same way. Which makes sense. At the time you were faced with a wholly different set of circumstances and were working from a different pov.

Don't castigate yourself now. That sense of desperation you felt then was real enough.

Aimless, Saturday, 23 May 2009 18:19 (seventeen years ago)

I said this on another thread but I felt after mine that it was kind of right-wing propaganda that you were supposed to feel fucked up afterward. Things wld have been a lot easier if someone had said, "No, it's a complicated thing and of course it's okay and often natural to have volatile, unpredictable emotions. You're still a good person."

cant go with u too many alfbrees (Abbott), Saturday, 23 May 2009 20:42 (seventeen years ago)

but apparently at the moment 51% of usa is pro life

i didn't know this : /

for some reason i was under the impression that with males it's about 50-50,
and 60-40 with females (in favor of choice)

^defense is impregnable (will), Saturday, 23 May 2009 21:30 (seventeen years ago)

I'd say 45% prefers it to be legal and rare while another 45% thinks it should be illegal with certain exceptions.

•--• --- --- •--• (Pleasant Plains), Saturday, 23 May 2009 22:15 (seventeen years ago)

but apparently at the moment 51% of usa is pro life

i didn't know this : /

source

corps of discovery (schlump), Monday, 25 May 2009 04:21 (seventeen years ago)

noone warns you about the vicious wave of regret.

You may have been warned, but did not regard it in the same way. Which makes sense. At the time you were faced with a wholly different set of circumstances and were working from a different pov.

Don't castigate yourself now. That sense of desperation you felt then was real enough.

― Aimless, Saturday, May 23, 2009 1:19 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark

no i was warned it would happen directly after and it didnt. i didnt think anything of it after or for the next 15 years but when i did have a kid it was like holy shit. the gravity of it smacked me in the face.

I wish I was the royal trux (sunny successor), Monday, 25 May 2009 04:59 (seventeen years ago)

I'm kind of surprised not to have seen anything on George Tiller's murder here. Fucking horrible.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hEsxTHOvCbc954sBWc59DuoqWxiwD98J7UOG0

"As one of a few doctors across the nation to perform third-trimester abortions, Tiller had survived an earlier shooting, his clinic was bombed, his home picketed. He hired a Brink's armored truck to take him to work for several weeks, and he frequently had the protection of federal marshals. He built a new surgical center without windows and was known to wear a bulletproof vest, sometimes even to church."

That someone would have to go through all that (and still get murdered!) because they preform a medical procedure is beyond ridiculous.

___________________________________________

Also, seriously PETA?

http://www.kansas.com/946/story/836204.html

Fuck you <3 E (a vegetarian for over 16 years)

Chaki Demus & Pliers (ENBB), Wednesday, 3 June 2009 19:01 (seventeen years ago)

"That someone would have to go through all that (and still get murdered!) because they preform a medical procedure is beyond ridiculous."

You're dealing with some serious psychopaths on the so called "Right to Life" side. Almost al-Queada like delusion.

Bill Magill, Wednesday, 3 June 2009 19:08 (seventeen years ago)

I know. That's why it's beyond ridiculous.

Chaki Demus & Pliers (ENBB), Wednesday, 3 June 2009 19:18 (seventeen years ago)

RIP Tiller, sorry there are some really twisted fucks in this world.

cant go with u too many alfbrees (Abbott), Thursday, 4 June 2009 19:52 (seventeen years ago)

Keith's show the day this happened was really good, albeit heartbreaking.

cant go with u too many alfbrees (Abbott), Thursday, 4 June 2009 19:53 (seventeen years ago)

hero, that dude.

horseshoe, Thursday, 4 June 2009 22:20 (seventeen years ago)

Yes, definitely.

ENBB, Thursday, 4 June 2009 22:22 (seventeen years ago)

This was passed on to me by one of my former professors and I think it's a pretty great concept:

I Am Dr. Tiller

More info about the site here.

ENBB, Thursday, 4 June 2009 22:30 (seventeen years ago)

That's wonderful and is going to make me cry. A lot.

But not someone who should be dead anyway (Laurel), Thursday, 4 June 2009 22:45 (seventeen years ago)

wow, ditto and thanks, Erica!

horseshoe, Thursday, 4 June 2009 22:57 (seventeen years ago)

a good roundup of some testimonials from dr. tiller's patients.

would you ask tom petty that? (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 4 June 2009 23:10 (seventeen years ago)

Sullivan's run a slew of heartbreaking posts in the last week.

Bud Huxtable (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 4 June 2009 23:11 (seventeen years ago)

Protesters bored, miss their reason for existing :-(

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/08/us/08wichita.html?_r=3&hp=&pagewanted=all

StanM, Monday, 8 June 2009 16:59 (seventeen years ago)

Tiller clinic closes:

http://www.ourbodiesourblog.org/blog/2009/06/dr-george-tillers-clinic-closes-for-good

sloth say hi to me (ENBB), Wednesday, 10 June 2009 11:09 (seventeen years ago)

And the assassin proclaims victory. I am not normally in favor of torture, but someone Abu Ghraib this fuck.

Hatfail of Hollow (Nicole), Wednesday, 10 June 2009 12:15 (seventeen years ago)

what for

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Wednesday, 10 June 2009 15:14 (seventeen years ago)

fun

am0n, Wednesday, 10 June 2009 15:17 (seventeen years ago)

three months pass...

http://mobile.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/10/07/okla_abortion/index.html

butt sound insanity (gbx), Thursday, 8 October 2009 16:38 (sixteen years ago)

read that. wtf are they thinking? ok i know what they're thinking but x-(

steamed hams (harbl), Thursday, 8 October 2009 16:39 (sixteen years ago)

infuriating

butt sound insanity (gbx), Thursday, 8 October 2009 16:43 (sixteen years ago)

I just posted a link about this on facebook. I AM SO ANGRY!

*:--☆--:*:--☆:*:--☆--:*:--☆--: (ENBB), Thursday, 8 October 2009 16:44 (sixteen years ago)

shit like this makes me want to secede and start my own country, whos with me?

& other try hard shitfests (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 8 October 2009 16:50 (sixteen years ago)

Christ, what next? Forcing women who have had abortions to wear red armbands with foetus symbols on them?

...and the wizard blew his horn (Masonic Boom), Thursday, 8 October 2009 16:51 (sixteen years ago)

Crazy. They can't do that, can they? It doesn't seem legally possible, and I am too lazy to comb through the whole issue. I want someone here to do it and then put it in a nutshell, please.

Beth Parker, Thursday, 8 October 2009 16:51 (sixteen years ago)

Let's not give them ideas because obviously there is no limit to the CRAZY.

& other try hard shitfests (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 8 October 2009 16:52 (sixteen years ago)

what the fucking fuck how can this possibly be legal

the taint of Macca is strong (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 8 October 2009 16:54 (sixteen years ago)

the good guys are attacking on procedural merits, but I can't help but think that there might be legit privacy concerns (legally). I looked over the opening questions of the questionnaire and they really did seem like they'd be enough to ID someone from small town. doubt it'd get by a univ IRB for instance

butt sound insanity (gbx), Thursday, 8 October 2009 16:57 (sixteen years ago)

tbh i'm not sure it is legal but they do this all the time--pass an abortion law they suspect is unconstitutional or violates privacy laws because they want to see it challenged in courts that are favorable to them. so even if it's struck down they come out with case law that supports them overall. i think that's why the challengers tried the "single-subject rule" method first, to avoid getting a ruling about health privacy or abortion. xp

steamed hams (harbl), Thursday, 8 October 2009 16:58 (sixteen years ago)

^^^this seems savvy

butt sound insanity (gbx), Thursday, 8 October 2009 17:00 (sixteen years ago)

I don't know if this is any crazier than the healthcare "argument" about not using any of the federal money/tax credits for ANY insurance packages that, as part of their standard coverage MIGHT include abortions IN THE EVENT that you are even a woman and therefore hypothetically eligible for one at some point in your life.

The result of which, of course, would be for insurance companies to drop abortion coverage from all their plans. Which HEY is a lot easier than taking the issue back to the Supreme Court, huh guys?

that stupid-ass cannibal pen-pal of yours (Laurel), Thursday, 8 October 2009 17:03 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/sfaa/oklahoma.html

So there are only 6 abortion providers in the entire state of OK, a parental cosent law and a 24 hour waiting period. This is yet another law that might discourage women who are afraid of their identities being discovered (which in small towns could easily be done from the questions like Ev said) from obtaining abortions. Great.

*:--☆--:*:--☆:*:--☆--:*:--☆--: (ENBB), Thursday, 8 October 2009 17:09 (sixteen years ago)

Ha when I got an abortion I was worried somehow people were able to magically scan my mind & see this happened – let's just make the paranoia a reality, eh?

existential eggs (Abbott), Thursday, 8 October 2009 23:17 (sixteen years ago)

*googles*

butt sound insanity (gbx), Friday, 9 October 2009 01:15 (sixteen years ago)

(j/k <3 u abbs)

butt sound insanity (gbx), Friday, 9 October 2009 01:16 (sixteen years ago)

hahahahahahaha

existential eggs (Abbott), Friday, 9 October 2009 01:20 (sixteen years ago)

Are you fucking kidding me? Why on earth are you going to go & give a list of names & personal info to the same nutjobs who would murder doctors for the prestige of (legal) martyrdom? The very existence of such a list/database is essentially an open sanctioning of, at best, harassment & exclusion.

cervix-a-lot (Pillbox), Friday, 9 October 2009 01:25 (sixteen years ago)

does not include the name, address or "any information specifically identifying the patient." - I guess I should actually read things before indulging kneejerk posting impulses. Still, tho, a dubious proposition, the fuckheads.

cervix-a-lot (Pillbox), Friday, 9 October 2009 01:54 (sixteen years ago)

cervix-a-lot is concerned

steamed hams (harbl), Friday, 9 October 2009 02:12 (sixteen years ago)

wow, what the fuck

jackie off the chain (k3vin k.), Friday, 9 October 2009 02:46 (sixteen years ago)

this is not OK, lahoma

latebloomer, Friday, 9 October 2009 03:25 (sixteen years ago)

a store i worked at a couple of years ago, we'd occasionally get these faxes from an abortion clinic in another city, containing patient's full info. i rang them twice to tell them what was going on, you'd think they'd be a little more fucking careful. what if i was some religious nutto? that kind of info is a loaded gun in the wrong hands.

DAN P3RRY MAD AT GRANDMA (just1n3), Friday, 9 October 2009 03:40 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.