No to take away from D Esq. serious post but
xpost omg hahahahahahahaha @ that video
― TAT THY SAD EAGLE (ENBB), Thursday, 21 May 2009 22:26 (seventeen years ago)
i definitely understand how non-asshole, non-bible beaters can be conflicted on this issue but at the end of the day, (1) legal = safer, and (2) none of my business, so...
what really grinds my gears is that if the religious right were reaaally that concerned about reducing abortions, they'd maybe get behind proper sex education and making contraception readily accessible. but they don't, which makes me think it's not really about their concern for the unborn and maybe more about political litmus tests, sexism and discrimination. and so maybe FUCK them.
― ^defense is impregnable (will), Thursday, 21 May 2009 23:19 (seventeen years ago)
(1) legal = safer
i'm pro-choice in a lot of ways, with (2) - constitutional right to privacy way behind a lot of other good reasons, but sometimes i think it starts and ends with (1); that old line about the time for an abortion debate being when abortion is readily and safely available. abortion is an option and is going to happen, so government should accommodate this and act accordingly. actually rolling back the existing laws - which i know is perpetually in the balance, but apparently at the moment 51% of usa is pro life - would be retrograde in so many ways beyond controlling whether or not women have reproductive rights or not.
re: daniel - i know that it's been polarised since forever in the states, but i think the entrenched democratic/pro-choice, republican/pro-life split has been reinforced by the rise of the religious right; there's a way more logical pairing between beliefs and policy there.
― corps of discovery (schlump), Friday, 22 May 2009 00:24 (seventeen years ago)
Without the proper legal training but with some knowledge of the Supreme Court battles since Griswold vs Connecticut, I'm very curious about the line of reasoning that Ruth Bader Ginsberg, among others, follow: finding a right to abortion amid the right to privacy was a poor decision, and came too soon, at a time when state legislatures were about to allow abortions anyway. Thoughts?
― Bud Huxtable (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 22 May 2009 00:34 (seventeen years ago)
(in other words, I'm open to the argument that justices like William O. Douglas went too far in pursuing a results-oriented jurisprudence)
― Bud Huxtable (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 22 May 2009 00:35 (seventeen years ago)
"Ruth Bader Ginsberg, among others, follow: finding a right to abortion amid the right to privacy was a poor decision"
does she mean it's a tactical mistake or that it doesn't reasonably fall under privacy under any application?
― Philip Nunez, Friday, 22 May 2009 00:42 (seventeen years ago)
Both. She was skeptical about locating a right to an abortion within the so-called right to privacy.
― Bud Huxtable (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 22 May 2009 00:43 (seventeen years ago)
I need to find a link to the article in which she wishes Harry Blackmun had used the due process clause instead of the Right to Privacy.
nonono she wishes he had used equal protection, not the due process clause iirc
― fantazy land (harbl), Friday, 22 May 2009 00:45 (seventeen years ago)
the due process "right to privacy" thing was kind of made up, perhaps a right to an abortion would be easier to ground in the equal protection clause but i'm not 100% convinced because of the way other EPC cases come out though. it's an interesting question, how stuff could have been different.
― fantazy land (harbl), Friday, 22 May 2009 00:47 (seventeen years ago)
like around the same time geduldig v. aiello makes it look like it would have been impossible for the court to say there is a right to an abortion in the due process clause, that's what makes it hard for me to wrap my mind around. i dunno.
― fantazy land (harbl), Friday, 22 May 2009 00:49 (seventeen years ago)
er i mean equal protection clause
i'm drinking btw
― fantazy land (harbl), Friday, 22 May 2009 00:50 (seventeen years ago)
i think the tactical argument has a counterpart in what optimists are saying about obama and policies toward on gay rights: that they'll be easier to pass and built on stronger foundations if things progress incrementally rather than through turnaround legislation. i do not know if this is true of ginsberg's theory though.
― corps of discovery (schlump), Friday, 22 May 2009 00:51 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah: Ginsberg theorizes that state legislatures were headed in this direction anyway.
― Bud Huxtable (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 22 May 2009 00:56 (seventeen years ago)
She has said, unequivocally, that Roe v Wade was a poorly decided and written decision.
― Bud Huxtable (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 22 May 2009 00:57 (seventeen years ago)
i think many people, including pro-choicers agree that it was poorly written
― Mr. Que, Friday, 22 May 2009 01:26 (seventeen years ago)
having a kid really fucks up with your belief system with most everything but esp wrt abortion. noone warns you about the vicious wave of regret.
― I wish I was the royal trux (sunny successor), Friday, 22 May 2009 02:03 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah. Despite the fact that I hate how the pro-life movement uses post-abortion trauma as a platform now, I think that this is something that isn't addressed very well in general. The bottom line is that it is a serious issue and the feelings that one goes through afterwards are real and can be devastating.
― TAT THY SAD EAGLE (ENBB), Friday, 22 May 2009 03:39 (seventeen years ago)
I've counseled some women during post-abortion check-ups and the experience was heartbreaking for me. I can't even imagine what it was like for them tbh.
― TAT THY SAD EAGLE (ENBB), Friday, 22 May 2009 03:41 (seventeen years ago)
btw pretty sure i used to live with that dog up there, who is vexed by abortion
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/211/488863262_072763a23b.jpg?v=0
― i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Saturday, 23 May 2009 15:35 (seventeen years ago)
yay the return of fun afternoon with vacuum salesman guy
― unattainable panini (jjjusten), Saturday, 23 May 2009 15:45 (seventeen years ago)
UH that is in reference to that picture, not the topic of abortion BTW
― unattainable panini (jjjusten), Saturday, 23 May 2009 15:46 (seventeen years ago)
omg
― TAT THY SAD EAGLE (ENBB), Saturday, 23 May 2009 15:51 (seventeen years ago)
LOL
― i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Saturday, 23 May 2009 15:58 (seventeen years ago)
still feelin bad for that dude :(
noone warns you about the vicious wave of regret.
You may have been warned, but did not regard it in the same way. Which makes sense. At the time you were faced with a wholly different set of circumstances and were working from a different pov.
Don't castigate yourself now. That sense of desperation you felt then was real enough.
― Aimless, Saturday, 23 May 2009 18:19 (seventeen years ago)
I said this on another thread but I felt after mine that it was kind of right-wing propaganda that you were supposed to feel fucked up afterward. Things wld have been a lot easier if someone had said, "No, it's a complicated thing and of course it's okay and often natural to have volatile, unpredictable emotions. You're still a good person."
― cant go with u too many alfbrees (Abbott), Saturday, 23 May 2009 20:42 (seventeen years ago)
but apparently at the moment 51% of usa is pro life
i didn't know this : /
for some reason i was under the impression that with males it's about 50-50,and 60-40 with females (in favor of choice)
― ^defense is impregnable (will), Saturday, 23 May 2009 21:30 (seventeen years ago)
I'd say 45% prefers it to be legal and rare while another 45% thinks it should be illegal with certain exceptions.
― •--• --- --- •--• (Pleasant Plains), Saturday, 23 May 2009 22:15 (seventeen years ago)
source
― corps of discovery (schlump), Monday, 25 May 2009 04:21 (seventeen years ago)
noone warns you about the vicious wave of regret.You may have been warned, but did not regard it in the same way. Which makes sense. At the time you were faced with a wholly different set of circumstances and were working from a different pov.Don't castigate yourself now. That sense of desperation you felt then was real enough.― Aimless, Saturday, May 23, 2009 1:19 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark
― Aimless, Saturday, May 23, 2009 1:19 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark
no i was warned it would happen directly after and it didnt. i didnt think anything of it after or for the next 15 years but when i did have a kid it was like holy shit. the gravity of it smacked me in the face.
― I wish I was the royal trux (sunny successor), Monday, 25 May 2009 04:59 (seventeen years ago)
I'm kind of surprised not to have seen anything on George Tiller's murder here. Fucking horrible.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hEsxTHOvCbc954sBWc59DuoqWxiwD98J7UOG0
"As one of a few doctors across the nation to perform third-trimester abortions, Tiller had survived an earlier shooting, his clinic was bombed, his home picketed. He hired a Brink's armored truck to take him to work for several weeks, and he frequently had the protection of federal marshals. He built a new surgical center without windows and was known to wear a bulletproof vest, sometimes even to church."
That someone would have to go through all that (and still get murdered!) because they preform a medical procedure is beyond ridiculous.
___________________________________________
Also, seriously PETA?
http://www.kansas.com/946/story/836204.html
Fuck you <3 E (a vegetarian for over 16 years)
― Chaki Demus & Pliers (ENBB), Wednesday, 3 June 2009 19:01 (seventeen years ago)
"That someone would have to go through all that (and still get murdered!) because they preform a medical procedure is beyond ridiculous."
You're dealing with some serious psychopaths on the so called "Right to Life" side. Almost al-Queada like delusion.
― Bill Magill, Wednesday, 3 June 2009 19:08 (seventeen years ago)
I know. That's why it's beyond ridiculous.
― Chaki Demus & Pliers (ENBB), Wednesday, 3 June 2009 19:18 (seventeen years ago)
RIP Tiller, sorry there are some really twisted fucks in this world.
― cant go with u too many alfbrees (Abbott), Thursday, 4 June 2009 19:52 (seventeen years ago)
Keith's show the day this happened was really good, albeit heartbreaking.
― cant go with u too many alfbrees (Abbott), Thursday, 4 June 2009 19:53 (seventeen years ago)
hero, that dude.
― horseshoe, Thursday, 4 June 2009 22:20 (seventeen years ago)
Yes, definitely.
― ENBB, Thursday, 4 June 2009 22:22 (seventeen years ago)
This was passed on to me by one of my former professors and I think it's a pretty great concept:
I Am Dr. Tiller
More info about the site here.
― ENBB, Thursday, 4 June 2009 22:30 (seventeen years ago)
That's wonderful and is going to make me cry. A lot.
― But not someone who should be dead anyway (Laurel), Thursday, 4 June 2009 22:45 (seventeen years ago)
wow, ditto and thanks, Erica!
― horseshoe, Thursday, 4 June 2009 22:57 (seventeen years ago)
a good roundup of some testimonials from dr. tiller's patients.
― would you ask tom petty that? (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 4 June 2009 23:10 (seventeen years ago)
Sullivan's run a slew of heartbreaking posts in the last week.
― Bud Huxtable (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 4 June 2009 23:11 (seventeen years ago)
Protesters bored, miss their reason for existing :-(
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/08/us/08wichita.html?_r=3&hp=&pagewanted=all
― StanM, Monday, 8 June 2009 16:59 (seventeen years ago)
Tiller clinic closes:
http://www.ourbodiesourblog.org/blog/2009/06/dr-george-tillers-clinic-closes-for-good
― sloth say hi to me (ENBB), Wednesday, 10 June 2009 11:09 (seventeen years ago)
And the assassin proclaims victory. I am not normally in favor of torture, but someone Abu Ghraib this fuck.
― Hatfail of Hollow (Nicole), Wednesday, 10 June 2009 12:15 (seventeen years ago)
what for
― i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Wednesday, 10 June 2009 15:14 (seventeen years ago)
fun
― am0n, Wednesday, 10 June 2009 15:17 (seventeen years ago)
http://mobile.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/10/07/okla_abortion/index.html
― butt sound insanity (gbx), Thursday, 8 October 2009 16:38 (sixteen years ago)