2008 Primaries Thread 3: The Rejecting and Denouncening

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (6022 of them)

a pass

max, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:05 (eighteen years ago)

ass pass

max, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:05 (eighteen years ago)

The idea that now is the time to go over the failings of the Clinton presidency is equally bizarre

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:06 (eighteen years ago)

I mean yeah there are lessons to learn I guess and there's no benefit in sugarcoating him but there's only so much time in the day

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:08 (eighteen years ago)

what i don't understand is why it isn't personally or publicly embarrassing for three senators to not do their supposedly important jobs for like a whole year

if the election process actually worked and focused on substantive issues it would be a worthy sacrifice.

Cosmo Vitelli, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:08 (eighteen years ago)

If Clinton is using her First Lady experience as an integral part of her argument to voters, that she has walked in the corridors of power and knows where the restrooms are, whatever -- then I think it is legitimate to assess the accomplishments of the Clinton administration, sure.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:09 (eighteen years ago)

yes

omar little, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:09 (eighteen years ago)

The idea that now is the time to go over the failings of the Clinton presidency is equally bizarre

i disagree. there's a major presidential candidate running right now who calls frequently on the merits that administration as a reason for her capacity to govern.

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:10 (eighteen years ago)

*of that administration

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:10 (eighteen years ago)

If Clinton is using her First Lady experience as an integral part of her argument to voters, that she has walked in the corridors of power and knows where the restrooms are, whatever -- then I think it is legitimate to assess the accomplishments of the Clinton administration, sure.

yea exactly. sorry didn't read this before i posted

Mark Clemente, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:11 (eighteen years ago)

The idea that now is the time to go over the failings of the Clinton presidency is equally bizarre

uh you do know there's a Clinton running for president right? one who constantly refers back to the Clinton years as her "experience" and as an example of the kind of presidency she would run?

and besides, I was just trying to answer a direct question, I didn't bring it up.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:11 (eighteen years ago)

(er x-post_

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:11 (eighteen years ago)

Tracer you are pulling the "I don't understand" + "Who cares, so much more important things" double whammy of shitty internet debating tactics... You can do better.

Gavin, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:12 (eighteen years ago)

Just out of interest, Gavin, do you post elsewhere on ILX?

suzy, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:13 (eighteen years ago)

also keeping in mind that there would likely be a lot of staff continuity between Clinton administrations, and the style of management would likely be the same

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:14 (eighteen years ago)

also, you could wear jeans in the white house again

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:14 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/26/us/politics/26cnd-mccain.html?ei=5088&en=91119d977f91346f&ex=1364270400&adxnnl=1&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&adxnnlx=1206554771-v0/vwjcLN8hc+jUcoSGf7w

mccain says US should honor its moral obligations to iraqis, close guantanamo, listen to the rest of the world, propose greenhouse emissions cap.

empty appeasement made possible by the glimpse of "chickens coming home to roost" radical leftism everyone just got? just your standard international political talking points? (would romney be making them?)
or have we forgotten that, in some ways, when relieved of the task of desperate pandering, mccain really isn't bush?

jermainetwo, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:17 (eighteen years ago)

Suzy, mostly in the political threads.

Gavin, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:19 (eighteen years ago)

listen to the rest of the world

lolz

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:20 (eighteen years ago)

bush said samey things

jhøshea, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:20 (eighteen years ago)

i'm thinking that after the last contest there's just gonna be a big chunk of supers flocking to obama, to such an extent that it won't be possible for hillary to stay in.

OTM the waiting is I think a combination of Let's Let the Voters Speak Before We Do sanctimony and trying to determine the point one's declaration of support will be most appreciated by Obama.

President Keyes, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:21 (eighteen years ago)

^^^not 4 years ago; 8 maybe. xpost

G00blar, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:21 (eighteen years ago)

also, you could wear jeans in the white house again

-- elmo argonaut, Wednesday, March 26, 2008 2:14 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

Did this apply to tours?

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:22 (eighteen years ago)

^^^not 4 years ago; 8 maybe

9/11 CHANGED EVERYTHING DO U C

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:24 (eighteen years ago)

ok, forget the rest, but isn't 'close guantanamo' sort of a significant break? (it might just be the standard distancing-from-failure tactic that forced even bush to eventually ditch rumsfeld, but remember that romney wanted to 'double' g'mo a few month ago).

jermainetwo, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:27 (eighteen years ago)

jon, i remember reading way back that the clinton white house relaxed the dress code aggressively, which would have made the clinton administration one of the leading examples of 90s business casual, that fashion crime against humanity.

elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:27 (eighteen years ago)

how about if Clinton & Gore hadn't been such mealymouthed 'centrist' shits, Dubya wdn't have come close to stealing the 2000 election?

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:29 (eighteen years ago)

sorry i don't buy that at all

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:30 (eighteen years ago)

if gore hadn't sighed at the wrong times he would have won that shit

omar little, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:32 (eighteen years ago)

hey guess what - shit in Iraq is about to blow up just in time for the US GE

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:32 (eighteen years ago)

I am SHOCKED.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:32 (eighteen years ago)

if you're suggesting that "shit blowing up in iraq" is somehow good for mccain or the gop, you're crazy

dmr, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:35 (eighteen years ago)

how about if Clinton & Gore hadn't been such mealymouthed 'centrist' shits, Dubya wdn't have come close to stealing the 2000 election?

Bill won in '92 by NOT running as a liberal and won in '96 because he successfully painted himslef as a centrist and Gingrich/Congress/Republicans as wingnut ideologues ready to shut down the governmment.

Michael White, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:41 (eighteen years ago)

if you're suggesting that "shit blowing up in iraq" is somehow good for mccain or the gop, you're crazy

quite the opposite, actually

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:42 (eighteen years ago)

yes Michael, and what did all of that get him and us, besides Dick Morris and triangulation? and Gore chanting "I agree" to W in debates?

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:44 (eighteen years ago)

there's been some grousing on this thread that the war "going well"/"winding down" would benefit McCain and/or Hilz and paint Obama into a corner as a defeatist/weak on defense, etc. My argument all along, however, has been that in all likelihood shit will get worse in Iraq right before the election because the Iraqi insurgents want to see someone in the WH who will pull out asap - and the best way to ensure that is to maintain and/or turn US public opinion against the war by making shit in Iraq as fucked up as possible. I sort of hate to say it, but the worse things get in Iraq, the better positioned Obama will be to win the election.

x-post

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:46 (eighteen years ago)

and what did all of that get him and us, besides Dick Morris and triangulation?

It got us Ginzburg and Breyer for starters, the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, an increased minimum wage in '96, a couple good vetoes, including on initial welfare reform proposals coming out of Gingrich's Congress, the first real attempt for Universal Health Care in a generation, and the first budget surplus since '69.

Michael White, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:59 (eighteen years ago)

the idea that we should give clinton as pass bc gwb is so awful is sort of bizarre to me

-- max, Wednesday, March 26, 2008 6:04 PM (46 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

a pass

-- max, Wednesday, March 26, 2008 6:05 PM (45 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

ass pass

-- max, Wednesday, March 26, 2008 6:05 PM

thanking u for making the important connections

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:59 (eighteen years ago)

I mean, considering how nuts the Republicans under Gingrich were in the 90's, having a triagulatin' MOR Democrat in the Oval Office was better than having another loser out of it.

Michael White, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 19:01 (eighteen years ago)

the first real attempt for Universal Health Care in a generation,

http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a59/penguinking3/fail.jpg

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 19:04 (eighteen years ago)

MW, what was won by the triangulation? Your list of accomplishments is pretty tenuous and small for 8 years in the WH.

Gavin, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 19:06 (eighteen years ago)

I think what some people (including myself) are saying is that if we are happy with toned-down Repubs for Democrats as the "left" party, then that's exactly what we'll get.

Gavin, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 19:08 (eighteen years ago)

quite the opposite, actually

right, ok. misread "SHOCKED" as if you thought Bush meant to do that or something

dmr, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 19:23 (eighteen years ago)

jon, i remember reading way back that the clinton white house relaxed the dress code aggressively, which would have made the clinton administration one of the leading examples of 90s business casual, that fashion crime against humanity

This was truly awful – jeans with long shirts and ties! The only good thing to emerge from the Bush years is the realization that presidents should go to bed early and take long vacations, not hang out eating pizza with the staff.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 19:33 (eighteen years ago)

God Alfred I mean that's a cute stance to take at all but you don't actually give one tiny political shit about it, do you? I mean honestly?

J0hn D., Wednesday, 26 March 2008 19:57 (eighteen years ago)

*& all

J0hn D., Wednesday, 26 March 2008 19:57 (eighteen years ago)

This was truly awful – jeans with long shirts and ties! The only good thing to emerge from the Bush years is the realization that presidents should go to bed early and take long vacations, not hang out eating pizza with the staff.

wau

gabbneb, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 19:59 (eighteen years ago)

well, i guess gwb did make a very good employee for Cheney for a coupla years

gabbneb, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 20:00 (eighteen years ago)

God Alfred I mean that's a cute stance to take at all but you don't actually give one tiny political shit about it, do you? I mean honestly?

John, I'm entitled to a few yuks after speaking my peace; but I AM serious about the jeans and ties.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 20:03 (eighteen years ago)

I'm the kind of executive who likes some distance between myself and my employees, but not for the bullshit Reagan-Dubya reasons for always dressing up in the Oval Office, i.e. "I don't want to disgrace the office of Jefferson and Lincoln."

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 20:05 (eighteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.