they never really explained why/how he fucked that errand up. sounds like he was covering his ass too... "and while i was on my way there, something terrible happened!"
― s1ocki, Thursday, 21 May 2009 15:45 (seventeen years ago)
Otm. I thought he was going be in that icy cave for an "All Our Yesterdays" rendezvous with Mariette Hartley.
― barney kestrel (James Redd and the Blecchs), Thursday, 21 May 2009 15:47 (seventeen years ago)
In fact, he should have blamed the whole screwup on Mr. Atoz, if not the Guardian of Forever.
― barney kestrel (James Redd and the Blecchs), Thursday, 21 May 2009 15:48 (seventeen years ago)
he said "the unthinkable happened", sort of suggesting that they miscalculated when the supernova would occur or that he was late for some unknown reason. weak!
― Hard House SugBanton (blueski), Thursday, 21 May 2009 15:54 (seventeen years ago)
Old Spock was fine for the most part but yeah they didn't seem too interested in the hows/whys of his appearance (I was kinda irritated that Spock didn't seem to have any inclination or concern about returning to his own timeline, surely they coulda shoehorned a slingshot around the sun in there for him or something)
― Wrinkles, I'll See You On the Other Side (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 21 May 2009 15:58 (seventeen years ago)
he said "the unthinkable happened"
― barney kestrel (James Redd and the Blecchs), Thursday, 21 May 2009 16:04 (seventeen years ago)
i get that they wanted to give chekov another thing to do, but it just seemed weird that his special skill overlapped almost perfectly with scottsie's.
His special skill of killing Spock's mom?
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 21 May 2009 16:36 (seventeen years ago)
yeah he didn't do too well on that one huh.
― s1ocki, Thursday, 21 May 2009 16:37 (seventeen years ago)
that was Chekov, no? It's been 2 weeks+. I've already had this trivial piece of product fade from memory.
― Dr Morbius, Thursday, 21 May 2009 16:38 (seventeen years ago)
He saw the Age of Innocence. xp
― Hatfail of Hollow (Nicole), Thursday, 21 May 2009 16:39 (seventeen years ago)
ha ha good cover morbs
― rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Thursday, 21 May 2009 16:40 (seventeen years ago)
oh morbs
― blair underwood: "man up" (omar little), Thursday, 21 May 2009 16:42 (seventeen years ago)
Slightly stupid question perhaps, but there was someone groaning in a handicapped way throughout the movie who kept distracting me, when young Spock flew the craft at the end in the whole "there's only a 4 per cent chance this will work" part, how did he end up safe and back on the Enterprise? I was wondering what happened him and then hey presto there he was, did it resolve in half a second as I looked away or something?
― Local Garda, Thursday, 21 May 2009 16:43 (seventeen years ago)
he got beamed in. scotty goes "i've never beamed three people from two destinations onto the same pad before"!
― s1ocki, Thursday, 21 May 2009 16:47 (seventeen years ago)
also what does "groaning in a handicapped way" mean
also why was there such a low chance of that working when the plan was basically, spock gets into a ship and shoots a chain
spocks not very good at math
― rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Thursday, 21 May 2009 16:48 (seventeen years ago)
do you think he misplaced the decimal and there was actually a 400% chance
― s1ocki, Thursday, 21 May 2009 16:49 (seventeen years ago)
that's why kirk was so insistent on the plan working. he didn't want to insult spock by calling him out on his math skills though.
― blair underwood: "man up" (omar little), Thursday, 21 May 2009 16:51 (seventeen years ago)
the person was making weird moans throughout the movie, suggesting they had some mental disability, but I'm not actually sure if they did or did not.
― Local Garda, Thursday, 21 May 2009 16:51 (seventeen years ago)
insistent that the plan would work, rather
the person was making weird moans throughout the thread, suggesting they had some mental disability, but I'm not actually sure if they did or did not.
― Hard House SugBanton (blueski), Thursday, 21 May 2009 16:56 (seventeen years ago)
enough on the animal collective thread already!
― Local Garda, Thursday, 21 May 2009 17:14 (seventeen years ago)
was the enterprise bigger, smaller or the same size as a supermarket?
― zinguist (cozwn), Friday, 22 May 2009 17:13 (seventeen years ago)
"there's only a 4 per cent chance this will work" was this in the movie? this is used in original series about a zillion times (spock quantifies success as very low, kirk marches in anyway), so it is most likely a tribute rather than a failing unique to the movie.
"was the enterprise bigger, smaller or the same size as a supermarket?"I don't think you see more than a supermarket's worth of the enterprise unless you count that weird scotty in the sewage pipe sequence. That is probably the one invention in the movie without reference to star trek or star wars.
― Philip Nunez, Friday, 22 May 2009 17:37 (seventeen years ago)
water pipes?
― The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Friday, 22 May 2009 17:44 (seventeen years ago)
they've been around for a bit.
this was pretty damn good. handful of annoying/questionable things already covered in here, but a+ entertainment.
― circa1916, Friday, 22 May 2009 18:06 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.pinenet.com/~rooster/trekjews.html
― blair underwood: "man up" (omar little), Friday, 22 May 2009 18:26 (seventeen years ago)
Never forget.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 22 May 2009 18:29 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.pinenet.com/~rooster/hasid.gif
― circa1916, Friday, 22 May 2009 18:37 (seventeen years ago)
xpost - Hey Local Garda - after young Spock destroys the drilling/jamming device, he is safely transported back to the enterprise at the same moment that Kirk & Pike are beamed back.
I know this because I have now seen this movie 3 times. Once at an early screening, once with gf, once with parents. It's still exciting too... not that I really need to see it a 4th time.
At this point I'm going to argue that it's the best Trek film ever made. The only arguments for II being superior are based on camp, melodrama, and Montalban. Which are all totally valid, but still don't make Khan a movie with less holes you can poke in it...
― Nate Carson, Saturday, 23 May 2009 22:06 (seventeen years ago)
I also just want to shout out randomly that I bought this cool diamond chrome & glass shelf last year and put it on display in my living room. A few months later, I spotted it in JT Kirk's SF apartment in II, III, and according to online trivia it was repurposed for a TNG episode called Farpoint.
http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/inconsistencies/props/shelf-startrekii.jpg
― Nate Carson, Saturday, 23 May 2009 22:13 (seventeen years ago)
I liked this well enough for summer fluff. I'm not going to load the whole thread to see if it's already been mentioned, but one thing that irritated me is how uninjured Pike looked when Kirk rescued him...just a little schmutz at the corners of his mouth. That critter that dug through his soft palate was the size of a big crawfish. He should either have drowned in his own blood or at least been bloody from nose to navel.
― resistance is feudal (WmC), Saturday, 23 May 2009 22:54 (seventeen years ago)
(dangles shiny pocket watch in front of WmC)
You shall forget about insectoid crawfish eating Pike's soft palate. Pike's soft palate does not interest you.
― Aimless, Sunday, 24 May 2009 00:08 (seventeen years ago)
that insect is the same one that went in Chekhov's ear in Khan, and it didn't do him any longer term harm!
― languid samuel l. jackson (jim), Sunday, 24 May 2009 00:10 (seventeen years ago)
I actually thought this was good despite the fact that I hate Abrams, hated the look of the square-jawed jock Kirk, hate prequels, really despise the alternative timeline aspect and hated the lens flare. A lot better than most Hollywood movies i've seen in the last few years.
― languid samuel l. jackson (jim), Sunday, 24 May 2009 00:11 (seventeen years ago)
better than Slumdog Millionaire, granted
― Dr Morbius, Sunday, 24 May 2009 00:14 (seventeen years ago)
certainly.
― languid samuel l. jackson (jim), Sunday, 24 May 2009 00:15 (seventeen years ago)
but your last sentence in the ptevious post is grading on a curve. Hollywood films have never been worse.
― Dr Morbius, Sunday, 24 May 2009 00:17 (seventeen years ago)
Hollywood films have never been worse.
^ i'll give you that much!
― Vokuhila (latebloomer), Sunday, 24 May 2009 01:48 (seventeen years ago)
Really? I'm not nearly that pessimistic about Hollywood blockbusters but come on, worse than the 90s?
― Nhex, Sunday, 24 May 2009 02:52 (seventeen years ago)
Also I almost admire your level of dedication to hating, Morbius
― Nhex, Sunday, 24 May 2009 02:53 (seventeen years ago)
Let's be fair to the doc, I think he's going longue durée on the shitness of films. In any case I fully enjoyed this film. I watched La Grande Illusion last night, this didn't come near it, but it more than approximated an enjoyable 2 hours.
― languid samuel l. jackson (jim), Sunday, 24 May 2009 02:56 (seventeen years ago)
well yeah, Grand Illusion is not a souped-up exploitation of a TV show.
I don't hate this movie. I hate the idea that it represents the pinnacle of mainstream entertainment to a disturbingly large number of people.
And I can't believe no one told the writers that "Bones" is just an abbrev of "Sawbones," which is what you called a doctor way-back-when.
http://www.thehousenextdooronline.com/2009/05/star-trek-90210-or-star-trash-or.html
It’s all piff-paff, whack-bang, etc, packed with heaps of post-modernist “irony” or whatever it is they call this bollocks. Nudge nudge, wink wink ahoy. We are all wallowing in a never-ending adolescence these days. So, instead of making us laugh, J.J. Abrams just wants to make us feel clever, and the whole thing becomes a big ego-massage. Like buying an I-Pod....
Abrams’s background in TV is most obvious in his compositions: A one shot of Kirk—CUT—a close up of Spock—CUT—a two shot of the star-crossed lovers’ resisting the urge to play a round of tonsil tennis—CUT—a one shot of Kirk, etc, with coruscating beams of light in the background that blind the retinas.
― Dr Morbius, Sunday, 24 May 2009 03:44 (seventeen years ago)
Well, as long as you've got something to hate.
― resistance is feudal (WmC), Sunday, 24 May 2009 03:49 (seventeen years ago)
The movie is a carnival ride, Morbs. It's not the greatest carnival ride ever built by a long shot, but it has no ambitions to be a drama, a comedy, a musical or anything else. You judge it against stuff like Transformers: The Movie, and not A Streetcar Named Desire.
As it happens, a large segment of the movie-going population is in high school and they have no idea that a goodish carnival ride is a bit shy of true greatness, because face it high schoolers are always going to have very shallow standards.
― Aimless, Sunday, 24 May 2009 03:56 (seventeen years ago)
also, calling a movie "a ride" I most DEFINITELY hate.
I'm not talking about teenages, I'm talking about intelligent ILXors.
― Dr Morbius, Sunday, 24 May 2009 04:06 (seventeen years ago)
Is this movie worth seeing if you were not especially a fan of the TV series or the prior movies?
― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 24 May 2009 04:09 (seventeen years ago)
Try to catch it at matinee prices if you can.
― resistance is feudal (WmC), Sunday, 24 May 2009 04:10 (seventeen years ago)