Eyes Wide Shut

Classic:

http://78.media.tumblr.com/c9740dd8e43ff1de28672f28b3346603/tumblr_inline_n14xx4gWEB1qfo9ju.jpg

Dud:

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-cOFObkWKrK8/Vn8EQnlQCRI/AAAAAAAAOks/kO9-VCodd0Y/s1600/eyes-wide-shut-sidney-pollack.jpg

it's hard to get an orgy of beautiful people going

if you can manage 50% beautiful people in the orgy it's pretty much a miracle

but probably 2/3 will be sub 5s

basically the more people participate the less likely you'll get hot people in it

only reason i bring this up is because you try keeping your dick hard with people you don't find attractive

unless the actors are being paid to participate

They've dicked around with the aspect on recent Blus supposedly. Bad cropping and suchlike compared to some older versions on DVD.

http://cdn.avsforum.com/f/f1/f1f4ac2a_vbattach236931.jpeg

http://www.avsforum.com/forum/150-blu-ray-software/928408-eyes-wide-shut-review-up-hdd-3-stars-pq-3.html

holy shit

glad i got to see it for the first time in a theater last year

i have now seen the uncensored orgy scenes

i still find Kidman's laughing fit in the pot scene a riot

had forgotten almost the entire Marie Richardson lascivious grieving episode

that whole scene is incredible. those curtains...

are the uncensored scenes on the blu ray or did you see a screening? how much more explicit is it really? like someone said upthread (i think), part of what's funny/interesting/scary about the orgy is how stiff and non-erotic it is.

I'm talking about the fact that the US release obscured the pelvic areas of the orgiasts with CG onlookers -- "the Austin Powers version," as Roger Ebert called it. Just a reminder that American culture was infantilized even before the Orange Grifter showed up.

Even unobscured, the sex is mechanical and non-erotic, as Kubrick intended.

there are at least 3 brilliant "character" roles filled here:

- the aforementioned Marie Richardson

- Rade Serbedzija as the costume shop owner who ultimately pimps out his daughter

- Alan Cumming as the hotel desk clerk, one of the funniest 3-minute performances in cinema annals (Franklin Pangborn would be proud)

Sydney Pollack for me. No one did smarmy gravitas so well. It's a shame he never made a Phil Jackson biopic.

are the CGI onlookers still present in versions sold in the US now?

you can gifs of the differences here: https://decider.com/2015/01/30/eyes-wide-shut-uncensored-hbo-go/

you don't get to see TC on his knees with a cock in his mouth or anything.

well hope springs eternal

I've come around to really admiring this film. No to the Alan Cumming reception scene, though. I think he comes across as some sort of grotesque gay stereotype - maybe that's the point I guess what with "Are we in the good doctor's head? " and all. Must rewatch.

yeah i loathe Cumming and that scene

https://cinephiliabeyond.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/6-6.jpg

top stuff here

https://cinephiliabeyond.org/eyes-wide-shut-tense-nightmarish-exploration-marriage-sexuality-kubricks-ultimate-film/

the Alan Cummings scene is amazing

ly bad

http://image.ibb.co/eL39vT/vlcsnap_2012_11_04_23h10m23s181.png

I probably should have had some reasonable sexual encounters in my life before seeing this film

are the CGI onlookers still present in versions sold in the US now?

They were up until the 2007 release, which is what i just watched.

hey guess what, for a lot of hotel desk clerks that gay stereotype is true.

btw there is a bar/showplace in NYC now called Club Cumming which he has a stake in

that still above makes it clear why SK originally considered Steve Martin to play Dr Bill

It would never have occurred to me that this was the case:

“In some of the scenes, the backgrounds were rear-projection plates,” the cinematographer reveals. “Generally, when Tom’s facing the camera, the backgrounds are rear-projected; anything that shows him from a side view was done on the streets of London. We had the plates shot in New York by a second unit [that included cinematographers Patrick Turley, Malik Sayeed and Arthur Jafa]. Once the plates were sent to us, we had them force-developed and balanced to the necessary levels. We’d then go onto our street sets and shoot Tom walking on a treadmill. After setting the treadmill to a certain speed, we’d put some lighting effects on him to simulate the glow from the various storefronts that were passing by in the plates. We spent a few weeks on those shots.”

Alan Cumming scene is great.

The whole thing definitely had the feel of being shot on sets. The couple of b-roll shots (maybe a freeway exit or such?) felt really out of place. The rest of it feels kind of like an 80s video.

you can tell if you're looking out for it. it's one of my favorite things about the movie xp

I probably should have had some reasonable sexual encounters in my life before seeing this film

― mh, Monday, June 25, 2018 9:41 PM (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

lol

yeah that's otm for me

there aren't many reasonable encounters in this film! mostly at the mechanical orgy.

Cumming said they shot his scene for a week, and that Kubrick laughed a lot.

if you know downtown Manhattan well, and that Cruise was never on those streets because Kubrick wasn't, you could surmise that something like that projection process was done.

The rest of it feels kind of like an 80s video.

yes. specifically this one that has the same plot as EWS.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=miGUnKWcYeo

i'm always posting about this ha.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfHB6etnELE

I admire this movie and how it was made a lot more than I like it. Probably my least favourite Kubrick

Was just with a friend the other day who has been to Sir Ivan's Hamptons Castle on several occasions, including one of the big orgy nights. Fascinating stories.

Go on...

You make my eyes
You make my eyes wide shut
You make my eyes
You make my eyes wide shut

Woah-oh-OH
Woah-OH-oh

is this movie good yet

To my eternal regret, I've only ever attended one of their minor orgy nights.

okay now I refuse to believe EWS wasn't Schnitzler's plot filtered through a Laura Branigan video

right?

That LB's video was directed by William Friedkin and Crusing is also basically about a civil servant's journey into nyc sexual underworld while not getting any bodily-fluid action

orgies are for savages irrc

that's great info, tonga. is cruising any good?

well
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jR7y7g8h1y4

its a neurotic, confused giallo. pacino seems weirdly lost

I rewatch this every couple of years. I'm not sure how much it has to say--If I were married, maybe it would seem more profound to me. The good thing is, you can also look past all that and just enjoy it as bizarre, good-looking junk. One annoying tic that I really noticed this time is the way 37% of Tom Cruise's lines amount to him repeating what's just been said to him. ("Come inside with me. I just live over there." "Come inside with you?") Weirdness everywhere. When Cruise drops into Nick Nightengale's club for the first time, the waiter asks him if he wants a drink; Cruise asks for a beer, and the waiter goes off to get him a beer. There's no mention of what kind of beer--evidently this particular club only carries one generic beer. And the newspaper headline on the model's overdose: "Ex-beauty queen in hotel drugs overdose." Is that even remotely grammatical?

Cruise asks for a beer, and the waiter goes off to get him a beer. There's no mention of what kind of beer--evidently this particular club only carries one generic beer.

This is pretty common though no? Feel like there’s a studious avoidance of brand names in film and tv, which I rarely notice except when characters say, “I’ll have a beer” and the server of courses understands immediately.

xp Hmmm... headlines tend to go for brevity rather than strict grammar. And people rarely ask for a specific type of beer in films and TV, so I'm not sure there's much to read into those. I do really like this film a lot though

I've watched it three times waiting for its profundities to reveal themselves, so I've said the hell with it and enjoy it as chic junk.