Who, maybe, not much
― "oh no my cheds" man had dark to black packet (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 15 February 2018 15:05 (eight years ago)
Josie Long?
― kim jong deal (suzy), Thursday, 15 February 2018 15:06 (eight years ago)
stewart lee obv
― albondigas con gas (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 15 February 2018 15:06 (eight years ago)
NV expertly cosplaying a begrudger there, foreigners take notes.
― Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 15 February 2018 15:09 (eight years ago)
Linehan famously insufferable on twitter but I mean, twitter - can't front fr ted is classic
― scrüt (wins), Thursday, 15 February 2018 15:11 (eight years ago)
those three comedians all have something in common. Can't quite put my finger on it though...
― Number None, Thursday, 15 February 2018 15:14 (eight years ago)
channel 4 iirc
― albondigas con gas (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 15 February 2018 15:16 (eight years ago)
Linehan is way past his sell by date.
Stewart Lee is too Guardian for my liking. No trust there.
― xyzzzz__, Thursday, 15 February 2018 15:21 (eight years ago)
Josie Long is good at twitter. Never seen her stand up tho'.
― xyzzzz__, Thursday, 15 February 2018 15:22 (eight years ago)
Does Linehan perform comedy as well as write it?
― Ward Fowler, Thursday, 15 February 2018 15:23 (eight years ago)
He hasn't written it forever
― "oh no my cheds" man had dark to black packet (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 15 February 2018 15:23 (eight years ago)
Josie Long is still the most famous alumnus (alumna?) (oh you problematic Romans!) of the gifted and talented course I not only attended but now help to run - well, it's either her or a kid who ended up being one of the world's best beatboxers. I will outmatch them both one day obv when I write the text that defeats the entire alt-right
― imago, Thursday, 15 February 2018 16:06 (eight years ago)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reeps_One
here he is
incredibly lovely kid btw
― imago, Thursday, 15 February 2018 16:09 (eight years ago)
fundamentalism doesn’t happen without men.
I like this.
can't spell fundamentalism without men iirc
And this.
― Leaghaidh am brón an t-anam bochd (dowd), Thursday, 15 February 2018 16:35 (eight years ago)
Father Ted is great but Linehan's sitcom work has been steadily declining since then and yeah, bad and terfy on twitter. I still love Seinfeld too but wouldn't list the dude as amongst my fav comedians.
Stewart Lee isn't really Guardian, he had Guardiandom thrust upon him. His entirely sensible reaction has been to record a Free Jazz album and announce his retirement.
Josie Long is a an angel and a hero, I miss her Camden comedy nights something fierce. But she is also perky and optimistic, so it shouldn't surprise anyone you can find lots of hate for her in the ILX archives.
― Daniel_Rf, Thursday, 15 February 2018 16:40 (eight years ago)
Frankie Boyle? Particularly after he got too woke to compare Becky Alsington’s face to a spoon any more.
― kim jong deal (suzy), Thursday, 15 February 2018 16:44 (eight years ago)
The proverbial stopped clock iirc
― "oh no my cheds" man had dark to black packet (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 15 February 2018 16:45 (eight years ago)
Didn't know lee had announced his retirement!
― scrüt (wins), Thursday, 15 February 2018 16:57 (eight years ago)
He calls it a break not a retirement - but I'm still guessin' those Southbank tickets will seel out fast. Can totally understand it tho - someone who's made a living of being contrarian and abrasive gets to the stage where they're almost universally acclaimed, it's gotta fuck up the shtick to some extent.
http://www.chortle.co.uk/news/2018/01/31/39027/stewart_lee_to_take_a_break_from_stand-up
― Daniel_Rf, Thursday, 15 February 2018 21:00 (eight years ago)
Well also he can maybe afford not to do it, and who wants to be doing standup in their 50s
― scrüt (wins), Thursday, 15 February 2018 21:15 (eight years ago)
Also run out of material about kids' TV and driving on the motorway
― "oh no my cheds" man had dark to black packet (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 15 February 2018 21:21 (eight years ago)
the alt-right
― scrüt (wins), Thursday, 15 February 2018 21:23 (eight years ago)
shocking, I know
So Jordan Peterson admits that he has been accused "three times during (his) career of sexual impropriety."That explains a lot of his views & behaviour. pic.twitter.com/l9IsYHgAyg— Sacha Saeen (@_Saeen_) February 17, 2018
― Simon H., Sunday, 18 February 2018 00:43 (eight years ago)
Good news everyone
Slavoj Žižek says that Jordan Peterson is a conspiracy theorist and accepts his invitation to debate, choosing New York City in October. https://t.co/pDhg1c7Ec0— Jack Smith IV (@JackSmithIV) February 19, 2018
― Glower, Disruption & Pies (kingfish), Monday, 19 February 2018 19:29 (eight years ago)
Hell yes
― flappy bird, Monday, 19 February 2018 19:30 (eight years ago)
stoked for the madness(what are the chances peterson is gonna end up disgraced and abandoned by october tho)
― NEW CHIMP THREAT (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 19 February 2018 19:31 (eight years ago)
Totally disagree with ppl itt saying that Peterson isn't worth serious critique or debate. that kind of intellectual/cultural elitism only emboldens Peterson and makes his audience grow. glad that Zizek is going to debate him. I thought his column about the lack of critique from the left and the lack of a defense beyond a patronizing "it's self evident" from the left was otm.
― flappy bird, Monday, 19 February 2018 19:33 (eight years ago)
peterson isn't worth of debate and it's not due to elitism - he's a tenured professor at U of T and now best-selling author, he is the elite - it's that his ideas aren't worth engaging with and it's best not to give him the oxygen of publicity
― khat person (jim in vancouver), Monday, 19 February 2018 19:38 (eight years ago)
zizek is an entertainer and troll as much as a thinker so it makes sense for his brand
whatever you think of his ideas, he needs to be engaged because of the audience he's garnering: very impressionable and seemingly more open-minded to criticism than fans of other explicitly alt right figures. Zizek is the perfect person to do it precisely for the reasons you stated
― flappy bird, Monday, 19 February 2018 19:41 (eight years ago)
if they debate and zizek hands his ass to him, it will do nothing to dissuade or deter peterson's fans who will maintain that he crushed zizek with logic
― khat person (jim in vancouver), Monday, 19 February 2018 19:43 (eight years ago)
flappy bird otm.
― pomenitul, Monday, 19 February 2018 19:48 (eight years ago)
this is gonna be awesome but anyone who thinks zizek is going to debunk jp or whatever doesn't understand zizek
― Mordy, Monday, 19 February 2018 19:48 (eight years ago)
― khat person (jim in vancouver), Monday, February 19, 2018 2:43 PM (five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
some, maybe. but this is fatalistic and again, dangerously dismissive. he needs to be interrogated, even if it starts with Zizek. certainly an improvement over some hapless cable tv host or sam fuckin harris
― flappy bird, Monday, 19 February 2018 19:50 (eight years ago)
nah, flappy, you're wrong on this. Peterson is the intellectual equivalent of a toddler throwing spaghetti at the wall, or a Rorschach test for bigoted assholes. He introduces so much bullshit so quickly and his audiences are so gullible and so filled with unearned intellectual confidence that any critique is gonna be useless.
Peterson looked like an idiot in that vice interview, but do you see fans of his saying, "Oh, man, the emperor has no clothes after all. What was I thinking?"?
― bamcquern, Monday, 19 February 2018 19:57 (eight years ago)
like I'd love to see Peterson get flustered because Zizek asks him questions on subjects he always suggests he has expertise in, like "Can you name two self-avowed postmodernists and give a brief summary of what they believe?" or something about Marxist bugbears like secular stagnation and financialization, but his audience doesn't admire Peterson for his erudition or his intellectual integrity, and they're gonna enthusiastically slurp up whatever dodge he offers them.
― bamcquern, Monday, 19 February 2018 20:10 (eight years ago)
again zizek is not going to debunk him. if anything i think zizek may be able to draw interesting ideas out of him or at least locate grounds for debate that are productive. i very seriously doubt he's going in to do a fisking of JP and i expect at least a few occasions where they are able to "find common ground." it'll be entertaining af but be prepared don't be disappointed.
― Mordy, Monday, 19 February 2018 20:11 (eight years ago)
ps my roommate has been mainlining this dude's lectures and proselytizing about him and I hate him so much
― bamcquern, Monday, 19 February 2018 20:11 (eight years ago)
ugh my condolences
― khat person (jim in vancouver), Monday, 19 February 2018 20:22 (eight years ago)
I'm sorry (not sorry) but any of you who think a "debate" between two self-fellating white men on the moot topic of white male supremacy is worthwhile, necessary, or might "draw some interesting ideas out," or all of the above, are on some very, very heavy and bad drugs that are affecting your ability to think your way out of a paper bag that's had the bottom cut out. You also seem grossly ignorant of what period of history we're living in. If you want to appreciate it like some kind of noize actionist art show, fine, but please please please don't act like either of these dudes has any merit other than challopsing at saddos with the full force of their solitaire scrabble scores.
Trying to think of something less relevant to human existence that's planned for eight months from now and can't come up with one.
― El Tomboto, Monday, 19 February 2018 20:34 (eight years ago)
if you don't see how zizek debating jp will be entertaining you should just pull your head out of your ass and stop worrying about being the wokest white guy in the room
― Mordy, Monday, 19 February 2018 20:35 (eight years ago)
Agree with Tombot 1000%. Both these men should be fired naked out of a space shuttle hatch; the video of them exploding into frozen meat-shards would be infinitely more illuminating than anything either of them has ever thought, said, or written.
― grawlix (unperson), Monday, 19 February 2018 20:36 (eight years ago)
I find it entertaining to say "fuck you, clown" to people who pay so little attention to the world that they think this is going to be worth anyone's time
― El Tomboto, Monday, 19 February 2018 20:37 (eight years ago)
sure but
challopsing at saddos
new board description
― persona non gratin (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 19 February 2018 20:37 (eight years ago)
el tomboto otm
― Van Horn Street, Monday, 19 February 2018 20:41 (eight years ago)
"You also seem grossly ignorant of what period of history we're living in." sorry but this is dumb af
― Mordy, Monday, 19 February 2018 20:48 (eight years ago)
If you want to appreciate it like some kind of noize actionist art show, fine
― El Tomboto, Monday, 19 February 2018 20:50 (eight years ago)
saddo as an insult all the time lately, why. seems a little kick-someone-while-they're-down-y. fuck the happyos imo.
― sleepingbag, Monday, 19 February 2018 20:52 (eight years ago)
lol at the thread that got bumped while i was typing that
― sleepingbag, Monday, 19 February 2018 20:54 (eight years ago)
http://thephilosophicalsalon.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/big_cd4fdd4b37-120x150.jpg
― F# A# (∞), Monday, 19 February 2018 20:58 (eight years ago)