PHANTOM THREAD: Paul Tomas Anderson, Daniel Day-Lewis, Fifties London

yeah i was gonna say that, Danvers is a very explicit character

Surprised there isn't more love itt for Reynolds' offscreen line about putting some fresh cream in his oatmeal. "It is a bit naughty though, isn’t it?”

That was the big "oh shit, I'm the only person in the theater laughing" moment for me. But I think along with the hungry boy note it says a lot about his psyche.

Highly recommended

Hello, I have degraded Paul Thomas Anderson's cinematically mature, devilishly funny, and tonally sophisticated Phantom Thread by collecting my #tweets about it into a meme-clustering moment titled ⚡️ “Phantom Retreads”https://t.co/juwSU9znZf

— Eric Allen Hatch (@ericallenhatch) February 7, 2018

PHANTOM THREAD (2017):

😋💬🐇🥚🥓🍶🍵.
🎀

💃🏻💘

😋💬🥓.
🎀

💃🏻❤️

😐💃🏻🏠
🎀

💃🏻🍽

🙄💭💥💣
🎀

🤫👉🏻🕰
🎀

💃🏻😍

😡📰
🎀

💃🏻😦

💃🏻🕯🌹🕯🍽

🙄
🎀

💃🏻😧

💃🏻🤔

💃🏻😃💡!

💃🏻🍄🌡⚰️

🤮
🚽

🤢💬💘💍👰🏻❤️💒?
🎀

💃🏻🤔

😧?!
🎀

💃🏻😜👍🏼

— Eric Allen Hatch (@ericallenhatch) February 7, 2018

the dvdscr has leaked.

This was very good. Vicky Krieps is fantastic, It's a real shame she didn't get nominated. the film is about the mother but in a completely different way from I expected. I thought the very particular notations of measurements between Reynolds and Cyril at Alma's first fitting were leading towards a different kind of mothering denouement.

Best dress was the pale pink one he rescued the lace from Antwerp for.

There's something about Reynolds that reminds me of Lucien Freud. The voice was very similar. Also, LF was a maniac about breakfast, having exactly the same breakfast at exactly the same restaurant for two decades. LF was very childlike too and very controlling of his muses and models.

meant to say that he had the same breakfast in the same place EVERY DAY.

The voice was very similar. Also, LF was a maniac about breakfast, having exactly the same breakfast at exactly the same restaurant for two decades

Only two decades? Amateur.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/47287000/jpg/_47287745_gilbert_george_afp.jpg

ah yes, but they are just actors!

Mixed about the film, but his PJs were fire.

I kind of wanted it to end at the point where he asks her to marry him and she hesitates and you see him panic

Interesting you should mention Lucien Freud, Jed- I think I spotted a picture of his in Woodcock's country pad...

In this New Statesman review, Ryan Gilbey claims DDL is doing an "excellent Dirk Bogarde impression" - can't really hear it myself?

https://www.newstatesman.com/culture/film/2018/01/phantom-thread-more-compilation-outstanding-scenes-great-movie

I watched Bogarde in King and Country last night, and I don't hear it... Certainly not the way DDL was doing John Huston's voice in TWBB.

A Very Hungry Boy

I am still processing this but one thing that bothered me was Julia Davis's line "I don't want to be racist, but …". I very much doubt anyone would use that phrase in 1950s London, certainly not about someone white! Also, I'm dubious that British marriage ceremonies included the line "you may now kiss the bride" back then.

Entrancing film. Really something. Watched it last night and thought about it all day today. Vicky Krieps is indeed excellent and it goes to show the predictable myopia of American award ceremonies that she was overlooked.

well she's not from here

Ah. Yeah. Touché!

Random question - is this a loud movie? I have tinnitus so I don't see as many movies as I used to, but kind of want to see this. I hated The Master and Inherent Vice (and the Sandler one, come to think of it), so I might be a sucker. But this looks interesting.

There's some very loud toast-scraping, but mostly quiet except for one (party) scene.

My general indifference towards the film aside, I thought it should have gotten an AA nomination for sound. All those little everyday sounds that drive DDL crazy--I share this hyper-sensitivity with him, and tinnitus with Chuck--were rendered bracingly and piercingly sharp throughout.

I hate the extra focus on foley sounds that the audio industry passes off as artistry, it's so fucking annoying and unnecessary, it's worse than teal and orange, make it stop.

There’s a genuine narrative purpose in this case

lmao

https://www.avclub.com/uwe-boll-accuses-paul-thomas-anderson-of-hiding-a-fuck-1822890557

I would never accuse him of hiding a fuck

Lol @ URL

At Cinerama in Seattle for my third viewing.

silby I was there too!

also G&G were in Mangal 2 when I went there

they're doing this w/ live orchestra in Brooklyn. $35, feh.

http://www.vulture.com/2018/02/for-the-hungry-boy-valentines-inspired-by-phantom-thread.html

ha they are great

The only review that makes me want to watch this:

https://blindfieldjournal.com/2018/02/09/fuck-off-to-back-where-you-came-from-notes-on-the-phantom-thread/

that's a really good review

See: designers, chefs, etc.

The masculine gentleman ‘artist’ appropriates the craft of proletarian women like his mother (sewing) and turns it into a private source of immense surplus-value in the production of aristocratic white femininity. This is a regime of value centrally predicated on the normative devaluation of most women: be they lower-class, ‘unladylike,’ fat, not fat enough, old, queer, unpretty, migrant, non-white or otherwise monstrous. This is my time, says Reynolds.

It's perceptive when it's not leaning on jargon.

I missed the whole Alma/Holocaust connection, hadn't heard or read anything about that.

You can always use google for jargon.

I agree with most of the arguments; it's that sentences like these are ungainly:

The Phantom Thread is a morbid depiction of social reproduction, where the gender division of labor appears as a toxic metabolism or circuit of necrotic value. The brutal poison of reification flows forth from Reynolds, attacking Alma’s body, and returns back again in the form of a deadly mushroom, penetrating Reynolds.

yeah no

I like the shapes you get into when the unfamiliar concepts are used. Leading to that last sentence.

Read it yesterday and iirc (and for someone who hasn't seen it) that bit is possibly the toughest xp

wtf

lol it definitely does seem like it's coming directly from the polar opposite of how you approach and enjoy movies, Veg!

I can appreciate a lot of approaches but there were a few passages in that review where I was thinking the interpretation of the film's narrative was being stretched a little far in service of the points being rationalized

does he get paid by the syllable or

*she

That's a good review although yeah that para reads like parody - haven't read any other reviews but are they really not touching on that stuff at all? I somehow don't believe that

I was instantly drawn in by until today I didn’t know who PT Anderson is

That review is glorious. I think the writer is aware of its academic excess, but keeps throwing those concepts out just b/c the review so readily lends itself to them. Her review has the same jaded sense of humor about itself as the film does.

there's an author bio on the 'about' page for the site if you're curious