how to make friends and influence ppl (without being a creep)

🖼

an ilx where this isn't one of the first replies itt is an ilx I don't recognise

Lol that seems so different. The example tom d posted was a woman pointing out a new coworker was pretty.

No, she wasn't a coworker, that would be creepy.

I’m going to leave this thread though because my perspective on this is not in the ilx mainstream

Well it's a new thread for you innit didn't I say that

I just remember the old days when there would be clusterfucks about whether you’d rather have been a beatle or have walked on the moon (past perfect was integral to the meaning of the question)

Present perfect rather

Thered have to be a thread for each half of that q now I spose

still recall tombot's 'cows are beautiful, delicious animals' comic fondly

xp As long as you recognise that there's two different branches of discussion here - the one you're on regarding the state of the soul of the thinker, and the one the rest of us are on regarding what effect it has once it gets said.

I’m going to leave this thread though because my perspective on this is not in the ilx mainstream and since I’m not even arguing that the stricter norms are “bad” there is no point.

I've learnt a lot from this thread, personally.

I can't work out who tombot is criticising there tbh

I did go a bit banaka for a while

I don't know what tips anybody could dispense tho, I think the women who've posted have laid out some reasonably clear guidelines

People who use telepathy with their nucleus acumbens.

Xp

point was tho Tombot that 95% of living in any human society in 2018 involves not being at the mercy of your nuclear bombadoms

retweets are not endorsements

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilization_and_Its_Discontents

Alright, it’s definitely not ok to talk about someone’s ”bombadoms” much less call them “nuclear”

cheerfully withdrawn

Accepted. The complaint’s been removed from your file.

I'm not saying this is the correct way of parsing your discussion – it's a lot more complicated than that, obviously – but looking at it through the lens of, say, mainstream French culture, makes for a mildly surreal experience. Not that cultural relativism resolves or even explains the issue at hand by any stretch of the imagination. It's just that it's hard not to notice that absolutist puritanism is a more readily accepted position in the English-speaking world and that part of it has to do with historically ingrained attitudes towards sexuality in general (incidentally, two pieces – one an open letter cosigned by 100 women, the other written by a woman writer – were just published in Le Monde this morning, alerting to the pitfalls of puritanism even as they acknowledge and welcome the necessity of a libération de la parole post-Weinstein). Make of this admittedly simplistic take what you will.

Thread twenty thousand four hundred and twelve. Take a ticket.

If one feels obligated to give praise at work, make it work related. Tell them they finished a project faster than expected and well executed, tell them you've received very good feedback on their performance, that they've done a very good job learning a new activity. There are so many compliments to be given that has nothing to do with a person's appearance. Women want to succeed at their job, no matter what the job is.

TBH that advice reads quite patronisingly.

Does it? I am trying to make advice that men who seem to have trouble with this can follow. Like, I don't wear my wedding ring to work and don't discuss my personal life unless I am outside friends with a person. I literally do not want to be bothered with any non work related compliments a man decides to bestow on me (it's strange and awkward) and I don't want to feel like I can't be friendly in fear of sending wrong signals. Work is work.

I'm with whoever said that the women posting their experiences and reactions to this thread are providing the closest anyone will ever have to 'the rules'

I think men can take some patronizing from a woman. They’ve been giving it for awhile, they can deal with getting it.

Ah yeah, men

Thread into th

I think work related praise is one area where that distinction Cardamon was making between career jobs and paying-the-bills jobs might be significant? I've been in workplaces where I'm pretty confident that absolutely no-one, male or female, was taking "pride" in their work and congratulating a colleague on their work would seem condescending

Indeed if anything in the shit jobs I'm thinking of the correct thing to do is to commiserate and laugh off the work with your colleague/mate rather than praise

I don't know. I've worked in some service related grunt jobs on the side and for some people that is their career job. Like older women who entered the work force late or support their entire family. They definitely take pride in their work. But again, there are so many variables on this. Just don't treat women as if they don't have these complicated internal lives that we are all getting off on someone telling us that our hair looks pretty is going to brighten our day.

This also

I've had terrible jobs where it was perfectly reasonable to compliment someone on being able to cope with the drudgery of it. Congratulations on surviving this shithole with most of your sanity intact. Wow, I'm impressed with your equilibrium. Your tolerance of stupidity and abuse is impressive.

Even without going there, there should be plenty of innocuous banter to be had. "Hey, those fake flowers on your cubicle are nice and cheery" or "That's a fun Chthulhu bobblehead you have there" or "I like your Ghost World figurine" or "Hey, a Minor Threat button! Been a while since I've seen one of those." Honestly even "Hey, I also like that type of yogurt."

But this is irrelevant to the larger discussion. Honestly cannot see why a shitty job would need to have different levels of tolerance for creepiness / harassment / abuse.

FTR I have it installed in my head that to enter a workplace is to enter a place where it matters what other people are comfortable with, part of 'the job' is always to try and match/mirror this - Yerac's post about just wanting work to be about work, and various other accounts people have told me, become like, part of a dossier of evidence about what people might want that I take into work with me

Ye Mad Puffin I would concur that harassment and abuse are harassment and abuse and are not okay anywhere

I think the shitty jobs are the worst when it comes to protecting women from harassment. It's easier to just try to find another job if you have that option.

Even without going there, there should be plenty of innocuous banter to be had. "Hey, those fake flowers on your cubicle are nice and cheery" or "That's a fun Chthulhu bobblehead you have there" or "I like your Ghost World figurine" or "Hey, a Minor Threat button! Been a while since I've seen one of those." Honestly even "Hey, I also like that type of yogurt."

I feel all of this potentially sounds creepy af though, depending on the context, e.g. if it was to a woman by one of the bad at eye contact, lip-licking, unusual-or-unpleasant-prominent-physical-characteristics guys that HR article described, this is the whole problem surely?

I definitely think the lack of the pretense of professionalism at some shit/poorly paid jobs can be heartening and builds solidarity, but there is so much grey area as to what a shit job is and I still feel a small swell of satisfaction thinking back to how sincerely impressed the assistant manager at kwik save was by the job I did on the sweets aisle.

xp But also, distinguishing 'creepiness' from harassment, I sort of feel like harassment is the word for stuff that is definitely wrong (and subject to firing or legal action), whereas creepiness is ambiguous and er I suppose 'personally and culturally relative' ... obviously no-one wants to be creepy or crept-on but people come back with different definitions and judgments on what that creepiness would entail? Like mostly itt we disagree with that HR document posted above where it listed unusual appearance as something 'creepy'.

Then also remember some of these jobs like serving, bartending, cashiering, telemarketing, women are also getting harassed by the customers, but there it's in your best interest to just smile.

I definitely think the lack of the pretense of professionalism at some shit/poorly paid jobs can be heartening and builds solidarity, but there is so much grey area as to what a shit job is and I still feel a small swell of satisfaction thinking back to how sincerely impressed the assistant manager at kwik save was by the job I did on the sweets aisle.

I agree it varied, but complimenting someone for (e.g) being good at stacking tins of beans feels potentially offensive for similar reasons to complimenting someone on their haircut, i.e. most ppl would like to think that there is more to them than that? (though obv compliments on physical stuff have the added problem of maybe making ppl worry that you're going to hit on you)

I think 'assistant manager' is key there perhaps, like my experience was that I'd appreciate it if a superior took note of my hard work and skill, but if someone at the same level as me did the same it'd be more wtf

i have long said that the word "creepy" is not doing us any favors here
it covers too broad a range of potential behaviors to be meaningful on its own, without further elaboration

its connotation is "bad, unwanted" afaict?

creep·y
ˈkrēpē/Submit
adjectiveinformal
causing an unpleasant feeling of fear or unease.

xp to soref: iirc my colleagues gave me the deprecating/semi-ironic "heard about the job you did on sweets!" thing. I was pretty happy to chat about almost anything to keep my mind off the shop radio tbh. I just think there are no hard rules for navigating this stuff, no one can speak for everyone and any imperative is a blunt tool which someone will raise an eyebrow at

I see your point upthread, soref, but it rather muddies the waters.

If the Sanpakus of the world are like "wow, I can't even say 'nice haircut,'" lots of the advice is "don't compliment coworkers on their appearance ever." "Find something else to talk about."

If then the advice evolves into "don't even say 'nice Cezanne poster' or 'nice Brienne of Tarth bobblehead' if you're going to be a creepazoid about it," I can see why someone might think the goalposts keep moving.

"Don't say anything nice, unless you can manage to do it in a non-creepy way" is the same as basically telling people who are bad at stuff "get good at stuff."

I dunno. Honestly I was just hunting for ways a call center drone could possibly compliment another call center drone without going into no-go appearance/clothing zones.

how about make conversation that is not a compliment? the need for compliments is actually quite low when it comes to regular everyday workplace conversation.

true

it's a good starting place for not making people feel unease
if that is your ultimate problem

I literally started watching terrible reality tv for one job so I would have something to discuss with people to pass the time.

reading over Sanpaku's comments on the other thread, it seemed like he was worried about what counts as flirting vs. other kinds of (positive, I gather) interactions. Flirting, it seems to me, is unserious courtship, a testing of the waters, so to speak. Is it genuinely unclear when an interaction aims to court? Is it genuinely unclear when you *intend* to court?