https://twitter.com/i/moments/942612074584256512
― Embalming is a flirty business (DJP), Monday, 18 December 2017 20:12 (six years ago) link
^ throws a lot of punches and some of them connect, but they don't form a counter-critique so much as escalate the twitter brawl. this only comes to a good end if it gets people to read the book before they argue about it.
― A is for (Aimless), Monday, 18 December 2017 20:28 (six years ago) link
i'm gonna say there is literally no hope for that
― flamenco drop (BradNelson), Monday, 18 December 2017 20:30 (six years ago) link
I don’t know @tanehisicoates well. We had a long dinner once & I interviewed him on @intercepted. But I do believe this line of attack is off base. I was struck by his humility and a clear sense that his views evolve as he gets more information, which should be true of all of us.— jeremy scahill (@jeremyscahill) December 18, 2017
I also believe that Cornel West has been unjustly smeared for years. West spoke out early and often about Obama’s wars, drone strikes, neoliberal economics. Still, I question why he would blast @tanehisicoates, rather than engage him directly.— jeremy scahill (@jeremyscahill) December 18, 2017
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Monday, 18 December 2017 21:35 (six years ago) link
I think the problem here is that Cornel West is no longer really engaged in serious scholarship and so tosses off a 1000 word article which doesn't really engage, makes arguments that don't really stick etc. and then, as TNC is as about as sacrosanct as a public intellectual can be for liberals, this results in a load of controversy and invective. there absolutely could be a compelling critique of Coates made from the left, which Cornel West himself would be capable of writing if only he would actually bother doing the work.
― khat person (jim in vancouver), Monday, 18 December 2017 21:45 (six years ago) link
his piece is just pure clickbait. the guardian published it knowing that. sometimes i want to just give up on the media
Pure clickbait? Not engaged in serious scholarship?
Well it’s a polemical piece after all. It’s supposed to provoke (reactions, thoughts, debates).
It’s an ungenerous and selective reading of TNC, I’d agree, but I can’t blame the old Prof for smelling a rat when presented with the spectacle of the unanimous, enraptured lionization of a fellow black intellectual by white liberal America. It may be that Coates ends up being unfairly charged by West, but in the process he may be shedding light on issues worth being alerted to.
― never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Tuesday, 19 December 2017 05:55 (six years ago) link
Reading my post over, I realize it’s an ungenerous reading of your post , jim, and very not otm
Also I’m tired and stressed out tonight
― never have i been a blue calm sea (collardio gelatinous), Tuesday, 19 December 2017 06:32 (six years ago) link
Jelani Cobb’s argument that West was motivated by professuonal jealousy is petty and meanspirited. Coates’s wntire worldview — from his atheistic pessimism to his strong critique of the idea that black and white working poeple can find solidarity on class grounds — goes directly against everything West stands for. Of course he would object to the intellectual who criticizes the very forms of hope that for the basis of West’s politics. Of course he would be skeptical that this vision — which might not be “hopeless,” but is way more cautious of hope than what West believes, because he believes the world can be transformed — has proven so popular among white middle class people. What do you expect him to say?
These two thinkers don’t believe in the same things.
― treeship 2, Tuesday, 19 December 2017 12:43 (six years ago) link
Bad grammar and typos but you get the idea.
― treeship 2, Tuesday, 19 December 2017 12:44 (six years ago) link
Just because you believe in different things you don't have to write so shallow attacks as West did.
― Frederik B, Tuesday, 19 December 2017 13:05 (six years ago) link
it looks like he just deleted his twitter account?
― k3vin k., Tuesday, 19 December 2017 13:58 (six years ago) link
Yes, he pointed to West, a South African feminist writer and Richard Spencer all disagreeing with him and suggested he didn’t want to be part of the conversation via that medium any more.
― Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Tuesday, 19 December 2017 14:01 (six years ago) link
it was a bit of a bad look tbh
― khat person (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 19 December 2017 18:33 (six years ago) link
not quitting twitter but basically saying: west, this feminist, and richard spencer agree with each other, see ya.
― khat person (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 19 December 2017 18:34 (six years ago) link
idk seems reasonable to me
― flamenco drop (BradNelson), Tuesday, 19 December 2017 18:43 (six years ago) link
if a white supremacist was enthusiastically seconding cornel west's critique of me i'd def quit the internet and possibly burn the bridge behind me
― flamenco drop (BradNelson), Tuesday, 19 December 2017 18:44 (six years ago) link
yeah weird that the white nat media-magnet stuck his nose into a disagreement between two prominent black leftists, wonder what's up with that
― goole, Tuesday, 19 December 2017 18:47 (six years ago) link
my issue is that being like "look richard spencer agrees with west, wow!" you're assuming that Richard Spencer is acting in good faith which he obviously fucking isn't, and you're trying to connect West with Spencer, which whatever you think of West is unfair
― khat person (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 19 December 2017 18:55 (six years ago) link
leaving twitter is pretty much always a good idea, too bad RS is gonna consider this a win
― Simon H., Tuesday, 19 December 2017 18:55 (six years ago) link
getting punched in the face, w/l?
― y'know, LIBS! libertarians, libertines, even liberians and librarians (Hunt3r), Tuesday, 19 December 2017 19:09 (six years ago) link
sorry to chime in on that point only. but come on, the man profits hugely on our indiscipline.
as a rule i think it's best for wp to just kind of read and observe these kinds of disagreements instead of coming out swinging. i mostly feel like i haven't read enough. i don't think the concepts in question are small enough to really boil down to 1 guy vs 1 other guy, whoever you think ought to win.
i will say that @ztsamudzi has been a good follow for the past few days (and generally)
― goole, Tuesday, 19 December 2017 19:20 (six years ago) link
The argument these last few days has literally been that Coates was suspect because white liberals agreed with him, but Richard Spencer co-signs West and it's no big deal?
― Frederik B, Tuesday, 19 December 2017 19:22 (six years ago) link
i tried, everybody
― goole, Tuesday, 19 December 2017 19:25 (six years ago) link
frederik profits hugely on your indiscipline
― j., Tuesday, 19 December 2017 19:26 (six years ago) link
― Frederik B, Tuesday, December 19, 2017 11:22 AM (three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
you rival richard spencer for disingenuousness
― khat person (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 19 December 2017 19:27 (six years ago) link
The problem isn't that Richard Spencer cosigned Cornel West. The problem is that Cornel West traded scholastic credibility for a cameo in a shitty Matrix movie and has spent a good chunk of the subsequent 20 years cosigning white people who feel they have the right to opine on whether particular black people are black enough.
― Embalming is a flirty business (DJP), Tuesday, 19 December 2017 19:37 (six years ago) link
there's another guy who lacked scholarly credibility
― j., Tuesday, 19 December 2017 19:50 (six years ago) link
maybe you've heard of him
― j., Tuesday, 19 December 2017 19:51 (six years ago) link
a stonemason from athens
spent a good chunk of the subsequent 20 years cosigning white people who feel they have the right to opine on whether particular black people are black enough.― Embalming is a flirty business (DJP), Tuesday, December 19, 2017 2:37 PM (fourteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― Embalming is a flirty business (DJP), Tuesday, December 19, 2017 2:37 PM (fourteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
What is this in reference to?
― treeship 2, Tuesday, 19 December 2017 19:52 (six years ago) link
https://www.singlepayeraction.org/2011/09/19/ralph-nader-cornel-west-unveil-proposal-to-challenge-obama-in-primaries/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibsP6XN2dIo
― Embalming is a flirty business (DJP), Tuesday, 19 December 2017 19:55 (six years ago) link
For the record, you can 100% criticize Obama's record without calling him an Uncle Tom or cosigning people who do; this is not about "Obama was right" as much as it "white people on the left are quick to decry racism right up until they get to use it themselves"
― Embalming is a flirty business (DJP), Tuesday, 19 December 2017 19:58 (six years ago) link
Did Nader ever apologize for that remark? If he did, I never heard about it.
― A is for (Aimless), Tuesday, 19 December 2017 20:12 (six years ago) link
of course he didn't, why would he?
― Embalming is a flirty business (DJP), Tuesday, 19 December 2017 20:14 (six years ago) link
He doubled down, if anything.
https://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/05/nader-defends-obama-slur/
― Simon H., Tuesday, 19 December 2017 20:20 (six years ago) link
not sure if i'm misreading, but my intended snarky point was "rs likely considered that a win too, what an ahole."
― y'know, LIBS! libertarians, libertines, even liberians and librarians (Hunt3r), Tuesday, 19 December 2017 20:25 (six years ago) link
i cant imagine looking at this scenario and thinking coates leaving twitter is some kind of "bad look" ... the fuck?
― Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Tuesday, 19 December 2017 21:35 (six years ago) link
^^^
― flamenco drop (BradNelson), Tuesday, 19 December 2017 21:43 (six years ago) link
seconding that
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 19 December 2017 21:51 (six years ago) link
did anyone in here already link RL Stephens much more substantive left critique of TNC? it's a more serious thing, not a glib guardian blog post, that i'd hoped somebody with a bigger platform like west might mount:
https://www.viewpointmag.com/2017/05/17/the-birthmark-of-damnation-ta-nehisi-coates-and-the-black-body/
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 19 December 2017 21:57 (six years ago) link
Yeah, that was linked upthread. Frederik didn't find that one very convincing, either.
― grawlix (unperson), Tuesday, 19 December 2017 21:58 (six years ago) link
tbh i didn't find that one convincing either
― flamenco drop (BradNelson), Tuesday, 19 December 2017 21:59 (six years ago) link
here he is on west for whatever that's worth for passerby
I think the Cornel West riff on Coates is rather shallow, sort of like an interview riff rather than a substantive take on Coates and his work. It's more about West projecting his intersectional line rather than taking up Coates on his own terms.— R.L. Stephens (@RLisDead) December 19, 2017
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 19 December 2017 22:00 (six years ago) link
(its a thread)
yeah this seems to repeat his point which i am probably extremely reductively compressing: tnc is too pessimistic
― flamenco drop (BradNelson), Tuesday, 19 December 2017 22:03 (six years ago) link
which imo...idk y'all, is the revolution gonna solve racism
― flamenco drop (BradNelson), Tuesday, 19 December 2017 22:04 (six years ago) link
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 19 December 2017 22:05 (six years ago) link
i already regret posting about this at all
― flamenco drop (BradNelson), Tuesday, 19 December 2017 22:05 (six years ago) link
i do think there's something to his point about reconstruction reparations being qualitatively distinct from TNC's suggestions in what they have the potential to make possible
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 19 December 2017 22:06 (six years ago) link