Post a controversial opinion

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (8526 of them)

why should be worry about providing a living wage if there are poor people starving in africa

Karl Malone, Thursday, 14 December 2017 18:50 (eight years ago)

everything is bad, it makes no difference

Karl Malone, Thursday, 14 December 2017 18:51 (eight years ago)

i've heard a couple people making a good point, but since it was less than 20% of the arguments i've heard in total, i'm not gonna worry about it that hard

Karl Malone, Thursday, 14 December 2017 18:51 (eight years ago)

we got problems, people

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 14 December 2017 18:51 (eight years ago)

^uncontroversial

Karl Malone, Thursday, 14 December 2017 18:53 (eight years ago)

Scott Ferrall is extremely wonderful

brimstead, Thursday, 14 December 2017 19:33 (eight years ago)

Whitney do you know any schooltechers

brimstead, Thursday, 14 December 2017 19:35 (eight years ago)

God nevermind

brimstead, Thursday, 14 December 2017 19:35 (eight years ago)

are people really encountering anti-net-neutrality arguments in the wild? I haven't seen ANY and I've seen quite a lot of chatter on the subject

Simon H., Thursday, 14 December 2017 19:36 (eight years ago)

I've seen it from some Facebook libertarians in friends' comment sections.

Monster fatberg (Phil D.), Thursday, 14 December 2017 19:36 (eight years ago)

Internet chicken licken arguments have ruined the world

remember the lmao (darraghmac), Thursday, 14 December 2017 19:44 (eight years ago)

THE WORLD

remember the lmao (darraghmac), Thursday, 14 December 2017 19:46 (eight years ago)

This is the first remotely convincing anti-net neutrality thing I've seen: https://thetrichordist.com/2017/12/01/thoughts-on-net-neutrality-from-down-here-in-the-coal-mine-guest-post-maria-schneider/

No purposes. Sounds. (Sund4r), Thursday, 14 December 2017 19:53 (eight years ago)

(Guy who shared it is m/l a socialist btw.)

No purposes. Sounds. (Sund4r), Thursday, 14 December 2017 19:55 (eight years ago)

Can't believe we're going to live in a world where people are going to choose garbage immediately instead of great things that require some effort, that's nothing like how we already process film and music and shopping already on the internet

must be cool to live in a world where the internet is just another entertainment hole and not a ubiquitous entity telling millions of people they had to vote for Donald Trump because Hillary Clinton killed four people in Benghazi and then sold all of our uranium

frogbs, Thursday, 14 December 2017 20:11 (eight years ago)

are people really encountering anti-net-neutrality arguments in the wild? I haven't seen ANY and I've seen quite a lot of chatter on the subject

― Simon H., Thursday, December 14, 2017 7:36 PM (thirty-nine minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i know a libertarian (""""anarchist""""") trans woman who is celebrating the end of net neutrality and the likely passage of the tax bill, who's legitimately confounded that no one in her Facebook feed seems to understand these are entirely positive things

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 14 December 2017 20:17 (eight years ago)

I assume Whitney is only pushing back on this bc ppl on Reddit are passionate about it.

JoeStork, Thursday, 14 December 2017 20:33 (eight years ago)

lol whiney

JoeStork, Thursday, 14 December 2017 20:34 (eight years ago)

I'm not really pushing back on the idea of ending net neutrality, just I think that A) most of the arguments I come across are pretty weak and entitled, though that may just be who I choose to follow on Twitter B) The internet is already pretty bad

mag gerwig! (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 14 December 2017 20:37 (eight years ago)

I feel like the lesson of the last couple years is It Can Always Get Worse

JoeStork, Thursday, 14 December 2017 20:38 (eight years ago)

Not that I'd argue with either of those points really

JoeStork, Thursday, 14 December 2017 20:40 (eight years ago)

love to counter the claim that something is bad with "well it's only a little more bad, and the whiners hate this, so I'm for it"

mh, Thursday, 14 December 2017 20:45 (eight years ago)

I've decided retroactively that the citizens united supreme court ruling did, in fact, totally own

mh, Thursday, 14 December 2017 20:46 (eight years ago)

I'll tell you one thing that entitled white people hate, it's when you wear a diaper and then post pics of yourself wearing the diaper

frogbs, Thursday, 14 December 2017 21:10 (eight years ago)

wuts rong w diapers

infinity (∞), Thursday, 14 December 2017 21:22 (eight years ago)

<png>
*poxy fuled*
"christ on a cross, honey, did you forget to pay the ilx bill again?"
</png>

*writes congressman*

crocus bulbotuber (Sufjan Grafton), Thursday, 14 December 2017 21:27 (eight years ago)

fucking classic whiney lol

k3vin k., Thursday, 14 December 2017 21:40 (eight years ago)

It's high fucking time restaurants start taking the tails off of shrimp in heavily sauced dishes... Inexcusable

sleepingbag, Thursday, 14 December 2017 22:50 (eight years ago)

ESP if they are meant to be eaten with chopsticks

sleepingbag, Thursday, 14 December 2017 22:51 (eight years ago)

Whiney otm.

Not really, obviously, but in a larger sense, yes.

treeship 2, Friday, 15 December 2017 00:25 (eight years ago)

The Thing is boring

fuck you, your hat is horrible (Neanderthal), Friday, 15 December 2017 01:19 (eight years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNAGir88An8

seems kinda fun to me

A is for (Aimless), Friday, 15 December 2017 01:22 (eight years ago)

http://rs1253.pbsrc.com/albums/hh594/NKassirer/Reaction%20Gifs/Addams%20Family/ThingBeckons.gif~c200

Darth be not proud (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 15 December 2017 01:48 (eight years ago)

Where did GAPDY stand on net neutrality?

Joan Digimon (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Friday, 15 December 2017 02:15 (eight years ago)

bring back napster

Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Friday, 15 December 2017 03:15 (eight years ago)

Doing math homework while stoned is fun

brimstead, Friday, 15 December 2017 03:44 (eight years ago)

Green's theorem on weed man

crocus bulbotuber (Sufjan Grafton), Friday, 15 December 2017 05:47 (eight years ago)

My college roommate smoked pot three times a day and got a Ph.D in Math. Wouldn't have happened without the weed, I'm sure of it.

Josefa, Friday, 15 December 2017 08:04 (eight years ago)

the same ppl who talk about the problems of white ppl and the problems of males based on the actions of a minority of both groups (due to condemnations of systemic factors within the groups themselves and their construction that allow those group individuals to lash out) do not do the same with other non-white non-male groups. they consider the former critical theory, & the latter bigotry. it's hypocrisy and the cheapened idea that power can only flow one direction to justify it is just putting lipstick on a hypocrite.

Mordy, Friday, 15 December 2017 13:50 (eight years ago)

not following... clarify?

Evan, Friday, 15 December 2017 15:25 (eight years ago)

The problems of white people are not based on the actions of a minority, Mordy.

El Tomboto, Friday, 15 December 2017 15:29 (eight years ago)

I’m actually pretty sure that what you posted doesn’t qualify for this thread at all. It’s the position of a strong majority of (surprise) white males.

El Tomboto, Friday, 15 December 2017 15:31 (eight years ago)

Doing math homework while stoned is fun

― brimstead, Thursday, December 14, 2017 10:44 PM (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

math is hard enough already for me and if i smoke a little it's impossible

marcos, Friday, 15 December 2017 15:37 (eight years ago)

Same

Moodles, Friday, 15 December 2017 15:40 (eight years ago)

Blaming is fun and necessary

remember the lmao (darraghmac), Friday, 15 December 2017 15:42 (eight years ago)

Also worth noting that Mordy posting that to ilx counts as controp obv

remember the lmao (darraghmac), Friday, 15 December 2017 15:45 (eight years ago)

are people really encountering anti-net-neutrality arguments in the wild? I haven't seen ANY and I've seen quite a lot of chatter on the subject

― Simon H., Thursday, December 14, 2017 11:36 AM (yesterday)

i'm not anti net neutrality - i think net neutrality is a good thing - but i'm anti people telling me to sign an online petition and then being furious that their online petitions are being ignored. and yeah, i'm cynical but i feel like a lot of this is a fight between giant corporations. i'm old enough to remember when there actually was a Backbone Cabal that exercised control over content. it wasn't good, but neither was it the end of the world. the only way this really would be disastrous was if strong sapir-whorf was valid, which it isn't.

that said this thing has definite implications for political speech on the internet, and the internet outrage machine has helped limit some of the damage that might otherwise have been done, even if i'm lukewarm on the long-term utility of an uncontrolled outrage machine, and on the general utility of internet political speech in general.

bob lefse (rushomancy), Friday, 15 December 2017 15:54 (eight years ago)

Blaming is fun and necessary

― remember the lmao (darraghmac)

show trials are not necessarily unjust

cite: d.c. stephenson's murder trial

bob lefse (rushomancy), Friday, 15 December 2017 15:55 (eight years ago)

I think the intense love Automatic for the People is baffling.

Yerac, Friday, 15 December 2017 21:50 (eight years ago)

yeah i had to tell everybody in the pub last night to stop going on and on about it

all this youthless booty (Noodle Vague), Friday, 15 December 2017 21:58 (eight years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.