fuck, don't know why it didn't tape...
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Friday, 10 November 2017 16:47 (eight years ago)
Should be up on cc.com though.
― Evan, Friday, 10 November 2017 16:55 (eight years ago)
We hear him say exactly what's in the subtitles? Am I missing something here?
― Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 10 November 2017 17:07 (eight years ago)
yes
― 龜, Friday, 10 November 2017 17:09 (eight years ago)
he definitely doesn't say that last part
― frogbs, Friday, 10 November 2017 17:10 (eight years ago)
oic. yeah, seems understandable tbh.
he's got the cutest sad look, i'm sorry, but it's true.
― Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 10 November 2017 17:18 (eight years ago)
He mixes convincing realness + the Nathan For You character so well, especially in this last episode. Like when he had the escort watch an episode in front of him. He was being the Nathan For You character acting as if out of character: not acknowledging the show is a comedy but also not denying it, going along with the accusation that he is lying to people but not suggesting it's for humor. It's a weird overlap.
― Evan, Friday, 10 November 2017 17:29 (eight years ago)
That subtitle addition could simply be a joke, his actual feelings and a joke at once, his character's feelings and a joke... who knows.
― Evan, Friday, 10 November 2017 17:31 (eight years ago)
So much pathos. Watching the finale felt like watching a tragicomedy by Samuel Beckett.
― davey, Friday, 10 November 2017 21:28 (eight years ago)
Wow, this episode. My wife said it was super weird (it was) but redeemed all the episodes this season she didn't like. At the same time, this was the first time she literally had to cover her eyes once in discomfort.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 11 November 2017 05:03 (eight years ago)
The way this one shifted from tragic to hopeful to scary to weird to sad to sentimental ... I noticed there were, what, 6 or 7 credited writers on it? I wonder how they put something like this episode together.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 11 November 2017 05:04 (eight years ago)
It's sadly fitting that when Nathan's NFY character finally finds a semblance of human connection, it's through a relationship that's really an ongoing business transaction.
― JRN, Saturday, 11 November 2017 06:25 (eight years ago)
nathan must have been burning through comedy central's money at some rate w/maci
― ||||||||, Saturday, 11 November 2017 09:18 (eight years ago)
anyone know why the last ep isn't on amazon?
― dynamicinterface, Saturday, 11 November 2017 13:25 (eight years ago)
What did he say the anecdote episode cost, $300,000? That would pay for over 40 24-hour days of Maci, at around her rate. Now that would be a funny episode, if instead of the girlfriend experience he wanted the wife experience (I could have sworn he was going to propose in this one) and he paid her her going rate to basically move in with him and do mundane domestic stuff for a month or two.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 11 November 2017 13:52 (eight years ago)
this was my thought as well
― Simon H., Saturday, 11 November 2017 15:59 (eight years ago)
Same with the Smoker's Allowed actress, right?
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 11 November 2017 16:00 (eight years ago)
Yup.
― Simon H., Saturday, 11 November 2017 16:13 (eight years ago)
MUD 2NEVER CLEAN
― johnny crunch, Saturday, 11 November 2017 16:15 (eight years ago)
definite smokers allowed parallels in their interactions
― maura, Saturday, 11 November 2017 20:44 (eight years ago)
am i only one that felt like that last episode was a waste of time, sort of a shaggy dog story without a punchline. oh well
― Week of Wonders (Ross), Sunday, 12 November 2017 06:19 (eight years ago)
I have mixed feelings about it. It's a departure from the show's main shtick, for one thing. It seems like Nathan wanted to show what people don't often see: the lonely old man who's lived a life of regret, the escort on her dates, and Nathan himself being called out as a liar, all of which was uncomfortable to watch. But I like Samuel Beckett and I like this, even if it's less entertaining than, say, Nathan inventing an absurd way for obese people to ride horses. (That episode almost killed me laughing.) The finale is another brand of absurdist performance, and it's heavier and probably a little more philosophical, and I appreciated the anticlimax. But TBH I did hope for more lolz, hah.
― davey, Sunday, 12 November 2017 08:01 (eight years ago)
Idk this show has always been about the ~journey~ and not the destination. Regardless, thought this episode was hilarious, disturbing, uncomfortable, sad, touching and finished with a kind of catharsis. That phone conversation Bill has with Frances (outside of her house!) was kind of just the right way to resolve it. So much going on there. Brilliant episode imo.
― circa1916, Sunday, 12 November 2017 18:56 (eight years ago)
loved how this ep kind of felt like a low-key spoof of S-Town at times.
― gr8080, Sunday, 12 November 2017 23:53 (eight years ago)
Yeah, it felt very podcast-y.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 00:32 (eight years ago)
“Can you switch to Fox News?”
― circa1916, Monday, 13 November 2017 00:35 (eight years ago)
I can’t believe this I love you this made my year https://t.co/cHS2SGIQR9— nathan fielder (@nathanfielder) November 13, 2017
― maura, Monday, 13 November 2017 04:32 (eight years ago)
been watching clips of nathan's show on youtube
not sure how i feel about him, but did find the poop one endearing in a my-6-year-old-makes-those-jokes way
― i n f i n i t y (∞), Monday, 13 November 2017 04:45 (eight years ago)
That’s kinda beautifulxp definite xp
― circa1916, Monday, 13 November 2017 04:57 (eight years ago)
i feel kinda lame for even pursuing this point given the precision of fielder's comedy but maci is clearly a scripted character yes?
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Monday, 13 November 2017 06:11 (eight years ago)
alsohttps://streamable.com/s154b
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Monday, 13 November 2017 06:15 (eight years ago)
I do wonder how many of the people on the show are in cahoots. The "ai doo" bit earlier in the season worked almost a little too smoothly, but who knows
― davey, Monday, 13 November 2017 06:18 (eight years ago)
somewhat related:https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2017/11/paying-for-fake-friends-and-family/545060/
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Monday, 13 November 2017 06:22 (eight years ago)
Hoooly shit that is depressing stuff
― davey, Monday, 13 November 2017 06:45 (eight years ago)
bill gates reminded me of the guy from the jinx a bit
― ||||||||, Monday, 13 November 2017 06:48 (eight years ago)
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Monday, November 13, 2017 12:11 AM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― davey, Monday, November 13, 2017 12:18 AM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
I wondered about these things, too. It's one of the mysteries of the show, how much of it is kayfabe. I had doubts about Maci especially, since she allowed her face to be shown, something I doubt a real escort would do.
― JRN, Monday, 13 November 2017 07:26 (eight years ago)
pretty convinced majority of this show is staged/finely edited. still it's great obviously
― Week of Wonders (Ross), Monday, 13 November 2017 07:32 (eight years ago)
Yep.
Maci is a real escort. Reddit is having a very hard time deleting her personal info, as she keeps being harrassed by people tracking her down and posting her asl. Supposedly her escort service is easy to find (I didn't look for it obv).
Which doesn't mean it was obv scripted, but she is in fact an escort.
― Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 13 November 2017 10:13 (eight years ago)
That should read it's obv scripted, but she is etc
― Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 13 November 2017 10:14 (eight years ago)
Like I noted, I think.6 credited writers on the finale. for what that's worth.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 13:01 (eight years ago)
Well yeah, the writers come up with general scenarios for each episode and ideas for things like Mud 2
they're not writing scripts for actors to learn (unless they actually are actors in the context of the show)
― Number None, Monday, 13 November 2017 13:19 (eight years ago)
Many people suspect that reality television is scripted, and with “Nathan for You,” this is, in a sense, the case. Fielder and his writers compose detailed outlines for each episode, trying their best to predict “what a reasonable person might say in a situation,” Fielder said, and to steer events in propitious directions — nudging customers from the gas station, for example, to the mountaintop. This doesn’t mean that the show’s marks are acting, however, or in on the joke: Fielder’s producers approach prospective businesses without letting on that “Nathan for You” is a comedy show, and Fielder never breaks character at a shoot.In filming the show, Fielder says, chance ultimately rules: “We don’t even reference the script after a certain point. An entire day of shooting will ride on stuff happening the way we hope. It’s crazy to do a production like that, but the uncertainty makes the show feel more authentic and spontaneous.” Koman agreed: “It’s setups and luck.” The way Fielder manages this unpredictability is to shoot an excess of footage: He may need only one kid sitting on Santa’s lap with a Doinkit, but he’ll film three to ensure that he’s covered. “This show shoots more footage than anything I’ve worked on,” Notarnicola said, sitting at his editing bay. Fielder said, “Only a few things keep making you laugh the 10th, 12th, 15th time you watch them, though, so it gets easier to cut as you go.”
In filming the show, Fielder says, chance ultimately rules: “We don’t even reference the script after a certain point. An entire day of shooting will ride on stuff happening the way we hope. It’s crazy to do a production like that, but the uncertainty makes the show feel more authentic and spontaneous.” Koman agreed: “It’s setups and luck.” The way Fielder manages this unpredictability is to shoot an excess of footage: He may need only one kid sitting on Santa’s lap with a Doinkit, but he’ll film three to ensure that he’s covered. “This show shoots more footage than anything I’ve worked on,” Notarnicola said, sitting at his editing bay. Fielder said, “Only a few things keep making you laugh the 10th, 12th, 15th time you watch them, though, so it gets easier to cut as you go.”
― Number None, Monday, 13 November 2017 13:20 (eight years ago)
6 credited writers seems like a lot doesn't it? Are there usually 6 writers on every Nathan For You episode? I've never noticed. most scripted shows don't credit that many writers per episode, let alone a pseudo documentary-style show. Anyway, clearly the show is written in the editing room. I'm not sure I would trust much about it, from chronology on down. In this last episode he claims he was in Little Rock for weeks. as depicted in this episode, there's not much that would take more than 3 days, imo. it's all like an elaborate meta magic trick.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 13:23 (eight years ago)
most of the episodes have 3-4 writers
this was obviously a bit more ambitious than usual though
― Number None, Monday, 13 November 2017 13:30 (eight years ago)
No doubt. I do think that this could have been edited down to a usual run time, if they wanted to, but the expansion - and all the weirdness that entailed - was what made it special. Conversely, I'm sure they could have made any other episode into a weird epic like this one. The Maci stuff, she's just tangential to it (if thematically linked, per the "plot"). Like (gross though it might have been) he could have said, to reference a previous episode, "but first we wanted to see if a regular person would buy chili dispensed from a fat suit, so we hired this actor/escort/whatever to play the part of a 'real' person," and so on. The Maci stuff is the hardest to suss in this one. She's OK with her face on camera, and for that matter, she's OK with the camera crew being present - except when she's not? Regardless, I'm continually impressed by his ability not to break character in uncomfortable situations. When he's doing the dance for her? When they're smooching? So uncomfortable. It's totally impossible for me to tell where Nathan the actor/host ends and Nathan the person begins. Vs. someone like Sasha Baron-Cohen, who pops up out of character all the time.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 14:04 (eight years ago)
yeah I was thinking about that a lot during this episode. is this the only time we see him laugh during the show?
― frogbs, Monday, 13 November 2017 14:07 (eight years ago)
as my friend dan pointed out, one of the most interesting beats in the series so far was when nathan says to maci: "it's business. you know, business."
― sean gramophone, Monday, 13 November 2017 14:14 (eight years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7cZoc6WTnYs
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Monday, 13 November 2017 14:31 (eight years ago)
― johnny crunch, Saturday, November 11, 2017 9:15 AM (two days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i've been laughing at this for like ten minutes
― ToddBonzalez (BradNelson), Monday, 13 November 2017 18:52 (eight years ago)
That Cotillard clip reminds me of the faux flirty Between Two Ferns with Charlize Theron.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=83I_rQUbw8c
Acting is a really amazing balance of power. I have a friend who once interviewed this minor actress, and he said she was so flirtatious, almost hypnotically so, that he was convinced she was going to ask him out for a drink or something. It was only as he was working on his feature that he recognized, Usual Suspects style, just how perfectly she had played him.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 19:38 (eight years ago)