i'm finally reading The Last Samurai and jesus does that book make me feel dumb. i mean it's about geniuses and i am not one of those but i really don't know much about much. is it too late in life to learn grammar rules or learn latin?
i am never using proper punctuation on this thread.
ALSO i love the lack of punctuation in that book! what a cool book.
i mean CASE ENDINGS i think i knew what that was but i looked it up and that just starts me on a rocky road through terminology i have no idea about.
THE VOCATIVE CASE. i dunno maybe its too late for me.
― scott seward, Friday, 10 November 2017 16:33 (six years ago) link
get yr head round finnish cases and the rest is easy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finnish_noun_cases#Finnish_cases
― mark s, Friday, 10 November 2017 16:45 (six years ago) link
They passed on their message with(using) the houses they built.
― scott seward, Friday, 10 November 2017 16:56 (six years ago) link
finns don't see gender. the language of the future!
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DRNAOBsXkAA4EP6.jpg
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 19 December 2017 23:26 (six years ago) link
otm
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 20 December 2017 00:33 (six years ago) link
are there any good reasons to use he's got rather than he has?
― mookieproof, Friday, 16 February 2018 21:21 (six years ago) link
stylistically, it lends a colloquial informality to whatever is being written.
― A is for (Aimless), Friday, 16 February 2018 21:24 (six years ago) link
"she has the look" - prince
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 16 February 2018 21:25 (six years ago) link
you know this is the first time I've read the opening post in this thread and it's a real doozy
― khat person (jim in vancouver), Friday, 16 February 2018 21:26 (six years ago) link
you mean its a real doozy
― Rhine Jive Click Bait (Hadrian VIII), Friday, 16 February 2018 21:35 (six years ago) link
it's a well established usage: shakespeare used it, johnson approves it, fowler quotes someone i haven't heard of calling it "not a real error but a counterfeit invented by schoolmasters"
which last i think paradoxically explains and perhaps validates the sense that it's more informal or colloquial
the other reason for choosing one over the other is, not rhythm exactly, since they're interchangeable in terms of syllables, but the sense of flow or of choppiness you need at that point
(either is fine, in other words: it's up to you)
― mark s, Friday, 16 February 2018 21:47 (six years ago) link
sorry: xps to got vs have
fair. it's a tic of an otherwise terrible writer of my acquaintance and i wanted to hate it as well
― mookieproof, Friday, 16 February 2018 21:56 (six years ago) link
tracer hand's recasting cracking me up
― mom tossed in kimchee (quincie), Friday, 16 February 2018 22:53 (six years ago) link
i am possibly going to take an editing test in the next couple of weeks for a special publications dept of a local newspaper
i have freelanced for years but haven’t written for Legit outlet like this before
can anyone recommend any websites or books to help me bone up on my editing/grammar etc. i’ve got functional skills but my knowledge feels v flabby
― Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 20 February 2018 00:57 (six years ago) link
disclaimer: I am not a newspaper employee or journalism major
I expect you won't be required to parse grammar in detail just to demonstrate a technical knowledge nearly so much as to show the ability to edit for clarity and brevity, correct writers' incorrect spelling or improper homophones (to, too, two, etc.), and show some familiarity with whichever style guide the newspaper favors. Ask them ahead of time what style guide they use so you can figure out how they want you to do stuff like capitalize, hyphenate, and a few other arcane details along those lines.
If I were hiring you, I'd mainly want to know you can recognize bad, awkward, or flagrantly ungrammatical writing and can clean it up to a minimum level of readability, and since this is for a newspaper, how to make the article fit the space allotted to it without ruining its sense.
If they think they want someone who can call a gerund a gerund with consummate ease, or can name-drop the subjunctive case in casual conversation, they are probably just confused or wrong-headed. Or horribly snobby about grammar.
Good luck. Oh, and "special publications" might be code for paid advertising inserts.
― A is for (Aimless), Tuesday, 20 February 2018 02:11 (six years ago) link
it is - that’s kinda where my background is, hence why i’m going for that gig & not tryna be a stringer in the oughts or something :)
― Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 20 February 2018 03:13 (six years ago) link
I keep a copy of the AP's Guide to Punctuation on my my nightstand. It's not the stylebook, which obviously can change from place to place, but does illustrate things like why the Oakland A's have had multiple MVPs.
Not bad for a book with only 93 pages, but maybe you can find something from this decade though.
https://www.amazon.com/Associated-Press-Guide-Punctuation/dp/0738207853
― pplains, Tuesday, 20 February 2018 03:51 (six years ago) link
The style guide for Chicago is pretty compressed and good. It's sort of like a shortened version of Garland's Oxford guide to American English usage.
― Pataphysician, Tuesday, 20 February 2018 04:01 (six years ago) link
I hit the AP Stylebook online often. I don't agree with everything they come up with (though I do have to abide by their rules), but it is interesting to see at least why they write the rules they write.
― pplains, Tuesday, 20 February 2018 04:40 (six years ago) link
thanks everyone, this is all v helpful <3
― Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 20 February 2018 05:53 (six years ago) link
Just read my posts
― DUMPKINS! (darraghmac), Tuesday, 20 February 2018 11:55 (six years ago) link
then delete them
― mark s, Tuesday, 20 February 2018 12:08 (six years ago) link
:o
― DUMPKINS! (darraghmac), Tuesday, 20 February 2018 12:26 (six years ago) link
this is an amaaaazing book on editing. it's about academic rather than newspaper editing, but there's so much helpful stuff
https://sites.duke.edu/niou/files/2014/07/WilliamsJosephM1990StyleTowardClarityandGrace.pdf
― Chuck_Tatum, Tuesday, 20 February 2018 12:45 (six years ago) link
When I was active as a copyeditor (USian term, sorry), the standard book to follow was Karen Judd's Copyediting: A Practical Guide. If I chance to leaf through it nowadays it seems dated, and very focused on practical aspects of paper-based work.
Speaking as an ex-newspaper employee and ex-journalism major, I agree with Aimless's post. It's more important to show you can make murky things clear (and correct the most howlingly egregious errors) than to master every nuance of using em dashes, en dashes, hyphens, etc. Most of those are issues of style rather than right/wrong.
I hire editors from time to time, and I like to look for a basically chill, audience-centric philosophy of editing. Vastly prefer that over dogmatic rigidity or encyclopedic memorized technical knowledge.
Consider one or more books by Bill Walsh, whose irreverent, pragmatic attitude is very much simpatico with my own. Look for The Elephants of Style if you can.
― persona non gratin (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 20 February 2018 14:38 (six years ago) link
speaking as someone currently employed as a proofreader and someone who has taken (and passed) a lot of editing tests, you are almost definitely overthinking it. virtually every copy editing test I've taken has focused on basic grammar, punctuation and usage errors, possibly some AP/Chicago style points (for a newspaper, you're probably going to deal with AP). editing for clarity/brevity generally doesn't show up, probably because those things are A) subjective and B) harder to deliberately insert into a story than a misspelling. as far as style, I've taken a surprising amount of editing tests where they just give you a style guide and dictionary during the test.
so if I were to brush up on anything before an editing test for a print publication, it'd actually be proofreading marks.
― algorithm is a dancer (katherine), Tuesday, 20 February 2018 15:14 (six years ago) link
katherine speaks wisdom
― persona non gratin (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 20 February 2018 15:54 (six years ago) link
thank you!!!it’s def prob just paranoia/overthinking. i just worry that i’m underqualified. i’ve been writing for a very small publication & i am not sure if my skills measure up, even tho i really want the job.
― Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 20 February 2018 17:50 (six years ago) link
Lopez' or Lopez's - both look, not great.
― Fizzles, Thursday, 12 July 2018 12:15 (five years ago) link
The latter is correct (per Chicago at least)
― rob, Thursday, 12 July 2018 12:42 (five years ago) link
de Lopez
― nonsensei (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 12 July 2018 12:43 (five years ago) link
kidding; definitely the second.
apostrophe s unless you're dealing with an archaic set phrase ("good friend for Jesus' sake forbear")
― nonsensei (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 12 July 2018 12:45 (five years ago) link
thanks all. makes sense.
― Fizzles, Thursday, 12 July 2018 13:11 (five years ago) link
i tend to go without additional s tho have some rules that i can’t remember right now where that doesn’t hold. failed at lopez tho without the s looked wrongerer.
― Fizzles, Thursday, 12 July 2018 13:14 (five years ago) link
in fact why i ever began to think it might be lópez’ is now alarming me. i haven’t been sleeping much recently.
― Fizzles, Thursday, 12 July 2018 13:16 (five years ago) link
I tend to follow Chicago on this, as in most things. But there is another school of thought that how you punctuate should reflect how you would say it. Which may vary depending on your dialect, your speech community, and the tone of what you're writing.
That is, if you would say "Jennifer Lopezzes career" then write Lopez's. If you would say "Jennifer Lopezz career" write Lopez'.
But that approach is too loosey-goosey for me.
― nonsensei (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 12 July 2018 13:24 (five years ago) link
If the 's' at the end of the word sounds like an 's', than use apostrophe-s.
If the 's' at the end of the word does not make an esss sound, just use the apostrophe.
"Illinois' roads are better-constructed than Arkansas' roads."
But Lopez is so close, but not exactly an 's', so I'd use an apostrophe. We have an editor here, let's say her last name is Fritz, and we use only the apostrophe for its possessive form.
― pplains, Thursday, 12 July 2018 13:37 (five years ago) link
Wait a minute, I think I confused myself there.
― pplains, Thursday, 12 July 2018 13:38 (five years ago) link
S at the end of the word - don't use an apostrophe.
― pplains, Thursday, 12 July 2018 13:40 (five years ago) link
huh?
― nonsensei (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 12 July 2018 14:02 (five years ago) link
the basic gist of the Chicago rule (at least in the 16th ed.; I don't have the 17th) for possessives is that you leave off the second s only when the word is plural, so "Illinois's roads" versus "many states' roads." No need to follow CMOS of course, but using pronunciation as a guide could get tricky as YMP said. For example, I'd be curious how pplains's rule would work in the part of Illinois where I grew up; there we pronounced Des Moines, "duh moyn," and Des Plaines, "dess plains."
― rob, Thursday, 12 July 2018 14:51 (five years ago) link
I favor making every singular noun possessive with apostrophe s, no matter what sound they end in, including s and z. I have never (until now) heard anyone advance the claim that a silent s should be treated differently.
The historical set phrase thing is an exception that I grudgingly accept if people think it's important.
Every regular plural noun gets s apostrophe. Irregular plurals (like people or children) generally get apostrophe s.
Usually this discussion bogs down around weirder cases like Joneses', where you have an existing s or z sound plus an additional s/z sounds that signal plural and possessive usages. Usageses. Usages's's. DAMMIT
― nonsensei (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 12 July 2018 15:10 (five years ago) link
my spouse bought me a magazine containing this sentence:
"Either/Or, her stylish North Williams breakfast bar-cum-drinking den."
do you think this was on purpose?
― milkshake duck george bernard shaw (rushomancy), Sunday, 9 September 2018 14:42 (five years ago) link
that is a correct usage afaik
― kinder, Sunday, 9 September 2018 15:27 (five years ago) link
but I would have used a different phrase in that context...
― kinder, Sunday, 9 September 2018 15:28 (five years ago) link
It would only be correct if there were a hyphen between drinking and den, imo.
― Alba, Sunday, 9 September 2018 15:34 (five years ago) link
Oh, and breakfast and bar too.
sorting out how to properly hyphenate that lengthy series of modifiers is reason enough not to try it tbh
― rob, Sunday, 9 September 2018 15:37 (five years ago) link