https://youtu.be/M-iwT86kIWo
― The Suite Life of Jack and Wendy (wins), Thursday, 9 November 2017 16:36 (eight years ago)
The misuse/misunderstanding of "nonplussed." I searched the thread convinced this would already be mentioned but there's just one use of it in here and it's incorrect. "Nonplussed" does not mean indifferent, aloof, or disinterested. It means surprised/perplexed/confused. OED:
1. So surprised and confused that one is unsure how to react.‘Henry looked completely nonplussed’
the incorrect usage of the word is the second entry, listed as "North American / Informal." what a strange way of saying WRONG
― flappy bird, Monday, 13 November 2017 00:16 (eight years ago)
Does nonplus perplex you? You aren't alone. Some people believe the "non" in nonplus means "not" and assume that to be nonplussed is to be calm and poised when just the opposite is true. If you are among the baffled, the word's history may clarify things. In Latin, non plus means "no more." In the earliest known uses, which date to the 16th century, it was used as a noun synonymous with quandary. Someone brought to a nonplus had reached an impasse in an argument and could say no more. Within a few decades of the first known use of the noun, people began using nonplus as a verb, and today it is often used in participial form with the meaning "perplexed" (as in "Joellen's nasty remark left us utterly nonplussed").
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/nonplus
― El Tomboto, Monday, 13 November 2017 00:19 (eight years ago)
wait until 2030 when both meanings have equal standing
language evolves, in ways we don’t like or want to accept, and seeing it happen is a marker you’re old
― mh, Monday, 13 November 2017 00:19 (eight years ago)
"Nonplussed" does not mean indifferent, aloof, or disinterested.
This is the first time I've ever heard of this definition, but I'm not North American and informal.
― Terry Micawber (Tom D.), Monday, 13 November 2017 00:25 (eight years ago)
lol
I like to think whoever wrote the BBC styleguide entry on Americanisms did it in one sitting, filled with rage pic.twitter.com/5JFMmJE0tS— Dave Lee (@DaveLeeBBC) October 25, 2017
― i n f i n i t y (∞), Monday, 13 November 2017 04:01 (eight years ago)
but then it ends with ‘eg’ followed by ‘etc.’
― rove mcmanus island (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 13 November 2017 04:08 (eight years ago)
showwhatnow?
― ur-oik (rip van wanko), Monday, 13 November 2017 04:11 (eight years ago)
Never heard an American say "post a total" (of runs). What is this?
Shopping center & shopping mall are different things in America.
No American has ever said "to rubbish."
― Josefa, Monday, 13 November 2017 04:12 (eight years ago)
I shudder to think what might happen if I shouted OUSTER in the town square
― ur-oik (rip van wanko), Monday, 13 November 2017 04:21 (eight years ago)
robin hood wld punch you in the bollox
ch ch cheerio
― i n f i n i t y (∞), Monday, 13 November 2017 04:33 (eight years ago)
― mh, Sunday, November 12, 2017 7:19 PM (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
this isn't like the abuse of "literally." this isn't popular culture or the 'everyman' molding language. most uses of "nonplussed" are in writing by writers trying to sound smart and the fact that it means the exact opposite of what they think it means, and that it's so obvious why everyone gets it wrong, makes it particularly irritating.
― flappy bird, Monday, 13 November 2017 07:37 (eight years ago)
I think the nonplussed war is already over at this point
I've been banging on about it for years
― Number None, Monday, 13 November 2017 08:44 (eight years ago)
I can't describe how I feel about the issue
― Gary Synaesthesia (darraghmac), Monday, 13 November 2017 09:24 (eight years ago)
i'm thinking chalant
― mark s, Monday, 13 November 2017 09:45 (eight years ago)
my theory re the misuse of nonplussed is that it sort of rhymes with "not fussed" so ppl think it means that?
― The Suite Life of Jack and Wendy (wins), Monday, 13 November 2017 09:53 (eight years ago)
similarly "craven" means cowardly but about half the time I see it used ppl seem to think it means something more like "brazen", again I'm going with the "it kind of rhymes" theory
I'm against prescriptivism in general but when ppl get the meanings of words wrong I reserve the right to drop a "you keep using that word..."
― The Suite Life of Jack and Wendy (wins), Monday, 13 November 2017 09:57 (eight years ago)
yeah, there's nothing wrong with telling people to use words malaproperly
― the intentional phallusy (Noodle Vague), Monday, 13 November 2017 10:02 (eight years ago)
nb I reserve the right but it's not like I exercise it often
basically if you're having a normal conversation with someone & they think "enormity" means enormousness you are a dick if you butt in & correct them, but if you're being subjected to a a prolix op-ed by some windbag and they keep making that error there is some value in being that dick
― The Suite Life of Jack and Wendy (wins), Monday, 13 November 2017 10:10 (eight years ago)
otm
― Gary Synaesthesia (darraghmac), Monday, 13 November 2017 11:28 (eight years ago)
You little prolix
― Gary Synaesthesia (darraghmac), Monday, 13 November 2017 11:29 (eight years ago)
I am on record as prioritizing audience-awareness and context-awareness WAY above right/wrong. In any given writing/editing task, I follow the rules that I think the audience cares about. Or rather, I follow the style guidance that tends to produce text that the audience will read without being distracted either by real, or apparent, wrongness.
Also I agree with wins. You generally don't help matters by correcting casual conversation but it can be enjoyable to point and laugh at windbags.
The crankiness level of that BBC thing made me smile. I should say that the USian meaning of "power cut" is a totally different thing - it's a physical feature of the landscape (trees cut down to facilitate passage of power lines), not an electrical outage.
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 13 November 2017 12:27 (eight years ago)
"power cut" sounds like an industry term for something like a Rush song from the mid-80s
― President Keyes, Monday, 13 November 2017 13:45 (eight years ago)
it's also a Wings song from 1973!
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 13 November 2017 13:59 (eight years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_F-ISSGbTJI
I have never heard of tree trimming around power lines as a "power cut" in my life. It's just tree trimming.
― mh, Monday, 13 November 2017 14:51 (eight years ago)
or a specific hairstyle imp
mh, no, not trimming around trees, I mean the total clearing of a swath over a mountain or through a forest or whatever. In my childhood I definitely heard this kind of thing referred to as a power cut:
http://c8.alamy.com/comp/CNX0DE/aerial-photograph-swath-through-forest-for-electrical-powerlines-alabama-CNX0DE.jpg
Maybe this is a rural or Midwestern usage? Or maybe I was just among idiots. Which is not out of the realm of possibility of course.
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 13 November 2017 15:19 (eight years ago)
ahh that's fair, not used to it but I'm from a more urban area, even if in the midwest
― mh, Monday, 13 November 2017 15:28 (eight years ago)
Now I'm wondering what other people call those.
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 13 November 2017 15:31 (eight years ago)
"where trees used be"
― Gary Synaesthesia (darraghmac), Monday, 13 November 2017 15:33 (eight years ago)
in (UK) forestry they're called firebreaks
― mark s, Monday, 13 November 2017 15:35 (eight years ago)
this is more for "use other words" I guess, but the cliché "much ink has been spilled" & the less-encountered but even worse variant "vast quantities of ink have been spilled"
― The Suite Life of Jack and Wendy (wins), Monday, 13 November 2017 15:38 (eight years ago)
No use crying
― Gary Synaesthesia (darraghmac), Monday, 13 November 2017 15:44 (eight years ago)
"it me"
― marcos, Monday, 13 November 2017 16:15 (eight years ago)
Oh Christ I just remembered an even fucking worse versionI wonder if as much digital ink would have been spilled on this whole ...news.ycombinator.com › itemI wonder if as much digital ink would have been spilled on this whole kerfluffle if the original article had not used the term 'bricked'. Bricking, at least in my mind, ...creative.inspiration on Instagram: “Much digital ink has been spilled ...https://www.instagram.com › ...12 Likes, 1 Comments - creative.inspiration (@the.creative.mind) on Instagram: “ Much digital ink has been spilled over why Tupac ended his relationship with ...How do you set metrics? – The Year of the Looking Glass – Mediumhttps://medium.com › the-year-of-the-loo...10 Aug 2017 · Much digital ink has been spilled on this topic, so I'll keep this brief: Unless a metric truly captures the ...Bingo Byte - Much digital ink has been spilled over the... | Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com › postsMuch digital ink has been spilled over the fledgling relationship brewing between Daenerys Targaryen and Jon Snow, not to mention all those ramifications that ...Much digital ink has been spilled over... - Celebrities Report ...https://www.facebook.com › postsMuch digital ink has been spilled over Disney's decision to fire Phil Lord and Chris Miller from the Han Solo Anthology movie – and it's only Thursday....Much digital ink has been spilled lauding the 2014 Cadillac ELR's ...www.guideautoweb.com › galleries › 20...Much digital ink has been spilled lauding the 2014 Cadillac ELR's styling,, photo 4/13.Filip Babovic on Twitter: "Considering how much digital ...https://mobile.twitter.com › status27 Sep 2017 · Considering how much digital ink has been spilt on the trolley problem this really is the appropriate ...Endangered Languages: An Introductionhttps://books.google.co.uk › booksSarah G. Thomason · 2015 · Language Arts & Disciplines... many new funding opportunities have arisen to support this research all over the world, much digital ink has been ...Algorithmic Life: Calculative Devices in the Age of Big Datahttps://books.google.co.uk › booksLouise Amoore, Volha Piotukh · 2015 · Political Science... reasoning, knowledge, truth, ethics and creativity (Bynum and Moore, 1998: 1), and much (digital) ink has been ...
― treeship: a year in the life (wins), Monday, 13 November 2017 16:18 (eight years ago)
wins stop wasting yr breath on that
― i n f i n i t y (∞), Monday, 13 November 2017 17:22 (eight years ago)
By way of contrast and judging purely by ILX standards (which might deviate from the norms of the larger world), I much prolix.
― A is for (Aimless), Monday, 13 November 2017 19:16 (eight years ago)
wins stop wasting yr digital breath on that
― how's life, Monday, 13 November 2017 19:21 (eight years ago)
Much digital breath has been expelled on shit turns of phrase
― treeship: a year in the life (wins), Monday, 13 November 2017 19:24 (eight years ago)
rectal prolix
― i n f i n i t y (∞), Monday, 13 November 2017 19:50 (eight years ago)
inherited this from my actual architect friend who is irked at the hijacking of his field's terminology for software architecture, but the word "architected" still gets under my skin
you're designing or engineering architecture, you're not architecting, my god
― mh, Monday, 13 November 2017 20:37 (eight years ago)
I hear this all the time: "arguably" when "inarguably" is the applicable word. I'm not sure if this because of a complete lack of proportionality, if people get the words confused, or if they're being treated as interchangeable. Example: a news report I heard yesterday that said Da Vinci is "arguably one of the most famous painters ever." Well, no--he's inarguably one of the most famous painters ever; if you want to say he's arguably the most famous or the greatest, then sure, you can argue about that.
― clemenza, Friday, 17 November 2017 15:09 (eight years ago)
I'd prefer "allegedly one of the most famous painters ever"
― President Keyes, Friday, 17 November 2017 15:15 (eight years ago)
suspect the issue there is nervous doubling-up of qualifiers - - - "arguably" piles onto knee-jerk use of "one of the..." with neither one having really been thought through.
― gimme the beet poison, free my soul (Doctor Casino), Friday, 17 November 2017 15:17 (eight years ago)
They're the same word tbh
― fake pato is kind of racist, dude (darraghmac), Friday, 17 November 2017 15:18 (eight years ago)
the different word is "unarguably"
― mark s, Friday, 17 November 2017 15:20 (eight years ago)
I mean they're not the same word but it's the same sentence
tbh inarguably is a nonsense word in that you might claim that it inarguably means inarguably but it doesn't
― fake pato is kind of racist, dude (darraghmac), Friday, 17 November 2017 15:22 (eight years ago)
It's flammable and inflammable that are interchangeable, right? I can't see arguable and inarguable as anything but opposites. (Webster's treats "inarguably" and "unarguably" as variations of the same word.)
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/inarguable
― clemenza, Friday, 17 November 2017 15:23 (eight years ago)
Unarguably isn't a word and I mean fuck a Webster if he argues otherwise
― fake pato is kind of racist, dude (darraghmac), Friday, 17 November 2017 15:24 (eight years ago)