actually getting that song to go viral somehow was clearly the goal but there's no way with that fucking beeping noise
― frogbs, Saturday, 28 October 2017 02:46 (eight years ago)
god, kirsten dunst telling a wedding anecdote with a drug mixup story just before nathan is just the best thing ever
(also, even in that little snippet they show - she didn't realize the weed in the blunt was real until AFTER they smoked the whole thing? no wonder it was the highest she'd ever been, that was probably her first time)
― Karl Malone, Saturday, 28 October 2017 05:05 (eight years ago)
"orphaned skies" still has <1000 plays on spotify, i don't know how it's possible
― Karl Malone, Saturday, 28 October 2017 05:29 (eight years ago)
In time the Earth will have to stomach what we spewAnd face the trees we killed before they grewFrom your disconnected heart youPlay the part, and take it to heartIt's true you believe in every word you saySpied one relevance releaseThe hard truth sink in latchYou would sit the spot, incentivize the plot intoThe monetary value you can frameInto something heavenly unveilTo God still link at once to justify your work or rectify your curse
So when we look up at the sunHer eyes go wide, we hear the humOf our faith, our hopeful eyesWe're bringing home those orphaned skiesIt's time to revolutionizeIt's time to revolutionizeWe're bringing home those orphaned skiesWe're bringing home those orphaned skies
Times are shifting, you can feel it in the swayYou can feel it in the words our hearts conveyThe rhythm of these anxious handsThe melody expands in order to enchant andProve there's beauty to be had within the danceOf sunlight in the ocean's lulling tranceIt's time to open up our heartsI'm groping in the darkAnd bring the world out from its tomb
So when we look up at the sunHer eyes go wide, we hear the humOf our faith, our hopeful eyesWe're bringing home those orphaned skiesIt's time to revolutionizeIt's time to revolutionizeWe're bringing home those orphaned skiesWe're bringing home those orphaned skiesIt's time to revolutionizeIt's time to revolutionizeWe're bringing home those orphaned skiesWe're bringing home those orphaned skies
― Karl Malone, Saturday, 28 October 2017 05:31 (eight years ago)
it’s up to 5669 (nice)
― maura, Saturday, 28 October 2017 14:30 (eight years ago)
I guess artists just feel more than the rest of us do
― davey, Saturday, 28 October 2017 19:21 (eight years ago)
― Karl Malone, Saturday, 28 October 2017 19:23 (eight years ago)
love that part
i totally missed out on this show. i've only seen maybe 4 full episodes? whenever i watch one i literally do it through my fingers like https://i.imgur.com/UtOnN9y.jpg
― Karl Malone, Saturday, 28 October 2017 19:25 (eight years ago)
Nathan's background in improv is clear in his interviews, funny and spontaneous guy
― Week of Wonders (Ross), Saturday, 28 October 2017 19:59 (eight years ago)
"are we done with the banter now?"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TUGZ1VQDss
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Tuesday, 31 October 2017 17:59 (eight years ago)
Smoke detector episode was a bust
Felt pretty bad for the band members too
― Number None, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 19:10 (eight years ago)
if you don't like the cringier moments of the show then definitely don't watch this last episode
that said the implication that Nathan's plan actually kinda did work in the end was pretty amusing
― frogbs, Friday, 3 November 2017 13:37 (eight years ago)
My wife is not a fan of the current season. She felt the past seasons had more emotion/heart to them. Which might be true! Smokers Allowed, the Hero episode, those things are emotionally epic and in many ways thought provoking. The new season is mostly just ... weird.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 3 November 2017 13:39 (eight years ago)
sorry your wife feels that way
― del griffith, Friday, 3 November 2017 14:17 (eight years ago)
there is a 2 hour season finale about finding the Bill Gates impersonator's wife, so maybe they're saving that stuff
― frogbs, Friday, 3 November 2017 14:23 (eight years ago)
what if Nathan for You did an episode about the ghost busters? pic.twitter.com/FuClMGSbha— Spooky Pain Blogger (@trash_sleeper) November 3, 2017
― na (NA), Saturday, 4 November 2017 00:58 (eight years ago)
Maria garcia seems like a real sweetheart
― i believe that (s)he is sincere (forksclovetofu), Saturday, 4 November 2017 04:02 (eight years ago)
Also: i hate to say it, but i dont think i need a two hour episode.
― i believe that (s)he is sincere (forksclovetofu), Saturday, 4 November 2017 04:03 (eight years ago)
I'm glad she found her dream guy
― frogbs, Saturday, 4 November 2017 04:07 (eight years ago)
The cut to Maria Garcia's face with the messed-up lipstick right as Salomon is asking her out is one the most brutal jokes in the history of the show. I have to say, Nathan's treatment of Salomon makes me uncomfortable in general, in much the same way that his continued targeting of business owners with a shaky grasp of English creeps me out a bit.
― JRN, Saturday, 4 November 2017 05:38 (eight years ago)
has finale aired yet?
― flopson, Saturday, 4 November 2017 19:10 (eight years ago)
next week
― maura, Saturday, 4 November 2017 21:06 (eight years ago)
uh... wow
― maura, Friday, 10 November 2017 04:50 (eight years ago)
spoiler ? http://youtu.be/_Ohkhhs0AiM
― maura, Friday, 10 November 2017 05:10 (eight years ago)
removed... what was it?
― Evan, Friday, 10 November 2017 13:35 (eight years ago)
This wasn't on last night, right?
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Friday, 10 November 2017 15:45 (eight years ago)
It was
― Evan, Friday, 10 November 2017 15:57 (eight years ago)
here's the video
There aas a hidden message in the closed captioms of #NathanForYou and I'm sad now. Geez this show is smart, sad, and funny pic.twitter.com/LSe4KG4mxI— Saw (Binoculars) (@Enduerrment) November 10, 2017
― maura, Friday, 10 November 2017 16:28 (eight years ago)
given that he devotes an entire 18 months of his life to produce four hours of TV I guess that's understandable
― frogbs, Friday, 10 November 2017 16:43 (eight years ago)
fuck, don't know why it didn't tape...
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Friday, 10 November 2017 16:47 (eight years ago)
Should be up on cc.com though.
― Evan, Friday, 10 November 2017 16:55 (eight years ago)
We hear him say exactly what's in the subtitles? Am I missing something here?
― Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 10 November 2017 17:07 (eight years ago)
yes
― 龜, Friday, 10 November 2017 17:09 (eight years ago)
he definitely doesn't say that last part
― frogbs, Friday, 10 November 2017 17:10 (eight years ago)
oic. yeah, seems understandable tbh.
he's got the cutest sad look, i'm sorry, but it's true.
― Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 10 November 2017 17:18 (eight years ago)
He mixes convincing realness + the Nathan For You character so well, especially in this last episode. Like when he had the escort watch an episode in front of him. He was being the Nathan For You character acting as if out of character: not acknowledging the show is a comedy but also not denying it, going along with the accusation that he is lying to people but not suggesting it's for humor. It's a weird overlap.
― Evan, Friday, 10 November 2017 17:29 (eight years ago)
That subtitle addition could simply be a joke, his actual feelings and a joke at once, his character's feelings and a joke... who knows.
― Evan, Friday, 10 November 2017 17:31 (eight years ago)
So much pathos. Watching the finale felt like watching a tragicomedy by Samuel Beckett.
― davey, Friday, 10 November 2017 21:28 (eight years ago)
Wow, this episode. My wife said it was super weird (it was) but redeemed all the episodes this season she didn't like. At the same time, this was the first time she literally had to cover her eyes once in discomfort.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 11 November 2017 05:03 (eight years ago)
The way this one shifted from tragic to hopeful to scary to weird to sad to sentimental ... I noticed there were, what, 6 or 7 credited writers on it? I wonder how they put something like this episode together.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 11 November 2017 05:04 (eight years ago)
It's sadly fitting that when Nathan's NFY character finally finds a semblance of human connection, it's through a relationship that's really an ongoing business transaction.
― JRN, Saturday, 11 November 2017 06:25 (eight years ago)
nathan must have been burning through comedy central's money at some rate w/maci
― ||||||||, Saturday, 11 November 2017 09:18 (eight years ago)
anyone know why the last ep isn't on amazon?
― dynamicinterface, Saturday, 11 November 2017 13:25 (eight years ago)
What did he say the anecdote episode cost, $300,000? That would pay for over 40 24-hour days of Maci, at around her rate. Now that would be a funny episode, if instead of the girlfriend experience he wanted the wife experience (I could have sworn he was going to propose in this one) and he paid her her going rate to basically move in with him and do mundane domestic stuff for a month or two.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 11 November 2017 13:52 (eight years ago)
this was my thought as well
― Simon H., Saturday, 11 November 2017 15:59 (eight years ago)
Same with the Smoker's Allowed actress, right?
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 11 November 2017 16:00 (eight years ago)
Yup.
― Simon H., Saturday, 11 November 2017 16:13 (eight years ago)
MUD 2NEVER CLEAN
― johnny crunch, Saturday, 11 November 2017 16:15 (eight years ago)
definite smokers allowed parallels in their interactions
― maura, Saturday, 11 November 2017 20:44 (eight years ago)
am i only one that felt like that last episode was a waste of time, sort of a shaggy dog story without a punchline. oh well
― Week of Wonders (Ross), Sunday, 12 November 2017 06:19 (eight years ago)