i wonder what would have happened if Andy would have enthusiastically supported sending the terrorist threat video to Uber lol
― flopson, Saturday, 14 October 2017 21:41 (eight years ago)
I would've liked to see that too
― davey, Sunday, 15 October 2017 00:03 (eight years ago)
turtle face & vegetables
― ||||||||, Sunday, 15 October 2017 07:26 (eight years ago)
soft teeth in sauce
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Sunday, 15 October 2017 07:32 (eight years ago)
also TURN OFF THE MUSIC! TURN OFF THE MUSIC! TURN OFF THE MUSIC!
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Sunday, 15 October 2017 07:34 (eight years ago)
I can't deal with the fake marriage, so amazing, Nathan is full-tilt insane at this point
― fgti, Monday, 16 October 2017 01:04 (eight years ago)
i love it so much
― flopson, Monday, 16 October 2017 03:57 (eight years ago)
nathan is good at towing the line between scripted and actual real stakes - last ep was a mentalist shaggy dog story
― Week of Wonders (Ross), Tuesday, 17 October 2017 02:36 (eight years ago)
Next Episode:
The Anecdote - Nathan hones his skills at telling stories.
just spitballing here but could this have to do with that bizarre appearance on Kimmel where he spends the entire interview telling a story about getting pulled over while in another guy's clothes? I've never seen him do an interview like that and, as mentioned in this thread, the story seemed completely made up.
― frogbs, Wednesday, 18 October 2017 18:29 (eight years ago)
I wonder how many hours of mediocre footage has to be shot before, say, you get a passenger who seems legitimately triggered by 'Mambo No. 5' or another who delivers a very earnest karaoke performance of 'Yankee Doodle Dandy'.
― I believe I will have another helping of your scrumptious casserole (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 18 October 2017 19:05 (eight years ago)
here's the kimmel appearancehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJbXsnFKGaU
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Wednesday, 18 October 2017 19:11 (eight years ago)
kinda think you're onto something there frogs
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Wednesday, 18 October 2017 19:34 (eight years ago)
I wonder if there will be an episode that explains Nathan's appearance on Conan a few months back pretending to play guitar in Mac Demarco's backing band.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3Fl0xsxsCA
― woman in the dunes, Wednesday, 18 October 2017 21:27 (eight years ago)
that seems a lot more on-brand than him just rambling about lost luggage
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Wednesday, 18 October 2017 21:47 (eight years ago)
Nathan's the best troll around today. Increasingly I don't buy the consequences of the show, I think it's just smartly edited - but it's always been a comedy show anyway I guess
― Week of Wonders (Ross), Wednesday, 18 October 2017 23:07 (eight years ago)
Ha!! I knew it!!!
― frogbs, Friday, 20 October 2017 02:15 (eight years ago)
“which is typical for two strangers”
― maura, Friday, 20 October 2017 02:27 (eight years ago)
"we also got permission to snake her drain for any body parts that mightev fallen in during a shower"
― johnny crunch, Friday, 20 October 2017 02:36 (eight years ago)
kirsten dunst mustve done the same anecdote analysis research
― johnny crunch, Friday, 20 October 2017 02:49 (eight years ago)
anyway, next episode involves forming a band in order to sell discount smoke detectors, might explain his appearance with Mac Demarco? was there any loud beeping during the performance??
― frogbs, Friday, 20 October 2017 03:15 (eight years ago)
good call w/ the jimmy kimmel bit. i wonder if they really spent $350,000 making this anecdote a reality
― dynamicinterface, Saturday, 21 October 2017 00:07 (eight years ago)
Nathan at the wedding was so hilarious
― JRN, Saturday, 21 October 2017 02:02 (eight years ago)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DMocsGPWkAARXUj.jpg
― johnny crunch, Saturday, 21 October 2017 03:39 (eight years ago)
Man I love Nathan Fielder
― carpet_kaiser, Saturday, 21 October 2017 03:43 (eight years ago)
LOL this episode
― flopson, Saturday, 21 October 2017 08:29 (eight years ago)
nathan's the best
― Week of Wonders (Ross), Saturday, 21 October 2017 20:25 (eight years ago)
Lol @ the irony of how he lies to all these people in order to have a "true" story to tell on Kimmel.
Also loved this as satire of the late-night talk show format, which is a pretty lame, tired thing deserving of savage mockery imo.
― davey, Sunday, 22 October 2017 05:41 (eight years ago)
Just caught up on the new season. This show fucking destroys me.
― circa1916, Sunday, 22 October 2017 06:25 (eight years ago)
On season 4 but still weirdly niche. It’s probably the funniest thing on TV.
― circa1916, Sunday, 22 October 2017 06:26 (eight years ago)
@davey i thought the same thing. that montage of anecdotes was amazing
― maura, Sunday, 22 October 2017 10:25 (eight years ago)
the scene where he invites himself to the wedding was excruciating
― gr8080, Monday, 23 October 2017 18:31 (eight years ago)
yeah as much as I love this show there are entire scenes I just have to skip
― Simon H., Monday, 23 October 2017 18:33 (eight years ago)
The hilarious thing about that is the couple seemingly unaware of the art of saying "We'll get back to you on that".
― Evan, Monday, 23 October 2017 18:33 (eight years ago)
also lol @ how he goes from hiding behind a tree to ripping up the dancefloor
― gr8080, Monday, 23 October 2017 18:34 (eight years ago)
its even more awkward when you consider that there were probably other couples that just flat out said no, this was as close to a "yes" as he got
― frogbs, Monday, 23 October 2017 18:35 (eight years ago)
series is killing it. last episode was insane
― ||||||||, Monday, 23 October 2017 19:06 (eight years ago)
So I've not seen him on Kimmel yet, should I go watch the new ep first or would seeing Kimmel first make more sense? Or is it entwined?
― Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 23 October 2017 19:41 (eight years ago)
*intertwined
The best way is to have seen the Kimmel appearance without the knowledge that there was going to be an episode about it. The next best thing is to watch the Kimmel appearance first, then the episode.
― Evan, Monday, 23 October 2017 19:45 (eight years ago)
^ this is correct
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Monday, 23 October 2017 19:46 (eight years ago)
Next best thing it will be (as a watcher of the show I unfortunately haven't avoided the knowledge)
― Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 23 October 2017 19:52 (eight years ago)
yea I was glad to have not seen the appearance first
― johnny crunch, Monday, 23 October 2017 20:01 (eight years ago)
was there any info on if Kimmel was in on it? I was leaning toward he was since after the story he says "you're out of your goddamn mind" in a laughing way that seemed like he knew.
― Western® with Bacon Flavor, Monday, 23 October 2017 20:03 (eight years ago)
Ok that was great. Surely Kimmel and Dunst too were in on it though, right?
Extremely good uncomfy viewing the couple.
― Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 23 October 2017 20:22 (eight years ago)
I don't think Nathan believes in people being in on it
― Number None, Monday, 23 October 2017 20:24 (eight years ago)
yea i would doubt they were
kimmels comment and knowing laugh maybe were just a guess that something was up idk
nathan commenting that 'i considered just leaving' when dunst's story was hitting all his points was really funny also
― johnny crunch, Monday, 23 October 2017 21:02 (eight years ago)
Idk but it doesn't take anything away from my enjoyment of the show either way
― Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 23 October 2017 21:07 (eight years ago)
I legitimately think the Kirsten Dunst thing was a coincidence
― frogbs, Monday, 23 October 2017 21:13 (eight years ago)
The show thrives on that sort of happenstance
― Number None, Monday, 23 October 2017 21:14 (eight years ago)
that appearance on kimmel makes so much more sense now lol
― Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Monday, 23 October 2017 21:57 (eight years ago)