question : is this a film for a 14 year old who has not seen the original, or, is it too boring for a thrills-n-spills overloaded teen and for the dad only ?
― mark e, Thursday, 12 October 2017 14:04 (eight years ago)
there's a lot of nudity if that's a matter
― rip van wanko, Thursday, 12 October 2017 14:16 (eight years ago)
Harrison Ford's crinkly old scrotum in 3d might be a bit much for some.
― calzino, Thursday, 12 October 2017 14:21 (eight years ago)
ah. would not bother me him seeing such stuff (3d scrotum aside), but he would get his uncomfortable teenager face on.like when he gets a naughty joke in family guy and tries to hide the fact that he gets it.
― mark e, Thursday, 12 October 2017 14:22 (eight years ago)
most of the nudity pertains to nubile holographic robogirlfriends
― rip van wanko, Thursday, 12 October 2017 14:36 (eight years ago)
I don't think the nudity would be problematic; it's sexualised but not in any way sexy - like a last-gasp effort of capitalism to sell something when everything else has failed, so let's use a 100ft tall nude neon hologram girl.
You don't need to have seen the first. It is slow, but it's very cool to look at, and the action bits, when they happen, have more impact because of this. I winced in a way I never have with an Avengers movie.
― Hey Bob (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 12 October 2017 14:43 (eight years ago)
its the slowness of it that i suspect will not appeal.
― mark e, Thursday, 12 October 2017 14:46 (eight years ago)
the couple of scenes where women get casually and graphically murdered for no reason I'm not sure I'd want a young teen watching
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Thursday, 12 October 2017 14:48 (eight years ago)
I felt pretty much bang-on average age (38) in the cinema. Reports I've read suggest it's not getting the teen market in the US. I was obsessed with 2001: A Space Odyssey when I was about 15, so I don't think slowness is necessary a teen no-no. I'd take them and try and realign their brain.
― Hey Bob (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 12 October 2017 14:53 (eight years ago)
to be sure though, mark e, the movie is paced languidly at best
― rip van wanko, Thursday, 12 October 2017 14:55 (eight years ago)
bugger, original is not on netflix/uk.was going to make him watch that over the weekend and see how it went.
― mark e, Thursday, 12 October 2017 15:14 (eight years ago)
it's also got a very depressing depiction of the Earth's future where there is a chronic shortage of every color except orange and teal
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Thursday, 12 October 2017 15:16 (eight years ago)
to be fair, thanks to the maze runner/hunger games/enders etc mk2 loves futuristic dystopian bleakness, but they are obviously aimed at the younger crew.
― mark e, Thursday, 12 October 2017 15:20 (eight years ago)
Dude teal and orange is not a problem in this movie.
― Hey Bob (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 12 October 2017 15:26 (eight years ago)
It’s less prevalent than in the original.
teal and sickly yellow, then.
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Thursday, 12 October 2017 15:29 (eight years ago)
http://cdn1-www.comingsoon.net/assets/uploads/2017/10/bladerunnerreview.jpg
― rip van wanko, Thursday, 12 October 2017 15:37 (eight years ago)
do a gis. some images are teal, and the others are orange.
― rip van wanko, Thursday, 12 October 2017 15:40 (eight years ago)
Jared Leto's House of Tron has a definite yellow theme going on in the film, like a giant backlit toilet bowl
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Thursday, 12 October 2017 15:52 (eight years ago)
saw this last night, loved it
should I see it again in IMAX
― it me, Thursday, 12 October 2017 17:22 (eight years ago)
another plot hole
the horse is still radioactive but the place where it came from is no longer radioactive
that's not how radioactivity works
― the late great, Thursday, 12 October 2017 17:49 (eight years ago)
radioactivity in 2049 in much more advanced, u wouldnt understand
― Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 12 October 2017 17:58 (eight years ago)
i am pretty dense it's true
i also had a hard time figuring out how gosling figured the memory maker as the daughter
― the late great, Thursday, 12 October 2017 18:24 (eight years ago)
He figured it out via a Usual Suspects flashback subroutine.And also she looks kind of like Sean Young?
― Philip Nunez, Thursday, 12 October 2017 18:35 (eight years ago)
I appreciated the fact that they left the trail vague enough that it seemed, to my slightly slow matinee mind, like a twist I hadn't quite anticipated.
The little flashback/montage bit that happened wouldn't have been necessary had the movie been tighter, but it laid it out -- Deckard showed them how to scramble the records, explaining why it was unclear whether the kid was a boy or girl. But the girl's record, which you're mislead into thinking was the bogus one, had a disease recorded. As in, the kind of disease that would lead to a life in isolation. Her visceral reaction when she said "this is a real memory" seemed a little disproportionate to the trauma of the actual memory. She's able to brush off her parents as being offworld, having left her.
None of it directly pointed to "this is the woman" but it all fit, and was enough for someone who actually had the memory to work it out.
― mh, Thursday, 12 October 2017 18:40 (eight years ago)
I was left guessing whether the disease part was true -- I'd lean on the side of "no" and it was just a very specific way for them to hide the daughter in plain sight, directly in view of the people who were seeking her, but out of reach.
― mh, Thursday, 12 October 2017 18:42 (eight years ago)
The way the dude was handling the horse didn't suggest it was actually all that radioactive. Was the idea perhaps supposed to be that it had traces of some particular isotopes that indicated where it had been?
You don't see what memory K shows the girl. Then again the furnace memory did involve getting kicked in.
― Noel Emits, Thursday, 12 October 2017 18:46 (eight years ago)
i was waiting for harrison ford to glue on a toothpick horn on the horse but instead got glitchy hologram elvis.
― Philip Nunez, Thursday, 12 October 2017 18:50 (eight years ago)
Enjoyed the movie. Spielberg meets Malick in a way. Not a masterpiece but pretty good and great atmoaphere.
― nostormo, Thursday, 12 October 2017 18:58 (eight years ago)
that’s a good description imo
― Squeaky Fromage (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 12 October 2017 19:20 (eight years ago)
nothing malickian in this beyond some of the pacing imo
― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Thursday, 12 October 2017 19:26 (eight years ago)
wait till you see adrien brody-bot cut scenes
― Philip Nunez, Thursday, 12 October 2017 19:29 (eight years ago)
I think villeneueve has a distinct style, whatever else you may say about him. But the one movie that kept coming to mind while watching this was A.I.
― ryan, Thursday, 12 October 2017 19:30 (eight years ago)
This is the closest stylistically to Enemy of all his movies (also my favorite of his until this one).
― ryan, Thursday, 12 October 2017 19:31 (eight years ago)
Yeah i meant the pacing regarding my Malick remark. Obviously not much of the malickian-nature themes here etc..
― nostormo, Thursday, 12 October 2017 19:53 (eight years ago)
I really liked the slow pacing. A 90 minutes movie like this wouldve been generic as fuck. Giving the audiance time to obsorb the themes is great.
― nostormo, Thursday, 12 October 2017 19:58 (eight years ago)
this seemed much more plot (and in a weird way action) driven than thematic.
― Philip Nunez, Thursday, 12 October 2017 20:11 (eight years ago)
I think there's a balance between the two more or less
― nostormo, Thursday, 12 October 2017 20:18 (eight years ago)
I think the pacing was off regarding plot beats -- the entire replicant rebellion gets short shrift
― mh, Thursday, 12 October 2017 20:32 (eight years ago)
This was very good
Haven't read any comments yet, no doubt I'll be back in an hour frothing at ye.
The only big missteps - they would've killed k after kidnapping declare, and the three minutes of matrix was shit and should never have made the screen
― Gary Synaesthesia (darraghmac), Thursday, 12 October 2017 20:56 (eight years ago)
I saw it again, in IMAX, which I recommend. This is an astonishing piece of visual art.
I also picked up on some of the more subtle religious allusions the second time—Leto directly quotes Genesis at one point, in reference to the infertility of the biblical Rachel.
Also the secret daughter has something (fictional?) called "Galatians syndrome," suggesting that Officer K is a kind of Paul of Tarsus figure, a persecutor turned convert.
Re the replicant rebellion: it's there, but subtle. The implication at the end is that the daughter is a mole the Wallace Corp, implanting memories inside the replicants that, when triggered, can push them off baseline. That's the set-up for the sequel, I would suspect—or at least, it was, before it ate shit at the box office.
― it me, Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:01 (eight years ago)
they've said, although maybe not truthfully, that there were no mysteries meant to be addressed in sequels
I thought the implication at the end was that the daughter is a mole for the _rebellion_ because K, like others, has this memory that is real that he dwells on. And it's the daughter's memory -- so while he's not the child in the memory, he wants to join with his kind to protect her and team with the underground
― mh, Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:08 (eight years ago)
"all the best memories are hers" or something to that effect -- the rebels know where these memories came from
― mh, Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:09 (eight years ago)
whoops you probably mean mole _in_ the Wallace Corp (although she's an independent contractor), not mole _for_
yeah, that's what I meant. they probably got the rogue subcontractor idea from Snowden
― it me, Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:12 (eight years ago)
actually the plot twist I was waiting for, which never came, was that Joi was a mole for the Wallace corporation, setting up an Infernal Affairs mole vs countermole narrative
maybe it's better they passed on that one
― it me, Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:14 (eight years ago)
they sure riffed extra hard on the Pinocchio angle for K
― mh, Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:16 (eight years ago)
I know others didn’t care for it, but there was something compelling to me about the climactic fight scene. It’s duration, the relentlessness of the water. It felt like there is something going on there at least other than robots beating on each other.
― ryan, Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:17 (eight years ago)
It was a bit Bond. Maybe the car reminded me of that Bond one that went underwater.
― Noel Emits, Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:20 (eight years ago)
having harrison ford flail helplessly for the entirety of it was (intentional?) chuckles
― Philip Nunez, Thursday, 12 October 2017 21:23 (eight years ago)