they just need to go into academia, like i did.
― ryan, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 16:45 (eight years ago)
i see the celibacy as i guess metonymic. they end up investing all the angst in the fucking/mating but really it's standing in for all the other alienations that they feel (mentioned above their inability to forge other non-romantic tight relationships) and other accomplishments of regular life they're missing. finding a girlfriend (or becoming someone who can find a girlfriend) becomes the panacea for all the things afflicting them.
― Mordy, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 16:48 (eight years ago)
or the scapegoat on which they hang all their problems
― mh, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 16:49 (eight years ago)
I agree with all that you say Mordy but I think that when a lot of these guys bemoan their undatability they are talking about a subset of women who meet their own standards for attractiveness. The league thing is a horrible metaphor but if you're sincerely looking.for.affection, maybe you need to.look for that quality in.others
― pulled pork state of mind (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 10 October 2017 16:57 (eight years ago)
Ignore the odd punctuation, my phone is a dick
― pulled pork state of mind (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 10 October 2017 16:58 (eight years ago)
there’s something to the fact they define their lifestyle in terms of “celibacy”
― mh, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 17:05 (eight years ago)
People arguing that looks do matter don't seem to consider that this would work both ways if true
― pulled pork state of mind (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 10 October 2017 16:22 (thirty-one minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
^^^
― mh, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 16:23 (thirty minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
what do you mean? they're constantly bemoaning how they're too ugly to date.
― Mordy, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 16:28 (twenty-five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Surely the "works both ways" thing here is that if you accept the logic that they're too ugly to date then there's also women who're in the same predicament, and presumably deserving of incel solidarity. The conflict would then be between the uglies and the hot ppl; but it's not, ever, it is entirely about hatred of women for being "superficial".
Also though let's get real here what're the odds that these guys would want someone in their self-defined league and aren't just pining because they wish they could fuck supermodels? xpost with NV
― Daniel_Rf, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 17:12 (eight years ago)
i've read this subreddit now and then out of fascination and horror and wonder how old these people actually are on average. something tells me there might be a fair amount of them in high school
― global tetrahedron, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 17:14 (eight years ago)
xp I think a lot of them would probably be happy with anyone. The problem isn't that they're too ugly to date really (even tho they might be right that if they were more attractive they'd have an easier time dating) it's that their souls are too ugly to date. It could be some of them /could/ date people in their "league" but are choosing not to bc they're really so entitled they believe they deserve a model - but I suspect that someone who refuses to date anyone because they're holding out for a model have significant problems beyond lack of reasonability about who to pursue ya know?
― Mordy, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 17:16 (eight years ago)
But also this is a systemic problem- society definitely makes single people feel like losers through media. But it's their choice to react in such an ugly way
― Week of Wonders (Ross), Tuesday, 10 October 2017 17:29 (eight years ago)
The stock response among the Reddit incels to the idea that they're holding out for exceptionally attractive women is absolute denial. You'll often see them insist that they would take literally any woman who would have them, no matter what she looks like, but not one will.
They also insist that there is no such thing as an incel woman. As evidence, they'll cite various "social experiments" in which a fake online dating profile with photos of a very conventionally unattractive woman gets a torrent of messages from men.
In fact, any expression of loneliness or sexual frustration from a woman is interpreted as that woman lamenting a lack of attention from high-value "chads" while ignoring her many "sub-8" suitors.
― JRN, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 17:33 (eight years ago)
Yeah they read to me like either in high school or young adult but trapped in a very small town
― Never changed username before (cardamon), Tuesday, 10 October 2017 17:34 (eight years ago)
many xposts If we can get back to the poor socialization of young men/the alienation of friendless adult men --
I'm glad that I developed interests before the internet became a part of daily life. If I had been playing computer games since age 5 rather than age 12 or whatever, I wonder if I would have ever developed my interests in record collecting, comic books, whatever. Gaming seems to be the most popular activity for a lot of young men, and it seems to be increasingly solitary. Playing games where you kill nameless strangers on the other side of the planet is not at all the same thing as playing Mortal Kombat with your buddies after school. I'm not a parent and I probably never will be, but encouraging young men to have hobbies outside of electronics is probably a step in the right direction. Sports can be terrible but they don't have to be! Read a book! Play magic cards or D&D! Collect something!
I think developing a hobby or hobbies when you're young can help immensely in socializing as an adult. My hobbies have certainly helped me make close friends and socialize with real humans, many of them also adult men. Collecting records is not necessarily a social hobby, but it really can. Learning to engage with people who share your interests is important. It will help you learn to communicate, it will help you learn empathy, it will give you a more nuanced worldview.
Sports and fandom definitely fill this void for some people, but I also (maybe I'm wrong here) think that's a hobby developed early-ish in life for most people? I don't know. SORRY for ramble but I feel like I could have become a crazy incel type guy and I'm glad I didn't.
― ian, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 17:37 (eight years ago)
xp
Specifically, I recall it being a thing circa 12-14 years old for kids to come up with like, diagnoses of why they liked or didn't like some boy or girl in their class; these would be ultra-specific, narrow things. (Obvs the kids would have been looking for a way to express their feelings here, so not necessarily 'buying into' these narrow division points.)
So in my high school anyway if a boy had a very short gelled down haircut, that was 'fit'. Glasses were not fit. If girls wore lip gloss that was fit but regular lipstick was not fit. Dyed blonde hair for girls was fit, curly hair on girls was not fit. And so it went on. I've read that this is pretty standard behaviour for the age group but don't have kids myself so wouldn't know. Anyone?
Eventually the group trundled onward from this point to something a bit more civilised but like, if I either was 12, or had somehow got stuck at the age of 12 socially-mentally, my understanding of what sexual attraction is all about would be ... well pretty much what the incels think it is, reduced to the crudest categories.
― Never changed username before (cardamon), Tuesday, 10 October 2017 17:42 (eight years ago)
ian you're OTM - my good buddy has hibernated playing video games for most of his life, and in conjunction with pot, it has been a big factor in not meeting anyone
― Week of Wonders (Ross), Tuesday, 10 October 2017 17:44 (eight years ago)
Re: the question of why they can't just get with someone 'in their own league'; their interest in supermodels is obviously nuts but otoh, to be fair I can't imagine a relationship based on both being at the bottom of a league table to be much fun for anyone so ...
― Never changed username before (cardamon), Tuesday, 10 October 2017 17:45 (eight years ago)
Playing games where you kill nameless strangers on the other side of the planet is not at all the same thing as playing Mortal Kombat with your buddies after school.
OTM - modern gaming systems almost definitely are a factor here as well as probably smartphones and tablets and social media
― Never changed username before (cardamon), Tuesday, 10 October 2017 17:46 (eight years ago)
I was really into computer games in my early teens, which coincided with my parents moving us a little way outside of town so actually meeting up with friends was trickier. But I always enjoyed getting on irc or other chat things and talking about games, music, whatever a lot more than just playing games. And when I became an adult, I realized I'd talked to some of these people over the course of years and would meet up if I was in their area, or they'd call me for a beer if they were driving through my city.
Obviously I get some sort of social good from posting on ilx or clicking around and responding on twitter but I can't see it in isolation from real life social interaction. It just seems like this broad continuum of social interaction and participating in a community online where it's all young men complaining about how they can't talk to women seems self-defeating. Like, why not join online communities where there are women, and figure out how to keep them diverse instead of driving women out?
then again, we've done a bang-up job of that on ilx :(
― mh, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 17:48 (eight years ago)
MH -- Yes! I was a big ole nerd and on the internet all the time but I also used it for social ends, to find communities where I could talk to likeminded people. I was a teenager when I started posting on ILX, and before that I post on usenet groups about fantasy novels & sonic youth. It's EASY to find people to talk to if you have something in common with them, but focusing your identity on your celibacy is not really the best common interest.
― ian, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 17:51 (eight years ago)
If these people learned to take a sincere, unselfish interest in others they wouldn't be lonely anymore. They would probably end up with romantic affection too after a while. The thing that repulses women
― Treeship, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 17:53 (eight years ago)
... is not their physical bodies or their lack of success but their neediness and suspiciousness and misogyny
― Treeship, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 17:54 (eight years ago)
In 99.9% of cases. Some people might be exceptionally strange looking or disfigured but in that case they are in a unique circumstance and need to seek out a specific support community, not a misogynistic hate group.
― Treeship, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 17:57 (eight years ago)
I do not think the problems represented by these guys and their line of thought will be solved by getting them laid.
― Marcus Hiles Remains Steadfast About Planting Trees.jpg (DJP), Tuesday, 10 October 2017 18:00 (eight years ago)
even the bronies figured out that friendship is magic
― mh, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 18:00 (eight years ago)
DJP otm. Their minds are poisoned with hatred. They need serious therapy to undo everything about their mindset.
― Treeship, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 18:03 (eight years ago)
I've always felt a "there but for the grace of god go I" with these guys because I think I struggled with similar emotional problems and put off dating and sex a lot longer than my peers because of it.
I feel like probably everyone has felt like this at some point; the idea that you're undateable/unfuckable makes your situation more tragic and *special* than it would otherwise be and, crucially, it allows you to stop trying.
Though thankfully even as a teen I turned this against some nebulous notion of "the popular kids" rather than women in general.
― Daniel_Rf, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 18:04 (eight years ago)
Yup with ya there DJP.
Some people also always want to be the underdog to a fucked up extent
― Week of Wonders (Ross), Tuesday, 10 October 2017 18:05 (eight years ago)
You'll often see them insist that they would take literally any woman who would have them, no matter what she looks like, but not one will.
to reiterate my point a little clearer, I think they--consciously or not--are trying to avoid being with anyone. And yes you can tragically pine for something and also work actively to make getting that thing impossible. there's an idea in psychology about "embeddedness"--they are comfortable in the the environment they are in, and fear leaping into a new one. it's a natural fear, but a convincing description of depression is an inability to leave one form of embeddedness for another one.
― ryan, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 18:10 (eight years ago)
there's something to having room in your interests for things others are into
like for every dipshit complaining about "normies" not liking what's cool, there might be a neighbor or coworker you could befriend by paying just passing attention to some mainstream thing and talking about it instead of defining yourself in opposition to really innocuous things
ryan otm again, though -- there's a base insecurity most people have about social interaction, but until you really interact, it's hard to see that you're not different
― mh, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 18:13 (eight years ago)
I mean, love and dating are painful and involve a great deal of heartbreak and rejection. It's not a crazy thing to want to avoid as long as you make the choice authentically.
― Treeship, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 18:14 (eight years ago)
Which these people aren't.
80% of successful social interaction involves recognizing that the other person is just as nervous about talking to you and mitigating it for them.
― Marcus Hiles Remains Steadfast About Planting Trees.jpg (DJP), Tuesday, 10 October 2017 18:15 (eight years ago)
I think what I was trying to get at earlier is that in order to be interested in and care about other people, you have to care about yourself and feel that you're worth caring about.
― mh, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 18:17 (eight years ago)
i read about a psychologist who treats social anxiety and his methods were pretty much "exposure therapy" down the line. forcing his patients to intentionally create awkward situation (like, dramatically spill a cup of coffee in a coffee shop and then ask for a new one, approach a table of women and ask one of them out). the ethics of his approach aside, there's definitely something to the idea that society has evolved in such a way that you can more or less avoid similar experiences--which would normally just happen via typical forms of socialization. do they even have middle school dances anymore? is it expected for the boys to ask the girls to them? etc.
so i think what we're seeing is a regrettable project in wholly new forms of socialization (the internet, gaming) for a subset of particularly socially anxious young men (like i was).
― ryan, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 18:19 (eight years ago)
I don't know if that's always true. I've had some severe bouts with depression where I didn't care much about myself or what happened to me but I still managed to be considerate of/interested in others.
― Treeship, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 18:20 (eight years ago)
Xp mh
― Treeship, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 18:21 (eight years ago)
― Treeship, Tuesday, October 10, 2017 12:53 PM (thirteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― Treeship, Tuesday, October 10, 2017 12:54 PM (twelve minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
I think there's some truth to this, but I also think statements like this have a bit of the just-world bias about them. These guys are so repellent that it's very tempting to dismiss them as simply too hateful to take the obvious steps to remedy their situation. But I think that a big part of what hooks these guys is the fact that the worldview is based, in part, on observations about real and intractable unfairness.
Surely there are people who take a sincere, unselfish interest in others who are still lonely; and people who are needy, suspicious, and misogynistic but still attractive to women; and the explanations for these things will have a lot to do with social advantages and disadvantages that are distributed arbitrarily. These guys lash out about that in the most unproductive way imaginable, but if the reply is basically "your problems would go away if you weren't such an asshole", that just digs them in further--because they know it isn't true.
I'm probably strawmanning you a bit to make this point, but a lot of responses to incels--there's a whole other subreddit devoted to making fun of them--are of basically that kind.
― JRN, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 18:24 (eight years ago)
Also, while I'm posting about this, I'd be remiss not to note that incel communities tend to be insanely racist.
― JRN, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 18:25 (eight years ago)
not being an asshole may or may not help them with women (romance is tragic and fickle and does not work out for everyone) but it will definitely make them happier with their lot in life. you don't care about others to get something in return, it's literally the only thing that makes your own life bearable.
It also needs to be said that there's a kind of willfulness to a tragic self-conception, where you see yourself in such romantically pathetic terms. it's like an updated "sorrows of young werther," the grandiose emotional pain of adolescence turned into a world-view. i think this tendency will always be with us! it's the online organizing and persistence into adulthood that is most upsetting here. without ideological support this attitude would vanish as just a matter of life going on, finally meeting a girl, etc., but these belief systems make it rigid and more resistant to actual experiences that contradict it.
― ryan, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 18:32 (eight years ago)
All their problems wouldn't go away if they became less self-absorbed and bitter but many would, and they would be in a better state of mind to deal with the problems that remained. Like, as long as you don't care about others you will be lonely. By definition--even if others love you.
These people seem to be missing like basic moral insights.
― Treeship, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 18:33 (eight years ago)
Or ryan otm
maybe someday reddit will produce its very own buddha who discovers that the suffering of not getting laid can be solved with....compassion!
― ryan, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 18:36 (eight years ago)
It being reddit, that buddha will go by the handle "urea_fritters"
― Marcus Hiles Remains Steadfast About Planting Trees.jpg (DJP), Tuesday, 10 October 2017 19:15 (eight years ago)
Lol
― pulled pork state of mind (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 10 October 2017 19:42 (eight years ago)
damn it
― mh, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 20:13 (eight years ago)
I also speculate some of these people aren't necessarily Americans- I know that there is a fairly sizable contingent in India of younger professional people clued into Reddit
― global tetrahedron, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 22:04 (eight years ago)
Maybe I'm just hoping that so I don't have to share a society with these folks
― global tetrahedron, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 22:05 (eight years ago)
Somewhere around a fifth of my coworkers are younger professional people from India but none of them are shitheads!
― mh, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 23:08 (eight years ago)
And also we've not knowingly met any of these people in real life - wonder if some of them would, face to face, be people with just a nice, quiet demeanour as contrasted with their online manner
― Never changed username before (cardamon), Tuesday, 10 October 2017 23:19 (eight years ago)
That's a good point. They could be venting and indulging an inner demon.
However, a person who thought the way these people claim they think would be a miserable person.
― Treeship, Tuesday, 10 October 2017 23:25 (eight years ago)