rly struggling tho
― Mr. Eulon Mask, urging the UN to ban the "homicide robot" (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 29 September 2017 10:04 (eight years ago)
the trailers are very :| but my favorite critic proclaims it's better than the OG. my brain went offline
― rip van wanko, Friday, 29 September 2017 11:00 (eight years ago)
164 minutes
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Friday, 29 September 2017 11:18 (eight years ago)
Good lord.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 29 September 2017 13:58 (eight years ago)
First reviews (Guardian, Variety) are full of praise.
― Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 29 September 2017 14:02 (eight years ago)
full of something
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 29 September 2017 14:07 (eight years ago)
sorry i don't know why i said that. i hope this movie is good.
Bradshaw also gave 5 stars to Dunkirk #never forget. But I've got to admit this sounds pretty good.
― calzino, Friday, 29 September 2017 14:14 (eight years ago)
i’m listening to the new hannah peel record and it should be a soundtrack for a blade runner sequel
― ToddBonzalez (BradNelson), Friday, 29 September 2017 14:16 (eight years ago)
rip van wanko which critic was that
― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Friday, 29 September 2017 14:25 (eight years ago)
Edelstein: "I thought it was okay."
― El Tomboto, Friday, 29 September 2017 14:26 (eight years ago)
god I hate rotten tomatoes so much
― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Friday, 29 September 2017 14:52 (eight years ago)
Soundtrack release announced, 2CD edition limited to 2049 copies (lol), no one seems to know a thing about the track list yet (all zimmer? Any johannsen bits? Wallfisch bits? Etc)
I’m more stoked about the score than before; if we get a fully-engaged zimmer it could be v suitable stuff. But... he didn’t have long to write this. The last standout thing he did, he had something crazy like a year and a half.
― harbinger of failure (Jon not Jon), Friday, 29 September 2017 15:24 (eight years ago)
I'm deeply skeptical of all the rampant praise. I'm not saying it can't be even just a good film, but this is all very curious.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 29 September 2017 15:38 (eight years ago)
To me it just says everyone thought it’d suck and it doesn’t suck. I’ll take a new blade runner movie that doesn’t suck. But more than that yeah we shall see.
― harbinger of failure (Jon not Jon), Friday, 29 September 2017 15:40 (eight years ago)
this movie still has jared leto in it right
― Mr. Eulon Mask, urging the UN to ban the "homicide robot" (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 29 September 2017 15:41 (eight years ago)
Thus in large part my skepticism.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 29 September 2017 15:42 (eight years ago)
this is the correct stance
― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Friday, 29 September 2017 15:42 (eight years ago)
Critically important typo in the prerelease PR, it’s actually Jared from Subway. To say more would be spoilers.
― harbinger of failure (Jon not Jon), Friday, 29 September 2017 15:43 (eight years ago)
keep that sick fuck away from replicant children
― mh, Friday, 29 September 2017 16:00 (eight years ago)
http://variety.com/2017/film/reviews/blade-runner-2049-review-1202576220/
Wow, not holding back in his praise: Make no mistake: Whereas the original “Blade Runner” was (eventually) embraced for its unrealized potential, its sequel ranks as one of the great science-fiction films of all time.
― Dan Worsley, Friday, 29 September 2017 16:04 (eight years ago)
in both tone and style, the new film owes more to slow-cinema maestro Andrei Tarkovsky than it does to Scott’s revolutionary cyberpunk sensibility
waht
― Mr. Eulon Mask, urging the UN to ban the "homicide robot" (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 29 September 2017 16:08 (eight years ago)
so is everyone smoking up before reviewing this or what
― mh, Friday, 29 September 2017 16:13 (eight years ago)
Trendacosta's review at io9 seems a little more sane than the rest (I fear to imagine what I would have read if it had gone to Lussier):
https://io9.gizmodo.com/blade-runner-2049-is-gorgeous-long-brilliant-pretent-1818967999
Two representative bits:
The plot is straight-up a Blade Runner fanfic. That’s not a criticism; I love fanfic. But the savvy fan is going to pick up on plot cues faster than the average person. And while the first movie’s actual plot is easy to describe, the sequel’s so sprawling, so world-changing, that it defies a two-sentence description. I am not going to spoil the plot, but down to sly references and cameos, the whole movie feels like a fan getting to play in their favorite sandbox. ...There’s no way to excise to the not-great parts of this movie from the great parts. Blade Runner 2049 is a gestalt, and while some will be enchanted by it, others will not. There are a number of reveals and twists that worked and fed into the themes of consciousness, identity, and connection that the first film explored. And there’s at least one major moment that felt a bit like a cop out. Everyone is going to react differently to this movie—everyone’s going to have some things they love, and some things they can’t stand. I’m still not sure if it was worth all of the time it demanded, but the fact that I can’t stop turning it over in my head is a point in its favor.
...
There’s no way to excise to the not-great parts of this movie from the great parts. Blade Runner 2049 is a gestalt, and while some will be enchanted by it, others will not. There are a number of reveals and twists that worked and fed into the themes of consciousness, identity, and connection that the first film explored. And there’s at least one major moment that felt a bit like a cop out. Everyone is going to react differently to this movie—everyone’s going to have some things they love, and some things they can’t stand. I’m still not sure if it was worth all of the time it demanded, but the fact that I can’t stop turning it over in my head is a point in its favor.
Which, fine, I'll go with flawed though watchable as opposed to "OMG NEXT LEVEL GENIUS." She also credits the actresses with the best roles/performances.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 29 September 2017 16:37 (eight years ago)
I somehow missed the second "short story" clip by Luke Scott, possibly because I was turned off by Jared Leto in the first. It's good? Dave Bautista is a real gem in recent movies, a hulk of a man who has this emotional vulnerability. Looking forward to seeing him in 2049, at least.
― mh, Friday, 29 September 2017 16:42 (eight years ago)
The plot is straight-up a Blade Runner fanfic. That’s not a criticism; I love fanfic.
yeah this is definitely going to suck
― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Friday, 29 September 2017 16:49 (eight years ago)
so it's robot porn?
― StanM, Saturday, 30 September 2017 06:32 (eight years ago)
things ridley scott never had (except possibly briefly and entirely inadvertently)
1: a "revolutionary cyberpunk sensibility"
― mark s, Saturday, 30 September 2017 11:24 (eight years ago)
exhibit A:
https://vignette4.wikia.nocookie.net/alienanthology/images/a/ab/Engineer.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20120630195433
― mark s, Saturday, 30 September 2017 11:25 (eight years ago)
we can but hope
― Mr. Eulon Mask, urging the UN to ban the "homicide robot" (bizarro gazzara), Saturday, 30 September 2017 11:25 (eight years ago)
Never have I been so suspicious of so many positive reviews.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 30 September 2017 19:43 (eight years ago)
idk maybe this is actually pretty decent you guys, yeesh
― circa1916, Saturday, 30 September 2017 23:07 (eight years ago)
y'all almost as bad as nerds who pile on critics who give a bad review to the nerd movie they haven't even seen yet
― circa1916, Saturday, 30 September 2017 23:08 (eight years ago)
og Blade Runner is a brilliant and visionary aesthetic achievement that also happens to be a zzzzzzz movie imo so maybe i don't hold the same protective reverence
― circa1916, Saturday, 30 September 2017 23:14 (eight years ago)
― circa1916, Saturday, September 30, 2017 4:08 PM (seventeen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
yes one of these things is definitely almost as bad as the other
― ToddBonzalez (BradNelson), Saturday, 30 September 2017 23:27 (eight years ago)
it's too bad they didn't make an all-female blade runner
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Saturday, 30 September 2017 23:45 (eight years ago)
y'all almost as bad as nerds who pile on critics who give a bad review to the nerd movie they haven't even seen yet― circa1916, Saturday, September 30, 2017 4:08 PM (seventeen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalinkyes one of these things is definitely almost as bad as the other
Well I CONTEND... that it almost is?
― circa1916, Saturday, 30 September 2017 23:58 (eight years ago)
those nerds routinely send death and rape threats so uh maybe not
― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Sunday, 1 October 2017 00:01 (eight years ago)
yeah, we're used to disappointment and we only blame ourselves
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Sunday, 1 October 2017 00:36 (eight years ago)
Well who really knows what kinda shit Ned’s been e-mailing these ppl.
xp
― circa1916, Sunday, 1 October 2017 01:05 (eight years ago)
jk Ned <3
Tsk.
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 1 October 2017 01:11 (eight years ago)
The Strange Case of Dr Raggett and Mr Ned
― El Tomboto, Sunday, 1 October 2017 03:02 (eight years ago)
https://media.giphy.com/media/yR84fJ0VVBHeE/giphy.gif
― mark s, Sunday, 1 October 2017 18:31 (eight years ago)
Of course.
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 1 October 2017 18:36 (eight years ago)
http://lwlies.com/reviews/blade-runner-2049/
well we have one dissenting voice at least
― Number None, Tuesday, 3 October 2017 12:40 (eight years ago)
that's weirdly reassuring
― Mr. Eulon Mask, urging the UN to ban the "homicide robot" (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 3 October 2017 15:25 (eight years ago)
up to 4 dissents on RT, including the AP
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory/review-gorgeous-2049-breaks-blade-runner-spell-50176968
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 3 October 2017 15:41 (eight years ago)
Do RT scores tend to peak early and decrease over time? I heard something like that for one movie recently, where the explanation was that critics who are interested enough (or invited) to attend advance screenings are also more likely to give positive reviews.
― jmm, Tuesday, 3 October 2017 15:49 (eight years ago)
yes that almost always happens
― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Tuesday, 3 October 2017 15:55 (eight years ago)