Ta-Nehisi Coates Rules, The Thread

OK I take it back the Block Poster feature fucking rules

Can it delete the memory of Fred going on about warm beautiful bodies from my brain tho?

It might help if you take those words away from me and give them to Coates, who I was paraphrasing:

"But you cannot arrange your life around them and the small chance of the Dreamers coming into consciousness. Our moment is too brief. Our bodies are too precious. And you are here now, and you must live - and there is so much to live for, not just in someone else's country, but in your own home. The warmth of dark energies that drew me to The Mecca, that drew out Prince Jones, the warmth of our particular world, is beautiful, no matter how brief and breakable."

It's kinda hard to avoid talking about beautiful black bodies when talking about Coates and Baldwin, though, as it's essential to their argument. This is from the final paragraph of The Fire Next Time:

“When I was very young, and was dealing with my buddies in those wine- and urine-stained hallways, something in me wondered, What will happen to all that beauty? For black people, though I am aware that some of us, black and white, do not know it yet, are very beautiful.”

It is not that hard.

Both Baldwin and Coates insists on specifying racism and the power of whiteness, relating it to corporality instead of keeping it as an abstraction. But yeah, I can keep it in the quotes.

yes you sure can

http://i.imgur.com/zOi9gJH.jpg

"Excuse me, but 'black bodies'? Isn't this just a buzzword that dumb white people use to sound woke?"

im confused about why everyone hates fred so much?? i mean i busted his balls once about the springsteen thing but itt at any rate it seems like he's being pretty reasonable

if you want to look towards an anti racist class movement what you're essentially talking about is the *leadership* of black people within that movement, but most white marxists dont seem ready to give up their concerns to follow the predominant black intellectual tradition. And while I do think there's a lot of truth to the notion of 'neoliberals' using identity politics to their own advantage, i have trouble envisioning a scenario where the most popular & established black intellectuals don't end up maligned as 'neoliberals' or 'liberals' for not following the lead of *white* marxists who've decided they're the ones who have set the priorities in this conversation

I'm actually going to use this Block Poster feature on Zing for the first time ever.

― El Tomboto, Wednesday, September 20, 2017 6:50 AM (eight hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

It doesn't work as well as I hoped.

― El Tomboto, Wednesday, September 20, 2017 6:50 AM (eight hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

FP'ing deej for encouraging freb

― El Tomboto, Wednesday, September 20, 2017 6:52 AM (seven hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

like, what above these posts was so objectionable?

dude, i have trouble envisioning a scenario where the most popular and established intellectuals don't end up maligned as libs, because you end up established by writing for establishment publications. Also, who defines the 'predominant black intellectual tradition', and in any event how is it opposed to Marxist analysis?

1. yes, success means anyone who attains some level of platform will end up being maligned that way. that doesn't mean that the dynamic i'm describing doesn't exist

2. 'who defines the predominant black intellectual tradition' -- how does anyone define any group of intellectuals/activists/writers? of course its always going to be contentious, but there are lots of popular black writers with many differing worldviews. the only one who seems to get cited by white marxists is RL Stephens at least in these conversations so maybe that says something.

3. it's not opposed to marxist analysis *per se* although some of it very much is.

By and large I'm not interested in defining or delimiting the limits of the 'black intellectual tradition' myself but denying it or suggesting it has some kind of leadership in the marxist world we're describing feels like a pretty obviously phony argument

*leadership role

there's a pretty rich vein of black and POC Marxism both currently and historically from Fanon to the Panthers and many more. POC leftists spend a ton of their twitter energy complaining of liberal erasure.

(and rightfully so, that sounded dismissive on its own)

yes most definitely. i see less quoting of fanon in these conversations than RL though

Also I don't know that its fair to call Fanon a committed marxist exactly, he built on / adjusted those ideas

RL was on a DSA national slate and is v well connected in twitter+left media circles which leads him to be v well represented but there are tons more kicking around.

my point is that there are black leaders of black constituencies whom white leaders are not apt to let into leadership situations, including amongst marxist communities, would you deny that this is true

honestly it's not even clear to me that contemporary Marxism has agreed upon 'leaders' per se so I don't really know how to begin to broach that question

it's certainly no secret that american left orgs have diversity issues generally

for a minor example, check out this thread.

was this an intentional self-own of yourself 7 days ago?

I love both TNC and CTH, but the part where R.L. Stephens talk about how "black bodies" has become a pseudo-intellectual buzzword was OTM

― Whiney G. Weingarten, Wednesday, September 13, 2017 11:38 AM (one week ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

http://i.imgur.com/zOi9gJH.jpg

"Excuse me, but 'black bodies'? Isn't this just a buzzword that dumb white people use to sound woke?"

― Whiney G. Weingarten, Wednesday, September 20, 2017 10:51 AM (seven hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Those posts make the same point, just the latter is intended as a zing on Fredrick B

It's almost as if people are referencing the same book? Next up, have you noticed how people keep saying 'single payer', what's that all about?

(I'm not entirely sure we have the same interpretation of that character from the Simpsons, though)

xp but... nevermind

'body' or 'bodies' is used 10 times in the first 5 pages of Between the World and Me.

Yes, what could possibly be the difference between TNC saying it and Fredrick B saying it

Ilx's response to fred is derision while its response to Coates is more

Ta-nehisi Coates: *breathes blackly*
white liberal public intellectual: "here is my rebuttal to Coates' eloquent yet misguided breathing"

— 🏅Yung Aegon🇳🇬 (@israelizreal) September 20, 2017

Everyone on ilx criticizes everything. That's what this website is for. It was created by and for critics.

Criticism is engagement and the opposite of dismissal.

You yourself are a professional critic.

In this case I think Fred made some good points, using poorly chosen words, about how Coates's writing tries to describe how lived experience -- the experience of racism and betrayal -- makes it hard to trust any kind of political metanarrative, especially hopeful ones. And maybe the breathless analysis of Trump's voters is rooted in a kind of hope Coates doesn't buy into because it implicitly suggests that there is a way to change these reactionary white voters and history doesn't bear that out. I think that's a powerful argument, if bleak. I don't think anyone was even really dismissing this, the crux of Coates's piece, they were grappling with it. It was a provocative article and it provoked people.

If you aren't black, best you can do is take his word on black experience. Even those South Park fucks figured that one out. Aren't you all smarter than those South Park guys?

Say you're a white nerd from the upper middle class, how would you expect, say, a braindead working class sentient garbage pile to understand you? There's a puzzler for you.

omg Block Poster so good

The truth hurts, baby

I love it, I always wanted to be one of those THE_TRUTH poster dudes

we need to lower the FP threshold on the count of less people posting to ilx so we can ban tweedledee & tweedledum more often

All you'll have left are a bunch of creepy sociopaths, then

Oh yeah, I was specifically calling out flopson here on that one

Just realised there's no flag post on flagging ironically

Join us flopson join us

It's absolutely fascinating the ways Treeship still doesn't get it, but I guess it would be a waste of time to explain it again.

The crux of the argument is that black lives are worth too much to wager on hope in white progress. In all honesty, the bleakness of that is inversely proportionate to the value you ascribe black lives. So it really doesn't have to be bleak at all.

i think you should probably accept that not everyone is going to see eye to eye on every issue

That is of course true, and where both Baldwin and Coates ends up.

Shorter Coates: not everyone sees eye to eye.

...so don't waste your time on convincing white people.

Which I guess since I'm a Danish writer, meaning basically all my readership is white, is a fairly bleak conclusion for me :(

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/07/17/article-0-1FB9A59400000578-548_634x501.jpg