Hillary Clinton: Classic or Dud?

Lol

Verrit it to my wordpress account

shoot it directly into my veins

Instant death

please

https://verrit.com/hillary-democrats-are-the-heart-and-conscience-of-america/

https://verrit.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/verrit-0443120.jpg

Oh sorry, the image version doesn't show the title (which shows if you click the link above, and is in the URL).

Jesus.

Is Hillary basically behind Verrit?

"Behind" as in responsible for or "behind" as in endorsed it? The latter yes, former I doubt. Daou seems like a bit of a hanger-on who is tolerated but outside the favored circle. I was actually surprised she even endorsed it. She probably thought of it as being like one of those meaningless book-jacket blurbs and didn't realize how many ripples her little pebble throw would have.

Yeah that's what I thought. It's a weird site though.
Hard for me to understand the purpse of it.

It kind of just reads like a really shitty version of the Harpers Index

Verrit sounds like a combination of ferret and varmint

that's bc they ferret out all the little fact-varmints that you need to uh

http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/292/603/337.jpg

another thing that I think people would find a lot more disgusting if it were anyone other than Bill Clinton.

The question I had to answer at the time, as a full-grown adult, was not whether it was disgusting, which it was in most respects given the extreme inequality in their ages and positions, but whether it was impeachable. My answer then and now is that, because it had no bearing upon or relevance to his conduct of the office of president, and did not touch on a single one of his official duties, that it was not impeachable, but it was censurable. iow, Congress could more justly have expressed its disgust and displeasure though a resolution making it plain that it was conduct unbecoming his office. Impeachment was a pure power grab, using disgust as a pretext.

Most other US adults at the time (about 70% iirc), apparently shared the bulk of my sentiments.

It was sexual harassment, pretty much, and every boss should be fired for that kind of behaviour. But a publicly elected leader is tougher to fire, and things have fortunately changed since the nineties.

Aimless, if it has nothing to do with his duties then why do we care that Trump said "grab her by the pussy"?

wtf

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DJNNxseXUAEidqK.jpg

at this point i sort of enjoy seeing her to continue fleecing her sycophantic following for all they are worth

Hillary Rodham Clinton is coming to London Literature Festival

sick bern on Colbert

“Look, Secretary Clinton ran against the most unpopular candidate in the history of this country and she lost and she was upset about it and I understand that,” the senator said. “But our job is really not to go backwards. It is to go forwards.”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-stephen-colbert_us_59b23843e4b0dfaafcf6dc94

that letter's a pretty good example of how out of touch she is. everyone lives in NYC and has a couple hundred to blow, so go watch this broadway show. i'm already a gazillionaire, but i should definitely charge 90 bucks for people to come to my book tour

Aimless, if it has nothing to do with his duties then why do we care that Trump said "grab her by the pussy"?

Because it was revealed during an election, when voters could evaluate its meaning for themselves and decide whether they had better choices upon whom to bestow their vote. Clinton was in office and removing him from office has much different practical effects on the nation.

Also, you seem to imply that I was saying no one cared about Clinton's misdeeds. People did care. People still care. His reputation is badly damaged and his sexual conduct will never be forgotten or excused. He was probably a factor in Hillary's loss, simply by their still being married, so that he would have been back in the White House had she won. As I said, it was worthy of official censure and it probably would have been unanimous. But impeachment was what the Republicans wanted and not what most of the nation thought was best for the country.

and things have fortunately changed since the nineties.

i am not making this assumption

Clinton wrote that while she was impressed with the massive anti-Trump demonstrations in the days after his January inauguration, "I couldn't help but ask where those feelings of solidarity, outrage and passion had been during the election."

oh my god i have to read this book

better you than me

fortunately clintonism is apparently just as self-destructive as trumpism

https://i.imgur.com/UKrzWOB.png

https://i.imgur.com/SU6CeFX.png

Re the "pony" thing, Hillary is that kid who ran for student council against the kid who was promising to get vending machines in the cafeteria, and her campaign was "Student council can't get vending machines in the cafeteria, he's just saying that to get votes!" And then the other kid wins and convinces the school administration to add vending machines in the cafeteria.

Classic for plugging Elena Ferrante, though I have my doubts about the Snyder (which I've only read excerpts of.)

I feel like the inevitable biography of Hillary is going to have to carry the theme of her incredibly poor judgement regarding other people's reactions. It's actually really, really sad, well maybe that's obvious, but that she was given so many opportunities, and took so many of those opportunities, and tried pretty fucking hard for the better part of half a century (Yale law '73), and came up snake eyes in so many ways. She trusted so many of the wrong people, and time and time again she committed unforced errors, and there's got to be at least a dozen occasions where she was supposed to be over, out, done with, toast, into the cornfield.

She strikes me as superlatively book-smart, frighteningly tenacious, and genuinely committed on womens' and childrens' issues. And she's also extraordinarily loyal, but mostly to people who suck.

that's a great point they made on the most recent chapo - she's very much like Trump in being loyal to & trusting of anyone that fawns over her but is otherwise incompetent (cf. daou, mook, dws)

and i agree it is very sad. this-

I feel like the inevitable biography of Hillary is going to have to carry the theme of her incredibly poor judgement regarding other people's reactions. It's actually really, really sad, well maybe that's obvious, but that she was given so many opportunities, and took so many of those opportunities, and tried pretty fucking hard for the better part of half a century (Yale law '73), and came up snake eyes in so many ways.

is so otm

She's probably one of the toughest people ever. Who else could hold her head high through the Lewinsky thing and then *want* to turn around and run for a Senate seat in a super high profile state? Then she endured a decade and a half in the public eye, where she was subject to an almost unprecedented degree of scorn and invective, lost a nasty presidential primary in which she burned a lot of goodwill among Democrats, and was investigated by the FBI. Then she ran for President again! Knowing how miserable it was, how she would spend the bulk of her 70s as an even more visible, even more hated target!

Like, who else would make these choices?

I'm not sure it's even admirable but it's awe inspiring.

Mastering that level of DGAF-what-people-say comes with side effects.

"If the dossier is to be believed, the Russian effort may well have started as an anti-Clinton operation, and only became combined with the separate effort to cultivate the Trump team when it appeared Trump might win the nomination."

https://www.justsecurity.org/44697/steele-dossier-knowing/

I feel like Hillary Clinton should read the keen insight into false equivalency found in the new book What Happened by Hillary Clinton pic.twitter.com/KKYEqith8r

— Jon Schwarz (@tinyrevolution) September 13, 2017

someone needs to convince this lady she could be america's cato

recommended twitter muting keywords for the next few weeks
"HRC" "Clinton" "Hillary" "Hillary's"

I read Sarah Jones' review but that's about all I can stand probably

I've already been in so many terrible arguments about this book, way worse than anything during or in the immediate aftermath of the election. The whole thing is a trap. The book and accompanying media blitz are bait. Avoid at all costs. Tie yourself to the mast and resist its siren song.

A guy told me I was trying to silence women's voices today. When I pointed out that, given that she is in literally every media outlet at the same time right now, and that she makes more for a one hour speech than my household makes in a year, the chances of me "silencing" her are slim, he responded "only because people like me are defending her."

the most silenced woman ever

she probably has a Southern accent. Who knows?

forced back into the kitchen by tweets

You can be unsuccessful at something you're trying to do, btw. Anyway, this was good: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/is-hillary-clinton-right-about-why-she-lost/

"only because people like me are defending her."

This is extraordinarily punchable imo