tbf the show skimmed some of the more disturbing moral implications of the show (by making leland (and now sarah)) less responsible for their actions)
― na (NA), Thursday, 7 September 2017 15:46 (eight years ago)
xp?
is there a second piece, because the one I read implicitly acknowledges the rape
― mh, Thursday, 7 September 2017 15:48 (eight years ago)
Love that waggish take on the finale
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 7 September 2017 15:50 (eight years ago)
I wouldn't read too much into the North Bend thing - when they had that scene with Mike and the creep, there was an establishing shot of his office that was the main street in North Bend.
― JoeStork, Thursday, 7 September 2017 15:50 (eight years ago)
Yeah I think it's enough to note that the RR diner looked different.
Also Ike the Spike's motel was obviously in LA, so it's not like there weren't simple continuity errors.
― cosmic brain dildo (Sparkle Motion), Thursday, 7 September 2017 15:53 (eight years ago)
On the other hand one defining characteristic of this show is that everything is up for grabs...
― cosmic brain dildo (Sparkle Motion), Thursday, 7 September 2017 15:54 (eight years ago)
remember that weird flash of the diner at the end of one of the early episodes, where it had a completely different set of people?
― mh, Thursday, 7 September 2017 16:00 (eight years ago)
I keep seeing this strange idea about that part 17 offers the "happy", "closed" version of the season ending whereas part 18 undoes all that/starts a new story with a bleaker open ending. But the two episodes basically have the same ending! Bad vibes at the palmer house, Laura screams, Cooper is lost and confused, the world spins.
― streeps of range (wins), Thursday, 7 September 2017 16:02 (eight years ago)
Diane and Cooper now reenact this summoning ritual in order to draw Judy into the Cage. They both know this is the plan; while they both care for and love each other, this act of sex is anything but an act of love. Both are joyless. Cooper is dispassionate throughout, but remains focused on Diane with an expression of restrained concern. Diane tries to be affectionate but collapses into terror and tears, covering Cooper’s face and staring up at the ceiling.
This is where I got off. I suppose that could be read as an implicit acknowledgment, if that's the part you mean. But it's too schematic for me, and tone deaf to what the actors are portraying.
Lynch is a fucking brilliant director of actors. The further an interpretation of his work gets from talking about what's hidden, diverted, revealed in their performances, the more it falls flat for me. That said there were some concepts I liked, like Laura being a kind of capacitator. But trying to tie it all together just on a plot or thematic level like that is more appropriate for a Christopher Nolan movie, where the performances basically don't matter.
― sciatica, Thursday, 7 September 2017 16:03 (eight years ago)
this is the very next line...
None of this is unexpected to them. This was the plan all along. The suffering that Diane (and to a lesser extent Cooper) endures is a product of her having sex with the man who raped her. She knows it is going to be a traumatic experience: she sees her double outside of the motel because she is already dissociating at the prospect of having to sleep with Cooper, even though he’s not that Cooper. Cooper tells her to turn out the light in the hopes of sparing her some of the trauma, but it’s an empty gesture. He is guilt-ridden with the sins of his doppelganger.
― dan selzer, Thursday, 7 September 2017 16:06 (eight years ago)
lol ok thanks, my bad
― sciatica, Thursday, 7 September 2017 16:07 (eight years ago)
That's such an incredible piece and that part is particularly affecting. I don't understand your objection, Sciatica.
― Cake hawn. (jed_), Thursday, 7 September 2017 16:08 (eight years ago)
oops
My general objection to the piece still applies but I don't feel like picking it apart.
― sciatica, Thursday, 7 September 2017 16:09 (eight years ago)
after rewatching the last two episodes, 18 felt like the epilogue and something that would've read really well as part of a book.
― Western® with Bacon Flavor, Thursday, 7 September 2017 16:13 (eight years ago)
Yeah it's totally an epilogue to me - it basically starts at the "curtain call"!
― streeps of range (wins), Thursday, 7 September 2017 16:17 (eight years ago)
Despite all of the obvious caveats and my belief that nothing substantive is really going to be further resolved or explained, I can't help but be intensely curious about Frost's next book.
― Higgs Bosom (Old Lunch), Thursday, 7 September 2017 16:21 (eight years ago)
Simon, if you're still bouncing around itt, I've finally started listening to your podcast this week. You and your fellow contributors are great and are giving me a lot of new angles to chew over.
thanks!! we're taking a week off to mull over it all before we record the finale/wrap-up with our guest. if we can secure (redacted) and/or (redacted) to come on we might do another post-series retrospective thing.
― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Thursday, 7 September 2017 16:25 (eight years ago)
xp It'll be as illuminating of the return's many mysteries as its predecessor was
(Also, I believe the intent is for it to cover the missing 25 years)
― streeps of range (wins), Thursday, 7 September 2017 16:27 (eight years ago)
I'm curious about the Frost books because I'm feeling the withdrawal pains but I don't know... I tried one of his novels and it was kinda bad. And the comments on the Secret History upthread (and Lynch's distancing himself from it) make it sound like it won't really be what I want from Twin Peaks.
That said I can get into esoteric history stuff so I'm curious if anyone would recommend it just on that level.
― sciatica, Thursday, 7 September 2017 16:31 (eight years ago)
I'm curious about it specifically because it's coming after the Return, and theoretically might explain...something?
tbh getting a bit weary from explanations (couldn't make it thru the piece above). Need probably a good 2 weeks to a month, and then just rewatch the thing and see what I think.
― Dominique, Thursday, 7 September 2017 16:35 (eight years ago)
My hunch is that The Final Dossier will be something like Cole's recollection of the 'unofficial version' that Jeffries alluded to.
― Higgs Bosom (Old Lunch), Thursday, 7 September 2017 16:36 (eight years ago)
Simon you indicated way up thread you had some production dirt that you'd hold onto until the finale aired; what was it?
― akm, Thursday, 7 September 2017 16:48 (eight years ago)
I have a feeling Leland/BOB was drugging Sarah all those years not to keep her in the dark about what was going on in the house but to keep Judy, the more powerful being, at bay, so that he could follow his own urges. Once he died Judy totally consumed her. Judy might have been both a "mother" and partner to BOB, which would add another disturbing layer of incest to things.
― Chris L, Thursday, 7 September 2017 16:49 (eight years ago)
I watched fwwm just before the finale and it's pretty clear that Sarah knew something was going on. If not the depth of it, she knew and she didn't stop it.
― dan selzer, Thursday, 7 September 2017 16:51 (eight years ago)
lmao he's never gonna reveal this, well played Simon
― streeps of range (wins), Thursday, 7 September 2017 16:52 (eight years ago)
YOU"RE NOT GOING TO TELL ME WHAT SHE FUCKING SAID?
― akm, Thursday, 7 September 2017 16:53 (eight years ago)
Haha I saw a tweetpic that juxtaposed Audrey shouting "you're not gonna tell me what she said?!" with Laura whispering in dale's ear
― streeps of range (wins), Thursday, 7 September 2017 16:54 (eight years ago)
I was gonna until wins gave me the idea not to just now xps
― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Thursday, 7 September 2017 16:55 (eight years ago)
Simon has put that dirt in his pocket
― sciatica, Thursday, 7 September 2017 16:59 (eight years ago)
lol
― streeps of range (wins), Thursday, 7 September 2017 17:08 (eight years ago)
simon will you make the final podcast a long, detail-oriented discussion of mountaintop ecosystems?
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 7 September 2017 17:19 (eight years ago)
Or replicate Jay Leno's post-Cheers finale show and just get a bunch of TP cast members hammered on-mic?
― Higgs Bosom (Old Lunch), Thursday, 7 September 2017 17:30 (eight years ago)
I went back to the waggish piece to try to give it a better read. I'm just not into longform pieces like that, there are too many unsupported interpretive leaps you have to just sit with while following along. Like when the author says
Cooper tells her to turn out the light in the hopes of sparing her some of the trauma, but it’s an empty gesture. He is guilt-ridden with the sins of his doppelganger.
Sure, that's a possible interpretation of that action. But it's not how I read MacLachlan's performance, which (as posters have pointed out above) is graded into Mr. C in an ambiguous way. And I find the implications of that a lot more interesting and conflicted and truer to how Dern plays in response. But then it just keeps going from there. Like the line I quoted above about Carrie Page being a less traumatized version of Laura, except for the dead body in the room. Slow down there buddy, maybe we should unpack that a little?
I like the message board format better for trying to work all this out, where we can argue with each other in real time.
That said, I think this is really good:
Why would the Fireman, portrayed as a positive figure, create (or at least target) such a martyr figure? Without knowing the exact mechanics, I suggest that Laura Palmer was meant to function as a capacitor: storing a huge accumulated charge of suffering which could then be discharged at the precise moment. Laura’s immense suffering does not make her superhuman, but it makes her uniquely capable of serving a purpose in the Trap. In the right setting, this discharge could overload the circuits of a Lodge entity and destroy it altogether. To use another apt analogy, it would be like an atomic bomb reaching critical mass. But with fissionable material as substantial as Judy, you would not want to detonate it in our universe, or else it would take most of our world with it.
It pushes against that blurring of roles through circumstance (Carrie sharing some with Shelly eg) and gets you thinking about why the distinctions that remain might be important.
― sciatica, Thursday, 7 September 2017 18:15 (eight years ago)
So that aerial shot of the avenida 9 de Julio, was that stock footage or (what I prefer to believe) did they go to Buenos Aires to shoot a single establishing shot for that one scene of a black box in a plain room turning into a whatever
― streeps of range (wins), Thursday, 7 September 2017 18:17 (eight years ago)
I disagree with about 1/3 of that piece but it's food for thought
― mh, Thursday, 7 September 2017 18:19 (eight years ago)
That piece looks tldr but sciatica's post gets at my problem with a lot of readings, inc Adam's above which is a strong interpretation in many ways, which is that they seem to wilfully ignore the actual emotional texture of what we're shown
― streeps of range (wins), Thursday, 7 September 2017 18:23 (eight years ago)
I don't think we'd get a sex scene where Dale Cooper seems like himself because Dale Cooper does not fuck
― mh, Thursday, 7 September 2017 18:26 (eight years ago)
wilfully ignore the actual emotional texture of what we're shown
yeah I hate this mode of interpretation tbh. I generally work backward from what we're shown on-screen, and a big part of that is how the actors are handling a scene
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 7 September 2017 18:26 (eight years ago)
like, what is emotionally going on between everyone involved, how is it being portrayed, what is the effect/mood being conveyed
otm, he's too pure
― flappy bird, Thursday, 7 September 2017 18:29 (eight years ago)
― na (NA), Thursday, 7 September 2017 16:46
Don't know what you mean. They're possibly both possessed and we never get to know how responsible they are.
In the description for Final Dossier it says there will be season 3 stuff. It's a short book and people have speculated it's just material from the writing of Secret History that would have been spoilers for the third season.
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Thursday, 7 September 2017 18:30 (eight years ago)
So much of the fascination for me with Lynch is the way you have these bizarre leaps in story logic, or elements of story logic that seem to be missing altogether, things never quite line up in this way, yet there's a pretty easily identifiable (often funny and devastating) emotional throughline that's rooted in all of the illogical aspects: the performances, the tone, colors etc. That tension between the two is so important but can be very easily be unraveled by ignoring one to focus too much on the other.
― sciatica, Thursday, 7 September 2017 18:33 (eight years ago)
Which in lynch is usually very complicated obv! Don't wanna act like these scenes are always easy for me to read or even know how I feel about
― streeps of range (wins), Thursday, 7 September 2017 18:34 (eight years ago)
/I don't think we'd get a sex scene where Dale Cooper seems like himself because Dale Cooper does not fuck/otm, he's too pure
Dale had sex with annie in season 2
― streeps of range (wins), Thursday, 7 September 2017 18:35 (eight years ago)
The most interesting part of that piece is the demon summoning sex, apparently that was in Secret History?
Two parts I didn't buy.
- Why would a huge amount of trauma destroy Judy?
- Laura really didn't look like she was doing a job, her scream seemed to be almost involuntary.
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Thursday, 7 September 2017 18:35 (eight years ago)
"It had only happened once before..."
^that crack in the facade that opens into a whole other world
― sciatica, Thursday, 7 September 2017 18:36 (eight years ago)
https://i.imgur.com/A3breF2.jpg
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 7 September 2017 18:40 (eight years ago)
that crack in the facade that opens into a whole other world
otm
― sciatica, Thursday, 7 September 2017 18:43 (eight years ago)