has every major social movement been criticized for being nasty spiteful jerks tho?
― Mordy, Wednesday, 12 July 2017 22:05 (eight years ago)
On original topic - Juno probe's view of the Great Red Spot occasioned the programme director to use the atavistic "up close and personal", upon which I discovered my 90s/00s rage against that phrase is intact.
― attention vampire (MatthewK), Wednesday, 12 July 2017 22:09 (eight years ago)
xp .... almost certainly?
― ogmor, Wednesday, 12 July 2017 22:19 (eight years ago)
Yeah idk about that ducking criticism behind "we are just too great our detractors are the reactionaries of history" isn't too great a look esp when there's evidence that you suck sitting right there like jacobins don't get to say sure the pile of heads but all of history the movers get backtalk
― Mordy, Wednesday, 12 July 2017 22:22 (eight years ago)
I'm not an activist but it's still obvious to me that a lot of discourse around social change follows predictable patterns & moderates telling radicals they'd have more luck and be more persuasive if only they'd be nicer is one of them. the politics of civility is obviously fraught (cf. plenty of ilx threads about rudeness, FP &c.) partly because it is another arena in which the same old class/political antagonisms are fought out in another guise. I think there is something gross and harmful in the crude trigger-happy piety that call-out culture can be at its worst, but the real social and political gulfs that it exposes seem like the more important issues to focus on
― ogmor, Wednesday, 12 July 2017 23:06 (eight years ago)
It's probably been upthread and on other threads but I'm really sick of people using "experts" as a dirty word. It's one of the ones that bothers me the most.
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Thursday, 13 July 2017 00:26 (eight years ago)
I can never take that word seriously after the experts exchange website
(it was an early google search optimized site for IT-related questions but their original domain was, no shit, expertsexchange.com)
― mh, Thursday, 13 July 2017 00:28 (eight years ago)
the politics of civility is obviously fraught (cf. plenty of ilx threads about rudeness, FP &c.)
imo, ilx discourse on rudeness and the existence of FPs has little to do with politics and everything to do with personal rudeness that rises to the level of disgusting savagery. iow, the verbal equivalent of spitting or pissing on someone, and usually over opinions that are never on the order of neo-Nazism, white supremacy or similar causes that might justify such raw abuse.
― A is for (Aimless), Thursday, 13 July 2017 00:36 (eight years ago)
xp
OK, so I'm biassed because I have (almost) consistently received highly qualified and accurate answers from E-E experts. Of those that were not quite so accurate or satisfactory, part of the blame was attributable to me not being specific enough in the way I structured my question.That brings me to my point. If you ask a question poorly, then expect a poor answer.Ask a question about horticulture in the equine care forum, and you will get pretty poor answers.
That brings me to my point. If you ask a question poorly, then expect a poor answer.
Ask a question about horticulture in the equine care forum, and you will get pretty poor answers.
― sarahell, Thursday, 13 July 2017 09:34 (eight years ago)
xp that sounds political to me! the people who oppose FP obviously do not see it just in terms of personal rudeness. etiquette and behavioural norms are politically & socially charged, that's implicit in your idea that it might be ok to break decorum for political reasons under some circumstances.
― ogmor, Thursday, 13 July 2017 12:20 (eight years ago)
You can criticize someone in private. I think most people have found that if you want to get a positive impact from criticism you should do it in private and in very soft, kind tones. Callout culture is angry public denouncement.
Okay, but then should we not bother to post here and discuss articles in newspapers that analyse and critique government policies, etc? As in, you'd agree that there's a something else that is neither private personal criticism (agree this is the way to get a person to improve) nor public twitter callouts?
― Never changed username before (cardamon), Thursday, 13 July 2017 18:09 (eight years ago)
as we're recycling old conversations I should point out again that every major social movement has had moderates tell them they were putting ppl off with their strident tone
Yus
But also to open this one out a bit - e.g. - abolitionists would break into private property in order to free slaves; moderates of the time would criticise them for them going so far in following their ideals that they broke the law; looking back on it the slavery was clearly so bad as to more or less handwave the breaking and entering of slaver's plantations in order to end it and also it wouldn't have ended without direct action. I don't know what would be the equivalent of actually breaking into plantations to free slaves, for today's callout culture?
― Never changed username before (cardamon), Thursday, 13 July 2017 18:13 (eight years ago)
What I'm saying is, sure, almost every social movement got tone-policing from moderates, but that tone-policing looks silly in proportion to how much those movements actually achieved. Whereas if the twitter callouts don't achieve anything (I have no idea if they do! I don't know enough about it to say) then mebbe the tone critique is more valid?
― Never changed username before (cardamon), Thursday, 13 July 2017 18:15 (eight years ago)
xxpz Correct. Those are not the only two options. Criticizing powerful public figures in the press or whatever is a different beast entirely.
― Mordy, Thursday, 13 July 2017 18:18 (eight years ago)
Shot, chaser
― flappy bird, Thursday, 13 July 2017 18:19 (eight years ago)
I... worked on this story for a year... and he... he just tweeted it out
Sooooo, I wrote a thing :)
I'm thinking now that a lot of the problem with some of this terminology today is that it's not specific enough, maybe doesn't have enough additions and variants.
You get people essentially saying
"It's only political correctness when I don't like it"
Or
"It's not cultural appropriation when I think it's okay"
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Thursday, 13 July 2017 20:37 (eight years ago)
"tone police"
Essentially anything that means "it's ok when I do it"
― jk rowling obituary thread (darraghmac), Thursday, 13 July 2017 21:46 (eight years ago)
flappy bird getting back to the core, the heart usage
― ﴿→ ☺ (Doctor Casino), Thursday, 13 July 2017 23:02 (eight years ago)
Yeah 'Tone policing' may be a loaded term itself I guess.
Overall, feels like having good control of tone is a great skill, definitely something to try and get locked down if you want to achieve anything, but also maybe something that can be very difficult, considering the varied nature of the 'audience' even when the audience is just another person face to face, and more so when the audience is online (millions of readers all with their own tendencies); and so the expectation that people express themselves with precision and an ear for how it's going to go over may sometimes be questionable imo
All that said I don't disagree that an awful lot of twitter callouts (that I've seen around anyway) have been pretty cloth-eared
― Never changed username before (cardamon), Friday, 14 July 2017 14:03 (eight years ago)
(Although the large number of people who with great reliability come out with reactions such as 'Black lives matter? What about white lives, why are you saying white lives don't matter???' 'Women's rights, what, don't men have rights???' are themselves heading into supremely cloth-eared territory, no?)
― Never changed username before (cardamon), Friday, 14 July 2017 14:05 (eight years ago)
they always stick me in the appendix because they don't think i'm the pretty one
― flappy bird, Friday, 14 July 2017 17:02 (eight years ago)
"My arms and wrists are numb." God would people just shut the fuck up already?
― billstevejim, Saturday, 15 July 2017 05:44 (eight years ago)
Thats a phrase?
― Stoop Crone (Trayce), Saturday, 15 July 2017 08:13 (eight years ago)
Don't forget "my face and lips are numb."
― A is for (Aimless), Saturday, 15 July 2017 17:17 (eight years ago)
i'm old and am sick of political neologisms in the first place. oh, if we use new words maybe people won't notice that they're the same fucking ideas and we don't have to address the problematic implications of those ideas!
more political discourse should be framed in reference to issues surrounding the defenestration of prague. and that's my uncool conservative idea.
― The Saga of Rodney Stooksbury (rushomancy), Saturday, 15 July 2017 17:34 (eight years ago)
my mouth is drymy face is numbfucked up and spun out in my roomon my own, here we go
― assawoman bay (harbl), Saturday, 15 July 2017 17:34 (eight years ago)
How much is Twitter responsible for the current political terminology? I wish people would only use it for links and signal boosting because I hate trying to work out if people are complaining about white women or Wonder Woman (WW acronym).
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Saturday, 15 July 2017 19:22 (eight years ago)
it all comes from Twitter
― flappy bird, Sunday, 16 July 2017 02:22 (eight years ago)
an abridged collection:
BOOM!#NotTheOnionShot; chaserI'm just going to leave this here...(((if you're Jewish)))SighYour long read for the day:
― flappy bird, Sunday, 16 July 2017 02:29 (eight years ago)
BOOM!Shot; chaser
What do these mean? Is the first one just for humorous dramatic effect?
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Sunday, 16 July 2017 03:25 (eight years ago)
yes, "humor"
― flappy bird, Sunday, 16 July 2017 03:28 (eight years ago)
at least an attempt at it
― flappy bird, Sunday, 16 July 2017 03:29 (eight years ago)
"nothing burger"
― Number None, Sunday, 16 July 2017 06:08 (eight years ago)
that one is bizarre because it came out of a specific cable news channel, MSNBC iirc. their attempt to "get on the same page" like Fox does with every issue & talking point...
― flappy bird, Sunday, 16 July 2017 20:21 (eight years ago)
I'm at the point where I cant follow what is being said sometimes - and I'm someone who is on the internet 94/7 - but because I dont fuck with Twitter/Insta I think i'm missing this weird "thing becomes a saying after 5.2 seconds" idea.
― Stoop Crone (Trayce), Sunday, 16 July 2017 23:40 (eight years ago)
lol i love "94/7" intended or not. gonna use that one if you don't mind
― flappy bird, Monday, 17 July 2017 01:32 (eight years ago)
Its an old ILXism actually!
― Stoop Crone (Trayce), Monday, 17 July 2017 01:47 (eight years ago)
(or maybe not but back in the day Ally and co used it a lot and it stuck with me)
sick, it rules, it's in the lexicon
― flappy bird, Monday, 17 July 2017 01:49 (eight years ago)
"i'm screaming"
― Neanderthal, Monday, 17 July 2017 01:51 (eight years ago)
OMFG yes that gives me hives, that one.
NO. NO YOU ARE NOT SITTING THERE SCREAMING AT YOUR PC/PHONE. YOU JUST AREN'T.
― Stoop Crone (Trayce), Monday, 17 July 2017 04:23 (eight years ago)
(and if you are, get help, nothing online is that hysterical)
also the insane abuse and misuse of "literally" before and after it was modified in the fucking dictionary
― flappy bird, Monday, 17 July 2017 04:30 (eight years ago)
Man, if I hear/see 'Winter is coming' one more time...
― Mince Pramthwart (James Morrison), Monday, 17 July 2017 06:09 (eight years ago)
fucking otm, it's like we're all supposed to care about game of thrones
― blink truther (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 17 July 2017 06:16 (eight years ago)
i feel that way about whovians so ymmv
― Stoop Crone (Trayce), Monday, 17 July 2017 07:28 (eight years ago)
yes but the world isn't soaking with constant "the daleks are coming" pissweak memes
― blink truther (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 17 July 2017 07:55 (eight years ago)
Exactly
― Mince Pramthwart (James Morrison), Monday, 17 July 2017 09:48 (eight years ago)