Mike Judge's "Silicon Valley" (HBO Show)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1593 of them)

tj miller has an excellent gurgly delivery that i'll miss

a fraction of the amt i miss peter gregory tho, holy cow remember :( :( :(

why ruin a good tradition? (Will M.), Tuesday, 30 May 2017 05:37 (nine years ago)

he's just the same grandiose motherfucker stereotype a bunch of other comedians use, even if he's good at it. imo erlich is only really funny when the script has him wistful or attached to some horrible idea, only to somehow break even or come out ahead

middleditch gets on my nerves and it's exactly the reaction the plot is going for, but I feel like they could plug in a number of similar neurotic genius types instead

― mh, Monday, May 29, 2017 8:43 PM (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

dont agree at all, it feels like a v specific type to me & hes pretty much always hilarious on the show imo

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Tuesday, 30 May 2017 07:22 (nine years ago)

This series has been disappointing really, just treading the same ground as before. GREAT IDEA > GET INVESTOR > HUGE FUCKUP > OR IS IT AN OPPORTUNITY? > GREAT IDEA WHICH IS SUBSET OF PREVIOUS IDEA > GET INVESTOR... maybe it works as a micro-satire of the startup tech industry as a whole, how there are no new ideas and they're just going further and further down the same rabbit holes until they get lucky (which seems to be by dumping the whole vapourware concept on someone with deep pockets).

Some great moments (Jared and the car, Liz' description of sex with Richard - even if the sex itself felt stupid, "you're my best friend") but nothing to stand out as justifying a new season for me.

Mud... Jam... Failure... (aldo), Tuesday, 30 May 2017 14:46 (nine years ago)

so are they going to have haley joel osment be their version of palmer luckey, complete with horrible political leanings

mh, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 14:49 (nine years ago)

the whole endless cycle of implosions is actually something I like about the show- no matter what they end up reseting all the way back to zero

Max-Headroom-drops-a-deuce-while-shredding (Sparkle Motion), Tuesday, 30 May 2017 17:06 (nine years ago)

yeah it's an endless churn

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 17:37 (nine years ago)

Kind of like a sitcom.

DJI, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 17:40 (nine years ago)

"You fucked my wife."
"I fucked your wives."

to pimp a barfly (Eazy), Tuesday, 30 May 2017 17:43 (nine years ago)

It's a funny show, but it's really just a nerd "Entourage."

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 19:12 (nine years ago)

wow no way

Spottie, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 19:14 (nine years ago)

*whispers* it's Office Space

mh, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 19:21 (nine years ago)

I just meant the repetitive arc - group of indivisible guys with not a real care in the world, constantly on the verge of massive success, constantly failing, learning no lessons, paying no discernible price.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 19:23 (nine years ago)

Obviously that we are dealing with doofuses and not douchebags makes "Silicon Valley" so much more endearing.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 19:24 (nine years ago)

Jared sleeps on a cot in a garage

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 19:25 (nine years ago)

group of indivisible guys with not a real care in the world

idk this is just a weird reading imo

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 19:26 (nine years ago)

this show will be way better without Miller

kurt schwitterz, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 19:28 (nine years ago)

Major difference (among many) between this and Entourage is that SV mocks its characters (oftentimes lovingly, but still) while Entourage treated them all like badassess (except Johnny Drama, maybe). Also everything always worked out in Entourage.

Gukbe, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 19:31 (nine years ago)

but maybe the last ep will be each of the SV guys getting onto their own private jets with their respective VCs idk

Gukbe, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 19:32 (nine years ago)

u should replace him, chaki

flopson, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 19:33 (nine years ago)

lol

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 19:34 (nine years ago)

dude everything always works out in this show too (see the deus ex machina that is haley joel osment coming out of no where) gimme a break.

kurt schwitterz, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 19:35 (nine years ago)

Jared is not recognizably human. But he's a brilliant TV creation.

These guys are not hurting for cash, not unhappy, sit around the house working on stuff, occasionally meet girls, smoke pot, drink beer. They don't seem to be worried about bills or anything. Their biggest concern, even Martin Starr, seems to be hitching their wagon to something that will make them rich. That's been the goal of every season. I suppose Richard also wants some semblance of independence/integrity, but even he has always had tres commas on the mind. I mean, I enjoy this show a lot, and have really come around to it. But it's not a show I watch to track the characters' personal growth, overcoming challenges, etc. There has yet to be any real fallout from anything that has gone wrong save them not being filthy rich. Save Bighead, I guess, who had money and lost it all, but he seems like the only one who doesn't care about money. Or know what money is.

Is it an accurate portrayal of Silicon Valley? Maybe, but then, I think Entourage was probably a pretty accurate portrayal of that sort of Hollywood life, too. FWIW. I don't know if I ever saw more than a season or two of Entourage, but most of that show was about their collective humiliation, iirc, with the one famous fulcrum guy constantly failing up and bringing the others with him.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 19:35 (nine years ago)

hmm yeah I don't disagree when you put it that way. they are p static in a sit-com-y way. They don't seem very happy-go-lucky, which was maybe me misinterpreting your comment about them "not having a care in the world" but that's because they are neurotic, not because they ever encounter serious problems (that then aren't conveniently solved w referenced deus ex machina tricks_)

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 19:38 (nine years ago)

Yeah, that's what I meant. They are neurotic and so probably can never be "happy," but they have the luxury of being neurotic because they keep getting bailed out and rescued despite it all.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 19:40 (nine years ago)

The arcs of the two shows are about careers more than any other kind of growing up. And when the TJ Miller news came out, I thought it sounded like if Piven had left Entourage mid-series. Also the detail and specificity of industry in-jokes and references combined with broad comedy, and both have been pretty delicate in focusing on guys in a pack without slipping into misogyny.

to pimp a barfly (Eazy), Tuesday, 30 May 2017 19:48 (nine years ago)

see the deus ex machina that is haley joel osment coming out of no where

he sees VC people

mh, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 19:55 (nine years ago)

dude everything always works out in this show too (see the deus ex machina that is haley joel osment coming out of no where) gimme a break.

for every do sex machina there's a corresponding twist that brings them back to square one

flopson, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 20:10 (nine years ago)

get on up

mh, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 20:10 (nine years ago)

I don't think the arc of either show is about careers. Whether it's the actor guy and his buds or the SV nerds, they can always find work/careers. The arc seems to be about getting rich, which in both cases is a queasy thing to root for.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 20:12 (nine years ago)

this is totally nerd entourage stop trying to deny it

kurt schwitterz, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 20:14 (nine years ago)

True, JiC!

to pimp a barfly (Eazy), Tuesday, 30 May 2017 20:18 (nine years ago)

imo the Silicon Valley thing is also about nerds who have this *pressure* to overachieve

if it was just making good money, they could have jumped whole hog on that "pied piper appliance" crap w/hooli and sold it to large corporations for $$$

you could argue it's about wanting to break out and be super rich, but I think some sort of ideological purity about the nature of the success is the core thing

wanting to ~change the world~

mh, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 20:21 (nine years ago)

it reminds me of this dude I knew in high school who did the stanford -> working at a tech company route, and was starting to come into his own success when I saw him speak back home at a small conference

I hung out with him for a while that evening, and his dad was there, and I got the impression his parents (both doctors) were just getting past the idea that he was fucking around in his life by not being a doctor or w/e

mh, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 20:25 (nine years ago)

I'm not really concerned with the character's success. Part of the fun is watching everything fall apart at varying degrees of extremely fast.

The actual characters aren't really the focus anyway imo, they're just used as a way in which to parody the culture of silicon valley in general.

Evan, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 20:29 (nine years ago)

imo both the story/characters and the thematic material have to be tight or you end up with soap opera hijinks or some sort of corporate parable with no investment in the episodes

mh, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 20:31 (nine years ago)

the narrative drive of this show is incredible when it's really working.

Gukbe, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 20:32 (nine years ago)

it's been mentioned on this thread before but the commitment to narrative - over character, over laughs - is one of the the things that makes this show unique

Max-Headroom-drops-a-deuce-while-shredding (Sparkle Motion), Tuesday, 30 May 2017 22:51 (nine years ago)

every joke in this show is character driven humor.

kurt schwitterz, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 22:58 (nine years ago)

the narrative is very dull characters are the only thing that matters

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 30 May 2017 23:17 (nine years ago)

aldo's post above pretty much fits the story loop. we don't really care where this company is going or Gavin or anything so long as there are lols. it's obvious nobody is in any real danger and consequences matter only in that they provide lols.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 30 May 2017 23:19 (nine years ago)

ugh i know he's supposed to be funny but i find Erlich so detestable in such a specific that it's hard to appreciate him even as just a character, i'm actually p stoked he's leaving

he not like the banana (Stevie D(eux)), Wednesday, 31 May 2017 00:58 (nine years ago)

This show is Nerd Entourage and that's fine with me

calstars, Wednesday, 31 May 2017 02:06 (nine years ago)

ya this show is def Nerd Entourage

he not like the banana (Stevie D(eux)), Wednesday, 31 May 2017 02:25 (nine years ago)

I'm surprised some people are glad Erlich leaves.
I would say he's the character that's the most identified with the show (with Jared maybe).
As I said earlier, he might be my favourite. but since I also really like Russ Hanneman and Gavin... I might simply enjoy major assholes !

AlXTC from Paris, Wednesday, 31 May 2017 08:12 (nine years ago)

he's a character that fits in really well w this particular time and place. he's still sort of a nerd bc he is immersed in this tech stuff. he is also nth generation california hippie hence the pot smoking and spirit quests. he can act ludicrously pompous because a lot of the people around him also think they are changing the world. its fun to see him try to take credit for things because that's the culture. take all that away and he doesn't work as well. the new non-SV things i've seen Miller in, he just seems douchey, prone to frat boy humor, not very smart.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 31 May 2017 11:31 (nine years ago)

He's Falstaff to a bunch of Hals.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 31 May 2017 11:37 (nine years ago)

I am going to see him do standup on Monday, mainly out of curiosity. Also, the other comics on the bill are rock solid, so even if he's rubbish, it'll still be a good show.

trishyb, Wednesday, 31 May 2017 12:28 (nine years ago)

There is a key difference between this and Entourage, in that SV is funny and charming, and Entourage was neither

I'm okay with TJ Miller leaving, as long as it doesn't mean more Russ Hanneman - he is p. much the definitive "fine in small doses" character

Surprised they dropped the Gavin Belson story so early, felt like that had much more potential

Chuck_Tatum, Wednesday, 31 May 2017 12:49 (nine years ago)

"There is a key difference between this and Entourage, in that SV is funny and charming, and Entourage was neither"

^^^ this.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 31 May 2017 12:56 (nine years ago)

imo Gavin will be back

still mourning the loss of Peter Gregory. Christopher Welch really pulled out all the stops in his acting on that one

mh, Wednesday, 31 May 2017 13:48 (nine years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.