Liked this one too. Something very 'classic series' about the world's armed forces being represented by a few people in costumes and a CGI plane and submarine.
― Never changed username before (cardamon), Sunday, 28 May 2017 15:48 (nine years ago)
I'm a few weeks behind but they really missed an opportunity for someone to go "it's bigger on the inside" during the house-hunting scene.
― Matt DC, Sunday, 28 May 2017 16:09 (nine years ago)
This was an enjoyable episode, but I don't understand why the Doctor hadn't told Bill about his regeneration ability, or why he didn't tell her about it during the countdown? That way Bill wouldn't have needed to consent to the Monks, since she would've known the Doctor can't really die.
― Tuomas, Sunday, 28 May 2017 19:25 (nine years ago)
Presumably if you get completely blown up, you can't regenerate, or something? Either way I'd file it under "stuff I'm happy to handwave".
Another good episode, although maybe the season's weakest so far? Was the first script by Harness I haven't found annoying, anyway.
Next week's looks good, but looking forward to getting back to more continuity-free Bill/Capaldi stories in eps 9-10, before the invetiable big-climax-two-parter.
― Chuck_Tatum, Sunday, 28 May 2017 22:51 (nine years ago)
I liked this episode. Didn't see much point in the military plot since the show gives away the real disaster-in-waiting right away. Working in a pyramid with mummies and the threads of life were nice touches.
― Einstein, Kazanga, Sitar (abanana), Sunday, 28 May 2017 23:15 (nine years ago)
nitpick corner: a) the lock dilemma could have been solved with some macguyvering. the doctor could have found a mirrored surface to let the scientist tell him what the lock says. b) lazy writer failsafe failures. automatic venting every 20 minutes, no braille on a lock in a place where people could easily become blinded. if you've seen one michael crichton movie.
― Einstein, Kazanga, Sitar (abanana), Monday, 29 May 2017 00:25 (nine years ago)
she would've known the Doctor can't really die.
the Doctor can totally die
― Doubtless they are toss. (sic), Monday, 29 May 2017 02:55 (nine years ago)
and the bbc can call the show "bill", it would be fine
― early morning reverse rumplestiltskin rage (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 29 May 2017 03:07 (nine years ago)
the doctor could have found a mirrored surface to let the scientist tell him what the lock says
― attention vampire (MatthewK), Monday, 29 May 2017 03:13 (nine years ago)
this is not a show that traditionally withstands a lot of "fridge logic" to borrow a term from the frequently wtf tvtropes
I liked this episode quite a bit, that's 2 for 2 with these monk mummies - monkies? no. mumkies. no. monksters. no. I give up.
― El Tomboto, Monday, 29 May 2017 03:21 (nine years ago)
YOU CONSENT OUT OF STRATEGY
― El Tomboto, Monday, 29 May 2017 03:22 (nine years ago)
b) lazy writer failsafe failures. automatic venting every 20 minutes, no braille on a lock in a place where people could easily become blinded. if you've seen one michael crichton movie.And worst of all, an airlock system that allows both doors to be opened at the same time, which defeats the whole purpose for having an airlock! I think real life airlocks automatically keep the other door locked if the other one is open, exactly to avoid human error like the one seen in this episode?The air venting system was really baffling... Why would a complex that deals with hazardous material and GM bacteria have a system that automatically vents its air into the atmosphere? You'd think that's exactly what they'd want to avoid in a breakout situation?
― Tuomas, Monday, 29 May 2017 05:54 (nine years ago)
I think it was meant to be unusual (due to accident) that the product was that dangerous but yeah
― Never changed username before (cardamon), Monday, 29 May 2017 11:15 (nine years ago)
Also, the whole "consent" thing was pretty nonsensical if you stop and think about it. It was established that consent needs to be given out of love and not fear, and clearly the implication is that humanity needs to love the Monks for them to gain power; they're like vampires, they need to be invited in. So after that's been established the viewer is like, how on earth are the Monks gonna make anyone love them? But then Bill gives her consent because she loves the Doctor and doesn't want him to die? So it's that easy for the Monks to rule over humanity? Then why didn't they use their fancy simulation machine to show the UN Secretary General images of his loved ones having died in the doomsday? Then he would've given his consent because of his love, just like Billy did. Also, consent given out of fear leads to disintegration, and Billy explicitly states he wants the Doctor to live because she's afraid of what would happen to Earth if the he wasn't around. But apparently that doesn't count as fear to the Monks?
The whole idea of "only love can give us power over you" is an interesting concept, but it feels like the writers had to resolve to semantic trickery to get the result they want, it didn't feel justified.
― Tuomas, Monday, 29 May 2017 11:48 (nine years ago)
Doctor could've Periscoped his phone view to get the code too.
― nashwan, Monday, 29 May 2017 12:38 (nine years ago)
Just fear us, love us, do as we say and we will be your slaves
― kinder, Monday, 29 May 2017 14:43 (nine years ago)
xp Yeah, the distinction between the consent given by military top brass and the consent given by Bill was sort of ... a workable distinction in outline, but maybe not in close up.
― Never changed username before (cardamon), Monday, 29 May 2017 15:03 (nine years ago)
xp: pretty much all bioengineering facilities, especially those working with potential pathogens, are designed with negative pressure. Air flows in through entrances, etc, but is all sucked out through UV-illuminated HEPA filters in the lab hoods were all manipulation takes place.
― it's just locker room treason (Sanpaku), Monday, 29 May 2017 20:58 (nine years ago)
another solution: Doctor takes a picture of the lock with his phone, shows it to scientist.
― Einstein, Kazanga, Sitar (abanana), Monday, 29 May 2017 23:02 (nine years ago)
would have preferred him to stay blind until regeneration tbh, if this can be handwaved away anything can
― early morning reverse rumplestiltskin rage (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 30 May 2017 00:27 (nine years ago)
This episode was clearly not written with adventure puzzle game enthusiasts in mind
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 03:15 (nine years ago)
Another contrived thing about that scene: the input for the unlock code was this weird, old-fashioned cylinder apparatus instead of the far more common 3x3 number pad, because if it had been the latter, it would've been quite easy for the Doctor to feel it with his fingers and deduce which buttons to push.
― Tuomas, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 09:00 (nine years ago)
and then they couldn't have done this ending.
everyone criticising that last scene is otm imo but they couldn't have achieved this specific ending without a contrived obstacle to his sight. also, archaic and stupid things pop up in real life all the time, so this didn't feel like a huge stretch.
― early morning reverse rumplestiltskin rage (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 30 May 2017 09:04 (nine years ago)
the monks magicking back his sight was much more stupid imo, unless this is all still inside the matrix, in case why do anything?
― early morning reverse rumplestiltskin rage (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 30 May 2017 09:08 (nine years ago)
*in which case
like you AA i didn't mind most of the things people have pointed out here - the airlock that isn't an airlock was a bit of a stretch. but in the service of delivering excitement! i don't really mind these things. and the sight thing didn't bother me - i thought oh god that's terrible, they can even repair a time lord's sight, not something even he could do, they have control, what is the nature of that control and why does it require this manner of consent?
― Fizzles, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 09:51 (nine years ago)
they can even repair a time lord's sight, not something even he could do, they have control, what is the nature of that control and why does it require this manner of consent?
otm, it was one of those episodes which makes 100% perfect sense within its arbitrary self-imposed rules which don't make a lot of sense (needing to fit some highly specific criteria for consent, which in itself is a highly specific criterion for deciding whether or not to let everyone perish). as sci-fi drama it's fine but it requires a particular suspension of disbelief to accept that some ocd politburo will go to these lengths for...? shits and giggles? christ just tell them someone fucked up in a lab, or better still land your pyramid on the lab so the doctor doesn't have to blow it up or even go there or even do any of this, and then you have a free slot to write idk a satire about how a giant orange fuck is ruining the universe.
― early morning reverse rumplestiltskin rage (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 30 May 2017 13:20 (nine years ago)
I've noticed every episode this season seems to have its central mystery solved by inspired guesswork rather than Honest Puzzle Solving - a bad habit from Sherlock, maybe?
This week's was ridic - it went from "the problem could be literally anything in the world" to "it's an accident at a chemical factory!!" within two lines of dialogue.
― Chuck_Tatum, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 13:57 (nine years ago)
Thin Ice wasn't solved by guesswork, was it?
― PJD PDJ DPJ (DJP), Tuesday, 30 May 2017 15:14 (nine years ago)
(I did like how they identified which lab they needed to visit, though)
I've noticed every episode this season seems to have its central mystery solved by inspired guesswork rather than Honest Puzzle Solving - a bad habit from Sherlock, maybe? This week's was ridic - it went from "the problem could be literally anything in the world" to "it's an accident at a chemical factory!!" within two lines of dialogue.
chibnall alert - brodchurch always astonished me by effectively making a series out of totally incompetent detective work. v little actual detection and the only way the murderer is discovered is through complete process of elimination, sure a definition of detective failure. in the agatha christie type/golden age story it's allowed for the reader to suspect *anyone* from a small community, in fact it's the point. but the detectives are usually seen to have known at some crucially earlier point. the killing was ok for me on this and i'm not sure why because the style was similar, but possibly bcos broadchurch was so confined and underpopulated.
i always felt that with sherlock holmes (the stories) displays of deduction would take place at the beginning of the story, but the discovery of the murderer often required not deduction but specialist knowledge/inspired guesswork or a moment of action to reveal the murderer. exceptions are the finest stories - the league of red-headed men, hound of the b's, and even they obv had a fair dollop of drama.
so i don't think there's such a thing as purity here.
on the speed of the solution, that feels more a requirement of keeping things lively and brief enough to fit in a short episode, which is why i'm fine with it. emphasis is important and doing it in two lines of dialogue is a success rather than a fault. (that said i enjoy the picking itt)
― Fizzles, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 16:45 (nine years ago)
I thought this too - apparently it was originally slightly less abrupt but a couple of lines referencing a terrorist attack were edited out late on
This is the bit of dialogue that was cut from last night's #DoctorWho. pic.twitter.com/Trpr9PVtKl— Alex Daily 🏳️🌈 (@heyalexdaily) May 28, 2017
― Iain Mew (if), Tuesday, 30 May 2017 17:27 (nine years ago)
okay that does make more sense
― PJD PDJ DPJ (DJP), Tuesday, 30 May 2017 17:30 (nine years ago)
Interesting! It's still kinda abrupt at full length but I see why they made the cut.
I only bring up the "lucky guesswork" as it's been more clumsily scripted than usual. But I suppose it's better to put your massive handwave halfway through the script (where it can be forgotten) than right at the end like RTD used to do. Either way - this has been one of the most enjoyable seasons so far, so moot point really.
― Chuck_Tatum, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 20:37 (nine years ago)
(Also great post re: Holmes/deduction!)
― Chuck_Tatum, Tuesday, 30 May 2017 20:38 (nine years ago)
Mostly the greatness of Bill has seen me over the rough bits of plotting
― Never changed username before (cardamon), Wednesday, 31 May 2017 19:15 (nine years ago)
I'm also really glad to have these horrible, horrible Monks that aren't cuddly or intentionally funny. I mean they're a bit unintentionally funny but you know, having the courage of convictions and all that
― Never changed username before (cardamon), Wednesday, 31 May 2017 19:21 (nine years ago)
While we wait, the neural network comes up with episode titles: http://lewisandquark.tumblr.com/post/159509399932/the-neural-network-writes-the-episode-list-for
The DontThe Sires of the DaleksThe Argass of the DaleksThe Arges of the DaleksThe Wire of the DaleksThe Argoss of the DaleksThe Argass of the DaleksThe Argas of the DaleksThe Daleks of the DaleksThe Stick of the DoctorThe Keds of DeathThe Twin DoctorsThe Ten DoctorsCold CloodThe Unicorn and the DaleksThe Fires of PoopThe Beads of the DaleksThe Sontaren BeepThe Power of TronThe Awkroids of TaraThe Agaves of The DoctorDinosaurs of the DeepThe Pirate LoverLoodly MoystersThe Wheeen DeathThe Bile DoctorsPlanet of limeThe Crows of DoomPlanet of Fire in SpaceThe Poupon Invasion
― Mince Pramthwart (James Morrison), Saturday, 3 June 2017 06:20 (nine years ago)
wd watch the crows of doom and the dalek of the daleks.
― Fizzles, Saturday, 3 June 2017 08:07 (nine years ago)
actually wd watch most of these.
― Fizzles, Saturday, 3 June 2017 08:08 (nine years ago)
Why do the monks have a German accent? (Or don't they?)
― StanM, Saturday, 3 June 2017 08:29 (nine years ago)
Villain Voice preset #3
― nashwan, Saturday, 3 June 2017 12:03 (nine years ago)
the ten doctors sounds like a blast, would def watch
― he's also fouled up with NON-FAT (bizarro gazzara), Saturday, 3 June 2017 12:41 (nine years ago)
thinking about what the plot for that episode might be has led me to the alternative title the gallifreyan centipede and i'm so, so sorry
― he's also fouled up with NON-FAT (bizarro gazzara), Saturday, 3 June 2017 12:43 (nine years ago)
dieter laser as the rani obviously
― early morning reverse rumplestiltskin rage (Autumn Almanac), Saturday, 3 June 2017 13:05 (nine years ago)
wait, wrong way around, i mean kate o'mara as dieter laser
― early morning reverse rumplestiltskin rage (Autumn Almanac), Saturday, 3 June 2017 13:10 (nine years ago)
perhaps i'm overthinking this
― early morning reverse rumplestiltskin rage (Autumn Almanac), Saturday, 3 June 2017 13:11 (nine years ago)
LOVE WIN
― early morning reverse rumplestiltskin rage (Autumn Almanac), Sunday, 4 June 2017 00:03 (nine years ago)
and next week is mark gatiss jfc i give up
― early morning reverse rumplestiltskin rage (Autumn Almanac), Sunday, 4 June 2017 00:06 (nine years ago)
Yeah, this was very reminiscent of the worst kind of Davies era plot resolutions, in that love saves the day in a nonsensical way they just pulled out if their ass. I can't even begin to count how many plot holes and unexplained things there were in this episode... Like, for example, we didn't even learn why the Monks wanted to conquer Earth in the first place? They have superior technology and godlike powers, so what do they need this backwater planet for? And their six month reign must've left a lot of people dead, right? So shouldn't Bill feel terribly guilty for allowing all that? But in the end she's like, whatever, humanity is stupid. I kept expecting there to be some kind of twist at the end, like that Bill's mysterious mum was really a former incarnation of Missy, and that's why she could withstand touching the emitter Monk, even when the Doctor couldn't... But no, it really was as silly as it seemed.
― Tuomas, Sunday, 4 June 2017 10:25 (nine years ago)