Star Wars started it but Star Wars is also kind of an exception to a lot of things
― Fiddle Catstro (latebloomer), Tuesday, 9 May 2017 01:22 (nine years ago)
It's Marvel that nailed the formula that everyone is desperately trying to copy
― Fiddle Catstro (latebloomer), Tuesday, 9 May 2017 01:23 (nine years ago)
Star Wars is now copying the Marvel model, not the other way around.
Anyway, back to Blade Runner I guess
― Fiddle Catstro (latebloomer), Tuesday, 9 May 2017 01:25 (nine years ago)
I wish they would have just cast Emily Blunt as the new Blade Runner and let Gosling be one of the (regular) replicants tbf - but this is Hollywood
― your cognitive privilege (El Tomboto), Tuesday, 9 May 2017 01:30 (nine years ago)
and that would have been too obvious after Sicario, I guess
but hey maybe that's the REAL twist? oh shit I've just ruined the movie
― your cognitive privilege (El Tomboto), Tuesday, 9 May 2017 01:31 (nine years ago)
They've greenlit an Edge of Tomorrow sequel with Blunt, so I don't need her in this. (EoT was so criminally slept-on; almost certainly because of that suck-ass title.)
― Malcolm X, Martin Luther King, Jr, and Violent J (誤訳侮辱), Tuesday, 9 May 2017 01:43 (nine years ago)
this looks really fucking bad tbh
― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Tuesday, 9 May 2017 01:48 (nine years ago)
So this was kind of fun
http://i.imgur.com/JzkzokL.jpg
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Tuesday, 9 May 2017 02:24 (nine years ago)
Oops
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Tuesday, 9 May 2017 02:25 (nine years ago)
New one looks like ass. Sorry. I've yet to be convinced by anything Villeneuve's directed.
― Acid Hose (Capitaine Jay Vee), Tuesday, 9 May 2017 02:28 (nine years ago)
We were promised offworld colonies by 2019.
Everything I liked about this, I liked in 1983 (or whenever I first saw the VHS).
I'd like to believe that the characters reprising Roy, Pris, Rachael et al in aren't so transparent. I'm trusting in you, Villeneuve.
Else, we're doomed to a rainy, replicant-ridden LA for the next installment in 2051.
― No one is THAT ackbar (Sanpaku), Tuesday, 9 May 2017 02:32 (nine years ago)
looks cool but mostly makes me want to rewatch the first one and call it a day
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 10 May 2017 13:29 (nine years ago)
time to die
― conrad, Wednesday, 10 May 2017 13:39 (nine years ago)
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe . . . Lego Transformer Wars 3: Rise of the Silver Guardians -- Origins Pt 1 . . .
(Adam OTM)
― Old Lynch's Sex Paragraph (Phil D.), Wednesday, 10 May 2017 13:42 (nine years ago)
I'd go see Lego Blade Runner
― your cognitive privilege (El Tomboto), Wednesday, 10 May 2017 14:52 (nine years ago)
BLEGO Runner, actually
http://i.imgur.com/8qGbDNf.jpg
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Wednesday, 10 May 2017 15:00 (nine years ago)
https://i.imgur.com/vm6hVC7.jpg
― 龜, Wednesday, 10 May 2017 15:03 (nine years ago)
No thread for BR2049?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BUozYf9w0Y
― DJI, Wednesday, 21 June 2017 21:25 (nine years ago)
So per the headline
http://ew.com/movies/2017/07/13/blade-runner-2049-ryan-gosling-harrison-ford-photos/
Ryan Gosling still wonders if Blade Runner 2049 might just be an elaborate episode of Punk’d
Based on some of the photos later in the feature, *I'm* wondering that.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 14 July 2017 13:33 (eight years ago)
i like the one where ryan and harrison are running away from an elaborate pile of dangerous mousetraps
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 14 July 2017 13:38 (eight years ago)
“The yellow is something I can’t talk about, but…it’s a very important color.”
🤔
I will eat kale if this turns out to be a good film.
― Acid Hose (Capitaine Jay Vee), Friday, 14 July 2017 13:48 (eight years ago)
Everything — the sets, the lights, the props, the vehicles — they are all saying something about our future
Which is why they decided at least one speaking part had to be played by somebody cosplaying as Abby from NCIS.
― El Tomboto, Friday, 14 July 2017 14:05 (eight years ago)
replicant urination confirmed
― mh, Friday, 14 July 2017 14:09 (eight years ago)
I'm looking at these pictures and thinking "Ryan Gosling: Man of Many One Faces"
― this iphone speaks many languages (DJP), Friday, 14 July 2017 14:28 (eight years ago)
can't replicate his face into a heart
― mh, Friday, 14 July 2017 14:29 (eight years ago)
I'm getting Ghost in the Shell 2017 flashbacks
― jmm, Friday, 14 July 2017 14:43 (eight years ago)
Says you!
http://i.imgur.com/km03GH4.jpg
― pplains, Friday, 14 July 2017 20:33 (eight years ago)
.. Billy Corgan cosplay?
― this iphone speaks many languages (DJP), Friday, 14 July 2017 20:36 (eight years ago)
The more I see from this film the less impressive it gets
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dZOaI_Fn5o4
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 17 July 2017 16:29 (eight years ago)
shit I should phave posted here
― Dean of the University (Latham Green), Monday, 17 July 2017 16:48 (eight years ago)
i don't know...i think to compare it to the original will always have this coming out well behind, but maybe it'll be a 2010-type thing, interesting or compelling on its own merits. i still trust Villeneuve.
― nomar, Monday, 17 July 2017 16:50 (eight years ago)
Maybe it will be as good as another classic release from 1982, Miner 2049er.
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Monday, 17 July 2017 17:07 (eight years ago)
I can see the 2010 comparison, but that's a movie that really held back on trying to explain it's predecessor. BR2049 seems more like it's going to try to fill in every. single. detail. of the backstory, whether the audience wants to hear it or not.
― Zings Can Only Get Better (snoball), Monday, 17 July 2017 17:26 (eight years ago)
It does look worryingly action heavy and light on thoughtful introspection. I really hope it's just a misleading trailer to get the punters in.
Isn't the scene with Dave Bautista based on one that was dropped from the first movie? From what I recall from "Dangerous Days" it was originally supposed to be Deckard's introduction but was cut before filming started.
― Pheeel, Monday, 17 July 2017 17:29 (eight years ago)
if it's on par w/2010 or The Two Jakes or some other traditionally kinda derided sequel to a legendarily classic film that's actually interesting despite their flaws (and trying to live up to the predecessors), i'll be happy enough.
― nomar, Monday, 17 July 2017 17:29 (eight years ago)
I suppose my own concern is what Ridley Scott is currently doing to the Alien backstory.
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 17 July 2017 17:36 (eight years ago)
you just want to shake him scream has george lucas taught you nothing???
― Larry Elleison (rogermexico.), Monday, 17 July 2017 17:40 (eight years ago)
*and scream
guys I bet this movie has a twist
― El Tomboto, Monday, 17 July 2017 18:01 (eight years ago)
there's no blade
― Yoni Loves Chocha (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 17 July 2017 18:02 (eight years ago)
and get this: he's walking slowly
― nomar, Monday, 17 July 2017 18:02 (eight years ago)
the twist is... they are all Legos
― this iphone speaks many languages (DJP), Monday, 17 July 2017 18:04 (eight years ago)
It's strongly implied by what Deckard finds in the final scene.
http://geekologie.com/2010/05/26/lego-unicorn-3.jpg
― jmm, Monday, 17 July 2017 18:10 (eight years ago)
New trailer is not promising. I think Jared Leto is gonna sink this movie for me. He's just not a credible actor in any role and looks particularly egregious here - and apparently has very big part.
― Badmotorfinger Debate Club (MFB), Monday, 17 July 2017 18:10 (eight years ago)
yeah, looks like it. I remember the bit about the pot boiling over
― Number None, Monday, 17 July 2017 18:11 (eight years ago)
really wish movie trailers didn't have to be a series of escalatingly tense moments leading to the title drop in 2017
― mh, Monday, 17 July 2017 18:15 (eight years ago)
first trailer: "tell either side there's no wall, you bought a war"second trailer: "if this gets out we've bought ourselves a war"screenwriter clearly very taken with this very bad line.
― The XX pants (ledge), Monday, 17 July 2017 19:04 (eight years ago)