Democratic (Party) Direction

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (11201 of them)

Ah come on fred, bad form

Treeship, Friday, 5 May 2017 23:49 (nine years ago)

Goddamnit why does Fred always have to shit up politics threads. America for Americans.

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Friday, 5 May 2017 23:56 (nine years ago)

Anyway, this is an interminable conversation. I just want the democrats to get their act together enough to beat a party whose policies actively harm 95% of voters

Treeship, Friday, 5 May 2017 23:56 (nine years ago)

My problem with the whole "don't appeal to racists" thing is I don't know what we mean by "racists." Like if we're talking about some archetypal hick who openly professes hatred of all people of color, that's not the majority of Trump voters. And plenty of democratic voters express more quiet forms of racism just like republicans do. Now I'm all for not appealing to racism (which, btw, the Clintons both have done), but you're not going to have many voters if you avoid seeking the votes of "racists."

the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Saturday, 6 May 2017 00:00 (nine years ago)

by racists i mean assholes toward african americans, latinos, arabs, asians, and so forth

reggie (qualmsley), Saturday, 6 May 2017 00:06 (nine years ago)

fuck them

reggie (qualmsley), Saturday, 6 May 2017 00:07 (nine years ago)

Agreed.

How would that affect the way you ran a presidential campaign? How would your approach differ from, say, Sanders in light of this "fuck racists" attitude?

What is this conversation even about?

Treeship, Saturday, 6 May 2017 00:09 (nine years ago)

I'm not even trying to be a dick I just want to understand what the moral reservation is from trying to appeal to the economic plight of poor whites with outsized electoral power? Wouldn't it be better to give them a non-racist political narrative to embrace?

Treeship, Saturday, 6 May 2017 00:13 (nine years ago)

it's like y'all have never dealt with racists and sexists

the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 6 May 2017 00:28 (nine years ago)

or voters

spud called maris (darraghmac), Saturday, 6 May 2017 00:30 (nine years ago)

You're not going to convince them to not be racist with a campaign anyway. The job of the democrats is to prevent the racist party from killing everyone.

Treeship, Saturday, 6 May 2017 00:32 (nine years ago)

sorry but that's the dumbest thing i've ever heard

the late great, Saturday, 6 May 2017 00:34 (nine years ago)

on a thread that is chock full of stupidity

the late great, Saturday, 6 May 2017 00:35 (nine years ago)

I just don't think clinton lost bc of her opposition to structural racism and sexism. That would have been noble. I think she lost because people 1.) are deplorable--fine and 2.) thought she was a snob.

Treeship, Saturday, 6 May 2017 00:36 (nine years ago)

the job of the democrats is to prevent the racist party from killing everyone

a snob you say?

the late great, Saturday, 6 May 2017 00:38 (nine years ago)

ppl were sick of politics and opted for an alternative

spud called maris (darraghmac), Saturday, 6 May 2017 00:39 (nine years ago)

It's fine for me to be a snob I'm not running for president.

Treeship, Saturday, 6 May 2017 00:41 (nine years ago)

Sorry for posting about the Democratic (party) direction it's a sickness.

Treeship, Saturday, 6 May 2017 00:43 (nine years ago)

personally i think the problems of the left have less to do w people like clinton and wasserman schulz and more to do w the actual people that make up the left

the late great, Saturday, 6 May 2017 00:45 (nine years ago)

cue bug eyed rage for conflating the democratic party and the left

the late great, Saturday, 6 May 2017 00:46 (nine years ago)

"actual people that make up the left" is poorly phrased, sorry, but you know what i mean

the late great, Saturday, 6 May 2017 00:47 (nine years ago)

'demos' means "people". anyone who wants to divide the 'demos' up can vote GOP and fuck right off. how do you direct a party to win elections against stuck up bigots? stop acting like america is a meritocracy, when it hasn't been in a long, long time, and recognize financial inequality is as bad as it's been since the great goddamn depression. tax wealth. tax investment. advocate universal health care. despise racists / classists / sexists -- no matter how subtle and/or sophisticated those assholes might come off

reggie (qualmsley), Saturday, 6 May 2017 00:50 (nine years ago)

mmm dude you sound kind of unhinged

the late great, Saturday, 6 May 2017 00:50 (nine years ago)

i'm beyond unhinged. 24,000,000+ americans are un-health-cared potentially, as of yesterday

reggie (qualmsley), Saturday, 6 May 2017 00:51 (nine years ago)

maybe if you perform more anger on the internet they will get their healthcare back

probably not tho

the late great, Saturday, 6 May 2017 00:52 (nine years ago)

the time is potentially out of joint

j., Saturday, 6 May 2017 00:53 (nine years ago)

Ayyy hamletttttt

Treeship, Saturday, 6 May 2017 00:54 (nine years ago)

train your guns on your allies. that will restore health care to the poor

reggie (qualmsley), Saturday, 6 May 2017 00:58 (nine years ago)

hahahaha that's ironic

the late great, Saturday, 6 May 2017 00:58 (nine years ago)

this thread is like the definition of circular firing squad

the late great, Saturday, 6 May 2017 00:59 (nine years ago)

24,000,000

reggie (qualmsley), Saturday, 6 May 2017 00:59 (nine years ago)

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

the late great, Saturday, 6 May 2017 01:00 (nine years ago)

24,000,000

reggie (qualmsley), Saturday, 6 May 2017 01:00 (nine years ago)

jesus

Treeship, Saturday, 6 May 2017 01:02 (nine years ago)

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

your cognitive privilege (El Tomboto), Saturday, 6 May 2017 01:04 (nine years ago)

personally i think the problems of the left have less to do w people like clinton and wasserman schulz and more to do w the actual people that make up the left

"actual people that make up the left" is poorly phrased, sorry, but you know what i mean

I don't, tbh

El Tuomasbot (milo z), Saturday, 6 May 2017 01:11 (nine years ago)

how many more state and federal seats can democrats lose in 2017/18?

:)

reggie (qualmsley), Saturday, 6 May 2017 01:13 (nine years ago)

24,000,000

your cognitive privilege (El Tomboto), Saturday, 6 May 2017 02:07 (nine years ago)

the french election is under attack too

reggie (qualmsley), Saturday, 6 May 2017 03:28 (nine years ago)

personally i think the problems of the left have less to do w people like clinton and wasserman schulz and more to do w the actual people that make up the left

No, it's those Clintonite monsters.

If I was still a Catholic i'd ask for penance for reviving this thread.

Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 6 May 2017 03:56 (nine years ago)

you only have yourself to blame

ToddBonzalez (BradNelson), Saturday, 6 May 2017 04:24 (nine years ago)

reggie is a pretty good example of twitter radicalization. dude was like the politics algerian goalkeeper when he started posting here

k3vin k., Saturday, 6 May 2017 04:58 (nine years ago)

I just don't think clinton lost bc of her opposition to structural racism and sexism

lol what opposition.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, 6 May 2017 16:50 (nine years ago)

iirc, she openly referred to racists and sexists as 'deplorables', or something like that.

Aimless, Saturday, 6 May 2017 16:53 (nine years ago)

If I was still a Catholic i'd ask for penance for reviving this thread.

― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius)

ten hail marys, five our fathers, go forth and sin no more

increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Saturday, 6 May 2017 16:57 (nine years ago)

Or at least stick to the fun sins.

El Tuomasbot (milo z), Saturday, 6 May 2017 17:39 (nine years ago)

I just don't think clinton lost bc of her opposition to structural racism and sexism

lol what opposition.

― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Saturday, May 6, 2017 9:50 AM (two days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
iirc, she openly referred to racists and sexists as 'deplorables', or something like that.
― Aimless, Saturday, May 6, 2017 9:53 AM (two days ago)

She gave a high profile speech on the rise of the far right and spoke strongly about her intention to protect reproductive rights during the 3rd debate, which wasn't an insignificant thing to some people.

Nerdstrom Poindexter, Monday, 8 May 2017 17:17 (nine years ago)

so Franken's doing a great job today, as he generally does, so between him being a beacon of GAF in the Senate and the fact that the GOP will gladly follow a washed-up reality star with multiple bankruptcies as long as it gets them a shot at controlling the SCOTUS, is there any good reason the Democrats should not actively recruit more celebrity candidates? Enumerate the things they have to lose.

your cognitive privilege (El Tomboto), Monday, 8 May 2017 21:02 (nine years ago)

Wish they'd picked him for VP in 2016 purely so he could've hit Pence with 'supply-side Jesus' in the debates but yes, please bring on a clever smartass from St Louis Park to end this, makes sense to me :-))

syzygy stardust (suzy), Monday, 8 May 2017 21:21 (nine years ago)

here is a stupid article that makes it easy to disregard the seriousness of the point I'm trying to make:
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/nov/14/michael-moore-oprah-winfrey-tom-hanks-us-president-donald-trump-democratic-party

your cognitive privilege (El Tomboto), Monday, 8 May 2017 21:23 (nine years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.