i would vote Warren in an instant. i'm surprised to discover she is 67! she obv takes care of herself.
not really seeing her nomiated though. if the same people in charge last year are still in charge they will probably pick someone that sucks.
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:38 (nine years ago)
voters?
― by the light of the burning Citroën, Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:45 (nine years ago)
unfortunately yes
― k3vin k., Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:57 (nine years ago)
yes here is your choice the 3 ppl who were able to raise half a billion dollars, pure democracy with a Big D
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 4 May 2017 20:00 (nine years ago)
lost to him by -2,868,691 votes
OK maybe just someone who reads Milton Bradley's instructions about The Object of the Game
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 4 May 2017 20:01 (nine years ago)
jfc at the singing dem congresspeople
― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Thursday, 4 May 2017 20:33 (nine years ago)
haven't heard or seen yet but it seems like an odd moment of misplaced overconfidence
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 4 May 2017 20:35 (nine years ago)
i will never not be embarrassed by and angry at american politicians i guess
― nomar, Thursday, 4 May 2017 20:37 (nine years ago)
CA is moving its primary to March so maybe a bunch of dumb fucks in New Hampshire and Iowa dont have full say on who will be the nominee..
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 4 May 2017 20:37 (nine years ago)
This is up there with Republicans whining that Clinton wasn't legitimate because he only got a plurality of the popular vote.
― El Tuomasbot (milo z), Thursday, 4 May 2017 20:43 (nine years ago)
oh yeah i'm sure it is
― ToddBonzalez (BradNelson), Thursday, 4 May 2017 20:49 (nine years ago)
it's tantamount to calling the president of the united states "jonad"
― passionate plant-based athlete (voodoo chili), Thursday, 4 May 2017 21:17 (nine years ago)
@adamjohnsonNYChow can dems on one hand talk about life and death (which it is) then sing based on some abstract political calculus 18 months form now?
Like, what's the point at all in looking smug like this? What upside is there? It confounds me.
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 4 May 2017 21:38 (nine years ago)
It does?
― the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 4 May 2017 21:42 (nine years ago)
The singing was fucked up.
― Treeship, Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:00 (nine years ago)
it was an elaborate callback
― ToddBonzalez (BradNelson), Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:01 (nine years ago)
It's like everyone has lost the ability to take things seriously.
― Treeship, Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:02 (nine years ago)
are we sure it was the dems who were singing that?
i've been seeing conflicting reports all day
― I got da Midas touch as you fucking were LG x (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:02 (nine years ago)
Idk. I hope it wasn't.
― Treeship, Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:05 (nine years ago)
What the House Republicans did today is despicable.
― Treeship, Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:06 (nine years ago)
True, but that doesn't make democrats response look good though.
― Moodles, Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:08 (nine years ago)
Duh
― Treeship, Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:10 (nine years ago)
I don't give a fuck.
― the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:16 (nine years ago)
me neither
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:16 (nine years ago)
https://www.google.com/amp/amp.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2017/05/04/democrats_tone_deaf_response_to_trumpcare_vote_singing_nah_nah_hey_hey_goodbye.html
Seems like there are good sources that it was the Democrats.
I care about this. This health care bill is potentially a death sentence for millions if it passes the Senate. It's not a hilarious tone deaf misstep by the Republicans, it's murder for profit.
― Treeship, Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:22 (nine years ago)
Those things are true, and I want to mock these people for being so stupid and myopic.
― the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:25 (nine years ago)
How about save the gloating and singing until after you win some fucking elections?
― Moodles, Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:28 (nine years ago)
House Dems vote as a unit against a bill that will kill people and mocked the Republicans who voted for it. I'm supposed to be upset? Or are we thinking BOO HOO THE DEMS SHOULD BE THE MATURE PARTY
― the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:29 (nine years ago)
should have included a public option rather than a fucking fine
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:29 (nine years ago)
They're mocking republicans for what? Getting exactly what they wanted?
― Moodles, Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:31 (nine years ago)
this is a total non-issue and paying any attention to it at all means you care more about the sound of your own voice than the issue at hand.
― People like Malcolm X, Martin Luther King, Jr, and (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:31 (nine years ago)
^^^
this handwringing is some nonsense. This thing isn't even a fucking law yet! It's ALL optics/theater at this point.
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:37 (nine years ago)
Trade in the poster board on sticks for actual pitchforks from now on
― your cognitive privilege (El Tomboto), Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:38 (nine years ago)
Strangely enough, Marx, Jesus, Mohammed, Lincoln AND Moses all said the same thing. Also Churchill and Gandhi.
― your cognitive privilege (El Tomboto), Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:41 (nine years ago)
Then I want some DAMN royalties!
― Moodles, Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:51 (nine years ago)
it goes without saying that on policy what's happening is disastrous
that said it's hard not feel apathetic reading all the political optimism from some dems coming out of this. the logic that by voting for a bill that is sure to be unpopular they're ensuring their own midterm defeat seems true but...is that all there is now? wasn't this exactly what happened 8 years ago? is this what we're going to see now, alternating wave elections for the foreseeable future? it's depressing.
― k3vin k., Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:53 (nine years ago)
is this what we're going to see now, alternating wave elections for the foreseeable future? it's depressing.
that's how American history has worked!
― the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:56 (nine years ago)
Check these out, especially 1894:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections,_1890
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections,_1894
― the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:58 (nine years ago)
means you care more about the sound of your own voice than the issue at hand.
― People like Malcolm X, Martin Luther King, Jr, and (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Thursday, May 4, 2017 6:31 PM (twenty-five minutes ago)
could the same be said of the congresspeople singing? smart money says yes
― k3vin k., Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:58 (nine years ago)
xp i know, it's just depressing to live it out. i was 19 or 20 when the ACA passed and it legit felt like a monumental achievement (even with the reservations that several of us itt shared). now i'm 8 years older and more cynical and tbf i just dgaf about looking forward to the next election or encouraging this infantile mock-singing
― k3vin k., Thursday, 4 May 2017 23:00 (nine years ago)
i would just like people to have health care
― k3vin k., Thursday, 4 May 2017 23:01 (nine years ago)
hey look I lived through forty years of Democratic dominance in the House. 1994 and 2002 felt like stomach punches, so much so that 2006 and 2008 were is-this-happening moments.
― the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 4 May 2017 23:02 (nine years ago)
― k3vin k., Thursday, May 4, 2017 7:01 PM
otm
damn:
The fragmented and disoriented Democratic Party was crushed everywhere outside the South, losing more than half its seats to the Republican Party. Even in the South, the Democrats lost seats to Republican-Populist electoral fusion in Alabama, Texas, Tennessee, and North Carolina.[2][3] The Democrats ultimately lost 127 seats in the election while the Republicans gained 130 seats (after the resolution of several contested elections). This is the largest swing in the history of the House of Representatives, and also makes the 1894 election the single largest midterm election victory in the entire history of the United States. (A political party would not suffer triple-digit losses again until 1932.)
of course in 1894 I would've been a socialist or Republican.
― the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 4 May 2017 23:03 (nine years ago)
Your cynicism was delayed by the election of a black president
― your cognitive privilege (El Tomboto), Thursday, 4 May 2017 23:11 (nine years ago)
many cross posts
alternating wave elections
About half the country hating the president's guts is the new normal.
I feel ya, K3v. P sure we all want people to have health care. Depressingly incremental steps in that direction may be the best one can hope for, and those steps will probably involve politics, alas. So stuff like optics and gloating and Bud Light and who sings what and what the tweetwits tweet? All that shit is going to matter to some extent.
― amex: bold as love (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 5 May 2017 11:41 (nine years ago)
In and of itself, sure. But it is an OMINOUS, OMINOUS sign that we can expect absolute worst from the Dems henceforth. Along with I'M STILL WITH HER gtfo.
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 May 2017 14:51 (nine years ago)
we can expect absolute worst from the Dems henceforth
somehow I don't think this will prove difficult for you
― Οὖτις, Friday, 5 May 2017 15:28 (nine years ago)
In and of itself, sure.
stopped reading here
― ToddBonzalez (BradNelson), Friday, 5 May 2017 15:43 (nine years ago)