Post a controversial opinion

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (8526 of them)

How is this for controversial: I'm still an optimist! The disaster was the crash in 2008, and we're still figuring out a way forward. Trumpism is failing, Bannonism is failing, the demographics are still pointing to a less white supremacist US, the story of France is centrism winning over conservatism + populist leftism winning over centrist leftism, and the rise of China still points to a less eurocentric world. Yeah, Britain is completely and utterly fucked, and for some reason the left keeps getting bogged down in internecine squabbles, but overall trends are fairly good. Until the oceans swallow us all, of course.

Frederik B, Thursday, 4 May 2017 11:49 (nine years ago)

things are definitely getting worse in the world ask anyone from 1547

s'rong, unstable (darraghmac), Thursday, 4 May 2017 11:51 (nine years ago)

our generation faces the hardest life and worst threats to existence ever

s'rong, unstable (darraghmac), Thursday, 4 May 2017 11:51 (nine years ago)

the story of France is centrism winning over conservatism

bro

The Adventures Of Whiteman (Bananaman Begins), Thursday, 4 May 2017 11:52 (nine years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6L8rHyzQj0

Treeship, Thursday, 4 May 2017 12:06 (nine years ago)

x-post: They went from Chirac + Jospin in 2002 to Macron + Melenchon in 2017. Overall, the electorate moved a fair bit to the left. FN has only gained five percentage points in the last three elections, despite a cleaning up of the image, that included kicking her father out, and she seems to have stumbled badly in the campaign - though I'm saying this with an outsiders perception. There are all indications that a populist leftist candidate could overtake her as the preferred anti-centrist option, though again: Internecine squabbles...

Frederik B, Thursday, 4 May 2017 12:35 (nine years ago)

our generation faces the hardest life and worst threats to existence ever

http://www.azquotes.com/picture-quotes/quote-sometimes-i-even-cut-myself-to-see-how-much-it-bleeds-it-s-like-adrenaline-the-pain-eminem-57-2-0274.jpg

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 4 May 2017 12:44 (nine years ago)

Yeah you bleed just to know you're alive

amex: bold as love (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 4 May 2017 12:48 (nine years ago)

you think the Great Leap Forward was hard, we have people making fun of CNN on a daily basis

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 4 May 2017 13:08 (nine years ago)

Tattoos are gross and off-putting.

I don't think they're gross but I don't see their point.

the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 4 May 2017 13:10 (nine years ago)

for in case you're waiting a long time for a bus and you get bored and wanna look at something

j., Thursday, 4 May 2017 13:20 (nine years ago)

Contro-op: It could just be that a group in power is the most susceptible to corruption, but it's also possible that there's something deeply, fundamentally wrong with white people.

Jigsaw Pizzle (Old Lunch), Thursday, 4 May 2017 14:30 (nine years ago)

tattoos can be incredibly sexy and they can also be very gross

marcos, Thursday, 4 May 2017 14:34 (nine years ago)

white people can be incredibly sexy and they can also be very gross

gnaw on my meat oreo (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 4 May 2017 14:35 (nine years ago)

The Monsanto Years is the best Neil Young album since Psychedelic Pill

HONOR THE FYRE (sleeve), Thursday, 4 May 2017 14:38 (nine years ago)

it shouldn't be against the law to drive without a seatbelt

also, open container laws make zero sense

Wimmels, Thursday, 4 May 2017 17:06 (nine years ago)

fwiw I always wear a seatbelt, I just don't think it should be illegal to not wear one. also it sucks to be driving three blocks never exceeding 15mph and have your car ding at you the entire time

Wimmels, Thursday, 4 May 2017 17:07 (nine years ago)

most of my controversial opinions involve motor vehicles for some reason

Wimmels, Thursday, 4 May 2017 17:08 (nine years ago)

seatbelt laws are one of the greatest public health achievements of the past 40 years, wtf

k3vin k., Thursday, 4 May 2017 17:11 (nine years ago)

seatbelts are the mandatory health insurance of cars, even at low speed impacts you're going to end up in the ER to get cautionary x-rays to make sure you didn't crack a rib and jacking up my car/health insurance rates

a landlocked exclave (mh), Thursday, 4 May 2017 17:16 (nine years ago)

Yes, but that has nothing to do with any other driver or pedestrian; whether or not I am buckled up makes no difference whatsoever to anyone else, so eschewing the seatbelt would seem like a personal--if reckless--choice, like smoking.

Wimmels, Thursday, 4 May 2017 18:34 (nine years ago)

fwiw I always wear a seatbelt, I just don't think it should be illegal to not wear one. also it sucks to be driving three blocks never exceeding 15mph and have your car ding at you the entire time

― Wimmels, Thursday, May 4, 2017 12:07 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this isn't post your self-owns

goole, Thursday, 4 May 2017 18:36 (nine years ago)

take that trip at 45 so it doesn't ding as long? idk

goole, Thursday, 4 May 2017 18:37 (nine years ago)

Yes, but that has nothing to do with any other driver or pedestrian

If I pull out, don't see you, and you run into me, your bruised ribs are on my insurance!

a landlocked exclave (mh), Thursday, 4 May 2017 18:41 (nine years ago)

or what if some kid whips around the corner and slams into you going over thirty head-on, meaning you're going to experience 15mph of your body decelerating plus 30mph of the other car's momentum

Ralph Nader's book that spurned automobile safety features was literally titled Unsafe at Any Speed and your argument is "idk I'm going real slow"

a landlocked exclave (mh), Thursday, 4 May 2017 18:43 (nine years ago)

if you are not wearing a seatbelt and are in a crash you can a: kill the person in front of you if you are indeed sitting behind someone by hitting the back of their headrest with your head at a great speed. b: go flying out of the car and presumably a human projectile has potential to injure others

-_- (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 4 May 2017 18:46 (nine years ago)

spurred xp?

Mordy, Thursday, 4 May 2017 18:48 (nine years ago)

good typo catch

a landlocked exclave (mh), Thursday, 4 May 2017 18:51 (nine years ago)

xp

If I pull out, don't see you, and you run into me, your bruised ribs are on my insurance!

― a landlocked exclave (mh), Thursday, May 4, 2017 2:41 PM (five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

or what if some kid whips around the corner and slams into you going over thirty head-on, meaning you're going to experience 15mph of your body decelerating plus 30mph of the other car's momentum

Ralph Nader's book that spurned automobile safety features was literally titled Unsafe at Any Speed and your argument is "idk I'm going real slow"

― a landlocked exclave (mh), Thursday, May 4, 2017 2:43 PM (two minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

in both of these examples, though, the accident is your fault. again, not sure what my wearing or not wearing a seatbelt has to do with it if a kid is "whipping" around a corner at twice the speed limit, or you pull out and "don't see" me. I'm wearing a seatbelt to assuage your guilt for hurting me more than I might have been hurt if I was buckled? I don't see what that has to do with the law

Wimmels, Thursday, 4 May 2017 18:51 (nine years ago)

if you are not wearing a seatbelt and are in a crash you can a: kill the person in front of you if you are indeed sitting behind someone by hitting the back of their headrest with your head at a great speed. b: go flying out of the car and presumably a human projectile has potential to injure others

― -_- (jim in vancouver), Thursday, May 4, 2017 2:46 PM (five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

exactly how often do you think this happens? serious question because I have no idea

Wimmels, Thursday, 4 May 2017 18:52 (nine years ago)

do you believe in the social contract or nah

a landlocked exclave (mh), Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:01 (nine years ago)

Enough with this every-man-is-an-island glibertarian garbage. Even if you, not wearing a seatbelt, have a single-car accident and propel yourself through your windshield, public servants who get paid by my tax dollars have to perform an on-scene accident investigation and clean your unsightly remains off the road. Wear your goddamned seatbelt, and support mandatory seatbelt laws.

Lauren Schumer Donor (Phil D.), Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:02 (nine years ago)

if you are not wearing a seatbelt and are in a crash you can a: kill the person in front of you if you are indeed sitting behind someone by hitting the back of their headrest with your head at a great speed. b: go flying out of the car and presumably a human projectile has potential to injure others

― -_- (jim in vancouver), Thursday, May 4, 2017 2:46 PM (five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

exactly how often do you think this happens? serious question because I have no idea

― Wimmels, Thursday, May 4, 2017 11:52 AM (ten minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/japan/1380376/Unbelted-rear-passengers-biggest-danger-in-crash.html

the actual projectile flying through the windscreen aspect i have to admit i have never heard of. just seems like a plausible thing that could potentially cause damage? but maybe not

-_- (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:05 (nine years ago)

I mean, even if you argue that it's exceedingly unlikely you'll get in an accident at that low speed for a few blocks, you're wagering the what -- four seconds, maybe? -- of buckling and unbuckling against that likelihood. I'm so used to buckling as I get in the driver's seat that I do it in the same motion as closing the door and starting the car. Why even close the door if you're going two blocks?

a landlocked exclave (mh), Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:05 (nine years ago)

the kind of position you have in the Gulf where it's relatively easy to obtain a right to work but citizenship and benefits are impossible

It is worth noting that guest workers in the Gulf states are notoriously maltreated, in many situations the conditions are indistinguishable from slavery.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:06 (nine years ago)

Why drive if you're going two blocks?

Lauren Schumer Donor (Phil D.), Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:06 (nine years ago)

the kind of position you have in the Gulf where it's relatively easy to obtain a right to work but citizenship and benefits are impossible

It is worth noting that guest workers in the Gulf states are notoriously maltreated, in many situations the conditions are indistinguishable from slavery.

― a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Thursday, May 4, 2017 12:06 PM (eighteen seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

this sort of position is also the most common way people come to work in canada and has been since the 70s. temporary foreign workers who have no road to permanent residence and whose staying in the country is reliant on them remaining in the initial job they were hired for

-_- (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:08 (nine years ago)

conditions better than the gulf in general but abuses and illegal wages and working conditions are reported

-_- (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:08 (nine years ago)

xp to Lauren--Because on my way to places that aren't in any way close enough to walk or bike to, I often have to run errands and stop at the post office, bank, library, etc, and buckling and unbuckling every time I have to jump out if the car to mail a letter seems tedious and unnecessary

Wimmels, Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:09 (nine years ago)

what makes you think you don't deserve a tedious life

ogmor, Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:22 (nine years ago)

touché

Wimmels, Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:37 (nine years ago)

Finally an opinion that kicked up some dust!

(And which I hella disagree with, fwiw.)

Jigsaw Pizzle (Old Lunch), Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:41 (nine years ago)

I notice no one challenged the open container law part of that post

surely we can all agree open container laws are nonsense, at least

Wimmels, Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:44 (nine years ago)

'all' ILX never agrees on anything that specific. and don't call me Shirley.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:48 (nine years ago)

Being dead would be pretty awesome, it's only the painful way of getting there that sucks.

Charles "Butt" Stanton (Neanderthal), Friday, 5 May 2017 01:07 (nine years ago)

I mean most of the drag of being dead = worrying about it when alive, guilt of leaving people behind, all things that I ain't gots to worry about if I just peace out in my sleep. i'm not suicidal or nothin, but...idk, eternal sleep seems p cool atm

Charles "Butt" Stanton (Neanderthal), Friday, 5 May 2017 01:08 (nine years ago)

seatbelts are cool. i wore them every time when i used to drive.

fwiw my brother was in a car accident and not wearing his seatbelt at the time. he flew out of the car and landed on the ground unhurt. lucky as hell.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 5 May 2017 01:24 (nine years ago)

xp if it is indeed just like sleep, I'm with ya. I think most people fear dying more than death, like you say, and that makes perfect sense to me. My anxieties are more about doing "enough" while I'm still here, to sorta earn the rest, I guess

that said, if it's hellfire and space monsters or something even more unimaginably horrible, that's gonna suck big time

biggest fear: some kind of lingering consciousness while buried, for all fucking eternity

sweet dreams, ILX!

Wimmels, Friday, 5 May 2017 02:08 (nine years ago)

that used to scare me but now i figure u can get used to anything even frozen eternity

Mordy, Friday, 5 May 2017 02:14 (nine years ago)

i honestly can't believe we had a discussion in 2017 on the merits of seatbelt laws. what's next, vaccines?

k3vin k., Friday, 5 May 2017 02:43 (nine years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.