warren is perfect
far from it, but there are no workable alternatives I can spot
― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Thursday, 4 May 2017 04:08 (nine years ago)
she's one of those people who seems way younger than her age though. a john stamos or mbah gotho type. xp
― Treeship, Thursday, 4 May 2017 04:13 (nine years ago)
i'm holding out for oprah
― bought 2 raris, went to chili's (crüt), Thursday, 4 May 2017 04:15 (nine years ago)
maybe i'll run
― Treeship, Thursday, 4 May 2017 04:17 (nine years ago)
buncha noise about Biden this week
― flopson, Thursday, 4 May 2017 04:20 (nine years ago)
joe biden is like nine hundred years old
― sexualing healing (crüt), Thursday, 4 May 2017 04:31 (nine years ago)
exactly
― flopson, Thursday, 4 May 2017 04:56 (nine years ago)
biden doesn't seem like a guy who particularly wants to be president tbh
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 4 May 2017 05:02 (nine years ago)
Won't Warren be in her 70s? <3 EW but maybe the Democrats should spend the next couple of years finding someone not eligible for Social Security to run against 76-year old Trump.
― El Tuomasbot (milo z), Thursday, 4 May 2017 05:48 (nine years ago)
making sure you are happy with a candidate’s purity.
GUESS WHAT NOUN I WANT TO BAN
Christ Almighty
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 4 May 2017 06:31 (nine years ago)
@samknight1
.@EvanMcS asks @NancyPelosi if single payer should be a Democratic Party platform in 2018.
"No," she says, without missing a beat
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 4 May 2017 18:23 (nine years ago)
@Atriosmedicaid expansion was the best thing in obamacare. all of its proponents know this. they need to say it.
the coverage regulations are also good but the "exchanges" are garbage and the law was sold on the exchanges
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 4 May 2017 18:33 (nine years ago)
the noun you want to ban is "Democratic Party"
what do I win
― your cognitive privilege (El Tomboto), Thursday, 4 May 2017 18:58 (nine years ago)
"it can’t primarily [be] about making sure you are happy with a candidate’s purity." =
"We're going to nominate Booker or Cuomo, commies, so smarten up"
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:10 (nine years ago)
you've read a lot of Erik Loomis I can tell
― your cognitive privilege (El Tomboto), Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:13 (nine years ago)
Tbf to morbs, it's hard to feel anything but loathing for a party that couldn't defeat a Cronenbergian carnival barker
― Treeship, Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:21 (nine years ago)
lost to him by -2,868,691 votes
― your cognitive privilege (El Tomboto), Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:26 (nine years ago)
But he is a demented swamp creature
― Treeship, Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:27 (nine years ago)
Who only managed to beat 16 other Republican primary candidates, who thought he had a chance? It is a mystery.
If I had a dollar for every Democrat I've seen excited about a possible Cuomo 2020 candidacy, I'd have zero dollars. The only person I've actually seen it floated as some sure thing is Morbz.
― Lauren Schumer Donor (Phil D.), Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:29 (nine years ago)
Tbf to morbs
this is unnecessary
― ToddBonzalez (BradNelson), Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:30 (nine years ago)
i would vote Warren in an instant. i'm surprised to discover she is 67! she obv takes care of herself.
not really seeing her nomiated though. if the same people in charge last year are still in charge they will probably pick someone that sucks.
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:38 (nine years ago)
voters?
― by the light of the burning Citroën, Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:45 (nine years ago)
unfortunately yes
― k3vin k., Thursday, 4 May 2017 19:57 (nine years ago)
yes here is your choice the 3 ppl who were able to raise half a billion dollars, pure democracy with a Big D
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 4 May 2017 20:00 (nine years ago)
OK maybe just someone who reads Milton Bradley's instructions about The Object of the Game
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 4 May 2017 20:01 (nine years ago)
jfc at the singing dem congresspeople
― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Thursday, 4 May 2017 20:33 (nine years ago)
haven't heard or seen yet but it seems like an odd moment of misplaced overconfidence
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 4 May 2017 20:35 (nine years ago)
i will never not be embarrassed by and angry at american politicians i guess
― nomar, Thursday, 4 May 2017 20:37 (nine years ago)
CA is moving its primary to March so maybe a bunch of dumb fucks in New Hampshire and Iowa dont have full say on who will be the nominee..
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 4 May 2017 20:37 (nine years ago)
This is up there with Republicans whining that Clinton wasn't legitimate because he only got a plurality of the popular vote.
― El Tuomasbot (milo z), Thursday, 4 May 2017 20:43 (nine years ago)
oh yeah i'm sure it is
― ToddBonzalez (BradNelson), Thursday, 4 May 2017 20:49 (nine years ago)
it's tantamount to calling the president of the united states "jonad"
― passionate plant-based athlete (voodoo chili), Thursday, 4 May 2017 21:17 (nine years ago)
@adamjohnsonNYChow can dems on one hand talk about life and death (which it is) then sing based on some abstract political calculus 18 months form now?
Like, what's the point at all in looking smug like this? What upside is there? It confounds me.
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 4 May 2017 21:38 (nine years ago)
It does?
― the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 4 May 2017 21:42 (nine years ago)
The singing was fucked up.
― Treeship, Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:00 (nine years ago)
it was an elaborate callback
― ToddBonzalez (BradNelson), Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:01 (nine years ago)
It's like everyone has lost the ability to take things seriously.
― Treeship, Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:02 (nine years ago)
are we sure it was the dems who were singing that?
i've been seeing conflicting reports all day
― I got da Midas touch as you fucking were LG x (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:02 (nine years ago)
Idk. I hope it wasn't.
― Treeship, Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:05 (nine years ago)
What the House Republicans did today is despicable.
― Treeship, Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:06 (nine years ago)
True, but that doesn't make democrats response look good though.
― Moodles, Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:08 (nine years ago)
Duh
― Treeship, Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:10 (nine years ago)
I don't give a fuck.
― the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:16 (nine years ago)
me neither
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:16 (nine years ago)
https://www.google.com/amp/amp.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2017/05/04/democrats_tone_deaf_response_to_trumpcare_vote_singing_nah_nah_hey_hey_goodbye.html
Seems like there are good sources that it was the Democrats.
I care about this. This health care bill is potentially a death sentence for millions if it passes the Senate. It's not a hilarious tone deaf misstep by the Republicans, it's murder for profit.
― Treeship, Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:22 (nine years ago)
Those things are true, and I want to mock these people for being so stupid and myopic.
― the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:25 (nine years ago)
How about save the gloating and singing until after you win some fucking elections?
― Moodles, Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:28 (nine years ago)
House Dems vote as a unit against a bill that will kill people and mocked the Republicans who voted for it. I'm supposed to be upset? Or are we thinking BOO HOO THE DEMS SHOULD BE THE MATURE PARTY
― the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:29 (nine years ago)
should have included a public option rather than a fucking fine
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:29 (nine years ago)
They're mocking republicans for what? Getting exactly what they wanted?
― Moodles, Thursday, 4 May 2017 22:31 (nine years ago)