2008 Primaries Thread 2: THE QUICKENING

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (7160 of them)

Edwards endorsing HRC just proves what a fake-ass faux populist liberal he is

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:40 (eighteen years ago)

Lincoln Chafee endorses obama btw

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:41 (eighteen years ago)

where are we getting this edwards leaning hillary info? seems like v strange timing.

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:42 (eighteen years ago)

I was gonna ask about that...

jaymc, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:43 (eighteen years ago)

the edwards endorsement murmurings are just rumor-mill grist right now, take it with a cellar of salt plz

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:43 (eighteen years ago)

inference could be drawn from him meeting w/ hillary but canceling w/ barack? I haven't read it anywhere explicitly

dmr, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:43 (eighteen years ago)

yah thats all ive heard seems pretty tenuous

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:44 (eighteen years ago)

i think this was what sparked the most recent rumors, via ben smith:

Edwards' aide Jonathan Prince made a previously unreported appearance at Hillary Clinton's Virginia headquarters last week, which has stoked a bit of chatter along the Edwards-Clinton lines ABC explores today.

Prince confirmed he was there, and said he was stopping by for lunch with his old friend Howard Wolfson, with whom he also dined on New Years Eve.

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:44 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=4281404&page=1

Simon H., Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:44 (eighteen years ago)

under the ILX administration, REFORM THRU EATING OUT CREDIT-CARD COMPANIES

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:45 (eighteen years ago)

waiting til hillarys behind to endorse her seems pretty clueless - but i guess edwards hasnt proven himself to be the master strategist so far

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:46 (eighteen years ago)

honestly edwards endorsement of hillz is gonna have a marginal impact i think, edwards supporters were the more-left and more-anti-hillary wing of the party weren't they?

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:46 (eighteen years ago)

Morbius I have no idea what you're talking about. Thanks for the actually realistic peek at Obama though.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:46 (eighteen years ago)

http://a.abcnews.com/images/Politics/AP_EDWARDS_080213_ms.jpg
a v silly man^^^^

jhøshea, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:47 (eighteen years ago)

Tracer i know you like to play the cynic here but what 'evidence' is actually contained in that paragraph Morbs posted??? All it says is "Obama isn't actually as left as Wellstone!!!" which is like, well, yeah and? Who is? The only evidence is his voting on a single bankruptcy bill and the fact that his health care plan might be, you know, pragmatic rather than extreme left.

Obama's always argued - and as an Illinoisian I can tell you this has been his thing from day one - in a practical approach rather than a bomb-throwing leftist approach - yet he still has a very left-of-center voting record. He may not have been the 'most liberal senator' in the last year due to his campaigning keeping him from key votes, but it was a year or two ago that he actually had a record to the left of Dennis Kucinich.

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:50 (eighteen years ago)

Edwards is a frauuuuud
You guys read that story about him telling Kerry the exact same "i've never told anyone this story before" story twice in two years, right?

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:51 (eighteen years ago)

Obama

-- Morbs

Granted. I should have said "compromise himself so thoroughly." But I don't think what you posted compares in any way to the gyrations and betrayals of the Clintons.

contenderizer, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:52 (eighteen years ago)

Tracer, Obama voted to allow credit card companies to raise interest rates to over 30%.

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:52 (eighteen years ago)

Your own damn fault for having a credit card.

HI DERE, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:53 (eighteen years ago)

deej take it easy, hard-charger

i just thanked morbs for a perspective on obama that wasn't omg-want-to-have-his-babies, that's all

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:53 (eighteen years ago)

I mean, Morbs, that I'll grant your point only to the extent that politics always tempers the rhetoric that gets you in the public eye with the compromises that make cooperative action possible. I just don't see any kind of trust-breaking betrayal in Obama's tactical compromises.

contenderizer, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:55 (eighteen years ago)

wellstone moved to the center in hopes of a prez run too

artdamages, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:56 (eighteen years ago)

oh there is plenty to critique about obama, i think we've all been critical of several things e.g. his debate performances, and I'm sure there's no way his presidency could possibly live up to expectations (lol heres hoping) but mis characterizing him as on par w/ the Clintons in terms of compromising his values is utterly misleading

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:56 (eighteen years ago)

contenderizer, in Morbiusrhetoric, compromise = betrayal. I don't know how long you've been reading his posts but it's becomes apparent pretty quickly.

HI DERE, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:57 (eighteen years ago)

hahahaha deej you're basically repeating the greatet ever political chestnut, i.e. "my greatest failing? well.." (candidate appears to think deeply for a moment) "it's probably that i'm too honest"

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:57 (eighteen years ago)

??? saying that he's given way below par debate performances = "i'm too honest"?

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:58 (eighteen years ago)

hes a politician and a politician is gonna be a politician but the whole "wahhh why are no politicians honest" morbs game is way misleading, you need to set your expectations within the realm of reality

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 17:59 (eighteen years ago)

BREAKING NEWS: ALL POLITICIANS LIE.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:00 (eighteen years ago)

Haha deej think about that last thing you just wrote and the likelihood of it happening compared to the likelyhood of the Earth spontaneously turning into a giant Skittle

HI DERE, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:01 (eighteen years ago)

I had to defend Obama over Christmas dinner against my aunt, who saw the 2004 convention speech and thought Obama was "the second coming" but then grew disappointed when he ran for president and started "pandering" to different interest groups. I was like, "Hi, he's a politician."

jaymc, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:01 (eighteen years ago)

Lesson #9 from Robert McNamara: In order to do good, you may have to engage in evil.

kenan, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:02 (eighteen years ago)

Also we can vote on which spelling of "likeliyhood" is more aesthetically-pleasing in my last post.

HI DERE, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:02 (eighteen years ago)

compromise on vital shit = betrayal.

for ILXpundits, compromise NEVER equals betrayal. Hence Wm J Clinton was in some ways "a great president."

I spent that entire Errol Morris film wanting to kick McN in the face.

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:03 (eighteen years ago)

lickyhoods

Mr. Que, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:03 (eighteen years ago)

how so Morbius? everyone on ILX is pretty bitter about HRC's compromising

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:04 (eighteen years ago)

the likelyhood of the Earth spontaneously turning into a giant Skittle

SO NOT GONNA HAPPEN.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:04 (eighteen years ago)

"everyone" = "most people" sorry

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:04 (eighteen years ago)

i think you guys are very charitable and sophisticated regarding the moral triage that must take place on a daily basis for national politicians from illinois who are seeking a higher office and i patiently await your extension of the same courtesy to national politicians from new york

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:05 (eighteen years ago)

i dont understand why its necessary to hold politicians to a higher standard of integrity than i hold myself

max, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:05 (eighteen years ago)

otm!

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:05 (eighteen years ago)

i will start getting mad about politicians compromising when i bike everywhere and give 30% of my income to the poor

max, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:06 (eighteen years ago)

Yes Tracer Hillary and Obama are exactly the same.

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:06 (eighteen years ago)

Obama never spent the 80s on the streets of Chicago as an organizer and activist, and even if he had it probably never impacted the way he would lead.

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:06 (eighteen years ago)

...

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:07 (eighteen years ago)

max voted to raise his cred-card rate to 30%?? I don't beeleeve it!

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:07 (eighteen years ago)

morbs, u a legendary crank! never change xoxo

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:07 (eighteen years ago)

HRC never spent years as a corporate lawyer, never voted for a war she didnt think would happen, and never pandered on issues like fuckin flag burning for political gain

there's pandering to interest groups and there is PANDERING to interest groups, Hillary's been in capslock mode for a minute

deej, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:07 (eighteen years ago)

If Hillary and Barack are exactly the same, where is he hiding the tits and where is she hiding the dick?

HI DERE, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:09 (eighteen years ago)

i patiently await your extension of the same courtesy to national politicians from new york

Has been extended. Numerous times. Feeding hand now has little holey bite marks all over it. Lesson learned.

contenderizer, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:09 (eighteen years ago)

never pandered on issues like fuckin flag burning for political gain

Actually, this strikes me as a pretty harmless form of pandering - a symbolic vote that will never go anywhere.

o. nate, Thursday, 14 February 2008 18:09 (eighteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.