Haha I like the photo, just the idea that it illustrates this article is...er.
― tales of a scorched-earth nothing (Doctor Casino), Monday, 20 February 2017 17:52 (nine years ago)
FAKE NEWS?
― El Tomboto, Monday, 20 February 2017 18:11 (nine years ago)
I can't tell whether that piece is really making the rounds as they say or whether I just get all my stories from a bubble predisposed to stab at uber whenever the opportunity presents itself
I'm really not in this bubble and like 10 copies of this came across my twitter feed
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Monday, 20 February 2017 18:13 (nine years ago)
Ya it's a shame because i guess there are times when hr/rest of upper mgmt don't believe the victim because ...
are you kidding me? there are functional workplaces and i would like to think most of us are in them, but in a lot of them (especially in the service industry or others with a significant management/worker gap in status, like salaried versus hourly) it's not that "there are times", it's that no one gives any shit whatsoever and favoritism or seniority wins every time
― mh π, Monday, 20 February 2017 19:58 (nine years ago)
man, this is a juicy read
― flopson, Monday, 20 February 2017 20:29 (nine years ago)
xp
sounds quite diff from
and no, HR in any competent place isn't going to do some shell game bullshit when it's obvious coworkers are going to talk and realize a "first incident" is anything butβ mh π, Sunday, February 19, 2017 5:07 PM (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
β mh π, Sunday, February 19, 2017 5:07 PM (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― Fβ― Aβ― (β), Monday, 20 February 2017 21:06 (nine years ago)
you mean where I said "in any competent place" and also referred to "functional workplaces" in the other?
― mh π, Monday, 20 February 2017 23:42 (nine years ago)
I guess it depends on whether you judge competence by their ability to shield management or their ability to act justly
I have a friend and former coworker who works at Uber and is friends with Susan; he corroborrated all of this, but also told me that there was a large HR shakeup several months ago (before she left) partially as a result of all of this already; and the two principals she mentioned (the one who did the whole thing with the jackets, and the one who propositioned her) were both gone; the latter fired, the former quit and is not director of eng at google, and is apparently a massive shithead. He defended the company to a degree, because he still drinks their kool aid, and also thinks that this situation isn't that abnormal (and drew comparisons to his former place of work, where I am now a manager; but, though the place I work has some ethical issues w/r/t who is in HR and how they've responded to, like, two things, it's absolutely not even close to being the same kind of thing where it seems like systematic workplace wide harrassment is covered up)
― akm, Tuesday, 21 February 2017 00:31 (nine years ago)
"and is NOW at google,"
http://jalopnik.com/uber-is-doomed-1792634203
― π ππ’π¨ (caek), Sunday, 26 February 2017 19:33 (nine years ago)
binladenthumbsup.gif
β mh π, Monday, February 20, 2017 2:58 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
otm - I was ranting about Lasership once and a friend of mine PMed me to confide she'd worked for them, and spent the next half hour telling her story of employment there, which involved lots of management encouraging rulebreaking, retaliating against her for reporting it, and even physically handling her the moment before she quit. it sounded v much like the Uber story.
Power plays are a definite thing in many corporate environments, particularly places where the pay is so abysmal and the employees are paycheck to paycheck and can't afford to be without one long enough or have the financial means to fight the company if they are taken advantage of.
― waht, I am true black metal worrior (Neanderthal), Sunday, 26 February 2017 19:38 (nine years ago)
https://newsroom.uber.com/a-profound-apology/
can i just say, i'm having a lovely time
― π ππ’π¨ (caek), Wednesday, 1 March 2017 02:47 (nine years ago)
Believe it when you see it, for at least a few years straight.
― larry appleton, Wednesday, 1 March 2017 02:52 (nine years ago)
love too see a company that is hemorrhaging billions quarterly, has never made money, and has no clear idea how to do so valued at $70b
i mean john galt at least made some quality steel
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 1 March 2017 04:41 (nine years ago)
you want to apologize for real? commit hari-kari and we'll all be impressed.
― a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Wednesday, 1 March 2017 04:53 (nine years ago)
who is this "we"
― mh π, Wednesday, 1 March 2017 15:10 (nine years ago)
Aimless is trapped in Ayn Rand's "Anthem" again
― waht, I am true black metal worrior (Neanderthal), Wednesday, 1 March 2017 15:32 (nine years ago)
How Uber Used Secret Greyball Tool to Deceive Authorities Worldwide
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/03/technology/uber-greyball-program-evade-authorities.html
― mookieproof, Friday, 3 March 2017 19:48 (nine years ago)
omg
― tales of a scorched-earth nothing (Doctor Casino), Friday, 3 March 2017 20:24 (nine years ago)
insane
― ιΎ, Friday, 3 March 2017 20:24 (nine years ago)
why does this company still exist
― Ξα½ΟΞΉΟ, Friday, 3 March 2017 20:31 (nine years ago)
their whole thing was "why can't I hail a cab w my phone" and now that every cab company has enabled that, why would anybody choose this shitty company with their shitty politics and policies instead of a cab idgi
― Ξα½ΟΞΉΟ, Friday, 3 March 2017 20:33 (nine years ago)
unbelievable
― sleeve, Friday, 3 March 2017 20:39 (nine years ago)
Ride sharing used to be cool. It used to be just drunk millennials all the time. But now it's just old smelly people who just want to save a few bucks.
― calstars, Friday, 10 March 2017 21:42 (nine years ago)
and children
― waht, I am true black metal worrior (Neanderthal), Friday, 10 March 2017 22:02 (nine years ago)
drunk children
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Friday, 10 March 2017 22:08 (nine years ago)
who want to save a few bucks
― j., Friday, 10 March 2017 22:21 (nine years ago)
their whole thing was "why can't I hail a cab w my phone"um
― Einstein, Kazanga, Sitar (abanana), Friday, 10 March 2017 22:39 (nine years ago)
i'm with Ξα½ΟΞΉΟ, idgi
suspect there's subtle racism behind it
(flees thread)
― a but (brimstead), Saturday, 11 March 2017 02:09 (nine years ago)
is ΓΌber just for rich ppl who don't want middle eastern cabbies or is my impression off?
β k3vin k., Sunday, November 23, 2014 8:57 PM (two years ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― a but (brimstead), Saturday, 11 March 2017 02:12 (nine years ago)
β a but (brimstead), Friday, March 10, 2017
if you live in suburban Miami and want to drink, Uber was a joy. Cabs don't simply drive around or show up when you phone. It's that simple.
― the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 11 March 2017 02:16 (nine years ago)
it might be cheaper than a cab, because of vc support? (i dunno, i've never used it). and i think there's also a trendiness because uber was maybe first with the app? but . . . yeah
― mookieproof, Saturday, 11 March 2017 02:17 (nine years ago)
big city snobbery going on here. Many parts of western Miami-Dade County have condo developments and no SIDEWALKS.
I've switched to Lyft in the last couple weeks, but for two years the relief Uber brought was incalculable.
― the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 11 March 2017 02:40 (nine years ago)
Uber makes travel effortless for me if i don't drive the trip
― waht, I am true black metal worrior (Neanderthal), Saturday, 11 March 2017 03:30 (nine years ago)
Yeah, anyone who doesn't "get" the massive success of these services is living in a city with decent public transport and/or cab services. This shit has made things significantly easier and safer for me and everyone I know. No more calling a cab and maybe they'll be there in 15 minutes, or 45, or maybe not at all. Or they'll straight up just ask you how much you're going to pay them before they take you to your destination knowing you're desperate. I get the gross capitalistic shark tank this all is, but the system in some cities needed a kick in the ass.
― circa1916, Saturday, 11 March 2017 03:51 (nine years ago)
Like knowing i can go to a strange town and not have to figure out their local cabs and reliably get a cheap ride has made me travel three times as much
― waht, I am true black metal worrior (Neanderthal), Saturday, 11 March 2017 03:54 (nine years ago)
its 'massive success' is only because unsustainably low costs are being propped up by venture capital. it has never made anything close to a profit, nor does it have a clear path to making one in the future. its only hopes are a) driverless cars or b) driving every other form of transportation out of business
neither is likely to happen soon. and yeah, taxi cabs are a total racket, but the fact is that personal transportation is fucking expensive. stop drinking and buy a car, you'll do fine. if you can't manage either then you're stuck
― mookieproof, Saturday, 11 March 2017 04:17 (nine years ago)
In Melbourne this has caused a big shitstorm because the taxi companies here had a weird monopoly semi-supported by state government, that involved a taxi plate (badge? Im not sure the proper term) being something of an investment for a driver. So they'd pay maybe $100k - but a lot more in recent years for complex reasons - to own one and be able to drive cabs/hire subdrivers.
Now the govt have conceded to Uber and said "ok we'll let you operate in our city but we have to compensate taxi plate owners". Except the payback ceiling is only $100k I think, and a lot of drivers are furious because they claim this was basically their retirement fund and it is being taken from them.
I'm struggling to find sympathy, as I see it as an investment like stock, but I prob dont know enough.
― Stoop Crone (Trayce), Saturday, 11 March 2017 04:28 (nine years ago)
"stop drinking and buy a car"
Awesome, excellent advice. Problem solved.
― circa1916, Saturday, 11 March 2017 04:55 (nine years ago)
oh, i've done neither. i'm just saying that uber isn't likely to be a long-term solution
― mookieproof, Saturday, 11 March 2017 05:01 (nine years ago)
its 'massive success' is only because unsustainably low costs are being propped up by venture capital
This is something I only discovered recently and this is pretty key. The dotcom crash happened for shit like this. Have techbros learned nothing?
― Stoop Crone (Trayce), Saturday, 11 March 2017 05:03 (nine years ago)
I at least see it as something to kickstart a change in a system that's total fucking garbage in a lot of cities. I'm not championing how they operate, but having things like ordering a car on an app and seeing their ETA are enough for me. I guess some cabs are doing that now, but not here.
― circa1916, Saturday, 11 March 2017 05:09 (nine years ago)
tbh cab companies here have had apps for some years but yeah I see the diff is big city v towns
― Stoop Crone (Trayce), Saturday, 11 March 2017 05:39 (nine years ago)
I mean Baltimore isn't necessarily a small town, but...
If there's a functional alternative here, anyone, let me know.
― circa1916, Saturday, 11 March 2017 05:53 (nine years ago)
heh https://danielcompton.net/2017/03/14/uber-bombshell
― π ππ’π¨ (caek), Tuesday, 14 March 2017 14:42 (nine years ago)
below a surge factor of ~1.5 uber is significantly cheaper here (montreal), there's also no alternative (Lyft or Juno) here yet, so I use cabs when uber is over 1.5, which is about half the time.
― flopson, Tuesday, 14 March 2017 15:51 (nine years ago)
so is there any way Levandowski could be facing criminal charges? What a dumb mess to get yourself into, if all that stuff in the filing is true.
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 14 March 2017 16:23 (nine years ago)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C7DfFtXV0AAlhsN.jpg
― mookieproof, Thursday, 16 March 2017 18:43 (nine years ago)