"some of you are saying 'oh, I quite like top gear'. The trouble is, I hate top gear, and I'm now going to explain why for 45 minutes."
― wins, Friday, 10 February 2017 17:08 (nine years ago)
hoped we were talking Sammy Lee diatribe tbh
― nashwan, Friday, 10 February 2017 17:51 (nine years ago)
marcos: my daughter's school dress code requires tucked-in shirts.
When they wrote it, I think they were thinking of a 10-year-old boy wearing a polo shirt or Redskins t-shirt. When he tucks his shirt into his jeans he looks okay.
Consider, however, a five-year-old girl wearing a tunic and leggings. If she tucks her tunic into her leggings she looks like a severely mangled sausage.
― Oh the pacmanity (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 10 February 2017 19:01 (nine years ago)
ha that's so weird, they don't have a uniform and can wear whatever they want but they have to tuck in their t-shirts?
― marcos, Friday, 10 February 2017 19:03 (nine years ago)
I remember when I was a kid and we had no dress code, just kids who were ordered to go turn their t-shirts inside out because even if your dad got a cool t-shirt with all his marlboro bucks, no cigarette advertising at school, please
― mh π, Friday, 10 February 2017 19:08 (nine years ago)
yeah our dress code was no alcohol/cigarette ads, nothing "offensive" or "sexually suggestive" (I recall "dolphin shorts" and halter tops being explicitly banned)
― Ξα½ΟΞΉΟ, Friday, 10 February 2017 19:10 (nine years ago)
Dolphin shorts?
― Treeship, Friday, 10 February 2017 19:11 (nine years ago)
I went to a prep school and people wore khakis with dolphins, crabs, whales and other sea creatures on them all the time. Horrific.
i'm thinking there was some t-shirt brand that was outlawed for a while. i want to say "no fear" shirts, but probably because they really should have been banned
― mh π, Friday, 10 February 2017 19:12 (nine years ago)
https://usercontent2.hubstatic.com/9583461_f260.jpg
― DJI, Friday, 10 February 2017 19:14 (nine years ago)
i think i remember some kid being told he could no longer wear the Metallica "METAL UP YOUR ASS" t-shirt but school admin was totally missing out on the dudes wearing L.A. Kings jackets with their gang name stitched on the back and their gang names (Hitman was one. Hitman!) stitched on the front. i thought they were wannabes but as it turned out they were actual gang affiliates.
― nomar, Friday, 10 February 2017 19:14 (nine years ago)
Remember And-1 shirts? I had a friend who remembered the insults being far more extreme than they were.
― Treeship, Friday, 10 February 2017 19:16 (nine years ago)
And 1 and JNCO are my favorite brands of all time.
― Treeship, Friday, 10 February 2017 19:17 (nine years ago)
omg @ "Hitman"
― mh π, Friday, 10 February 2017 19:27 (nine years ago)
co-ed naked beach volleyball it's a senior thing you wouldn't understand
― Karl Malone, Friday, 10 February 2017 19:32 (nine years ago)
omg coed naked, that was a banned shirt brand for sure
― mh π, Friday, 10 February 2017 19:32 (nine years ago)
Coed Naked Analytic Geometry never caught on for some reason
― Oh the pacmanity (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 10 February 2017 19:41 (nine years ago)
coed naked vs senor frogs
― marcos, Friday, 10 February 2017 19:45 (nine years ago)
salty dog cafe
― marcos, Friday, 10 February 2017 19:46 (nine years ago)
anyway i am wearing a tucked-in t-shirt right now
I, to my great shame, have been to a senor frogs
it really does encapsulate everything a middle school kid thinks "partying" should be
― mh π, Friday, 10 February 2017 19:47 (nine years ago)
did y'all have Big Johnson shirts. those were banned as were Bart Simpson shirts
― rob, Friday, 10 February 2017 19:51 (nine years ago)
yes, and yes
― mh π, Friday, 10 February 2017 19:53 (nine years ago)
Spent many happy high school classes watching M the punk argue that being told to change his IF IT AIN'T STIFF, IT AIN'T WORTH A FUCK t-shirt was some kind of tradeucement of his civil rights.
― jane burkini (suzy), Friday, 10 February 2017 20:56 (nine years ago)
About food again, is it a British thing and/or working class thing for food to be treated like a naughty luxury? (Dylan Moran has a bit on this)
I've puzzled over this a lot. Makes me think of old British kids comics in which food is frequently the goal of the story and they get it in a cheeky way then wink at the audience at the end. Twice this week someone passed me while I was eating and they chuckled and said something about enjoying the food, as if I was up to some mischief.Some people have gave me kinda dirty smiles about it or licked their lips and winked at me when I'm getting food.
Maybe it's mostly people who've been poor? If so that makes it less funny.
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Thursday, 16 March 2017 18:49 (nine years ago)
that's like the protestant ethic of allowing you the fruits of your success but not taking pleasure in them. can't look like you're enjoying the windfalls of your labor
or they're body-shaming you with the "eh, looks like you've already had enough to eat" implication, also rude
― mh π, Thursday, 16 March 2017 18:57 (nine years ago)
Believe me there is not much pleasure to be had from a Scottish diet.
― Ongar Is An Energy (Tom D.), Thursday, 16 March 2017 18:59 (nine years ago)
lol
― mh π, Thursday, 16 March 2017 19:00 (nine years ago)
sounds like they're hitting on you, try to eat less sexily
― qualx, Thursday, 16 March 2017 19:00 (nine years ago)
now I'm picturing people having this reaction as I'm eating a munchie box on a park bench
'Naughty' is any sweet that's more elaborate than a digestive biscuit.
― syzygy stardust (suzy), Thursday, 16 March 2017 19:16 (nine years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBU-pzAmqcM
― everything, Thursday, 16 March 2017 19:17 (nine years ago)
I'm not fat so I don't think they're body shaming me. I got this even when I was pretty skinny.
It seems almost like vicarious pleasure. I remember after I finished something an older guy I know really eagerly grinned and asked "Are you enjoying that! Are you enjoying that!"
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Thursday, 16 March 2017 19:24 (nine years ago)
https://youtu.be/IwlVa6i6Yg8?t=2078
― calzino, Thursday, 16 March 2017 19:27 (nine years ago)
"nipping for a cheeky nandos" is maybe related
― mark s, Thursday, 16 March 2017 19:28 (nine years ago)
Every time I visit any family or friends in Scotland they're ceaselessly offering biscuits, sandwiches or tea. Even after I refuse.
Is the culture just generally decadent or?
― Carlotta's Portrait (Ross), Thursday, 16 March 2017 19:29 (nine years ago)
"you do not need to go to Switzerland ... Scottish chip shops provide an effective euthanasia service"
― calzino, Thursday, 16 March 2017 19:31 (nine years ago)
It'd be "You'll have had your tea?" in Edinburgh. (xp)
― Ongar Is An Energy (Tom D.), Thursday, 16 March 2017 19:32 (nine years ago)
lol sounds about right Tom
― Carlotta's Portrait (Ross), Thursday, 16 March 2017 19:53 (nine years ago)
st patrick's day is a garbage holiday
― marcos, Thursday, 16 March 2017 20:12 (nine years ago)
weather should be abolished
― contenderizer, Thursday, 16 March 2017 20:17 (nine years ago)
uncontroversial
― mookieproof, Thursday, 16 March 2017 20:22 (nine years ago)
Space. Or, specifically, certain Americans' glurgey reverence for NASA, astronauts, the space program, the fucking Shuttle.
People who are otherwise level-headed, liberal-minded, skeptical, cynical, irreligious, and snarky can nevertheless have this weird Nerd Glaze come over their eyes when the topic comes up. They laud Humankind's Glorious Quest To Explore The Skies... And Beyond! If you express doubts about the cost-to-benefit ratio of manned space flight you get lectures about spinoffs like trampolines and Tang and, crap, I forgot the third one.
Everybody comes to DC and the first thing they want to see is the goddamn Air and Space Museum, which to me just seems tired and dated, reeking of my 1970s childhood and that brown/orange palette and wide ties and the Cold War. The whole of space culture gets this noble, uplifting Trekkie overlay. But the real impetus was always Beating the Russkies, with all the jingoism that entailed USA! USA! We are #1! It was never about universal brotherhood.
News flash: They call it "space" because there's pretty much nothing there.
― sane in the membrane (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 16 March 2017 20:32 (nine years ago)
Seems to me like the cost/benefit of space exploration/colonization makes a lot of sense since the potential benefit might mean the continued survival of our species.
― Mordy, Thursday, 16 March 2017 20:35 (nine years ago)
Can we do it without the gloopy sentimentality? Or, at least, can I still roll my eyes when normal people get all fluttery over That Time They Met Alan Bean (or whoever)?
― sane in the membrane (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 16 March 2017 20:45 (nine years ago)
oh yeah if anything we should only approach it w/ hardnosed cynicism
― Mordy, Thursday, 16 March 2017 20:47 (nine years ago)
the cost/benefit of space exploration/colonization makes a lot of sense since the potential benefit might mean the continued survival of our species mineral rights.
― contenderizer, Thursday, 16 March 2017 20:54 (nine years ago)
the cost/benefit of space exploration/colonization makes a lot of sense since the potential benefit might mean watching c-beams glitter in the dark near the TannhΓ€user Gate
― Pengest & Corsa (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 16 March 2017 20:56 (nine years ago)
imo having large, society scale projects to rally around, even if they have no specific tangible benefit, is known to be a boon as far as morale goes and outside of the obvious monetary expenditure (which is not small) space exploration has historically fit that bill
the number of technological advances from the development of equipment for getting to and staying in space, along with insights into human physiology, is pretty huge as well
― mh π, Thursday, 16 March 2017 20:58 (nine years ago)
some examples: https://spinoff.nasa.gov/Spinoff2008/tech_benefits.html
― mh π, Thursday, 16 March 2017 21:00 (nine years ago)