poor milo, the only people who will listen to him are the president and majorities of both houses of congress
― increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Thursday, 2 February 2017 17:09 (nine years ago)
there was definitely video of one woman in a #maga hat being maced (or something), but i only saw one injury apart from that that looked like someone who had been hit by a police projectile. local reporters said that the cops were firing rubber bullets and "pepper balls" from the second floor of the building. the bonfire was a portable lighting system that was tagged, then tipped over and lit on fire. which then caught a nearby tree on fire. some windows were smashed, but they picked carefully and only hit amazon (which is on the ground floor of the student union, and nothing else in the student union building was broken) and a number of nearby banks.
the campus received a bomb threat today.
― wmlynch, Thursday, 2 February 2017 22:51 (nine years ago)
banks are people too my friend
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 2 February 2017 23:01 (nine years ago)
from the chancellor's email: "Last night the Berkeley campus was invaded by more than 100 armed individuals clad in Ninja-like uniforms"
― wmlynch, Thursday, 2 February 2017 23:47 (nine years ago)
...
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 2 February 2017 23:47 (nine years ago)
wants to make sure their traditions aren't misappropriated
― j., Thursday, 2 February 2017 23:50 (nine years ago)
surely the point of ninja-like costumes is that nobody recognizes them?
― sheer presence, look and size (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 2 February 2017 23:52 (nine years ago)
you mean they might not be ninjas
― j., Thursday, 2 February 2017 23:53 (nine years ago)
Milo Yiannopoulos is scum the Berkeley kids were right to riot.
― Treeship, Friday, 3 February 2017 00:15 (nine years ago)
after the shit he pulled at uw-milwaukee and the fact that one of his supporters literally shot a protestor at his university of washington appearance, students at every college should be preventing him from speaking by whatever means they can
― intheblanks, Friday, 3 February 2017 00:18 (nine years ago)
Yeah I am more critical than most leftish ilxors of the tendency toward "no platforming" but at a certain point you have to draw a line in the sand. Milo is trying to inflame bigotry and now his antics have the implicit backing of the president.
― Treeship, Friday, 3 February 2017 00:22 (nine years ago)
Yeah, the Milwaukee shit alone should make every university cancel him. Yes, freedom of speech, but they also have a duty to defend their students, and a guy known for siccing hordes of followers at his enemies getting on stage and calling out other students, is insanely dangerous.
― Frederik B, Friday, 3 February 2017 00:22 (nine years ago)
totally, particularly since that uw-milwaukee stunt was live-streamed on breitbart,
― intheblanks, Friday, 3 February 2017 00:44 (nine years ago)
milo was planning on calling out supposedly undocumented berkeley students by name as well. dude is a scumbag nightmare (who looks like a half-deflated macaulay culkin blowup doll).
― maura, Friday, 3 February 2017 01:30 (nine years ago)
should have buckets of shit poured on top of him at every appearance
― Neanderthal, Friday, 3 February 2017 02:54 (nine years ago)
I saw the vid of the woman in the trump hat getting pepper sprayed by one of the so-called "ninjas." I don't support that, I guess.
― Treeship, Friday, 3 February 2017 02:59 (nine years ago)
let's put it this way - I wouldn't go up to a dude and say "hey, that lady in the Trump hat? go pepper spray her", but I'm done caring about anything that happens to Trump supporters nor will I condemn any damn thing anybody does to them
― Neanderthal, Friday, 3 February 2017 03:01 (nine years ago)
yeah same p much. they made their bed, they have to lie in it
― maura, Friday, 3 February 2017 03:14 (nine years ago)
i considered writing "if you voted for Trump, you're my enemy" on FB today and realized only two people on my list would care cos I'm p much conservative repellant
― Neanderthal, Friday, 3 February 2017 03:15 (nine years ago)
Won't someone protect the precious trump supporters they are totally defenseless and persecuted w no access to the avenues of power oh wai
― Οὖτις, Friday, 3 February 2017 03:38 (nine years ago)
These are ppl that advocate institionalizing racial discrimination and ethnic cleansing fuck them
― Οὖτις, Friday, 3 February 2017 03:40 (nine years ago)
As i was saying to my daughter this morning the key ethical difference between our side's potential violence and theirs is that theirs is directed at ppl solely on the basis of identity (ethnic, religious, etc) and ours is directed at ppl based on their expressed ideology. To put it in massively simplified terms.
― Οὖτις, Friday, 3 February 2017 03:43 (nine years ago)
As soon as your denying other people's right to simply exist, you have exiled yrself from the protections of civil society imo.
― Οὖτις, Friday, 3 February 2017 03:49 (nine years ago)
Typing on a phone probly not ideal for cogently arguing my point here...
― Οὖτις, Friday, 3 February 2017 04:02 (nine years ago)
But basically if u break the social contract u don't get to turn around and claim the protections of the social contract
― Οὖτις, Friday, 3 February 2017 04:03 (nine years ago)
right, which is why we should give all criminals the chair, ban extreme religions that treat women and other groups like inferiors, and monitor everyone's correspondence to know where their ideologies actually lay. glad to see you have a reasonable political opinion for once dog.
― sleepingbag, Friday, 3 February 2017 04:15 (nine years ago)
Those are state actions. I'm talking about personal behavior of private citizens. The state must operate along different principles.
― Οὖτις, Friday, 3 February 2017 04:18 (nine years ago)
For ex that dude that punched Spencer - that was assault, he should be arrested and charged etc. That's the law. However, i also believe punching spencer was morally defensible.
― Οὖτις, Friday, 3 February 2017 04:25 (nine years ago)
that's why they wear their ninja costumes
― j., Friday, 3 February 2017 04:31 (nine years ago)
I'm talking about personal behavior of private citizens. The state must operate along different principles.
don't worry they will
― sleepingbag, Friday, 3 February 2017 05:20 (nine years ago)
gandhi is mad @ all u guys
― the late great, Friday, 3 February 2017 05:27 (nine years ago)
two wrongs don't make a right etc
― the late great, Friday, 3 February 2017 05:29 (nine years ago)
i think the chancellor got it rigbt
― the late great, Friday, 3 February 2017 05:35 (nine years ago)
right
gandhi was weak on terror
― Neanderthal, Friday, 3 February 2017 05:36 (nine years ago)
it's true + he did not always treat his family well
― the late great, Friday, 3 February 2017 05:57 (nine years ago)
we acknowledge that these rights are inalienable except for ppl who didnt vote the way we wanted lol
― Mother Teresa May I (darraghmac), Friday, 3 February 2017 06:36 (nine years ago)
here are two parts of the chancellor's statement i like
Mr. Yiannopoulos is not the first of his ilk to speak at Berkeley and he will not be the last. In our view, Mr. Yiannopoulos is a troll and provocateur who uses odious behavior in part to “entertain,” but also to deflect any serious engagement with ideas.
violent behavior on the part of protestors also helps deflect any serious engagement with his ideas
second part
Milo Yiannopoulos ... has been invited to speak on campus by one of our registered campus organizations, the Berkeley College Republicans (BCR). Like all student organizations, the BCR is a separate legal entity from the university, and it is technically the BCR, and not the university, that is the host of this upcoming event ... from a legal perspective, the U.S. Constitution prohibits UC Berkeley, as a public institution, from banning expression based on its content or viewpoints, even when those viewpoints are hateful or discriminatory. Longstanding campus policy permits registered student organizations to invite speakers to campus and to make free use of meeting space in the Student Union for that purpose. As mentioned, the BCR is the host of this event, and therefore it is only they who have the authority to disinvite Mr. Yiannopoulos. Consistent with the dictates of the First Amendment as uniformly and decisively interpreted by the courts, the university cannot censor or prohibit events, or charge differential fees. Some have asked us whether attacks on individuals are also protected. In fact, critical statements and even the demeaning ridicule of individuals are largely protected by the Constitution; in this case, Yiannopoulos’s past words and deeds do not justify prior restraint on his freedom of expression or the cancellation of the event.
ty chancellor for helping cya and mine
― the late great, Friday, 3 February 2017 06:57 (nine years ago)
the bit about critical statements and demeaning ridicule sounds pretty hint-hint to me
― Larry Elleison (rogermexico.), Friday, 3 February 2017 08:31 (nine years ago)
― Treeship
same, blowdarts or gtfo
― increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Friday, 3 February 2017 12:28 (nine years ago)
The Covering of the American Ass
― stein beck ii: the wrath of grapes (Doctor Casino), Friday, 3 February 2017 13:30 (nine years ago)
some of you have stared too long into the abyss.
― Peacock, Friday, 3 February 2017 14:41 (nine years ago)
^keep an eye on this one
― I Am In Atlanta And Thug Is Young (imago), Friday, 3 February 2017 16:42 (nine years ago)
one peaeye
― Mother Teresa May I (darraghmac), Friday, 3 February 2017 16:53 (nine years ago)
In fact, critical statements and even the demeaning ridicule of individuals are largely protected by the Constitution; in this case, Yiannopoulos’s past words and deeds do not justify prior restraint on his freedom of expression or the cancellation of the event.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CQEvWJ_VEAEyDbx.png
― Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Friday, 3 February 2017 21:41 (nine years ago)
http://www.dailycal.org/2017/02/07/violence-self-defense/
Last week, a violent protest erupted on campus, in response to a scheduled speaking event by Milo Yiannopoulos. Many people soon began to decry the protesters. Here are a few arguments in favor of the use of violence in protests.
quite a few
― j., Tuesday, 7 February 2017 21:08 (nine years ago)
https://psmag.com/antifascists-have-become-the-most-reasonable-people-in-america-92525aceabd5#.4pzgrix22
The antifa banner features black and red flags, signifying an alliance between anarchists and communists. What unites these two groups (who have been known to kill one another from time to time) is a commitment to confront and defeat fascists and white supremacists by whatever means necessary. It’s a coalition that has existed for as long as fascism has; the Italian Arditi del Popolo (People’s Squads) rose to fight Mussolini in 1921, even when the Socialist and Communist Parties refused to support them. In 1924, anarchist lumberjacks allied with the Industrial Workers of the World waged a “drawn battle” with a Ku Klux Klan recruitment drive in Greenville, Maine. American anti-fascists have been fighting a mostly quiet conflict with domestic Nazis at punk rock venues and small white-nationalist gatherings for decades, but, as fascists have snuck their collective jackboot into the curved door of the Oval Office, the struggle has reached the mainstream.*
― j., Wednesday, 8 February 2017 03:39 (nine years ago)
soooo, there have been anti-fascist sleeper cells in the u.s. since the 20's? talk about underground.
― scott seward, Wednesday, 8 February 2017 03:50 (nine years ago)
http://societyandspace.org/2017/02/14/the-discomfort-of-safety/
― lazy rascals, spending their substance, and more, in riotous living (Merdeyeux), Thursday, 16 February 2017 21:41 (nine years ago)
After trying to read that, I need a space safe from scare quotes! Sheesh...
― DJI, Thursday, 16 February 2017 22:30 (nine years ago)