the gop taking people's healthcare away is a given. that's what the gop is for. democratic voters being outraged at the gop doesn't make them stop taking people's healthcare away. being outraged (not on twitter tho) at the clinton/booker wing of the dems for its constitutional inability to effectively oppose fascism has some glimmer of a chance of making them more effective.
― difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 18 January 2017 20:29 (nine years ago)
despite voting for a similar one w tougher measures the same night
I spotted what must have been an attempted debunking of this but no way I'm digging through the twitter archives to find it
― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Wednesday, 18 January 2017 20:30 (nine years ago)
i agree w man alive that Dem party need to 'stress test' their candidates more. but there will be a lot riding on who the Bernie contingent will be willing to endorse or vote for in 2020, and who they will see as beyond the pale. after the last primary everyone's hoping for a good unifying candidate. so far the tone of anti-Booker stuff i've seen from left has suggested he won't be that
― flopson, Wednesday, 18 January 2017 20:35 (nine years ago)
I'm not particularly a fan of Booker or think he's a great candid choice either but (maybe I was the only one who saw this idk) certain people seemingly way more mad about that particular vote then the stripping of health care. That seems like taking primary grievance pretty far.
A lot of it seems like a reflex. This for example. The idea that HRC would have nominated someone just as bad as DeVos, like this is even a fair comparison.. Are Dems critical of Trump going to be consistently undercut by the left? https://twitter.com/baltimorematt/status/821533320383254528
― Nerdstrom Poindexter, Wednesday, 18 January 2017 20:38 (nine years ago)
(maybe I was the only one who saw this idk) certain people seemingly way more mad about that particular vote then the stripping of health care
Republicans gonna Republican - they're doing exactly what they said they were going to do - beyond a blanket "fuck them" (which I saw everywhere) there's not much reason for a progressive voice to go on about it, whereas the guy who's positioning himself to run in 2020 is going to get criticism for coming out of the gate doing the wrong thing.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 18 January 2017 20:42 (nine years ago)
Agree that it's better Booker is subject to those criticisms sooner than later. He should have just voted for Bernie's amendment since it was symbolic anyway
― Nerdstrom Poindexter, Wednesday, 18 January 2017 20:43 (nine years ago)
jfc that tweet
― who is extremely unqualified to review this pop album (BradNelson), Wednesday, 18 January 2017 21:17 (nine years ago)
that tweet is awesome, brad
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Wednesday, 18 January 2017 21:27 (nine years ago)
clean shot
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Wednesday, 18 January 2017 21:28 (nine years ago)
Jeet Boy, Jeet Girl
― THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Wednesday, 18 January 2017 22:12 (nine years ago)
effective ruling politics is not built on members of the ruling party voting for their "local interests" on national issues.
― increasingly bonkers (rushomancy), Wednesday, 18 January 2017 22:16 (nine years ago)
TBH, I was pretty amused that democrats lambasted Trump for picking the Hardees CEO for secretary of labor, and then the wikileaks email showed that Clinton was likely going to select Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz. Our fast food is more progressive than theirs I guess.
― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Wednesday, 18 January 2017 22:34 (nine years ago)
Yes, it is. Howard Schultz isn't perfect, but he's worlds better than Andrew Puzder. (and love how Mike Allen has become a go-to source when it serves an end)
― by the light of the burning Citroën, Wednesday, 18 January 2017 22:42 (nine years ago)
Starbucks is not fast food
(says the guy who can count the number of times he has been inside a Starbuck's on one hand)
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 18 January 2017 23:03 (nine years ago)
Starbucks is totally fast food, come on.
― Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 18 January 2017 23:08 (nine years ago)
Yeah Bernie supporters aren't reliving the primary at all, that's only Hillary supporters. Now let's talk about these supposed "ghost cabinet" appointees to say "Hillary would have been bad too" while people who want to destroy government are being confirmed.
― Nerdstrom Poindexter, Wednesday, 18 January 2017 23:15 (nine years ago)
lol
― Islamic State of Mind (jim in vancouver), Wednesday, 18 January 2017 23:29 (nine years ago)
Our fast food is more progressive than theirs I guess.
I mean ... yes? Like, Starbucks has benefits packages for part-time employees while Carls Jr. is famous for violating laws mandating that employees get a tiny break during the day?
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 18 January 2017 23:48 (nine years ago)
the HRC ghost cabinet isnt about them being as low as Trump's, it's just an indicator that "Sanders is pushing her to the left" was Guess What?
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 19 January 2017 01:22 (nine years ago)
What?
― lettered and hapful (symsymsym), Thursday, 19 January 2017 01:51 (nine years ago)
it was bs
― flappy bird, Thursday, 19 January 2017 01:55 (nine years ago)
Guess Jeans?
― THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Thursday, 19 January 2017 02:15 (nine years ago)
so closehttp://shop.nordstrom.com/s/richer-poorer-poindexter-socks/3159594
― velko, Thursday, 19 January 2017 02:16 (nine years ago)
Anyway back to Chapo, this radio play episode kind of sucks. Can't stay with it.
― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 19 January 2017 03:49 (nine years ago)
Would've been better if they were actually into the game while folding in all the fan service.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 19 January 2017 03:51 (nine years ago)
yeah i can't get through it
― flappy bird, Thursday, 19 January 2017 04:03 (nine years ago)
The Eminem bits may well have been the show's nadir.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 19 January 2017 04:49 (nine years ago)
Enh, I liked this ep, but I'm a Lovecraft fan, and dug that they did something this dorky.
― THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Thursday, 19 January 2017 07:35 (nine years ago)
ok I did lol at "Go Miskatonic U! The fightin' squid!"
― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Thursday, 19 January 2017 11:58 (nine years ago)
i thought matt's stoned-on-pizza voice was funny but that's p much all i got.
― difficult listening hour, Thursday, 19 January 2017 15:07 (nine years ago)
Maybe I need to give it more time, I only made it about 10 mins and there was something exhausting about it. It seemed like something that would be really funny and clever at a family gathering but not something I wanted to listen to on the radio.
― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 19 January 2017 15:09 (nine years ago)
no it's definitely bad
― adam, Thursday, 19 January 2017 15:12 (nine years ago)
I went back and listened to the Freeway Ross episode that keeps being recommended, and while it eventually got pretty funny there were 15 minutes of boring shit-shooting at the beginning. Pretty standard for a Guys-in-a-living-room podcast. I can see how people can't hang with this.
― duped and used by my worst Miss U (President Keyes), Thursday, 19 January 2017 15:26 (nine years ago)
I also didn't know that half of that episode was a relatively sympathetic convo about Sean Hannity
― duped and used by my worst Miss U (President Keyes), Thursday, 19 January 2017 15:27 (nine years ago)
Yeah, when I recommend eps like that I usually remind people to stick through the shit-shooting at the beginning. After a while I think that stuff grows on you too, but at first I can see how it seems inert.
― the last famous person you were surprised to discover was actually (man alive), Thursday, 19 January 2017 15:28 (nine years ago)
I'm sorry, what?
― (The caption: “fine dining.”) (DJP), Thursday, 19 January 2017 15:30 (nine years ago)
http://fair.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/SeanHannityFootball.png
not so hard to understand tbh, looks like a likeable guy imo
― marcos, Thursday, 19 January 2017 15:33 (nine years ago)
http://static01.mediaite.com/med/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/sean-hannity-04152015.jpg
― marcos, Thursday, 19 January 2017 15:34 (nine years ago)
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/378800000709183776/6273b31aa1836ac86426478aaa82a597.jpeg
― marcos, Thursday, 19 January 2017 15:35 (nine years ago)
The only way it's relative sympathetic is that they're not just cursing his parentage for 20 mins. Getting into his sadsack need to dine at foofy NYC steakhouses while complaining about elites on the air as well as his compulsion to proof he's the alpha dog enough amongst his employees on an almost daily basis is just part of it. Not to mention his bragging about regular training sessions with Chuck Liddell.
― THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Thursday, 19 January 2017 15:46 (nine years ago)
eh, they favorably compare him to O'Reilly numerous times and say he'd be fun to go out drinking with. All the negative stuff was kind of a given.
― duped and used by my worst Miss U (President Keyes), Thursday, 19 January 2017 16:09 (nine years ago)
Well, yeah, comparing to Oreilly kinda tilts it a bit.
― THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Thursday, 19 January 2017 17:09 (nine years ago)
i don't fuck with roleplaying games or table-top stuff but i finally got thru the most recent one and it was good for what it was. obv would appreciate it more if i was a fan of those games. if y'all are following them on twitter, they're already in DC reporting on the Inauguration. psyched for their live show.. tmrw?
― flappy bird, Thursday, 19 January 2017 18:59 (nine years ago)
this rules, sorry if it's been posted already
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvN464imtMQ
― flappy bird, Friday, 20 January 2017 02:13 (nine years ago)
holy shit this kid is a fucking moron
― will, Friday, 20 January 2017 02:52 (nine years ago)
That interview has such a great moment of Matt completely blowing up at some chump refusing to engage.
― THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Friday, 20 January 2017 03:26 (nine years ago)
http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/issues/january-20th-2017/my-dream-for-my-kids-celibacy/
His great desire for his sons is that they be celibate.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 20 January 2017 07:36 (nine years ago)
Matthew Walther is associate editor of the Washington Free Beacon and a Robert Novak Journalism Fellow
― THE SKURJ OF FAKE NEWS. (kingfish), Friday, 20 January 2017 07:38 (nine years ago)
new episode is great, one of their best imo, but about 50 min. the audio starts glitching and cutting out, FFS GUYS FIGURE THIS SHIT OUT
― flappy bird, Monday, 23 January 2017 20:15 (nine years ago)
the chapo dudes tweets are 100x better than the podcast imo
― marcos, Tuesday, 24 January 2017 22:16 (nine years ago)