Eyes Wide Shut would have worked a lot better if Kubrick didn't attempt to use Cruise/Kidmans' own celebrity relationship for his own ends.
Bring in unknowns / ruin their future careers. Its the Kubrick way.
― Least-satisfying overall (Sanpaku), Tuesday, 3 January 2017 23:16 (nine years ago)
Warner Bros and Kubrick both knew you needed stars for a big expensive Arthur Schnitzler adaptation
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 3 January 2017 23:22 (nine years ago)
Brit mainstream authors seem to do rather well when they dip their toes in spec fic.
Does Atonement count here? The twist at the end is some sad trombone Twilight Zone shit.
Children of Men is incredibly exciting first time 'round but just too grim to rewatch.
― Chuck_Tatum, Tuesday, 3 January 2017 23:23 (nine years ago)
McEwan actually did a dystopic sci-fi thing earlier in his career with The Child in Time
― Number None, Tuesday, 3 January 2017 23:27 (nine years ago)
28 Days Later fits in here somewhere too. It gets lumped in with the latter-day zombie craze, but I think it was genuinely exciting at the time of release and had some crossover/mainstream appeal. Not high-minded, especially, but I'd argue that CoM isn't either.
― rb (soda), Tuesday, 3 January 2017 23:30 (nine years ago)
you'd love to know what i've seen, but cinema convo w/ middle-aged Rogue One viewers nah
lol yeah middle-aged Rogue One viewer, you sure got me pegged. Now that I re-read your post I notice that you don't claim Eyes Wide Shut was particularly insightful about marriage just that it was one of the best films *about* marriage, although I'm not sure how it could be the latter without also being the former, maybe it's possible idk
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 3 January 2017 23:38 (nine years ago)
Where's calum to settle this?
― rb (soda), Tuesday, 3 January 2017 23:41 (nine years ago)
None of the paranoid classics from the 70s seem especially "high minded" either but you don't need to be a paradigm-shattering genius to guess what dumb, self-destructive tricks our species is going to get up to next
― The beaver is not the bad guy (El Tomboto), Tuesday, 3 January 2017 23:43 (nine years ago)
Now imagine Charleston Heston in this.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 4 January 2017 01:02 (nine years ago)
imo it got Tom Cruise's marriage to a T
the viewpoint is from his scientology handlers -- Nicole wasn't their favorite but he should stick with her because the outside world is full of creepy sex perverts and life destroyers. best to stick to the church and a mediocre marriage
that is why the scientologists killed kubrick iirc
― mh 😏, Wednesday, 4 January 2017 01:05 (nine years ago)
Hey so is it true that Xenu = Darth Sidious?
― The beaver is not the bad guy (El Tomboto), Wednesday, 4 January 2017 01:09 (nine years ago)
"overrated (by me at first too)
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius)
Terrifying that even morbius was right, once, for a while; reassuring that all is now returned to normal
― I hear from this arsehole again, he's going in the river (James Morrison), Wednesday, 4 January 2017 01:11 (nine years ago)
Children of Men is way better than Kubrick's indentured marriage drama.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 4 January 2017 01:28 (nine years ago)
I like both
― mh 😏, Wednesday, 4 January 2017 01:56 (nine years ago)
OTM, and thanks! I've been looking for a new dn!
― some sad trombone Twilight Zone shit (cryptosicko), Wednesday, 4 January 2017 02:10 (nine years ago)
everyone knows the best movies about marriage are: the shining, desperate characters, safe, don't look now, and gaslight.
― scott seward, Wednesday, 4 January 2017 02:29 (nine years ago)
i knew someone would bring up the boooooring horror movie
the UK original version of Gaslight, scott!
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 4 January 2017 02:35 (nine years ago)
What do people think about Carnal Knowledge these days? Did anybody put Ballbusters On Parade in the redditor youtube canon?
― wrinkled sweater guy (los blue jeans), Wednesday, 4 January 2017 03:23 (nine years ago)
Carnal Knowledge of Men
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 4 January 2017 03:47 (nine years ago)
Brad and Angie and Ted and Alice
― aaaaaaaauuuuuuuuu (melting robot) (WilliamC), Wednesday, 4 January 2017 03:49 (nine years ago)
only good Chris Hardwicke joke is that the Twilight Zone should have been named "nice try, asshole"
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Wednesday, 4 January 2017 03:55 (nine years ago)
Rewatched this and felt even slighter (and longer) than it did the first time around. Some nice camerawork/sets, a few good action sequence, sexy sexy Clive Owen and not much else to dig into.
― One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Saturday, 14 January 2017 14:52 (nine years ago)
Watched this for the first time last week. First half was very impressive, second half was a let down. All the 'commentary' and plot was in the first half, the second was just a big action packed part consisting of one premise: get to the boat alive and asap. All action, no depth. While it was really done extremely well, camera wise, I got nothing out of it and found myself thinking: yeah yeah, get to the boat already, you won't get shot anyway.
― Le Bateau Ivre, Saturday, 14 January 2017 16:02 (nine years ago)
action is depteh
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 14 January 2017 16:07 (nine years ago)
depth too
I didn't totally buy the justification for going to the refugee camp. Obviously it's set up as the only way to reach the boat, but that felt more like an excuse to have the sequence. But the camp is my favourite part of the movie. I love the characters we meet there like the Roma lady and the old Greek (iirc?) couple who have somehow managed to create a comfortable home sealed off from the camp.
And I would say action is plot too. Plot is everything that happens, not just everything that's easily paraphrasable.
― jmm, Saturday, 14 January 2017 16:15 (nine years ago)
https://newrepublic.com/article/147849/will-hollywood-ever-make-another-children-men
(also the bobby more headline in the image at the top of that piece is extremely Real England)
https://images.newrepublic.com/8bedf9706b95ec9260b21cb3e623a36ffffa0fb7.png?w=1000&q=65&dpi=1&fit=crop&crop=faces&h=667
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 23 April 2018 23:07 (eight years ago)
interesting take, similar to what I read after Blade Runner 2029 'bombed'...studios aren't going to invest that kind of money on that sort of thing at this point (expensive looking heady intellectual sci fi art films).
― akm, Wednesday, 25 April 2018 13:07 (eight years ago)
damn, look at all that world-building in those newspaper headlines (the art department spelled 'violence' wrong tho ffs)
i need to watch this again, one of my favourite movies of the 21st century
― Mahogany Loggins (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 25 April 2018 13:11 (eight years ago)
CHARLES SHOULD BE THRONE OUT
― wmlynch, Wednesday, 25 April 2018 13:42 (eight years ago)
that, along with 'fa cup cancelled', suggest that there were at least a few bright spots amongst the unremitting misery of the film's alternate future
― Mahogany Loggins (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 25 April 2018 13:45 (eight years ago)
i've seen this film more times than any film I think... it's so good
― brand new universal harvester (dog latin), Wednesday, 25 April 2018 14:03 (eight years ago)
it's so good that not even charlie hunnam can sink it
― Mahogany Loggins (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 25 April 2018 14:08 (eight years ago)
did i dream it or was there talk of doing a TV series?
― brand new universal harvester (dog latin), Wednesday, 25 April 2018 14:10 (eight years ago)
that rings a very vague bell, but i don't think anything ever came of it
seems like the handmaid's tale would have stolen whatever sci-fi infertility-dystopia momentum it might have had, anyway
― Mahogany Loggins (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 25 April 2018 14:13 (eight years ago)
oh yeah
― brand new universal harvester (dog latin), Wednesday, 25 April 2018 14:16 (eight years ago)
Which basically points up to the real outcome here. Yes, Children of Men could get made in 2018 ... as a Netflix series.
― Uppercase (Eric H.), Wednesday, 25 April 2018 14:19 (eight years ago)
And Cuaron arguably knows it.
― Uppercase (Eric H.), Wednesday, 25 April 2018 14:20 (eight years ago)
10 episodes with only enough plot for four
― Mahogany Loggins (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 25 April 2018 14:23 (eight years ago)
yes, and ugh
― mh, Wednesday, 25 April 2018 14:25 (eight years ago)
My second viewing of COM in December 2016 confirmed my affection, but the enthusiasm baffles me a little.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 25 April 2018 14:28 (eight years ago)
this is one of my favorite movies
― marcos, Wednesday, 25 April 2018 14:29 (eight years ago)
i have so much affection for jasper, what a great character. i wanted to watch another hour of him and theo hanging out, listening to records and talking politics
― marcos, Wednesday, 25 April 2018 14:31 (eight years ago)
love that he had Test Dept as his alarm sound
― sleeve, Wednesday, 25 April 2018 14:33 (eight years ago)
the enthusiasm baffles me a little
one of the things i love most about it is that it's such a great example of sci-fi not really being about the future but a reflection of the present - it shows a dying society which has entirely given up on maintaining a sustainable environment, where immigrants face utterly horrifying everyday hardships, where bombs in the street are so commonplace that an explosion in a coffee-shop you were just in can barely raise a shrug
it just feels like a really lived-in world, way more than a casual read of a plot summary would suggest, and it feels like it's just around the corner
― Mahogany Loggins (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 25 April 2018 14:41 (eight years ago)
the relative subtlety of the whole enterprise makes it something that's not wearying to be enthusiastic about, imo
― mh, Wednesday, 25 April 2018 14:43 (eight years ago)
xp More that everything is already long set in motion and there's no reversing it now.
― Uppercase (Eric H.), Wednesday, 25 April 2018 14:43 (eight years ago)
yeah, that long slow defeated slump into oblivion just hangs over the film like smog
― Mahogany Loggins (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 25 April 2018 14:48 (eight years ago)
Also, the least happy "happy" ending since A.I.
― Uppercase (Eric H.), Wednesday, 25 April 2018 14:52 (eight years ago)
have to admit i was nonplussed the first time i watched it. i was expecting something else. it really clicked the second time round
― brand new universal harvester (dog latin), Wednesday, 25 April 2018 15:32 (eight years ago)