nice parallel to Kylo Ren's Vader shrine too. Dark side dudes are basically just eternally sulky teenagers
― Number None, Monday, 19 December 2016 15:29 (nine years ago)
yeah if there's any place kylo ren is going to try to hang out if he gets a chance, it's grandpa's super metal volcano pad
― mh 😏, Monday, 19 December 2016 15:36 (nine years ago)
Saw Gerrera
please tell me this is not an actual character name
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 19 December 2016 15:37 (nine years ago)
that is forest whitaker's character's name. so sorry.
― mh 😏, Monday, 19 December 2016 15:38 (nine years ago)
Better Call Saw
in theatres December 2020
― Number None, Monday, 19 December 2016 15:40 (nine years ago)
"Quick, get me a rebel character name that sounds like Che Guavera!""How about ... Saw Gerrera?""Perfect!"
Vader Castle totally likehttps://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/52/Luminiferous.jpg
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 19 December 2016 15:40 (nine years ago)
Saw Luzah
― nashwan, Monday, 19 December 2016 15:41 (nine years ago)
Watch Dominguez
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 19 December 2016 15:42 (nine years ago)
ball-peen lopez
― Rush Limbaugh and Lou Reed doing sex with your parents (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 19 December 2016 15:43 (nine years ago)
Emo Kylo Ren @KyloR3n Dec 16there is nothing worse than when you are watching a stirring tribute to young Darth Vader and then someone has photoshopped in your mom
there is nothing worse than when you are watching a stirring tribute to young Darth Vader and then someone has photoshopped in your mom
― and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 19 December 2016 15:50 (nine years ago)
eternally sulky teenagers
know your audience
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Monday, 19 December 2016 15:55 (nine years ago)
We can't all be Captain Sunshine like you.
― and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 19 December 2016 16:06 (nine years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kc2kFk5M9x4
some fair points.
― piscesx, Monday, 19 December 2016 18:40 (nine years ago)
They manage to refer to the non-Anglo characters not by their real names or character names but as "Guy McAccent" and "two Chinese guys." Outstanding.
― and this section is called boner (Phil D.), Monday, 19 December 2016 19:06 (nine years ago)
i thought this was a fun star wars movie :)
― blonde redheads have more fun (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 19 December 2016 19:11 (nine years ago)
I disagree with their premise. I thought this one succeeded specifically *because* of all the connections to A New Hope. Whereas The Force Awakens felt redundant, because it *was* A New Hope.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 19 December 2016 19:27 (nine years ago)
another, newer hope
― mh 😏, Monday, 19 December 2016 19:29 (nine years ago)
I liked this more than they did, but I generally agree with their points. I don't agree though that this proves that you can't try something new with Star Wars films.
― Al Moon Faced Poon (Moodles), Monday, 19 December 2016 19:31 (nine years ago)
In general I like those guys, or their observations, but I think they were pretty inconsistent about what was good and bad based on whether it was new or redundant. Because this takes place literally right before A New Hope, of course there is going to be a ton of familiar stuff. Lack of Vader, or Cushing, or even R2D2/C3PO/Leah would be conspicuous, as would lack of giant laser ships and Death Star, etc. I do agree they could have done more with characters, given them some more depth, but I'm not sure how much depth Luke or Han or Leah had to begin with, they're just iconic roles reenforced by decades of fandom (in the proud tradition of b-movies). But, like, neither Fisher nor Hamill were particularly charismatic or good actors. They're carried by Ford, who *is* charismatic and a good (especially comedic) actor.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 19 December 2016 19:40 (nine years ago)
Lack of Vader, or Cushing, or even R2D2/C3PO/Leah would be conspicuous
Yes yes and no (also, Leia) - they could definitely have skipped the last section, but I don't think it shits on the rest of the film or anything.
― Andrew Farrell, Monday, 19 December 2016 19:49 (nine years ago)
my wife & i were talking about carrie fisher and how it's weird she's such a funny and charismatic person irl but she somehow loses that when the camera turns on
― blonde redheads have more fun (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 19 December 2016 19:50 (nine years ago)
Surgery has not helped with facial expressions, I'm sorry to say.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 19 December 2016 19:51 (nine years ago)
they certainly didn't need to show Leia's face and Cushing could have appeared (briefly) by hologram or whatever. They were just too proud of the tech
― Number None, Monday, 19 December 2016 19:52 (nine years ago)
xpost Yeah, I agree with that. They didn't need the latter, but it didn't exactly hurt things. It felt less like fan service than, I dunno, the two grouchy cantina creatures.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 19 December 2016 19:54 (nine years ago)
xposts but that's how Leia the character is written. She's written to be somewhat serious-minded, a leader, and she plays that well!
irl carrie fisher would not be quite so believable as a leader of rebellion forces
― Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 19 December 2016 19:56 (nine years ago)
in the ESB commentary track she kids herself over having to memorize that Hoth speech about the ion cannon
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 19 December 2016 19:58 (nine years ago)
i think it shows how good an actor she is that she's NOT carrie fisher, and that she can turn George's robocharacter into a likeable hero
― Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 19 December 2016 20:00 (nine years ago)
― Number None, Monday, December 19, 2016 1:52 PM (nine minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
^^^
― jason waterfalls (gbx), Monday, 19 December 2016 20:02 (nine years ago)
yeah at first I thought they were just going to show Tarkin only from behind and his face reflected on the window in that first scene. That would have avoided the uncanny valley issues, I think.
― silverfish, Monday, 19 December 2016 21:07 (nine years ago)
Need to watch this again to see how they hold up, as I just didn't get annoyed by Tarkin or Leia at all.
― Dominique, Monday, 19 December 2016 21:08 (nine years ago)
Might be interesting to see a side by side comparison with young Jeff Bridges in Tron legacy - I got the sense photo-realism CG hasn't really improved between the two films but then there were reshoots to contend with and you get a lot more of Moff than Jeff (I thought CGI Jeff looked pretty impressive/a bit more convincing at the time though).
― nashwan, Monday, 19 December 2016 21:14 (nine years ago)
I guess some people are less affected by this stuff than others. A coworker who saw this didn't even notice they were CGI and assumed they just used similar looking actors (she didn't watch the original star wars dozens of times as a kid like I did though, and only has a somewhat vague recollection of what those characters look like)
I imagine they are going to go back and redo the cgi Tarkin and Leia several times in the future so that in the special editions released in 10-15 years time it will probably look pretty much perfect.
― silverfish, Monday, 19 December 2016 21:15 (nine years ago)
Marvel have done the de-aging thing in a couple of their movies. It's a bit more convincing
― Number None, Monday, 19 December 2016 21:15 (nine years ago)
I mean, I certainly knew they were CGI, and given that, looked amazingly good. I also knew a lot of the shots of x-wings were CGI, and for some reason, was less impressed. I hadn't read much about this movie before I saw, so I big part of my enjoyment had to do with not knowing they were coming.
― Dominique, Monday, 19 December 2016 21:16 (nine years ago)
a
― Dominique, Monday, 19 December 2016 21:17 (nine years ago)
I am going to bring my 8 year old son to see this sometime in the next week and am going to ask him what he thinks of the CGI characters. I suspect he will not notice or be bothered by it at all.
― silverfish, Monday, 19 December 2016 21:25 (nine years ago)
May or may not have mentioned it, but my nine-year-old had no idea how they made Princess Leia young again. And didn't even notice the CGI Cushing at all. But then, she had no idea the actor was dead. Knowing that going in makes it hard to fully believe, no matter how good the effects.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 19 December 2016 21:30 (nine years ago)
like I'm going to listen to opinions on a Star Wars movie from a bunch of kids
― Number None, Monday, 19 December 2016 21:32 (nine years ago)
For what it is worth, every time I watch older movies with my kids I make sure to stress how they were done without any computer effects at all. Just practical effects, or stunts, or models, or elaborate sets or paintings. Because otherwise they just assumed everything was done with computers, even black and white movies from the 1930s and 1940s. Because that's all they have known.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 19 December 2016 21:32 (nine years ago)
do your kids like the originals Josh?
― Dominique, Monday, 19 December 2016 21:33 (nine years ago)
Really Leia's CGI, I noticed it for the brief time she was on screen. However, I watch some clips of Ingvild Deila today and the one thing that had stood out to me during Rogue One - her teeth - belong to the actress. She also has a very similar face shape to ANH Fisher. I'm just not sure how much retouching she had.
― how's life, Monday, 19 December 2016 21:38 (nine years ago)
i mean, the cgi was *weird*, but it didnt like ruin the movie for me or anything.
there was way more weird-face cgi in the first Captain America movie when they did bizarro scrawny Steve, and I still like and watch that movie
it doesnt upset the movie & the characters being there makes sense, it's not that big of a deal imo
unless doll-eyed tarkin gives you nightmares idk ymmv
― Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 19 December 2016 21:44 (nine years ago)
or erotic dreams
― Neanderthal, Monday, 19 December 2016 21:46 (nine years ago)
:D
― Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 19 December 2016 21:51 (nine years ago)
xpost My kids liked the originals to some extent, mostly New Hope/Jedi. I don't think they liked Empire as much. They never saw the prequels, have never asked to see them, and may not know they exist. They really didn't care for Force Awakens, to the extent that my younger daughter who saw the new one with me noted she had not seen any Star Wars movies since Force Awakens, which was a year ago.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 19 December 2016 21:56 (nine years ago)
After a conversation this evening, I'm curious as to whether there's correlation between being put off by CGI Cushing vs knowing about it beforehand. I'd not heard of it, and thought it was fine (though in fairness there were a few shots where the verisimilitude flickered I thought "I've enjoyed video games with entirely CGI characters, this is good").
― Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 00:13 (nine years ago)
i hadn't heard anything about it and it was v noticeable/off-putting when it cropped up
― jason waterfalls (gbx), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 02:58 (nine years ago)
also a determining facror: were one or both of yr parents killed by cgi
― Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 04:31 (nine years ago)
saw a third time tonight....regarding the stolen Imperial ship, I was trying to figure out when they acquired it, cos originally they were in their own Rebel ship that they crashed, they're all told to stay put, and after they disobey K-2SO actually says "where are they going? we're leaving if Cassian comes back before them", suggesting they're going to leave in the now damaged ship. and then at the end of the scene, they're picking Jyn and Cassian up in a stolen Imperial ship.
obv had to have happened off-screen, perhaps w/ Bodhi helping K-2SO find one, just was a lil weird.
― Neanderthal, Tuesday, 20 December 2016 04:39 (nine years ago)
Dude are we going to have to send you back a fourth time
― a Warren Beatty film about Earth (El Tomboto), Tuesday, 20 December 2016 04:45 (nine years ago)