Marvel's Luke Cage

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (354 of them)

re: slowness -- i didn't feel this re the pace of the story, but i did feel it in some of lay back and conversate scenes, starting with the barbershop in the first ep; which seemed careful and stately when conversations in such places tend to be fast and, well, unstately

this wasn't a huge deal but it meant a scene that was important to setting a mood and a community and culture was more tell than show (i felt)

(i only know marvel via the movies -- the vast interconnectedness daunted me as a kid, even tho lol i was a kid like 40 years b4 most of the rest of you, and i never embarked on them -- anyway, this is entirely watchable and explicable w/o needing to know anything abt other storylines)

many many xposts: scott upthread lamented there not being "a great black family drama to watch on t.v." and it suddenly made me flash on a series from, i'm guessing, the early 90s, which was exactly this -- i think it was named for the name or number of the house, but i honestly don't remember much about it except that it was a bit groundbreaking for being about urban black american life and family without being embedded in crime or social justice issues? haha this is not much of a clue -- maybe i shd ask my sister, i watched it with her

mark s, Friday, 21 October 2016 20:51 (seven years ago) link

227

¶ (DJP), Friday, 21 October 2016 20:52 (seven years ago) link

well wait that was a sitcom, not a drama

¶ (DJP), Friday, 21 October 2016 20:52 (seven years ago) link

was it this? http://www.famousfix.com/topic/413-hope-st

¶ (DJP), Friday, 21 October 2016 20:53 (seven years ago) link

huh totally don't remember that

Οὖτις, Friday, 21 October 2016 20:59 (seven years ago) link

p sure it was not 227 tho lol

Οὖτις, Friday, 21 October 2016 20:59 (seven years ago) link

yes i think it was, dan, thank you -- i was going to say i think it was cancelled before first season finished, which it was

wikipedia: "The topics addressed by the series included drug addiction and recovery, HIV and AIDS, foster care, re-integration into society after incarceration, and homelessness" <-- so a bit more social-justicey than i remembered

anyway, digression, sorry

mark s, Friday, 21 October 2016 21:00 (seven years ago) link

there was another series that meets the criteria (well maybe not the number in the title) that ran around the same time - maybe earlier? - and only lasted like one season. arrrgh what was that, I remember there was an episode addressing dark-skinned vs. light-skinned cultural hierarchy stuff

Οὖτις, Friday, 21 October 2016 21:00 (seven years ago) link

I can totally picture the lead and can't recall his name. bah!

Οὖτις, Friday, 21 October 2016 21:01 (seven years ago) link

ah Frank's Place

Οὖτις, Friday, 21 October 2016 21:02 (seven years ago) link

ha I was going to try Frank's Place next

¶ (DJP), Friday, 21 October 2016 21:03 (seven years ago) link

(frank's place definitely earlier)

mark s, Friday, 21 October 2016 21:09 (seven years ago) link

i liked frank's place. i want to get the live season of roc on dvd. do you guys remember when they did that?

a t.v. version of the movie crooklyn, that would be good. i dunno, doesn't have to be super nostalgic. just something good. like i said, just so many talented people out there now who could make such a great drama.

scott seward, Friday, 21 October 2016 21:36 (seven years ago) link

huh, i do not remember that hope street show. but if it got cancelled right away that might be why.

scott seward, Friday, 21 October 2016 21:38 (seven years ago) link

you guys probably didn't watch the show Southland but in that show Regina King played a detective and there was lots of home life stuff with her and she was by far the most compelling part of the show. and i sometimes wished that the whole show was about her and her mom and their dating lives. but i'm kind of an old maid....

also really liked abraham from the walking dead on that show as the gay cop. probably the best role he'll ever have.

scott seward, Friday, 21 October 2016 21:43 (seven years ago) link

oh yeah I remember Southland

¶ (DJP), Friday, 21 October 2016 21:44 (seven years ago) link

I also don't know that there's an effective metric for actually measuring that popularity atm.

renewal, methinks

the notes the loon doesn't play (ulysses), Friday, 21 October 2016 22:16 (seven years ago) link

xps Southland was ace. Such a shame it never really broke through

groovypanda, Sunday, 23 October 2016 19:47 (seven years ago) link

wow episode 4 (the origin story episode) was *terrible*

man that really stopped things dead, way too many dumbshit cliches w him + the prison psychologist

Οὖτις, Monday, 24 October 2016 22:42 (seven years ago) link

pvmic

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 24 October 2016 22:56 (seven years ago) link

you're welcome :)

Οὖτις, Monday, 24 October 2016 22:58 (seven years ago) link

There's more to be revealed about the prison psychologist (AKA his ex-wife, as anyone who's watched all of these shows like a TRUEFAN already knows).

the most corrupt, deceitful, lying, caniving, treasonist, POS (Old Lunch), Monday, 24 October 2016 23:00 (seven years ago) link

oh... great

Οὖτις, Monday, 24 October 2016 23:05 (seven years ago) link

The writing/directing cliches and often terrible acting in this pretty much killed it for me. Not a patch on Daredevil which, while also riddled with awful acting here and there (I see u, Karen Page actress), was still sufficiently weird and entertaining. And it felt like it didn't take place in a three -block radius throughout the entire damned series. Plus the villains and their ambitions were weak.

Acid Hose (Capitaine Jay Vee), Monday, 24 October 2016 23:08 (seven years ago) link

So there.

Acid Hose (Capitaine Jay Vee), Monday, 24 October 2016 23:09 (seven years ago) link

Who were the terrible actors, if you please?

the most corrupt, deceitful, lying, caniving, treasonist, POS (Old Lunch), Monday, 24 October 2016 23:16 (seven years ago) link

the black ones

¶ (DJP), Monday, 24 October 2016 23:19 (seven years ago) link

Off top of my head: Guy who plays Shades (awful)/ guy who plays Cage's doc/Cottonmouth/...

Acid Hose (Capitaine Jay Vee), Monday, 24 October 2016 23:22 (seven years ago) link

Not a patch on Daredevil

lolwhut

Spottie, Monday, 24 October 2016 23:35 (seven years ago) link

I think he meant that DD is even worse.

Godspeed You! Black Widow (Leee), Monday, 24 October 2016 23:58 (seven years ago) link

No, I meant I prefer DD over this. Crazy, huh?

Acid Hose (Capitaine Jay Vee), Tuesday, 25 October 2016 00:05 (seven years ago) link

yes

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 25 October 2016 01:12 (seven years ago) link

Origin ep was my fav out of the ones I've seen.

Jeff, Tuesday, 25 October 2016 01:16 (seven years ago) link

right!?

I dunno what kind of ingmar bergman shit ppl expect from this show.

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 25 October 2016 03:09 (seven years ago) link

we need our own *forget it jake it's ilx* nicholson scabby nose jpegs

scott seward, Tuesday, 25 October 2016 12:21 (seven years ago) link

God forbid everyone's not on the same page about something lol

Acid Hose (Capitaine Jay Vee), Tuesday, 25 October 2016 15:37 (seven years ago) link

nah, its not that. for me its more the "this show is kinda cliche" kinda thing. about a show based on a comic book. that was made for children. i mean the cliches are built in. i see that on ilx a lot. but hey people have high standards!

i see this all the time now when it comes to kid's stuff though. not just here. "that movie that was made for 8 year old children about the cartoon fish just didn't MOVE me like the first one did..."

scott seward, Tuesday, 25 October 2016 15:49 (seven years ago) link

ingmar bergman shit

lol this is... not what I'm looking for

this show is not for kids, it's basically a blaxploitation/noir homage, as noted upthread. the comic book stuff is more or less window-dressing. cliched writing is never good.

Οὖτις, Tuesday, 25 October 2016 15:58 (seven years ago) link

i'd say they were aiming for 14-21. male.

scott seward, Tuesday, 25 October 2016 16:19 (seven years ago) link

shakey otm. the argument that properties based on comic books don't have to be good holds no water. the entire point of the MCU and the reason for its success is based on the radical notion that filmed entertainment based on comic book properties doesn't have to suck.

i loved loved loved what this show was trying to do. tremendous cast and attention to detail in the production kept me going, and if you pressed me i could even tell you what it was about (vgl guy restores his future by coming to terms with his past), but in the most fundamental sense there was almost nothing by way of story or character. just this happened and then that happened and then oh hey this other thing is happening and now it's over.

that all the screenwriting techniques were present just made it worse bc none of them were put to any use. Commissioner Burrell saying "always forward" every other line doesn't count as plant and payoff; quoting scripture or wearing sunglasses doesn't make a villain interesting; and while all of the four major heavies bore structural relationships with the hero none of them actually served as foils.

Larry Elleison (rogermexico.), Tuesday, 25 October 2016 16:25 (seven years ago) link

tbf none of the netflix joints have really done much for me but this one was more of a downer bc it set its sights so high

Larry Elleison (rogermexico.), Tuesday, 25 October 2016 16:27 (seven years ago) link

i didn't say they didn't have to be good. just that genre stuff plays by different rules.

scott seward, Tuesday, 25 October 2016 16:30 (seven years ago) link

"I'm going to tell you what the story was and then turn around and say there was no story" is what I'm taking away from your post.

¶ (DJP), Tuesday, 25 October 2016 16:30 (seven years ago) link

i feel like almost everything is held to the same standard now, and i think there are different standards. that's all.

(though it probably bugged me even more in the old days when people would do that: hey, this is actually pretty good for a horror movie/sci-fi book/metal album/etc!)

scott seward, Tuesday, 25 October 2016 16:32 (seven years ago) link

With most cultural objects, I feel that it's worthwhile to make a rational consideration of what the likely goals of the creators were and then judge the work on the basis of whether it succeeded in those goals rather than pooh-poohing when the thing fails to clear a bar I've independently set for it but that it was never trying for in the first place. YMMV, of course.

the most corrupt, deceitful, lying, caniving, treasonist, POS (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 25 October 2016 16:36 (seven years ago) link

none of them actually served as foils.

― Larry Elleison (rogermexico.), Tuesday, October 25, 2016 9:25 AM (thirty-one minutes ago)

I think you have a weird definition of "foil"

sarahell, Tuesday, 25 October 2016 17:00 (seven years ago) link

old lunch otm. was this a pretty good comic book t.v. show? yeah, it was a pretty good comic book t.v. show.

scott seward, Tuesday, 25 October 2016 17:03 (seven years ago) link

"I lost my phone at the barber shop" smdh

quis gropes ipsos gropiuses? (ledge), Thursday, 27 October 2016 21:37 (seven years ago) link

That was really the only thing that irritated me

¶ (DJP), Thursday, 27 October 2016 21:41 (seven years ago) link

the music stuff reaaaallly pulls a lot of weight in making this enjoyable for me. I mean, they even used my favorite John Lee Hooker song ("It Serves You Right to Suffer") in a brief bit.

Οὖτις, Thursday, 27 October 2016 21:42 (seven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.