the daily beast olympic outing article made me think of the gawk
― 龜, Friday, 12 August 2016 14:39 (nine years ago)
kind of dying thinking how Treeship is right about thecuck and how our old buddy marc would fit right in
he might be possibly too otm
― mh, Friday, 12 August 2016 18:57 (nine years ago)
Senior Week has wandered into Challops Country
― El Tomboto, Saturday, 13 August 2016 01:01 (nine years ago)
pale imitation of racket teen anyway
― mookieproof, Saturday, 13 August 2016 01:03 (nine years ago)
Why was I surprised this turned out to be a HamNo post
http://gawker.com/wear-your-shorts-proudly-men-786226991
― El Tomboto, Monday, 15 August 2016 16:35 (nine years ago)
he's from florida
― J0rdan S., Monday, 15 August 2016 16:48 (nine years ago)
Was that some kind of dare to get him through a whole post about legs without extolling the virtues of squatting?
― how's life, Monday, 15 August 2016 16:51 (nine years ago)
last bids accepted 5pm today; we really should've kickstarted
― thrusted pelvis-first back (ulysses), Monday, 15 August 2016 17:26 (nine years ago)
maybe we can negotiate to buy a sub-blog from whoever takes over the assets
i'm in for $20 if we can get thecuck
― mh, Monday, 15 August 2016 17:30 (nine years ago)
I just want Dog
― El Tomboto, Monday, 15 August 2016 21:16 (nine years ago)
iirc dog was an independent contributor and hireable without buying a site
― mh, Monday, 15 August 2016 21:28 (nine years ago)
Thankfully it looks like all of Dog is on archive.org. Nice!
― El Tomboto, Monday, 15 August 2016 21:36 (nine years ago)
They should include Gawker Media in one of their Amazon affiliate "Today's Best Deals" posts
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 15 August 2016 22:37 (nine years ago)
¡univision!
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 16 August 2016 22:13 (nine years ago)
the shitlords are gonna flip out (more)
http://www.recode.net/2016/8/16/12504008/univision-is-buying-gawker-media-for-135-million
― goole, Tuesday, 16 August 2016 22:16 (nine years ago)
http://gawker.com/carefully-groomed-stubble-is-a-mark-of-low-moral-charac-1648477161
where else can journalists sub-piece their own bosses
― j., Tuesday, 16 August 2016 22:34 (nine years ago)
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/16/opinion/peter-thiel-the-online-privacy-debate-wont-end-with-gawker.html
― thrusted pelvis-first back (ulysses), Tuesday, 16 August 2016 23:42 (nine years ago)
hamilton nolan: worst person of all time ever named hamilton?
― yolo mostly (sleepingbag), Wednesday, 17 August 2016 03:42 (nine years ago)
no: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Fish
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 17 August 2016 03:47 (nine years ago)
100 children vs. millions of impressionable future new yorkers
― yolo mostly (sleepingbag), Wednesday, 17 August 2016 03:50 (nine years ago)
compulsive cannibalism vs obsession with the purity of yogurt
― pokemon go speed run (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 17 August 2016 09:58 (nine years ago)
Greta Van Susteren @gretaWhy is Gawker worth so much? Could the buyers not go to domain.com or @GoDaddy and buy a domain for $3?
gets it
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 17 August 2016 15:39 (nine years ago)
lol
― mh, Wednesday, 17 August 2016 15:53 (nine years ago)
@melbournecoalPer a source, Univision does "not intend to keep operating Gawker.com."
― mookieproof, Thursday, 18 August 2016 15:45 (nine years ago)
i wonder if gawker included non competes in the employment contracts
― 龜, Thursday, 18 August 2016 15:47 (nine years ago)
Folding it into the Onion?
― Going Down On The Anals Of History (Old Lunch), Thursday, 18 August 2016 15:47 (nine years ago)
http://gawker.com/gawker-com-to-end-operations-next-week-1785455712
― adam, Thursday, 18 August 2016 16:52 (nine years ago)
Why would Univision buy a company it plans to shutter?
― Mordy, Thursday, 18 August 2016 16:55 (nine years ago)
Oh the other websites. Duh
The decision to close Gawker comes days after Univision successfully bid $135 million for Gawker Media’s six other websites
― Blowout Coombes (President Keyes), Thursday, 18 August 2016 16:56 (nine years ago)
damn.
― goole, Thursday, 18 August 2016 17:10 (nine years ago)
aww :( rip gawker, you were great and infuriating and awful and hilarious
― The Chinese is NOW doing a munchy box! (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 18 August 2016 17:26 (nine years ago)
Yeah, I bitched about the site constantly but I also read it constantly.
― Going Down On The Anals Of History (Old Lunch), Thursday, 18 August 2016 17:31 (nine years ago)
Explain this to a simpleton like me plz: why is Gawker shutting down but all the sister sites like Jezebel/deadspin/io9 staying up, when the whole franchise was purchased?
― Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 18 August 2016 18:18 (nine years ago)
univision purchased the other brands but not gawker.
i imagine that they feel the gawker brand is damaged goods, that the other brands are more valuable separated from the original..
― wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 18 August 2016 18:21 (nine years ago)
univision owns fusion, right?
i never read fusion but it's kind of a gawker-esque site, right?
― I look forward to hearing from you shortly, (Karl Malone), Thursday, 18 August 2016 18:22 (nine years ago)
probably because it duplicates other portions of the univision/fusion empire?
― mookieproof, Thursday, 18 August 2016 18:22 (nine years ago)
Man, dump all your blind items online and go out with a bang!
― thrill of transgressin (Eazy), Thursday, 18 August 2016 18:43 (nine years ago)
rip
:'(
― flopson, Thursday, 18 August 2016 18:55 (nine years ago)
why doesn't univision sell gawker.com and keep the rest? more trouble than it's worth?
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 18 August 2016 18:56 (nine years ago)
it's got a huge judgment against it
― 龜, Thursday, 18 August 2016 19:10 (nine years ago)
ive got a huge judgment against you
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 18 August 2016 19:11 (nine years ago)
rowr
― Don't boo, vote (DJP), Thursday, 18 August 2016 19:11 (nine years ago)
wasn't the word some time back that gawker's interesting properties were not actually all that profitable or were being subsidized by like the gadget website or whatever?
― j., Thursday, 18 August 2016 19:15 (nine years ago)
― wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, August 18, 2016 1:21 PM (58 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
no univision bought gawker media which owns all of it. your 2nd sentence is accurate afaik
― goole, Thursday, 18 August 2016 19:20 (nine years ago)
hmmm, some of the articles seemed to imply they only bought certain properties. but i guess you're right.
if univision purchased gawker media, does that mean they "purchased" the judgement levied against the company by the court? that is, does univision now owe peter thiel?
― wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 18 August 2016 19:22 (nine years ago)
(ha, i almost typed "own peter thief"--if only.)
no idea how that works, don't even know how to guess
― goole, Thursday, 18 August 2016 19:23 (nine years ago)
Reading the informal obits posted by friends on FB, I realized, surprised, that I never read more than a couple of Gawker-related stories a month – if that. Only by referral too.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 18 August 2016 19:25 (nine years ago)
i still get mixed up by the proliferation of clickbait blogs in the mid-2000s. they really all blur together for me. i think i was just busy in grad-school coursework when other folks were able to attend to the differences between all the various brands...
― wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 18 August 2016 19:29 (nine years ago)