A thread for Stranger Things, the "Goonies meets X-Files" new Netflix series (with SPOILERS!)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1894 of them)

iana child psychologist but I wonder if Johnny Five Eleven will speak in full sentences in s2 because she is obv fluent in English and I'm not sure it made much sense that she didn't speak in full sentences once she started talking

stop trying to make fet wappen (wins), Sunday, 7 August 2016 18:22 (seven years ago) link

She's been a human lab rat her whole life. What reason could she have to trust people she's never met?

Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Sunday, 7 August 2016 19:13 (seven years ago) link

sure, that is a reason not to speak at all at the beginning

once she obviously fully trusts her new friends it is a bit weird that she doesnt use sentences

stop trying to make fet wappen (wins), Sunday, 7 August 2016 19:29 (seven years ago) link

This is ok (havent finished yet), not sure there's much more here than v thorough pastiche tbh.

Οὖτις, Sunday, 7 August 2016 19:30 (seven years ago) link

wrong

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Sunday, 7 August 2016 19:52 (seven years ago) link

Loved the performances in this, especially the toothless kid and Winona

Treeship, Monday, 8 August 2016 03:19 (seven years ago) link

Loved Steve's redemption/epiphany, which happened all of a sudden like the Grinch

Treeship, Monday, 8 August 2016 03:21 (seven years ago) link

I cried when Will got rescued. I wonder if tge ad&d insurance company demanded payback.

Neanderthal, Monday, 8 August 2016 04:00 (seven years ago) link

as far as boy on bike genre films, i think the overall emotional tone had lots of elements of flight of the navigator.

woke-ing class zero (s.clover), Monday, 8 August 2016 04:36 (seven years ago) link

Yes!

Neanderthal, Monday, 8 August 2016 04:43 (seven years ago) link

Weirdly i wanted to watch that after finishing this series

Neanderthal, Monday, 8 August 2016 04:43 (seven years ago) link

God this gave me all the goddamn feels

I like how it partly ended up being about how mediocre parents can still be good parents, or are deep down, or when it counts or something idk quite how to articulate it

So good. SO good.

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 8 August 2016 05:40 (seven years ago) link

Liked this a lot but it did feel like the weight of the obvious references (ET, Alien - at one point where Hopper and Winona are in the upside down she shouts something far too close to "get away from her you bitch" for comfort) was too much for me at times. Did love that the end titles were just randomly scattered through the show - the final ep has them after about 10 minutes and I think ep 5 has them about 5 minutes before the end.

Because you know I love nitpicking, how credible is it for the science teacher to have The Thing on VHS in late '83 or alternatively that it was on broadcast TV that soon after release?

One mystery I haven't seen discussed anywhere is Hopper finding his daughter's stuffed tiger in the upside down. It's implied in one of the flashbacks that she's seeing something that isn't there, could that be an early attempt at breaking through? Also could her leukaemia just have been exposure to the toxic environment of the upside down?

When the boys were looking for Eleven after she'd run off and shouting for her I couldn't get this out of my head, which spoiled the tone a bit:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sAz_UvnUeuU

Horizontal Superman is invulnerable (aldo), Monday, 8 August 2016 09:26 (seven years ago) link

haha yeah i was thinking about that lift scene too aldo!

TARANTINO! (dog latin), Monday, 8 August 2016 10:51 (seven years ago) link

There are some very obvious, very big references to certain films all through this show. It has me wondering if it's a pastiche, a period drama or something else.

This sort of thing happens a lot more in music than on the screen - taking a confluence of ideas and tropes, mashing them together and updating them/putting a new spin on them, like say Haim or whoever you wish to pick. Stranger Things is like a DJ set of remixes of all your favourite teen horror films. I spend a lot of the time thinking 'that's ripped from Donnie Darko' or just wanting to shout 'GO INTO THE LIGHT CAROL-ANNE!'.
As such, you can't expect credibility to get in the way of a good storyline in Stranger Things. Would a smalltown cop really be able to bash his way into a high-security FBI unit like he did?
What I do like is how we get to see the development ofWinona's mum character. Source-material characters are ephemeral to plotlines. They're either overbearing sceptics or simply not there at all - 'Honey, I'm going out, don't eat anything!'

TARANTINO! (dog latin), Monday, 8 August 2016 11:31 (seven years ago) link

*source material parental characters is what I meant there.

TARANTINO! (dog latin), Monday, 8 August 2016 12:00 (seven years ago) link

My personal theory is that 11 somehow manifested the monster/s herself through her sheer terror of the sens-dep experiment.

Or maybe it was just that the monsters were always there but she softened the wall between the worlds <- obv more likely but i like my theory better :)

I think she was so afraid of what she had done that she didnt want to face them down & accept that she could control or stop them.

I really loved that moment with 11 & Winona when 11's in the sens-dep & she's rigid with terror & winona's telling her "don't be afraid, don't be afraid, I'm here" it was v powerful

Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 8 August 2016 16:15 (seven years ago) link

Stranger Things is like a DJ set of remixes of all your favourite teen horror films. I spend a lot of the time thinking 'that's ripped from Donnie Darko' or just wanting to shout 'GO INTO THE LIGHT CAROL-ANNE!'.

this seems about right - even there though it's a pretty narrow subset of (mostly) 80s films. All of the direct rips/refs do take me out of a bit, I find myself thinking more about the construction of the show overall rather than getting drawn into the story.

Οὖτις, Monday, 8 August 2016 16:22 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, I know what you mean. When they first showed the foresty underworld and the dead deer, I just knew they'd show the monster feeding off it just like a specific scene in Harry Potter. At the same time, there's enough source material to be referenced (and it's not just 80s horror - there are lots of kids films and sci-fis and stuff in there, and as I say, Harry Potter and Donnie Darko aren't 80s films).

TARANTINO! (dog latin), Monday, 8 August 2016 16:32 (seven years ago) link

Donnie Darko is a pastiche of 80s films

stop trying to make fet wappen (wins), Monday, 8 August 2016 16:36 (seven years ago) link

^^^

honestly the only non-80s stuff I've really noticed has seem to come from that Voice of the Beehive remake I forget the name of

Οὖτις, Monday, 8 August 2016 16:39 (seven years ago) link

(altho fair pt about the deer-feeding, I hadn't caught that)

Οὖτις, Monday, 8 August 2016 16:39 (seven years ago) link

All of the direct rips/refs do take me out of a bit, I find myself thinking more about the construction of the show overall rather than getting drawn into the story.

― Οὖτις, Monday, August 8, 2016 12:22 PM (10 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Remember when directors would reference like Truffaut or Kurasowa or whatever and Stranger Things is all like the Alien scene that was parodied in The Critic and the Commando scene that was parodied in UHF, and critics are falling all over themselves to praise what is, in a lot of ways, a stylized Family Guy episode

Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 8 August 2016 16:41 (seven years ago) link

My new show JURASSIC GUMP is gonna clean up once I finish my Netflix pilot

Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 8 August 2016 16:42 (seven years ago) link

I never identify with "takes me out of it" criticisms tho, doesn't really resonate with how I experience things xps

stop trying to make fet wappen (wins), Monday, 8 August 2016 16:43 (seven years ago) link

ok lol @ JURASSIC GUMP

Οὖτις, Monday, 8 August 2016 16:44 (seven years ago) link

you know what else keeps popping into my head while watching this is Beyond the Black Rainbow. Which was much more specific and abstract and strange than this (also had a really stupid ending) but did kind of a similar v specific late 70s/early-80s sf horror pastiche. Better soundtrack too.

Οὖτις, Monday, 8 August 2016 16:45 (seven years ago) link

oh man JURASSIC GUMP. the nineties revival is in full swing elsewhere so that's only a matter of time really.

and agreed with Veg about that Winona scene - - - a moment of comparative subtlety for the show, too, like it lets you think about the upbringing El's had to this point, and the power of a parental figure that actually is concerned for her well-being, and the comfort Winona has been dying to give to Will, and so on.

Silence, followed by unintelligible stammering. (Doctor Casino), Monday, 8 August 2016 16:53 (seven years ago) link

Looks like somebody itt doesn't understand the difference between parody and pastiche.

emil.y, Monday, 8 August 2016 16:56 (seven years ago) link

critics are falling all over themselves to praise what is, in a lot of ways, a stylized Family Guy episode

― Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, August 8, 2016 11:41 AM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

nah

i watched this with pals who are not really wide cultural consumers (or at least not in the way so many ilxors are) and when i made the now standard, boring, observation that it looked like 80s movies, they were all 'ohhhhhhhhh yeah i see that.' all the specific call-outs seem like easter eggs for media nerds like those itt, who spend all day thinking about movies and music etc. i think most ppl can grok that it's a pastiche, but i don't think they're having the jarring experience you're having, whiney -- it just scans as narrative, not as a series of references or gestures to other, specific movies

jason waterfalls (gbx), Monday, 8 August 2016 16:57 (seven years ago) link

Yeah, I know what you mean. When they first showed the foresty underworld and the dead deer, I just knew they'd show the monster feeding off it just like a specific scene in Harry Potter. At the same time, there's enough source material to be referenced (and it's not just 80s horror - there are lots of kids films and sci-fis and stuff in there, and as I say, Harry Potter and Donnie Darko aren't 80s films).

― TARANTINO! (dog latin), Monday, August 8, 2016 12:32 PM (24 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

What in particular did they use from Donnie Darko? It's been years since I've seen that film.

how's life, Monday, 8 August 2016 16:58 (seven years ago) link

Commando scene that was parodied in UHF

But surely that was Rambo: First Blood part II?

https://media3.giphy.com/media/LnftOVI9nd2zm/giphy.gif

Sentient animated cat gif (kingfish), Monday, 8 August 2016 16:59 (seven years ago) link

It's what's being "referenced" that seems to be the sticking point xxp

stop trying to make fet wappen (wins), Monday, 8 August 2016 17:00 (seven years ago) link

Isn't the commando ref the "getting tooled up" scene? That was parodied in loaded weapon 1, idk about uhf as I haven't seen it

stop trying to make fet wappen (wins), Monday, 8 August 2016 17:03 (seven years ago) link

hahaha thanks wins

Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 8 August 2016 17:04 (seven years ago) link

has anyone mentioned the blatant pilfering of Under the Skin in the psychic spying scenes yet

critics are falling all over themselves to praise what is, in a lot of ways, a stylized Family Guy episode

lol that is a low-ass blow, dude

for the most part I thought it was entertaining and engaging and rose above the pastiche elements, which were all pretty obvious

very good kid actors

Rob Boss (latebloomer), Monday, 8 August 2016 17:04 (seven years ago) link

I'm just trying to say these "easter eggs" like the thing dripping goo on Hopp's face or the Commando scene or whatever are like actually huge, iconic cultural signposts to the point where they've been parodied to death.

Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 8 August 2016 17:04 (seven years ago) link

hahaha thanks wins

listen if there's one thing I know

stop trying to make fet wappen (wins), Monday, 8 August 2016 17:05 (seven years ago) link

xxp I mean, look, I like the show a lot too! but we really have to own up to the fact that there is some CORNY, LAZY shit in there

Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 8 August 2016 17:05 (seven years ago) link

Under the Skin in the psychic spying scenes

this was the first thing I thought of tbh altho it just made me wonder if there was some 80s ur-text I was forgetting

xp

Οὖτις, Monday, 8 August 2016 17:06 (seven years ago) link

uh breakin out the CORNY isn't that deej's thing

Οὖτις, Monday, 8 August 2016 17:06 (seven years ago) link

uh oh

I meant to say

Οὖτις, Monday, 8 August 2016 17:06 (seven years ago) link

I'm just trying to say these "easter eggs" like the thing dripping goo on Hopp's face or the Commando scene or whatever are like actually huge, iconic cultural signposts to the point where they've been parodied to death.

― Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, August 8, 2016 12:04 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

only to a relatively small-ish cohort of viewers, though! i really dont think most viewers are catching these in any sort of conscious way.

jason waterfalls (gbx), Monday, 8 August 2016 17:08 (seven years ago) link

I really enjoyed Beyond the Black Rainbow but I feel like it was more of a stylistic exercise where Stranger Things is a thematic one.

A filmmaker on twitter was mentioning how BTBR didn't have very wide interest, but from a shot composition/directorial standpoint he's seen its influence

mh, Monday, 8 August 2016 17:13 (seven years ago) link

i guess i can get with 'lazy' and 'corny' in that the dramatic beats/tropes are familiar, and encouraged some ppl i was watching with to, like, yell at the screen because they knew what was coming --- but to me that just highlights how effectively they pulled it off. someone getting drawn in to it despite the familiarity is a success. only the nerds/movie heads are like "omg this is JUST LIKE that part in..."

jason waterfalls (gbx), Monday, 8 August 2016 17:15 (seven years ago) link

How low have we seriously lowered the fucking bar if "People who have seen E.T. and Aliens" count as "movieheads." This is like calling Kanye super clever for putting the "trope" of Michael Jackson samples in "Good Life"

Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 8 August 2016 17:17 (seven years ago) link

Fan service has completely cannibalized everyone's ability to think rationally about film.

There's like huge chunks of this that are just biting E.T., which is one thing if it's like Spielberg or Leone biting from Japanese movies a tiny cross-section of Film Forum mouthbreathers have seen vs. wholesale jacking from a move that made $750 million in 1982 dollars

Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 8 August 2016 17:23 (seven years ago) link

^^^

Οὖτις, Monday, 8 August 2016 17:23 (seven years ago) link

i mean i think a lot of ppl over a certain age would see the similarities if ~pointed out~, but, for real, loads of otherwise very observant people just don't have huge parts of their brain/awareness given over to noticing what might seem to you or anyone else itt a really obvious ref (kids on bikes, eg). these ppl, btw, are the ppl that are impressed by and are, ostensibly, the target audience of all those "do you see??" articles that point out all the influences on something like ST. they've seen ET and Alien, they're just not consuming media the same way as 'movie heads' do.

also lots of ppl under 30 haven't seen any movies from the 80s!

jason waterfalls (gbx), Monday, 8 August 2016 17:23 (seven years ago) link

directly referencing some of the biggest blockbuster films of all time is not some movie nerd shit

xp

Οὖτις, Monday, 8 August 2016 17:24 (seven years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.