iana child psychologist but I wonder if Johnny Five Eleven will speak in full sentences in s2 because she is obv fluent in English and I'm not sure it made much sense that she didn't speak in full sentences once she started talking
― stop trying to make fet wappen (wins), Sunday, 7 August 2016 18:22 (seven years ago) link
She's been a human lab rat her whole life. What reason could she have to trust people she's never met?
― Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Sunday, 7 August 2016 19:13 (seven years ago) link
sure, that is a reason not to speak at all at the beginning
once she obviously fully trusts her new friends it is a bit weird that she doesnt use sentences
― stop trying to make fet wappen (wins), Sunday, 7 August 2016 19:29 (seven years ago) link
This is ok (havent finished yet), not sure there's much more here than v thorough pastiche tbh.
― Οὖτις, Sunday, 7 August 2016 19:30 (seven years ago) link
wrong
― Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Sunday, 7 August 2016 19:52 (seven years ago) link
Loved the performances in this, especially the toothless kid and Winona
― Treeship, Monday, 8 August 2016 03:19 (seven years ago) link
Loved Steve's redemption/epiphany, which happened all of a sudden like the Grinch
― Treeship, Monday, 8 August 2016 03:21 (seven years ago) link
I cried when Will got rescued. I wonder if tge ad&d insurance company demanded payback.
― Neanderthal, Monday, 8 August 2016 04:00 (seven years ago) link
as far as boy on bike genre films, i think the overall emotional tone had lots of elements of flight of the navigator.
― woke-ing class zero (s.clover), Monday, 8 August 2016 04:36 (seven years ago) link
Yes!
― Neanderthal, Monday, 8 August 2016 04:43 (seven years ago) link
Weirdly i wanted to watch that after finishing this series
God this gave me all the goddamn feels
I like how it partly ended up being about how mediocre parents can still be good parents, or are deep down, or when it counts or something idk quite how to articulate it
So good. SO good.
― Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 8 August 2016 05:40 (seven years ago) link
Liked this a lot but it did feel like the weight of the obvious references (ET, Alien - at one point where Hopper and Winona are in the upside down she shouts something far too close to "get away from her you bitch" for comfort) was too much for me at times. Did love that the end titles were just randomly scattered through the show - the final ep has them after about 10 minutes and I think ep 5 has them about 5 minutes before the end.
Because you know I love nitpicking, how credible is it for the science teacher to have The Thing on VHS in late '83 or alternatively that it was on broadcast TV that soon after release?
One mystery I haven't seen discussed anywhere is Hopper finding his daughter's stuffed tiger in the upside down. It's implied in one of the flashbacks that she's seeing something that isn't there, could that be an early attempt at breaking through? Also could her leukaemia just have been exposure to the toxic environment of the upside down?
When the boys were looking for Eleven after she'd run off and shouting for her I couldn't get this out of my head, which spoiled the tone a bit:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sAz_UvnUeuU
― Horizontal Superman is invulnerable (aldo), Monday, 8 August 2016 09:26 (seven years ago) link
haha yeah i was thinking about that lift scene too aldo!
― TARANTINO! (dog latin), Monday, 8 August 2016 10:51 (seven years ago) link
There are some very obvious, very big references to certain films all through this show. It has me wondering if it's a pastiche, a period drama or something else.
This sort of thing happens a lot more in music than on the screen - taking a confluence of ideas and tropes, mashing them together and updating them/putting a new spin on them, like say Haim or whoever you wish to pick. Stranger Things is like a DJ set of remixes of all your favourite teen horror films. I spend a lot of the time thinking 'that's ripped from Donnie Darko' or just wanting to shout 'GO INTO THE LIGHT CAROL-ANNE!'. As such, you can't expect credibility to get in the way of a good storyline in Stranger Things. Would a smalltown cop really be able to bash his way into a high-security FBI unit like he did? What I do like is how we get to see the development ofWinona's mum character. Source-material characters are ephemeral to plotlines. They're either overbearing sceptics or simply not there at all - 'Honey, I'm going out, don't eat anything!'
― TARANTINO! (dog latin), Monday, 8 August 2016 11:31 (seven years ago) link
*source material parental characters is what I meant there.
― TARANTINO! (dog latin), Monday, 8 August 2016 12:00 (seven years ago) link
My personal theory is that 11 somehow manifested the monster/s herself through her sheer terror of the sens-dep experiment.
Or maybe it was just that the monsters were always there but she softened the wall between the worlds <- obv more likely but i like my theory better :)
I think she was so afraid of what she had done that she didnt want to face them down & accept that she could control or stop them.
I really loved that moment with 11 & Winona when 11's in the sens-dep & she's rigid with terror & winona's telling her "don't be afraid, don't be afraid, I'm here" it was v powerful
― Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 8 August 2016 16:15 (seven years ago) link
Stranger Things is like a DJ set of remixes of all your favourite teen horror films. I spend a lot of the time thinking 'that's ripped from Donnie Darko' or just wanting to shout 'GO INTO THE LIGHT CAROL-ANNE!'.
this seems about right - even there though it's a pretty narrow subset of (mostly) 80s films. All of the direct rips/refs do take me out of a bit, I find myself thinking more about the construction of the show overall rather than getting drawn into the story.
― Οὖτις, Monday, 8 August 2016 16:22 (seven years ago) link
Yeah, I know what you mean. When they first showed the foresty underworld and the dead deer, I just knew they'd show the monster feeding off it just like a specific scene in Harry Potter. At the same time, there's enough source material to be referenced (and it's not just 80s horror - there are lots of kids films and sci-fis and stuff in there, and as I say, Harry Potter and Donnie Darko aren't 80s films).
― TARANTINO! (dog latin), Monday, 8 August 2016 16:32 (seven years ago) link
Donnie Darko is a pastiche of 80s films
― stop trying to make fet wappen (wins), Monday, 8 August 2016 16:36 (seven years ago) link
^^^
honestly the only non-80s stuff I've really noticed has seem to come from that Voice of the Beehive remake I forget the name of
― Οὖτις, Monday, 8 August 2016 16:39 (seven years ago) link
(altho fair pt about the deer-feeding, I hadn't caught that)
All of the direct rips/refs do take me out of a bit, I find myself thinking more about the construction of the show overall rather than getting drawn into the story.
― Οὖτις, Monday, August 8, 2016 12:22 PM (10 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Remember when directors would reference like Truffaut or Kurasowa or whatever and Stranger Things is all like the Alien scene that was parodied in The Critic and the Commando scene that was parodied in UHF, and critics are falling all over themselves to praise what is, in a lot of ways, a stylized Family Guy episode
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 8 August 2016 16:41 (seven years ago) link
My new show JURASSIC GUMP is gonna clean up once I finish my Netflix pilot
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 8 August 2016 16:42 (seven years ago) link
I never identify with "takes me out of it" criticisms tho, doesn't really resonate with how I experience things xps
― stop trying to make fet wappen (wins), Monday, 8 August 2016 16:43 (seven years ago) link
ok lol @ JURASSIC GUMP
― Οὖτις, Monday, 8 August 2016 16:44 (seven years ago) link
you know what else keeps popping into my head while watching this is Beyond the Black Rainbow. Which was much more specific and abstract and strange than this (also had a really stupid ending) but did kind of a similar v specific late 70s/early-80s sf horror pastiche. Better soundtrack too.
― Οὖτις, Monday, 8 August 2016 16:45 (seven years ago) link
oh man JURASSIC GUMP. the nineties revival is in full swing elsewhere so that's only a matter of time really.
and agreed with Veg about that Winona scene - - - a moment of comparative subtlety for the show, too, like it lets you think about the upbringing El's had to this point, and the power of a parental figure that actually is concerned for her well-being, and the comfort Winona has been dying to give to Will, and so on.
― Silence, followed by unintelligible stammering. (Doctor Casino), Monday, 8 August 2016 16:53 (seven years ago) link
Looks like somebody itt doesn't understand the difference between parody and pastiche.
― emil.y, Monday, 8 August 2016 16:56 (seven years ago) link
critics are falling all over themselves to praise what is, in a lot of ways, a stylized Family Guy episode
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, August 8, 2016 11:41 AM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
nah
i watched this with pals who are not really wide cultural consumers (or at least not in the way so many ilxors are) and when i made the now standard, boring, observation that it looked like 80s movies, they were all 'ohhhhhhhhh yeah i see that.' all the specific call-outs seem like easter eggs for media nerds like those itt, who spend all day thinking about movies and music etc. i think most ppl can grok that it's a pastiche, but i don't think they're having the jarring experience you're having, whiney -- it just scans as narrative, not as a series of references or gestures to other, specific movies
― jason waterfalls (gbx), Monday, 8 August 2016 16:57 (seven years ago) link
Yeah, I know what you mean. When they first showed the foresty underworld and the dead deer, I just knew they'd show the monster feeding off it just like a specific scene in Harry Potter. At the same time, there's enough source material to be referenced (and it's not just 80s horror - there are lots of kids films and sci-fis and stuff in there, and as I say, Harry Potter and Donnie Darko aren't 80s films).― TARANTINO! (dog latin), Monday, August 8, 2016 12:32 PM (24 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― TARANTINO! (dog latin), Monday, August 8, 2016 12:32 PM (24 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
What in particular did they use from Donnie Darko? It's been years since I've seen that film.
― how's life, Monday, 8 August 2016 16:58 (seven years ago) link
Commando scene that was parodied in UHF
But surely that was Rambo: First Blood part II?
https://media3.giphy.com/media/LnftOVI9nd2zm/giphy.gif
― Sentient animated cat gif (kingfish), Monday, 8 August 2016 16:59 (seven years ago) link
It's what's being "referenced" that seems to be the sticking point xxp
― stop trying to make fet wappen (wins), Monday, 8 August 2016 17:00 (seven years ago) link
Isn't the commando ref the "getting tooled up" scene? That was parodied in loaded weapon 1, idk about uhf as I haven't seen it
― stop trying to make fet wappen (wins), Monday, 8 August 2016 17:03 (seven years ago) link
hahaha thanks wins
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 8 August 2016 17:04 (seven years ago) link
has anyone mentioned the blatant pilfering of Under the Skin in the psychic spying scenes yet
lol that is a low-ass blow, dude
for the most part I thought it was entertaining and engaging and rose above the pastiche elements, which were all pretty obvious
very good kid actors
― Rob Boss (latebloomer), Monday, 8 August 2016 17:04 (seven years ago) link
I'm just trying to say these "easter eggs" like the thing dripping goo on Hopp's face or the Commando scene or whatever are like actually huge, iconic cultural signposts to the point where they've been parodied to death.
listen if there's one thing I know
― stop trying to make fet wappen (wins), Monday, 8 August 2016 17:05 (seven years ago) link
xxp I mean, look, I like the show a lot too! but we really have to own up to the fact that there is some CORNY, LAZY shit in there
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 8 August 2016 17:05 (seven years ago) link
Under the Skin in the psychic spying scenes
this was the first thing I thought of tbh altho it just made me wonder if there was some 80s ur-text I was forgetting
xp
― Οὖτις, Monday, 8 August 2016 17:06 (seven years ago) link
uh breakin out the CORNY isn't that deej's thing
uh oh
I meant to say
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, August 8, 2016 12:04 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
only to a relatively small-ish cohort of viewers, though! i really dont think most viewers are catching these in any sort of conscious way.
― jason waterfalls (gbx), Monday, 8 August 2016 17:08 (seven years ago) link
I really enjoyed Beyond the Black Rainbow but I feel like it was more of a stylistic exercise where Stranger Things is a thematic one.
A filmmaker on twitter was mentioning how BTBR didn't have very wide interest, but from a shot composition/directorial standpoint he's seen its influence
― mh, Monday, 8 August 2016 17:13 (seven years ago) link
i guess i can get with 'lazy' and 'corny' in that the dramatic beats/tropes are familiar, and encouraged some ppl i was watching with to, like, yell at the screen because they knew what was coming --- but to me that just highlights how effectively they pulled it off. someone getting drawn in to it despite the familiarity is a success. only the nerds/movie heads are like "omg this is JUST LIKE that part in..."
― jason waterfalls (gbx), Monday, 8 August 2016 17:15 (seven years ago) link
How low have we seriously lowered the fucking bar if "People who have seen E.T. and Aliens" count as "movieheads." This is like calling Kanye super clever for putting the "trope" of Michael Jackson samples in "Good Life"
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 8 August 2016 17:17 (seven years ago) link
Fan service has completely cannibalized everyone's ability to think rationally about film.
There's like huge chunks of this that are just biting E.T., which is one thing if it's like Spielberg or Leone biting from Japanese movies a tiny cross-section of Film Forum mouthbreathers have seen vs. wholesale jacking from a move that made $750 million in 1982 dollars
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 8 August 2016 17:23 (seven years ago) link
― Οὖτις, Monday, 8 August 2016 17:23 (seven years ago) link
i mean i think a lot of ppl over a certain age would see the similarities if ~pointed out~, but, for real, loads of otherwise very observant people just don't have huge parts of their brain/awareness given over to noticing what might seem to you or anyone else itt a really obvious ref (kids on bikes, eg). these ppl, btw, are the ppl that are impressed by and are, ostensibly, the target audience of all those "do you see??" articles that point out all the influences on something like ST. they've seen ET and Alien, they're just not consuming media the same way as 'movie heads' do.
also lots of ppl under 30 haven't seen any movies from the 80s!
― jason waterfalls (gbx), Monday, 8 August 2016 17:23 (seven years ago) link
directly referencing some of the biggest blockbuster films of all time is not some movie nerd shit
― Οὖτις, Monday, 8 August 2016 17:24 (seven years ago) link