kinda on the fence about Alien tho tbh
― Οὖτις, Monday, 11 July 2016 21:42 (nine years ago)
I still maintain that the horror element of the Alien series is minor in comparison to the sci-fi & action elements. Iirc I refused to vote for it in the big horror poll despite it being awesome because I didn't think of it as properly horror (and then hypocritically put Threads as my number one, ha).
― emil.y, Monday, 11 July 2016 21:45 (nine years ago)
yeah that's how I feel about it - and the sequels definitely foreground the sf and action
― Οὖτις, Monday, 11 July 2016 21:46 (nine years ago)
It's Alive had two sequels.
If we're making a case for the Romero Dead movies, one could make a similar case for the Psycho sequels. I won't be stumping hard, but they arguably count.
― Night Jorts (Old Lunch), Monday, 11 July 2016 21:59 (nine years ago)
wellll original Psycho is pre-1970 cutoff though
― Οὖτις, Monday, 11 July 2016 22:12 (nine years ago)
Night of the Living Dead is 1968.
― Vernon Locke, Monday, 11 July 2016 22:15 (nine years ago)
i do think that 'aliens' has a decent amount of horror elements, mostly w/r/t the hopelessness and the fact that those aliens are nasty and scary creatures. i think roger ebert's review is pretty otm in some respects:
The ads for "Aliens" claim that this movie will frighten you as few movies have, and, for once, the ads don't lie. The movie is so intense that it creates a problem for me as a reviewer: Do I praise its craftsmanship, or do I tell you it left me feeling wrung out and unhappy? It has been a week since I saw it, so the emotions have faded a little, leaving with me an appreciation of the movie's technical qualities. But when I walked out of the theater, there were knots in my stomach from the film's roller-coaster ride of violence. This is not the kind of movie where it means anything to say you "enjoyed" it.
the intensity and wrung-out feelings are correct although tbh i enjoyed it happily
― nomar, Monday, 11 July 2016 22:17 (nine years ago)
we talked about NotLD already. Genuinely feel like Psycho (the original film) is a different animal and almost really of a different genre than Night of the Living Dead (which functions in many ways as the birth of the modern horror genre imo)
― Οὖτις, Monday, 11 July 2016 22:52 (nine years ago)
Amityville
― Night Jorts (Old Lunch), Monday, 11 July 2016 23:54 (nine years ago)
Oh, someone aleady said Amityville so not Amityville.
Uhh...Puppet Master?
― Night Jorts (Old Lunch), Monday, 11 July 2016 23:56 (nine years ago)
(xxp) I missed emil.y's comment, apologies.
― Vernon Locke, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 00:36 (nine years ago)
Scanners?
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 01:18 (nine years ago)
Maniac Cop
― Night Jorts (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 02:52 (nine years ago)
Texas chainsaw massacre 2 is all time amazing. Hellraiser 2 is the best of the series. Both are going to get owned since everything after the second installment is face-punchingly terrible.
― Here, let me Danesplain that for you (jjjusten), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 05:24 (nine years ago)
there were multiple Scanners sequels?
Maniac Cop is a good call
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 15:22 (nine years ago)
There's three main Scanners films and an additional two spinoffs.
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 16:18 (nine years ago)
Scanners sequels were direct-to-video = disqualified
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 16:37 (nine years ago)
OK I'm gonna set this up today unless people have any other nominations/suggestions
House. Tho not seen any and prob rubbish.
― ewar woowar (or something), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 16:50 (nine years ago)
lol House. had no idea that made it to three films. I remember the first one being okay in a stupid way, plus George Wendt was in it
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 16:56 (nine years ago)
House had three sequels (The Horror Show wasn't labeled as such in all markets, and I think the fourth was direct-to-video).
― Night Jorts (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 16:58 (nine years ago)
Wendt was in the first, Ratzenberger in the second. I wish they'd continued that trend.
there's some things even Shelley Long won't do, I guess
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 17:01 (nine years ago)
don't have any to add, but yeah, poll 'em dead
― oculus lump (contenderizer), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 17:34 (nine years ago)
I liked the first 2 house movies, would watch again.
― scarcity festival (Jon not Jon), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 17:38 (nine years ago)
living dead and psycho series both ought to be included, imo, as they came into their own as franchises during your window, and each has an equally good claim on the "birth of the modern horror genre" crown
― oculus lump (contenderizer), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 17:41 (nine years ago)
not that anyone's gonna vote for the psycho sequels
― oculus lump (contenderizer), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 17:42 (nine years ago)
too bad demons only got one official sequel
what about thematic series, like fulci's "gates of hell" trilogy (the beyond, city of the living dead and the house by the cemetery)? suppose that stretches things beyond the remit...
― oculus lump (contenderizer), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 17:56 (nine years ago)
The third House film wasn't supposed to be part of the series but they just named it that for sales.
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 18:03 (nine years ago)
guys, ship has sailed
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 12 July 2016 18:05 (nine years ago)
Yeah but this is the AMC post-show wrap-up. I'm your host, Chris Hardwick.
Creepshow arguably counts if we do some gymnastics (Creepshow TV series becomes Tales From the Darkside due to rights issues, TFtD: The Movie becomes de facto Creepshow 3). And yes, I know Creepshow 3 technically exists but I like to think that we as a society have chosen to ignore that fact.
― Night Jorts (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 18:07 (nine years ago)
Was there a The Fly 3?
― scarcity festival (Jon not Jon), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 18:11 (nine years ago)
Yeah, but only in the '60s.
― Night Jorts (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 12 July 2016 18:15 (nine years ago)
MANSION OF MADNESS
The story isn't particularly engaging but the well designed sights and people of the asylum sustain it well enough. Quite like Houglass Sanitorium but less surreal. So it's not as good as Alucarda but I wasn't expecting that.
I'm not sure if I had previously heard about Alucarda having a planned sequel called Alucarda Rises From The Tomb. Sounds tantalizing. Must repeat that I wish there was another 20 Moctezuma horror films.
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Sunday, 17 July 2016 23:18 (nine years ago)
So it's not as good as Alucarda
but what is?
― Best Beloved Trumppence (contenderizer), Monday, 18 July 2016 00:51 (nine years ago)
Lemora has a similar place in my heart, with me wishing there was another 20 Blackburn horror films.
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Monday, 18 July 2016 08:33 (nine years ago)
kinda want to rep for Blair Witch 2
― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Monday, 18 July 2016 08:57 (nine years ago)
Good concept, unfortunate execution.
― Night Jorts (Old Lunch), Monday, 18 July 2016 12:25 (nine years ago)
never seen it cuz i didn't like the first one. have noticed lately that it has fans. still not inclined.
― Best Beloved Trumppence (contenderizer), Monday, 18 July 2016 12:29 (nine years ago)
You really aren't missing out on anything.
― Night Jorts (Old Lunch), Monday, 18 July 2016 12:43 (nine years ago)
https://vimeo.com/167772153
A clip of a film per year since 1895 to present.
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Monday, 18 July 2016 12:59 (nine years ago)
Bat Whispers looks pretty cool. Surprised I haven't seen more about it.
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Tuesday, 19 July 2016 13:16 (nine years ago)
The following three come in a boxed set called American Horror Project vol 1. Seems like a promising series, I wonder what will be in the next sets? I suspect these films weren't released individually because they might be ignored (again). Each film comes in bluray and dvd, with extensive features and a booklet with essays by Stephen Thrower, Kim Newman, Kier-La Janisse and Brian Albright.
THE WITCH WHO CAME FROM THE SEA
The title is well known for being misleading. There's nothing fantastical about this story of an abused child who became a mentally ill serial killer. It's a quiet character drama with a dazed quality and some strange distorted moments. It's pretty solid but it's my least favourite of the set.
THE PREMONITION
A mentally ill musician loses custody of her daughter and years later tries to steal the child back from the adoptive parents. Strange psychic communication is involved and an unconventional scientist sees this phenomena as the key to resolving the situation that develops from the kidnapping. There is a series of psychic hauntings and one is unexpectedly scary and stuck in my mind for the night. The film slightly resembles films like Audrey Rose, The Entity and The Changeling.
MALATESTA'S CARNIVAL OF BLOOD
Horror editor Ross E Lockhart linked an amazing clip of this in a discussion of surreal films and I bought this boxed set for this film (which was impossible to see for decades). I had previously ignored it because I got it confused with two other 70s horror films called Carnival Of Blood. It's a rough gem, a new favourite. An atmospheric surreal little adventure with deranged ghouls and vampires in a run-down fairground. My favourite line of dialogue: "he's TOO evil".
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Sunday, 24 July 2016 18:00 (nine years ago)
I was interested in that set but I can't justify spending £45 on it, will wait til it hopefully drops a little. The Witch Who Came From The Sea was the one that initially attracted me,seen bits online and it has a nice uncanny feel, promising you think it's least of the trio.
― ewar woowar (or something), Sunday, 24 July 2016 19:27 (nine years ago)
Amazon has cheap digital rent or buy versions of them all, I'd guess that's without features.
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Sunday, 24 July 2016 20:58 (nine years ago)
COUNT YORGARETURN OF COUNT YORGA
These are on the same disc of the Arrow edition. They're Dracula style films set in the 70s, like Hammer did at the end of their Dracula series. Although Yorga is obviously in both, the stories have no continuity (Yorga dies in the first film). I think they're pretty mediocre, they move along easier than most Dracula films, fairly enjoyable at times but they can be quite drab and silly. The second film is surely the better one. The scenes of Yorga running towards victims (more of that in the sequel) are quite memorable for straddling daftness and being kind of cool too.
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Sunday, 21 August 2016 19:58 (nine years ago)
Here are some things I'm looking for:
-A list of (putatively) public domain horror/sci-fi movies. Like the ones that wind up in every 50-pack DVD compilation ever.-Some Discogs-esque site that breaks down the various home video releases of horror/sci-fi movies.
I mean, I'm looking for horror/sci-fi info specifically, but any general film site that does the job will also work nicely, obvs.
This is partly inspired by my current monomaniacal attempt to track down as many non-shit oldies (through like the '50s) as possible. Unfortunately, a lot of the older stuff is either only available in cut-rate comps or as DVD-Rs released by major studios (which is really just one of the most shameless and insulting money grabs ever).
― Our Meals Are Hot And Fresh! (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 6 September 2016 13:51 (nine years ago)
I can't think of any such list but I often find public domain collections to be slim pickings. I remember there was a YouTube channel devoted to public domain horror but I don't recall the name. They're not always as complete or in the good condition of the version you have pay for. Or its something you've probably seen (Nosferatu, Carnival Of Souls, Night Of The Living Dead). I think some of the Corman films are public domain, not sure.
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Tuesday, 6 September 2016 17:28 (nine years ago)
I had a collection with the Corman films A Bucket Of Blood and The Terror on them, which I think was public domain. A Bucket Of Blood is pretty good, an old horror comedy with funny beatniks. The Terror has Karloff and Jack Nicholson is much like the Vincent Price films but not as good.
― Robert Adam Gilmour, Tuesday, 6 September 2016 17:44 (nine years ago)
Part of the issue I'm running into is with movies that have received next-to-no DVD release outside of some weird slapped-together multi-film set whose title doesn't make it immediately apparent what it contains. Which can be cool when you happen upon something you had no idea was available (or that's OOP and expensive on its own).
― Our Meals Are Hot And Fresh! (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 6 September 2016 17:58 (nine years ago)