― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Thursday, 3 November 2005 03:21 (twenty years ago)
"guys, i can connect to your wireless network from my flat. do you want me to set up the security on your router?"
at least, don't say this unless you're willing to spend an hour on a sunday afternoon tooling around helplessly after you manage to FUCK THEIR ROUTER COMPLETELY so nobody can connect to it AT ALL. shit.
luckily i managed to a) fix it and b) make it secure. and c) set up an iBook and a flaky-as-fuck vaio to connect to it. given i know arse all about windows PCs, i consider this a grate triumph.
still. bah, computers, etc.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Sunday, 13 November 2005 18:15 (twenty years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Sunday, 13 November 2005 18:21 (twenty years ago)
next week we're having a bring-your-own-laptop party at syxties. complete with candles.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Sunday, 13 November 2005 18:26 (twenty years ago)
So this weekend I'm throwing a party in a pub. I want to plug my laptop into their projector and run a PowerPoint thing we've made, on a loop all evening. So far, so simple - just buy the appropriate lead and all's well, right?
But.
The projector is bolted to the (very high) ceiling and completely non-accessible. And it's permanently plumbed into a VCR on a different floor, with all the relevant leads (just SCART, as far as I can see)actually painted into the fittings, if you see what I mean.
My question:
If I only have access to the end of a SCART lead which is currently plugged into the aforementioned VCR, can I "simply" create a lead which has a monitor plug at one end and a "male" SCART plug at the other?
Or do I absolutely have to somehow access the monitor socket on the projector?
We're fucked without the projection...
HELP!
― CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Monday, 21 November 2005 09:01 (twenty years ago)
my laptop has this socket:
http://www.fbe.unsw.edu.au/FBEguide/Computing/Projector/Copy%20of%20laptop_back_close.jpg
so i need lead with a plug that will fit in to that socket at one end, and in to this -
http://www.cybermarket.co.uk/ishop/images/923/756.378.jpg
- at the other.
yes, I mean *into* this as opposed to, er, just *being* this - as I said, i have no other way of attaching anything to the projector.
the key quesion here is of compatibility: are laptops SCART compatible, in principle?
― CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Monday, 21 November 2005 09:09 (twenty years ago)
― CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Monday, 21 November 2005 10:09 (twenty years ago)
― CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Monday, 21 November 2005 11:21 (twenty years ago)
― tissp! (the impossible shortest specia), Monday, 21 November 2005 12:34 (twenty years ago)
i'm hoping there's such thing as an rgb-to-scart converter, then i'm sorted.
― CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Monday, 21 November 2005 12:47 (twenty years ago)
http://www.avforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=136811&page=1&pp=15http://www.idiots.org.uk/vga_rgb_scart/
Sorry :(
― tissp! (the impossible shortest specia), Monday, 21 November 2005 13:04 (twenty years ago)
http://www.nexusuk.org/projects/vga2scart/circuit
One you can buy:
http://www.macwarehouse.co.uk/catalogue/item/STARMK10?speedtrapid=mwfroogle&lead=mwfroogle
― Ed (dali), Monday, 21 November 2005 13:09 (twenty years ago)
I've not done any research, so y'know take with grain of salt kind of thing.
xpost
― Greig (treefell), Monday, 21 November 2005 13:13 (twenty years ago)
― Ed (dali), Monday, 21 November 2005 13:21 (twenty years ago)
what's vga?
(i only need this once, for a one-off event, so i'm not splashing out over 50 quid. thanks anyway, ed)
in fact, i've discovered that a simpler solution would be to convert my ppt presentation to vhs, so that's probably what i'll do. but for that, i still need some way to connect my laptop to a vcr! gaaaah.
― CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Monday, 21 November 2005 13:48 (twenty years ago)
― Ed (dali), Monday, 21 November 2005 19:33 (twenty years ago)
― Ed (dali), Monday, 21 November 2005 19:44 (twenty years ago)
― Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 21 November 2005 20:04 (twenty years ago)
― Ed (dali), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 15:37 (twenty years ago)
here's a bunch that i haven't used:http://www.videohelp.com/convert#4;13this looks promising:http://www.videohelp.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=259841as does this:http://www.videohelp.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1271288#1271288
(if only because the mention libraries i recognise - tmpgenc and ffmpeg respectively).
― koogs (koogs), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 16:24 (twenty years ago)
So we send these photos to our website guy each month. He scales the pics down each time, to about 13kb so they're usable for a website.
The first time, the photos all went up fine. The second time, all fine again. The third time, we checked the pics on the site and they were real crappy. All blocky and ugly. I mailed him and asked why. He said it was because we were taking the pictures at 72dpi. Either that, or when we were taking them off the camera, the program we used was converting them to 72dpi. Thing is, we don't use a program to take them off the camera, we just drag them off. And the settings on the camera haven't been changed ever, they're all taken at the best quality.
Plus, saying that we take them at 72dpi doesn't make sense because surely this would make the jpegs much smaller than 3mb?
So, I'm confused. Is it the camera at fault? The website admin guy says that pictures can still be taken at 72dpi and be of a large file size, but this doesn't make sense. These photos can be printed on an A3 sheet of paper and still be great quality so saying they only have 72 dots per inch sounds mighty wrong.
We sent the most recent batch of photos over and he said that when he opens them, they're 72dpi again.
Here's one of the pics: http://s49.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=2BGUVE28MVREY2VZ9FOJ1DZF33
Does anyone have an explanation for what might have happened here?
― Affectian (Affectian), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 17:36 (twenty years ago)
> The third time, we checked the pics on the site and they were real crappy. All blocky and ugly
this sounds like either a compression problem ie they are too compressed or like he has them one size and is forcing them via img height and width in the code to be a different size.
http://home.clara.net/koogy/photos/01s.JPG = same image resized to 300x450 (75dpi, jpeg quality = 50%, filesize = 21K, done using gimp) (50% is quite low)
― koogs (koogs), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 18:09 (twenty years ago)
Thanks again for clearing that up.
― Affectian (Affectian), Tuesday, 22 November 2005 19:21 (twenty years ago)
― Paul Eater (eater), Wednesday, 23 November 2005 02:31 (twenty years ago)
― M. V. (M.V.), Wednesday, 23 November 2005 03:16 (twenty years ago)
― Paul Eater (eater), Monday, 28 November 2005 15:24 (twenty years ago)
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Monday, 28 November 2005 15:27 (twenty years ago)
― Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 28 November 2005 15:29 (twenty years ago)
― koogs (koogs), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 14:20 (twenty years ago)
― Forest Pines (ForestPines), Tuesday, 29 November 2005 14:28 (twenty years ago)
ok, Java. i have a list of things (for a particle system), only some of which are currently active. i've currently got them in an array and everytime i want to draw them i go through the entire array and draw the ones where the state is ALIVE. when i need another particle i go through the array until i find one that is DEAD and re-initialise that. this strikes me as bad and i'd rather have a list of ALIVE elements and a list of DEAD elements and swapt things between the lists as the state changes. in C (i am a lot more comfortable with C) i'd malloc a bunch of space and modify pointers as required. what happens in Java? can i change pointers? can i switch things between lists (Vectors? Arrays? what) without having to recreate them? will the vm be continually deallocating and reallocating memory? how fast will it be?
(can i just say in advance: threadkilla! thanks)
― koogs (koogs), Friday, 27 January 2006 17:57 (twenty years ago)
I would consider using a linked list rather than an array (you could even store the linked list in state order, hence dead ones could always be at the front of the list, so you'll get O(1) performance on re-initialising dead particles).
― tissp! (the impossible shortest specia), Friday, 27 January 2006 18:09 (twenty years ago)
if i use an ArrayList can i add ALIVE things to the front and DEAD things to the end? i guess so (array is fixed size (at the mo). i never need information about DEAD things so i can delete them without worrying). if i add things or delete them will that bollocks up the indexing for the rest of the list i'm iterating over? i remember vaguely having to make a copy of something because i couldn't modify it whilst iterating over it. (maybe that was j2me only.)
in C you had to write all this stuff yourself (until glib came along) but at least you then knew how it worked 8)
― koogs (koogs), Friday, 27 January 2006 18:31 (twenty years ago)
class ParticleWrapper { int id; Particle p;}
with a unique id.
― tissp! (the impossible shortest specia), Friday, 27 January 2006 18:35 (twenty years ago)
if i'm trundling through a list, processing the alive ones, and get to element 4 and decide it's now dead (due to aging or collision or whatever) so i mark it as such and move it to the end. but what is element 5 now? is it what used to be element 5 before i deleted #4 or is it what used to be element 6 because everything's moved up to fill the gap?
i think i need to write some tests...
― koogs (koogs), Friday, 27 January 2006 19:02 (twenty years ago)
― tissp! (the impossible shortest specia), Friday, 27 January 2006 19:07 (twenty years ago)
― koogs (koogs), Friday, 27 January 2006 19:14 (twenty years ago)
I've got a 300gb C: drive (Windows XP, 1gb ram, 2.21ghz) and foolishly chose not to partition it when I first set up my PC. Now the hard drive is about half full and running r e a l slowly, so I guess I need to partition it. But how do I do it without wiping everything off my pc and starting again from scratch? Do I have to download a new program or can XP do it quickly and easily? (sorry for sounding like a st00pid newbie moron)
― Melissa. (melissamelissa), Friday, 17 February 2006 13:40 (twenty years ago)
ed is this what i need to do?!?!
― ambrose (ambrose), Friday, 17 February 2006 13:47 (twenty years ago)
― Greig (treefell), Friday, 17 February 2006 13:51 (twenty years ago)
― Ste (Fuzzy), Friday, 17 February 2006 13:55 (twenty years ago)
Right click on my computerchoose propertiesselect the advanced tabClick on the performance 'Settings' ButtonClick on the Advnanced tabClick on the virtual memory change buttonselect custom sizeSet the inital size and the maximum size to the same value, minimum 1.5 times installed RAM, maximum 3 times installed RAM
― Ed (dali), Friday, 17 February 2006 13:55 (twenty years ago)
― Ed (dali), Friday, 17 February 2006 16:31 (twenty years ago)
The memory card is inserted properly and we've tried a different card and that works fine. We've put the card back in the camera and it says 'no pictures', but we took another picture and it said '1 out of 60' so that suggests there are pictures still on there. It recognises any new pictures we take, but not the old ones.
Probably grasping at withered straws here but does anyone have a magical solution for making these pictures come back to life? It's seriously important as there were a lot of vital shots for people on there. The camera is a Canon EOS350D (similar to yours Ed, I do believe) if that's any help. Has anyone had this happen before even?
― Affectian (Affectian), Sunday, 19 February 2006 22:48 (twenty years ago)
― nervous (cochere), Sunday, 19 February 2006 23:24 (twenty years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Sunday, 19 February 2006 23:36 (twenty years ago)
― Affectian (Affectian), Monday, 20 February 2006 21:33 (twenty years ago)
― Jase, Saturday, 25 February 2006 14:48 (twenty years ago)
― Jase, Saturday, 25 February 2006 15:20 (twenty years ago)
I've got the username, password and ftp details. I'm getting hold of Fireworks (for the photos) and Cuteftp to upload the photos to the ftp server. But I'm clueless as to where to begin with actually sticking this stuff up on the site.
I guess it's all there in the help file but there's so much to wade through I thought I'd try here first. Is it a simple task? (I only need to add some text to a few pages and upload some more photos to a gallery). Can anyone give a quick idiots guide on how to begin?
― Affectian (Affectian), Monday, 27 February 2006 23:57 (twenty years ago)