― -+-+-+++- (ooo), Monday, 8 May 2006 12:56 (twenty years ago)
― Dan (Bah) Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 8 May 2006 14:22 (twenty years ago)
― Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 8 May 2006 14:38 (twenty years ago)
― Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 8 May 2006 14:42 (twenty years ago)
See, for the last 20 mins I was all I GET IT AWREADY.
The first 20 mins of the Barris movie are astonishing -- big ups to Rockwell and Clooney -- then it just sorta flops around.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 May 2006 14:52 (twenty years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 8 May 2006 14:55 (twenty years ago)
― the Enrique who acts like some kind of good taste gestapo (Enrique), Monday, 8 May 2006 14:57 (twenty years ago)
― JoseMaria (JoseMaria), Monday, 8 May 2006 15:02 (twenty years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 8 May 2006 15:02 (twenty years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 8 May 2006 15:03 (twenty years ago)
― -+-+-+++- (ooo), Monday, 8 May 2006 15:06 (twenty years ago)
Adaptation really merits repeated viewing, too. crazy brilliant.
― horseshoe (horseshoe), Monday, 8 May 2006 15:06 (twenty years ago)
― -+-+-+++- (ooo), Monday, 8 May 2006 15:07 (twenty years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Monday, 8 May 2006 15:10 (twenty years ago)
― Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 8 May 2006 15:20 (twenty years ago)
― -+-+-+++- (ooo), Monday, 8 May 2006 15:22 (twenty years ago)
― -+-+-+++- (ooo), Monday, 8 May 2006 15:24 (twenty years ago)
― David Orton (scarlet), Monday, 8 May 2006 15:30 (twenty years ago)
― Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 8 May 2006 15:39 (twenty years ago)
― horseshoe (horseshoe), Monday, 8 May 2006 15:42 (twenty years ago)
― Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 8 May 2006 15:44 (twenty years ago)
BJM revolves around a really interesting idea. Its Metaness is secondary.I have a problem with this statement, because while it may revolve around a really interesting idea, once you see or hear that idea it's like OK, that's cool, now what? And there's nothing there. A movie has to be better than its synopsis (or gimmick) for me to care.
Eternal Sunshine is as meta and formalist as either of the other ones, but that nakedly emo bullshit core gives me a reason to want to see it again.
― milo z (mlp), Monday, 8 May 2006 20:07 (twenty years ago)
― mike h. (mike h.), Monday, 8 May 2006 20:28 (twenty years ago)
I personally love his first two films for daring to be so meta and formal in an age of formulaic blockbusters
It's no stretch for any screenwriter or director with half a brain to be meta. Gimme a formulaic blockbuster any day: at least the stars are prettier.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Monday, 8 May 2006 20:48 (twenty years ago)
new project: Steve Carell as a screenwriter, Jack Black as his film blogger nemesis.
http://www.awardsdaily.com/2011/10/about-that-new-charlie-kaufman-screenplay-frank-or-francis/
― incredibly middlebrow (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 2 October 2011 17:33 (fourteen years ago)
to HBO, with Keener.
http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/charlie-kaufman-to-write-direct-hbo-series-starring-catherine-keener-20120521#
― World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 22 May 2012 17:54 (fourteen years ago)
Okay, yeah, I'm 100% on board with that.
― Quiet Desperation, LLC (Deric W. Haircare), Tuesday, 22 May 2012 17:57 (fourteen years ago)
^well, what happened with this?
New TV pilot:
http://www.deadline.com/2014/01/john-hawkes-michael-cera-to-star-in-charlie-kaufmans-fx-comedy-pilot/
― eclectic husbandry (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 15 January 2014 17:36 (twelve years ago)
Okay, yeah, I'm at least 92% on board with that.
― Yes, Yes, Of Course, My American Friend! Ah Ha Ha Ha! (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 15 January 2014 17:46 (twelve years ago)
lol
http://www.clickhole.com/article/cinephiles-rejoice-here-are-9-screenshots-movie-ad-3714
― on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 13 January 2016 21:36 (ten years ago)
maybe more appropriate for a spike jonze thread though
― on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 13 January 2016 21:38 (ten years ago)
Anyone read his novel?
― A White, White Gay (cryptosicko), Sunday, 26 July 2020 18:49 (five years ago)
“ B. Rosenberger Rosenberg, neurotic and underappreciated film critic (failed academic, filmmaker, paramour, shoe salesman who sleeps in a sock drawer)”
Pass.
― Donald Trump Also Sucks, Of Course (milo z), Sunday, 26 July 2020 18:52 (five years ago)
No but it is being aggressively advertised to me on various platforms
― Rishi don’t lose my voucher (wins), Sunday, 26 July 2020 18:54 (five years ago)
Is there any talk around here about his new movie on Netflix?
I’m only about 2/3 through and had to take a break. But holy shit. It’s kind of incredible.
― circa1916, Sunday, 6 September 2020 02:39 (five years ago)
curious even though i hated anomalisa
― mellon collie and the infinite bradness (BradNelson), Sunday, 6 September 2020 02:47 (five years ago)
same on both counts
― unpaid intern at the darvo institute (Simon H.), Sunday, 6 September 2020 03:08 (five years ago)
I did. It’s ridiculous and annoying and brilliant and beautiful. I missed it when it was done.
― Cherish, Sunday, 6 September 2020 04:03 (five years ago)
I really disliked Anomalisa too fwiw.This kinda became a different thing in the last 1/3 or so and I’m not sure how a feel about the turn, but the first chunk of this is pretty incredible. Don’t think I’ve felt or thought this many things simultaneously moment to moment in a film. Really masterful.
― circa1916, Sunday, 6 September 2020 06:00 (five years ago)
Total sucker for Kaufman and can't wait to see this. Somebody start a I'm Thinking of Ending Things thread!
― life is beauitul (rip van wanko), Sunday, 6 September 2020 06:01 (five years ago)
Watched last night. I was pretty stoned, which helped, I think, but I'm not sure I was convinced by what he does at the end.
― akm, Sunday, 6 September 2020 15:42 (five years ago)
Yep, same. But I already want to watch this again, and that says something considering how bleak and uncomfortable it is.
― circa1916, Sunday, 6 September 2020 17:39 (five years ago)
Really loved it
― rascal clobber (jim in vancouver), Sunday, 6 September 2020 18:41 (five years ago)
Found this completely insufferable. Think the Variety review is if anything not harsh enough https://variety.com/2020/film/reviews/im-thinking-of-ending-things-review-charlie-kaufman-jessie-buckley-jesse-plemons-1234748508/
― Piedie Gimbel, Sunday, 6 September 2020 18:45 (five years ago)
That’s an incredibly facile and surface read of the movie. Like there are so many other things happening beneath the surface that aren’t acknowledged at all.
― circa1916, Sunday, 6 September 2020 19:07 (five years ago)
“a bad-news “Twilight Zone” episode that isn’t telling difficult truths; it’s just a Debbie Downer dud”c’mon
― circa1916, Sunday, 6 September 2020 19:09 (five years ago)
“In the sheep pen, a couple of lambs have died and are frozen solid, which inspires Jake to tell a lovely story about pigs who got eaten alive by maggots. I think it’s supposed to be a metaphor. (Life is like a pig eaten by maggots — you never know what you’re gonna get!)”
― circa1916, Sunday, 6 September 2020 19:12 (five years ago)
I’m interested to read some actual thoughtful swipes at this, but that Gleiberman review is terrible.
― circa1916, Sunday, 6 September 2020 19:15 (five years ago)
Real dunce shit
― rascal clobber (jim in vancouver), Sunday, 6 September 2020 19:48 (five years ago)
Like if you see this as a “bummer town sad sack movie about the impossibility of romantic relationships... and then it gets SURREAL” were you watching this shit over the top of your phone? There is a world of things about communication and relating, internal lives against external, hidden histories, shame and reckoning with the past, this play with the audience over sympathies and feelings about characters, the humiliation and horror of aging, the drifting away and changes of loved ones aging, relating to the world and creating yourself through the ideas of others, peace and solace found in fantasy. To say nothing of the fact that this couple might be some fusion of a grander self or maybe some fragment of the janitor’s psyche or whatever.Just a ton of shit to chew on that that stupid review doesn’t even care to acknowledge. It’s hardly subtext for Christ’s sake.
― circa1916, Sunday, 6 September 2020 19:57 (five years ago)