Star Wars Anthology shit talk (Rogue One, Young Solo, TBD)

Are AT-STs the babies of AT-ATs? I've always wondered.

DEATH stars, if those count xp

http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--GLtQuylw--/18mnsllx67vt6jpg.jpg

this is mechanically separated AT-AT. it's what the empire uses to make their AT-STs. disgusting

So AT-STs are basically walking dinosaur nuggets.

Chicken (McNugget) Walkers

(That took me way too long.)

This has nothing to do with Rogue One (or does it...?) but since this is currently the happening Star Wars thread, I thought I should post here that I just learned the name of the Tusken Raider that attacked Luke, and his name is URoRRuR'R'R. That is precisely the kind of name I used to give imagined characters in elementary school. It's stupid and I love it.

The best part is when you pronounce the name backwards

http://www.balloonsabuzz.com.au/images/stories/virtuemart/product/scooby-doo-ruh-roh.jpg

roislecxe

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zatanna#/media/File%3AZatanna_by_Brian_Boland.jpg

please note I stated this back in January so I guess I scooped Mads Mikkelsen about his own job?

http://io9.gizmodo.com/mads-mikkelsen-might-have-just-dropped-a-huge-rogue-one-1773632382

I wouldn't put it past Mads to be making a silly Star Wars joke

young han solo, everybody
http://media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/35/22/4c/35224c0084fcb54ded5713bbbfee0715.jpg

Coen Brothers continuing their scouting work for Star Wars, there.

he was good in that coppola film as well.

ruh roh!!!

The much-anticipated “Rogue One” is due for release on Dec. 16, but we’re told bosses at Disney are not fully satisfied with the first cut from director Gareth Edwards.

One Hollywood source told us, “The execs at Disney are not happy with the movie, and ‘Rogue One’ will have to go back into four weeks of expensive reshoots in July.”

let me guess everybody died at the end and nobody liked it

The source added, “Disney won’t take a back seat, and is demanding changes, as the movie isn’t testing well.”

yup

Just slap a new Blake Shelton song over that bleak ending and get ready to watch some focus group faces light up.

they can just add a scene where someone yells "oh wait they're not quite dead" and throw all of them in a dumpster of bacta

(Honestly would not be at all surprised to learn that some of the complaints were along the lines of "Where's Rey?")

xpost Or like the ending of Freddy Got Fingered, where a kid walked out of the shot and into a plane's propellors, showering everyone onscreen with blood just before the studio-mandated paste-in of the kid saying "I'm okay!"

What, somebody didn't read the script? "Hey, we can't sell any dead Han Solo action figures this way."

(Honestly would not be at all surprised to learn that some of the complaints were along the lines of "Where's Rey?")

― I Do Dumb Things And Then I Cry (Old Lunch), Tuesday, May 31, 2016 2:04 PM (25 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

This boils down my son's complaint about the trailer. "This doesn't have anything to do with the last movie. I have to wait for three years to find out what happened in that one?"

I'm bummed. The trailer looked so so good to me.

Back in my day, kid, we had to wait three years AND suffer through issue after issue of Starlog to get production reports and rumors! Suck it up!

Maybe the director spent the entire SFX budget on blow and all of the battles wound up with him smashing old-school Kenner vehicles into one another against a green screen while his coke buddy goes "PEW PEW P-PEW" offscreen.

i never ask the entertainment-industrial complex for anything but i did ask for a cynical girl space fighter jock star wars movie so of course it's getting cold feet now

Edwards is obviously good at making things look cool, but he's yet to demonstrate the ability to tell a good story. Or even make a non-boring movie. Trailer tells us nothing really.

Man, the trailer before Civil War looked incredible on the screen.

Current best trailer-to-worst movie ratio champ is Jarhead but if this is bad it would come close.

thought it looked cheap & dull, but the at-ats picked things up a bit

Star Wars universe is supposed to look cheap and dull

ehhh the Rogue One trailer wasn't that good imo
xp nah, Star Wars looks used and lived-in, not cheap and dull

Rumour: 40% of R1 is being reshot.

Some crew initially heard J.J. Abrams was supervising the reshoots.
Gareth Edwards is doing the reshoots himself but with a partner, Christopher McQuarrie.
Christopher McQuarrie, the final writer on Rogue One will be working extensively with Edwards onset to make sure they’re on the “same page” with the most recent draft of the film.
Christopher McQuarrie’s draft of Rogue One: A Star Wars Story was considered superior to the film they shot previously.
It was not Edwards’ fault as McQuarrie’s draft wasn’t completed when much of the film was shot and revisions kept coming in that made the film feel uneven.
32 sets have been recreated for the reshoot.
The crew expects they are reshooting 40% of the film.
They are working 6 days a week for 8 weeks.

http://makingstarwars.net/2016/06/how-extensive-will-the-rogue-one-reshoots-be/

this is why I give no fucks when hollywood complains about films not making enough money because of piracy or whatever bullshit

Do you care to clarify that line of reasoning at all?

Anyway, sounds like they rushed it, if McQuarrie was that far from finished when they started shooting. I liked the trailer a lot, though! Especially in the theater.

Just that Hollywood should stop flushing its own money down the toilet before they accuse their audience of stealing from them

because they're reshooting some stuff?

40%? jesus christ.

Literally all American films of any size are represented wholly and specifically by anything Gareth Edwards ever does.

It was not Edwards’ fault as McQuarrie’s draft wasn’t completed when much of the film was shot and revisions kept coming in that made the film feel uneven.

rly love the visual here, spectacled man sitting at typewriter alone in windowless room, intern coming in whenever a page falls free & dashing carrying it aloft to the full-scale exploding galaxy mockup in the next room

lol worse things have been done

I think they admitted that the James Bond film that was shot during the writers strike had a lot of Bond dialogue written by Daniel Craig

It was really weird in that scene where 007 went on and on about his favorite Pokemon

oh wow you're not kidding http://collider.com/daniel-craig-quantum-of-solace-script-problems/

lol latebloomer. I think if Craig did another Bond film he would probably be irritated enough to talk about pocket monsters all day

xp lol that explains a lot about how bad that movie was

I liked how it was straightforward plot progression and action scenes without Mendes' sloppy emotional beats tbh

the problem with mendes is he really think he's a maestro at composing a beautiful shot but his films grind to a halt when he's not shooting action scenes (and sometimes even then too.) skyfall was about as exciting as road to perdition when craig wasn't riding motorcycles on top of trains. He's terrible at narrative momentum. forster wasn't especially a good pic for QoS but I think the Bourne-style pacing kept that movie going forward pretty briskly. Said this elsewhere but I kinda want to tell these producers that no one really cares who's directing a bond film, you just need a craftsman like Martin Campbell. You don't need a name. Cf goldeneye and CR.

Gareth Edwards is more mendes than anything unfortunately, I did like the Rogue One trailer but parts of it skewed towards a skyfallian portentousness.

Ok wait apparently it's not McQuarrie, it's Tony Gilroy, and there were no test screenings.

http://io9.gizmodo.com/one-of-the-writers-behind-jason-bourne-is-now-helping-w-1780449151

Something is happening, for sure!

it's me, I'm actually on set and not on a vacation right now

the problem with mendes is he really think he's a maestro at composing a beautiful shot but his films grind to a halt when he's not shooting action scenes (and sometimes even then too.)

wait, "he really think[s] he's a maestro"? you have it on some authority that his hubris dominated the editing? i ask because the most riveting moments in the last couple bond films were consistently the most beautiful: the skyscraper assassination setup and manor approach in skyfall, belluci's walk through her house and the casino approach in spectre.

God knows what I want out of a bond movie is not pacing or a sense of momentum but a riveting building approach.

i don't really like bond movies, so an interesting moment or two is fine by me