http://www.newyorker.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/borowitz-670.png
can someone shop this onto osama thumbs up
― ejemplo (crüt), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 17:01 (ten years ago)
I am sure there's a long german word for the particular brand of disgust I feel when I see a link to a borowitz article
― μpright mammal (mh), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 18:26 (ten years ago)
that article written by the NYer's general counsel was really good, i really can't see how they lose this appeal
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 23 March 2016 18:31 (ten years ago)
Would we be worse off if no one were willing to publish such a video? You don’t have to be a First Amendment absolutist, in favor of the unlimited publication of sex tapes, to believe that we would.
lol
― tremendous crime wave and killing wave (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Wednesday, 23 March 2016 18:51 (ten years ago)
The one thing I found odd about that piece is that he uses the term "public interest" throughout it in the sense of "something the public is interested in." I'm no lawyer so I could be way off, but I was under the impression that in legal terms "public interest" means something related to the general welfare of the public, not something a lot of people are curious about. I think it'd be a lot harder to argue that the video serves the public interest under that definition.
― early rejecter, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 19:04 (ten years ago)
i think it can mean both but it can be a cute rhetorical trick to talk about "the public interest" which def implies public welfare when you mean just titillating shit that gets the public's rocks off
― Mordy, Wednesday, 23 March 2016 19:08 (ten years ago)
God help us if theres a war, and so on.
― Interesting. No, wait, the other thing: tedious. (Trayce), Thursday, 24 March 2016 06:00 (ten years ago)
the ol' deadspin-jezebel switcheroo, i like it
― goole, Friday, 1 April 2016 15:58 (ten years ago)
surprised no one bumped this thread for this the other day: http://www.law360.com/media/articles/777787
Gawker Escapes Unpaid Intern FLSA Suit
A New York federal judge on Tuesday tossed a proposed class action accusing Gawker Media LLC of not paying interns in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act, saying the experience the interns gained outweighed the benefits the internship program provided the digital media company.
― de l'asshole (flopson), Friday, 1 April 2016 16:03 (ten years ago)
saying the experience the interns gained outweighed the benefits the internship program provided the digital media company.
grim
― goole, Friday, 1 April 2016 16:08 (ten years ago)
so basically a judge ruled that Gawker has shitty interns?
― i like to trump and i am crazy (DJP), Friday, 1 April 2016 16:20 (ten years ago)
they must have spilled coffee on some laptops
― Blowout Coombes (President Keyes), Friday, 1 April 2016 16:54 (ten years ago)
i thought we were gawker's interns
― mookieproof, Friday, 1 April 2016 23:31 (ten years ago)
Did J0rdan forget to eat yesterday?
― how's life, Friday, 15 April 2016 18:52 (ten years ago)
https://49.media.tumblr.com/8652cd63085b749c7ec263e863562bb5/tumblr_n0pdtxhxQf1sdqajoo1_400.gif
― mookieproof, Saturday, 16 April 2016 02:38 (ten years ago)
actually, yes. (well i did all the eating at once but I was traveling yesterday and forgot to post the video, so im gonna put it up on monday. it's the last one!)
― J0rdan S., Saturday, 16 April 2016 02:45 (ten years ago)
lol J0rdan... I didn't even look at the byline until I saw this and thought "gotta be an ilxor"
But the “27 Questions Black People Have For Black People” video was so bad and... hated that BuzzFeed’s facade of positivity was punctured, and what spilled out was anti-BuzzFeed Motion Pictures tea that could not have been brewed just in one night.
― Larry Elleison (rogermexico.), Friday, 22 April 2016 21:49 (ten years ago)
ouch.
― Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Friday, 22 April 2016 23:56 (ten years ago)
re: the Harris Wittels convo at the very top of this thread: https://medium.com/@stephaniewittelswachs/the-end-of-empathy-5d8383b066d3#.nzuft1b33
― some dude, Saturday, 23 April 2016 20:18 (ten years ago)
Hi JS I liked your longish-form bit on the (potentially dismal) future of writing in new media
― bothan zulu (El Tomboto), Sunday, 24 April 2016 00:58 (ten years ago)
f the alternative is an io9 headed by rob bricken, i'm all for them shutting up shop
― Butt here is always time for the John Mayer Trio or Sting. (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, January 14, 2016 1:42 PM (3 months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck
― i do not sense the entity ted (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 3 May 2016 10:41 (ten years ago)
yeah I almost revived this thread this weekend
― bothan zulu (El Tomboto), Tuesday, 3 May 2016 12:31 (ten years ago)
you sadly called that one, bg
― μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 3 May 2016 13:02 (ten years ago)
perfect
― Allen (etaeoe), Tuesday, 3 May 2016 14:14 (ten years ago)
gawker's new editor is the guy from kotaku that posts nothing but videos of himself playing mario
― Allen (etaeoe), Tuesday, 3 May 2016 14:15 (ten years ago)
― μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 3 May 2016 14:56 (ten years ago)
is that the same as the kotaku guy who lives in japan and is one step removed from shiroib4sketsh0es?
― μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 3 May 2016 14:57 (ten years ago)
― bothan zulu (El Tomboto), Saturday, April 23, 2016 8:58 PM (1 week ago) Bookmark
thanks tomboto
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 3 May 2016 15:19 (ten years ago)
http://sploid.gizmodo.com/gorgeous-shot-of-an-espresso-being-poured-from-the-mach-1774825130
I don’t even drink coffee but after seeing an espresso shot get pulled through a naked portafilter on an espresso machine, it’s the only thing I want in my life. Watching the water swish through the finely ground coffee beans and then seeing it seep through each hole and then finally getting being allowed to witness how the various flows group together to form that golden brown liquid of the gods. Man oh man, it’s like being around to see a superweapon charging up.
― sexy dander (Stevie D(eux)), Thursday, 5 May 2016 03:07 (ten years ago)
they want to fuck that machine
― μpright mammal (mh), Thursday, 5 May 2016 03:12 (ten years ago)
that gif did not live up to the description
― Treeship, Thursday, 5 May 2016 03:16 (ten years ago)
and then finally getting being allowed to witness how the various flows group together to form that golden brown liquid of the gods. Man oh man
― sexy dander (Stevie D(eux)), Thursday, 5 May 2016 03:39 (ten years ago)
i love getting being allowed
― Treeship, Thursday, 5 May 2016 03:44 (ten years ago)
i love crapping in your mouth
― map, Thursday, 5 May 2016 03:56 (ten years ago)
rude
― sexy dander (Stevie D(eux)), Thursday, 5 May 2016 03:56 (ten years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13H8_xGMBe0
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Thursday, 5 May 2016 04:49 (ten years ago)
"i don't even drink coffee" who the fuck even are you
you would be literally murdered on the cof thread
― yellow despackling power (Will M.), Thursday, 5 May 2016 15:00 (ten years ago)
I wish they'd amend stories with info on why they're trending again - the Jezebel redditor incest story is in the sidebar again but I have no clue why.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 5 May 2016 15:56 (ten years ago)
I think the Slate advice columnist has a related story today
― Blowout Coombes (President Keyes), Thursday, 5 May 2016 17:08 (ten years ago)
when is incest not trending
― map, Thursday, 5 May 2016 19:12 (ten years ago)
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, May 5, 2016 11:56 AM (4 hours ago) Bookmark
sometime it's really hard to figure out why this happens http://gawker.com/why-is-gawkers-top-story-a-four-year-old-post-about-vaj-1586474680
― J0rdan S., Thursday, 5 May 2016 20:49 (ten years ago)
Kinja definitely could use a little more "curator" intervention from time to time
Is it just me or have Kotaku and io9 kind of devolved into frontends for SPLOID!!!! with like <5 vertical-specific pieces per day?
― bothan zulu (El Tomboto), Saturday, 7 May 2016 00:46 (ten years ago)
is this shit even supposed to be funny? Every time I think this guy is going to turn a corner and stop pissing me off, he doesn't.
http://gawker.com/science-watch-sleazy-space-sex-1775158310
― bothan zulu (El Tomboto), Saturday, 7 May 2016 12:31 (ten years ago)
ashley feinberg and gabrielle bluestone are pretty funny sometimes.
― Treeship, Saturday, 7 May 2016 13:28 (ten years ago)
http://screengrabber.deadspin.com/bartolo-colon-jacks-first-career-dong-1775360860
― Takes 'n Takes (Whiney G. Weingarten), Sunday, 8 May 2016 03:08 (ten years ago)
I don’t even drink coffee but after seeing an espresso shot get pulled through a naked portafilter on an espresso machine, it’s the only thing I want in my life. Watching the water swish through the finely ground coffee beans and then seeing it seep through each hole and then finally getting being allowed to witness how the various flows group together to form that golden brown liquid of the gods. Man oh man, it’s like being around to see a superweapon charging up.― sexy dander (Stevie D(eux)), Wednesday, May 4, 2016 10:07 PM (3 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
fwiw this existed in the pre-clickbait era: http://espressoporn.blogspot.com/
― JWoww Gilberto (man alive), Sunday, 8 May 2016 03:22 (ten years ago)
jon stewart on the louis ck gawker "story" at 1:14:04https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Da5VYSPsoE0curious how the follow up to that for-sure-damning-evidence-is-on-the-way blind item is coming along
― ulysses, Wednesday, 11 May 2016 13:30 (ten years ago)
well
i've received dozens & dozens of emails about him. i still get them monthly even tho the story is like a year old. most of them are people passing on secondhand knowledge, but i've gotten several from people with close accounts of harassment. unfortunately people are reticent to come forward because comedy is a close knit community that privileges people who can keep secrets. this is true for hollywood writ large, really. being a whistleblower is a giant risk to someone's livelihood in a number of ways. i've found this to be true for people with nascent or nonexistent careers and also for people who you would think could not be touched by simply saying something about an incident of harassment. people with hundred million dollar movie budgets and multiple televised award show acceptance speeches have said things off the record to me but then refused to speak about them any further. so i dunno. i still report out the story when i can. ultimately i'm in no way less convinced of its truth.
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 11 May 2016 14:03 (ten years ago)
i read that as you're suggesting the system is complicit and that's why you can't be reasonably expected to report this story more deeply. I'm not sure how that's any different from any scandal that's ever been broken? Isn't one of the key purposes of investigative journalism to unearth a cover up? To what degree are you willing to take on responsibility for the difficulty of evidence gathering by publishing hearsay before you had on-the-record confirmation? And if you truly believe that your allegations are true, what degree of complicity do you take on by not more actively furthering the story?
― ulysses, Wednesday, 11 May 2016 14:37 (ten years ago)
Or are these naive questions?