Artificial intelligence still has some way to go

Make a list of shit nobody actually believes and then cherry pick quotes by a wide range of credentialed and non-credentialed so-called smart people and hey look a listicle!!! my head
http://gizmodo.com/everything-you-know-about-artificial-intelligence-is-wr-1764020220

Related, and way more fun: http://www.clickhole.com/clickventure/youre-computer-can-you-pass-turing-test-4009#27,

ugh, the structure of that gizmodo thing, with "Myth" set against "Reality", only by "reality" i suppose they mean "fact", which they then support with...opinions? Myth: Someone thinks something might happen in the future. Reality: someone else thinks that it might not.

wtf

also they forgot to edit it. like near the end, with this quote:

“Over the next couple of decades AI is going to destroy many jobs, but this is a good thing,” Miller told Gizmodo.

who is Miller? they never say. it is a mystery

perhaps the author was distressed because his job was being destroyed as he wrote the article. and maybe the AI wrote the bit about it being a good thing.

sorry, but let me lightly edit to fit the format:

MYTH: perhaps the author was distressed because his job was being destroyed as he wrote the article

REALITY: maybe the AI wrote the bit about it being a good thing

computers can play go now, I guess

truly the end is near

people are learning new strategies from computers, in a 2500 year old game. sounds like the beginning to me!

look at these robots falling over!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g0TaYhjpOfo

look at these stupid babies!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9nWOaDit5w

Those robots have far less sophisticated sensors and control mechanisms than the babies do. A baby can learn to walk without constantly falling over in a matter of a few weeks, without being torn down, re-designed, refitted or rebuilt. But the robots will probably need another 20 years, endless redesigns and hundreds of millions of dollars in research funding before they can open doors or climb over obstacles.

It seems to me both perfectly understandable and mostly unjustifiable to try to make robots replicate human form with human physical capabilities. We already have humans for that. AI is always more successful when it focusses on narrowly specific jobs and builds on that capability by increments.

boston dynamics robots walk better than any babies I know

Do they really though? I always wonder when watching those vids how many takes of each task they've done.

perhaps you were c+p'ing something as a joke, but here is the video of a robot doing all of that right now: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVlhMGQgDkY

xp i don't know. tbh, it can be fun to be cool skeptical guy at the robot conference, but you probably need an accent and a cane to pull it off.

and maybe some highly cited papers

"A baby can learn to walk without constantly falling over in a matter of a few weeks, without being torn down, re-designed, refitted or rebuilt."

This inspired some disturbing visualizations

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9Hu6J3pEwQ

In 2016, I find it more impressive for humanity that one person can still beat (in at least 1 out of 4 games) a computer program running on 1,920 CPUS and 280 GPUs at a board game.

Those Boston Dynamics robots are pretty impressive. Quite an accomplishment tbf, but any minimum wage 16 year old could still run rings around them. Among other things, I noticed most of the objects they interacted with, like the doors and boxes, had bold black-and-white designs placed on them to assist their sensors.

This interview with the DeepMind founder is way better. The guy speaks a bit to the different approaches people are taking to AI and knows where his bread is buttered

http://www.theverge.com/2016/3/10/11192774/demis-hassabis-interview-alphago-google-deepmind-ai

Well, it’s just a completely different approach. You’re building in from the ground up the ability to learn new things and deal with the unexpected, and I think that’s what you need for any robot or software application in the real world interacting with real users — they’re going to need to have that kind of capability to be properly useful. I think the learning route ultimately has to be the right way.

xp as long as you're willing to send minimum wage 16 year olds into the fukushima nuclear power plant

Sending anything or anyone into a fukushima power plant situation would seem to arise only rarely - thank goodness. Sadly, afaics those robots wouldn't be up to that level of job, yet, if such a catastrophe happened again soon.

(yes, I know this post now becomes bait for the "sadly" thread.)

well my point is that one can foresee applications for a robot that a 16 year old human could still "run rings around." And it's not always best to let applications drive discovery, anyhow (see the history of the laser for an example).

TBF, a lot of robotics doesn't strike me as being only about AI but about challenges of physics and mechanics. I get the sense that processing power is advancing faster than the speed at which we are getting closer to creating something as flexible/strong/adaptable/durable as muscle tissue, but IDK.

yeah... also, the comparison to the time it takes a human baby to learn to walk isn't quite the right one to make -- if/when the engineering problems are solved for robots, they'll take to it in no time. the 'engineering' stage for biological life took eons. and it didn't even get us built-in hoverboards.

speak for yourself

jeal

http://www.businessinsider.com/microsoft-deletes-racist-genocidal-tweets-from-ai-chatbot-tay-2016-3?r=UK&IR=T

gonna put so many human racists out of work, good job!

vp dark horse tay

damn tay is being discussed here

xp as long as you're willing to send minimum wage 16 year olds into the fukushima nuclear power plant

― Toof Seteltha (Sufjan Grafton), Monday, March 14, 2016 4:19 PM (1 week ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Not only willing but eager.

they need to add "i have intensely absorbed the negative aspect of my time" to tay's bio though

oh lol I was just coming here to post about Tay

taytay be craycray

I read about Tay yesterday and thought "that is a weird thing for Microsoft to put out but I respect the lack of care for branding and I guess not many people will notice it anyway". Today...

this is why billion-dollar companies can't have nice things

https://twitter.com/TayandYou/status/712830495449440257

wait someone told me taylor swift endorsed genocide, please confirm

posted these in the twitter thread but i will post them here with the intent to preserve that special moment microsoft created a 21st c frankenstein

https://imgur.com/a/iBnbW

https://imgur.com/gLapRVZ

https://imgur.com/JS7I5e6

tay is basically the typical twitter user by now

upper management in tech really has no clue what happens on social networks do they? like they have no idea what kind of people bubble up

wasn't there an instance a month or so ago where a twitter exec said something mildly stupid and got harassed for the next 48 hours solid? and he was stunned. he had no idea how his community platform functioned de facto.

what else? moot just got hired by google. were they like, "google+ is a failure, you made a playground for fascists and pedophiles, can you help us?"

i have a lot of trouble imagining my way into the techy view of the world

― goole, Thursday, March 24, 2016 1:23 PM (19 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I admit that I am more surprised that Microsoft would do this as opposed to, say, Coke's hilarious "Share a bottle with ______" campaign

http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/03/tay-the-neo-nazi-millennial-chatbot-gets-autopsied/

Bot creators, especially those of interactive bots like Tay, say that they have to continually adjust their bots to keep them on the straight and narrow. Abusive users, and how these will be addressed, have to be considered right from the start. The Tay experience has made some from this group angry. Natural language researcher thricedotted, who has 37 bots (the best known of which, or at least, the only one that regularly gets retweeted into my timeline, is sexting bot @wikisext) told Jeong that "You absolutely do NOT let an algorithm mindlessly devour a whole bunch of data that you haven't vetted even a little bit." In other words, Microsoft should have known better than to let Tay loose on the raw uncensored torrent of what Twitter could direct her way.

I especially like the conclusion that the reason the Chinese equivalent didn't turn Hitler Youth is because the PRC's censorship regime makes the necessary circumstances all but impossible

Censorship pwns

http://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/ive-seen-the-greatest-a-i-minds-of-my-generation-destroyed-by-twitter

What was astonishing about that victory was, in part, how quickly AlphaGo became an expert. In five months, it reviewed and played more matches than most humans could in a lifetime. Tay appears to have accomplished an analogous feat, except that instead of processing reams of Go data she mainlined interactions on Twitter, Kik, and GroupMe. She had more negative social experiences between Wednesday afternoon and Thursday morning than a thousand of us do throughout puberty. It was peer pressure on uppers, “yes and” gone mad. No wonder she turned out the way she did.

Memristor-based tech can provide huge gains in learning speeds:

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/ibm-chip-30000x-ai-speedup,31484.html

Tay has returned! ...And is gone again.

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/mar/30/microsoft-racist-sexist-chatbot-twitter-drugs

Genuine lols, I hope she keeps being resurrected for more and more madness at irregular intervals

There are definitely aspects of the Tay situation that aren't funny at all (teaching it to harass people = horrible) but the general "let's throw an overly-receptive chatbot at Twitter and see what happens OH NO SHUT IT DOWN" vibe of this has me rolling