Yeah, removing a pawn from the board was just move one.
― Telephone Meatballs (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 16:41 (ten years ago)
BB is about the destructive power of high expectations, BCS is about the destructive power of low expectations. There's very little doubt in my mind that when Jimmy flips over into full Saul Goodman it'll be down to Chuck in some way.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 17:39 (ten years ago)
If I had to guess, and maybe their conflict this episode was some clue, I would guess that Jimmy's downfall will come when he tried to save Chuck from something, either something Chuck finally done wrong or something Jimmy does to get Chuck in trouble.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 18:24 (ten years ago)
Sorry, phone messing up subject-verb grammar.
I think Nacho's question at the end is answered in the Jim Beaver scene -- Mike decides against the sniper plan when he sees the old rifle he used in Vietnam. He doesn't want to go back to that if he doesn't have to.
― orifex, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 20:26 (ten years ago)
I got that much. Hmm, I'm trying to remember how killing-averse Mike was in BB ...
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 20:28 (ten years ago)
Aside from situations when his life was in danger, the only people I remember him killing were the cops who killed his son.
― Buckles On My Goulashes (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 20:33 (ten years ago)
He's no Walter White, at any rate.
He killed the Pollo Hermanos truck hijackers personally
― μpright mammal (mh), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 20:39 (ten years ago)
http://49.media.tumblr.com/723764fd513c78910e638e684e7c711c/tumblr_nnoynblR1r1s0hs2uo6_400.gif
― JRN, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 22:21 (ten years ago)
Yeah wtf mikes a killer, it's like his defining characteristic
― anglos with derpy phasis (wins), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 22:44 (ten years ago)
he is going to kill jesse and walt in breaking bad because they've outlived their usefulness/are a liability
― Cornelius Pardew (jim in glasgow), Wednesday, 9 March 2016 22:48 (ten years ago)
and only jesse killing gill stops him from doing so because the two are again indispensable to their enterprise
So I guess that is his moral line character arc - what will drive Mike to kill again?
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 9 March 2016 23:18 (ten years ago)
I know Mike is a killer. I just genuinely couldn't remember if he had ever been a wanton killer in the Walter White mode. Like, he's always willing to do it if it's necessary but he'd always prefer to find another way, has been my take.
― Buckles On My Goulashes (Old Lunch), Thursday, 10 March 2016 00:19 (ten years ago)
Nah he's definitely more trigger happy than that in BB. He's way keener to wack Lydia than either Walt or Jesse, for example.
Was the gun buying scene the first intimation he may have been in Nam?
― the joke should be over once the kid is eaten. (chap), Thursday, 10 March 2016 16:50 (ten years ago)
Yeah that hadnt been mentioned before
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 10 March 2016 17:09 (ten years ago)
Coasting/table-setting this week.
― defibrillate after opening (WilliamC), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 16:20 (ten years ago)
Pretty intriguing though, with Kim's secret striving, Howard and Kim, Howard and Chuck, Mike and Tuco's pre-stroke uncle, and deep background--Chuck's wife! Even deeper: the way Chuck tells it anyway, Jimmy gradually ruined their father's business, at least in part---"Dad wasn't the greatest business man"---then, after Dad had to sell, and died six months later, Jimmy cried the hardest at the funeral--"Jimmy's not a bad person. He has a good heart"---what did Chuck say after that??
― dow, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:03 (ten years ago)
"He just can't help himself."
― a serious and fascinating fartist (Simon H.), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:23 (ten years ago)
tíoooooo!
― anglos with derpy phasis (wins), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:36 (ten years ago)
str breaking bad would also do this thing of having >1 stupidly long montage in an episode to fill time
This was great tho. Howard and chuck are such a pair of cunts. Have we seen the shitheel from the DA's office before? I didn't recognise him
― anglos with derpy phasis (wins), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:44 (ten years ago)
Does Saul mention an ex-wife at any point in BB? I'm pretty sure he does but I'm not sure when in the series it actually happened.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:03 (ten years ago)
Maybe coming up? Though Howard was informing/deferring to Chuck, re Kim's landing big client, so maybe now she might possibly be considered for redemption. Don't think Howard relishes having to please Chuck so fucking much.
― dow, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 18:20 (ten years ago)
"Though"--"Thought," that is.
Intro set up the other reason Chuck can't stand Jimmy -- people actually like Jimmy! It was painful watching Chuck be a charisma black hole around his wife
― μpright mammal (mh), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 19:02 (ten years ago)
Scenes like the one between Chuck and Kim this week make me reluctant to think of Chuck as a villain. Jimmy is a career con artist who embezzled thousands from the family business (supposing that latter story is true as Chuck tells it); it makes perfect sense to think that he'd make for an unscrupulous, dangerous lawyer.
Chuck certainly can be conniving and two-faced, particularly when he needs Jimmy's help. But he's also helped Jimmy, as the opening this week reminded me.
― JRN, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 19:49 (ten years ago)
just finished season 1 and mannnn was this good. hated just about everything the ending with jimmy turning down the partner-track gig but otherwise this was arguably at least as good as the best parts of BB, certainly much better than season 1 of BB
also marco totally died of a pulmonary embolism, not a heart attack
― k3vin k., Tuesday, 15 March 2016 20:18 (ten years ago)
very Coen-y, the kettlemans especially
― k3vin k., Tuesday, 15 March 2016 20:19 (ten years ago)
Chuck isn't a villain so much as a pompous control freak, as was made clear by the opening scene
― anglos with derpy phasis (wins), Tuesday, 15 March 2016 20:48 (ten years ago)
Renewed for a third season:
http://mashable.com/2016/03/15/better-call-saul-renewed-for-season-3/
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 22:20 (ten years ago)
Yeah, a control freak with compulsions, some of them painful---running through the sunlight to the mailbox, while huddling under his goddammed space blanket, and staring up at the wires!. And his rejection of Jimmy for getting a "spurious" law degree, and without telling Chuck he was doing it, until he'd already passed the bar--his rejection seems like a self-fulfilling prophecy of Jimmy going to the shady side again---but, given their history, and Jimmy's own compulsions, how should/could he handle the little bastid? Family shit runs deep.
― dow, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 22:21 (ten years ago)
trying to imagine watching better call saul having never watched breaking bad and then watching breaking bad
― conrad, Tuesday, 15 March 2016 23:30 (ten years ago)
^^I think about that every time I watch the show. I'm not sure what it would be like. BCS is slower-paced, and its take on Saul is of course much subtler, so if you've seen that first, it might seem like Saul is too much of a one-note joke character when he shows up in BB.
On the other hand, it might be cool. BB is a good show on its own, and it could be fun to be surprised by how Mike and Saul get mixed up with Walt and Jesse. Like the episode where Jesse's girlfriend overdoses: you're all horrified at Walt letting her die, and wondering how they're going to deal with it, and then all of the sudden "whoa, there's Mike!" That character showing up would have a weight to it that it couldn't have had for someone who saw Breaking Bad first (especially since IIRC Mike's role was not initially planned to be anywhere near that big).
― JRN, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 00:16 (ten years ago)
How about the light in Chuck (and his wife)'s place? Man.
― bearded flack trickster god (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 08:42 (ten years ago)
Chapette thinks this season is 'slow as fuck', and it's difficult to logically argue with her when you have like five minutes of Kim Wexler looking at post-it notes. I'm loving it however, it makes the moments of intense drama all the more rewarding.
― the joke should be over once the kid is eaten. (chap), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 10:14 (ten years ago)
Why does Howard have it in for Kim so much? Idgi
― i;m thinking about thos Beans (Michael B), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 10:44 (ten years ago)
For showing him up by vouching/covering for jimmy, also he's a dick
― anglos with derpy phasis (wins), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 10:46 (ten years ago)
I'm sure there's some more shit lurking under the surface as well.
― the joke should be over once the kid is eaten. (chap), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 10:47 (ten years ago)
Wow, Rebecca (Chuck's wife) is played by a Cusack.
Also, renewed for a third season!
― bearded flack trickster god (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 11:37 (ten years ago)
This show can continue being 'slow as fuck' as long as it likes, afaic. Anyone bothered by that can go watch every other show on tv.
― Horse Throat (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 12:49 (ten years ago)
chuck and howard toasting each other - so much hate
― draxx them sklounst (dog latin), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 13:03 (ten years ago)
montage soundtrack was hilarious
― ive seen enough Good Wife episodes (s.clover), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 13:42 (ten years ago)
Howard vs. Kim: how much of it is really about her, about the offense of not warning Howard that Jimmy was making this commercial, thus Davis-Main somehow blaming Jimmy's *previous* sort of parent firm, how much of it is Howard being enough under the thumb of Chuck, that Howard is somehow threatened by/beholden to Chuck in all matters related to Jimmy especially? Taking out his frustration on Kim, or just doing what he thinks he needs to, in order to please/somewhat mollify/not look so weak to Chuck (more of a cold calculation than taking out frustration)? Guess we're supposed to calculate all this for ourselves as it goes along, rather than having the characters explain everything to each other and the audience, like on regular TV and in lots of movies.
― dow, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 13:55 (ten years ago)
Yeah, and I agree that there's probably more to be revealed about Howard's position. We were led to believe that he was a dick all last season before the Chuck card was overturned.
― Horse Throat (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 14:00 (ten years ago)
It's interesting that Chuck is painted as such a villain in this show because, to the extent that his narration is reliable and he's not projecting overly much (although we know he is to some extent), he kinda has a point about Jimmy. We all know where this is heading, and what we know about Jimmy's past doesn't exactly promote faith in his actions. He's just so darn likeable, and he has such a good heart!
― Horse Throat (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 14:42 (ten years ago)
yeah the shades of gray to all the characters are so well-drawn.
where this show is reminiscent of BB is in the way that a solution to one problem inevitably begets a bigger problem.
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 15:50 (ten years ago)
Howard's coming off a little Gordon Gekko x Zap Brannigan but I love it
― nashwan, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 15:53 (ten years ago)
I liked the slight foreshadowing of Tio's appearance with the ringing of the bell at the beginning of that last diner scene.
― woman in the dunes, Wednesday, 16 March 2016 16:31 (ten years ago)
Nice catch.
― Horse Throat (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 16 March 2016 16:40 (ten years ago)