The official thread for Lord Of The Rings - The Return Of The King [LOTR ROTK TROTK ROK] (NOW CONTAINS SPOILERS)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (647 of them)
Ah, they couldn't cast Holm anyway, he's too old for the part. They'll just cast whatshisname who's Harry Potter's friend or someone equally obvious.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 00:59 (nineteen years ago)

Pete Doherty!

Beth S. (Ex Leon), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 01:00 (nineteen years ago)

Isn't Bilbo supposed to look the same at the beginning of LOTR as he does at the end of The Hobbit due to The Ring's anti-ageing effects, though?

chap who would dare to welcome our new stingray masters (chap), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 01:01 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, and I doubt Serkis would gollum up for anyone but Jackson, too.

So obviously Ahmed Best would have to take over.

It's the lazy and immoral way to become super hip. (Austin, Still), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 01:02 (nineteen years ago)

Pete Doherty!

Only if he does the theme song.

Joe: there's a hypergeeky answer to that even I'm not going to get into, for once.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 01:03 (nineteen years ago)

no tell us

Marmot (marmotwolof), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 01:06 (nineteen years ago)

You are a sick man.

In one of the DVD commentaries for Fellowship for that scene where Bilbo first finds the ring, it is explained that Ian Holm was wearing something which literally was pulling his skin smooth so he could seem younger in the context of the storyline.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 01:08 (nineteen years ago)

I've only watched a bit of the actor's commentary from one of em, Two Towers I think, and Merry and Pippin were swearing like troopers, unbeeped! I guess the censors don't bother to check commentaries.

chap who would dare to welcome our new stingray masters (chap), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 01:16 (nineteen years ago)

x-post
Oh for a sec I thought there was some geeky reason BILBO (the character) wouldn't look the same that I missed in the books.

SHYAMALAN:"Stop complaining Ian, you only have to wear this 16 hours a day."[throws money at Ian Holm]

Problem solved.

Marmot (marmotwolof), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 01:18 (nineteen years ago)

Did anyone buy the latest DVDs that have both the extended and theatrical versions together? How are those? I think might want them since I only own the theatrical Fellowship.

Marmot (marmotwolof), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 01:21 (nineteen years ago)

x-post -- An ineluctable logic.

I got those new money-soaking editions through a couple of Amazon deals so I only had to pay 6 bucks for each, and basically just for the behind the scenes documentary stuff, which is pretty cool (if you're me). Haven't actually seen the movie disc on each.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 01:22 (nineteen years ago)

I guess the censors don't bother to check commentaries.

dvd's expressly disclaim that the bonus material is unrated

cutty (mcutt), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 01:55 (nineteen years ago)

They better get Rankin-Bass to do it again!

Abbott (Abbott), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 03:12 (nineteen years ago)

Like check out Gollum, he's fucking awesome lizard cape man!

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/7e/Gollum3.jpg

I had a dream once that Peter Gabriel's RAEL character looked like this Gollum, so I can't hear "Carpet Crawlers" w/out seeing this hissing cavedweller.

Abbott (Abbott), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 03:20 (nineteen years ago)

i hope they leave the hobbit alone

latebloomer (latebloomer), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 12:55 (nineteen years ago)

Hey! You! New Line! Leave that Hobbit alone!

chap who would dare to welcome our new stingray masters (chap), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 13:00 (nineteen years ago)

roffle

latebloomer (latebloomer), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 13:31 (nineteen years ago)

I had a dream once that Peter Gabriel's RAEL character looked like this Gollum, so I can't hear "Carpet Crawlers" w/out seeing this hissing cavedweller.

AND THE RIIIIIIIIING GOES DOOOOOOWWWWWWN TO MOR-OR-ORDOR

stoked for the madness (nickalicious), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 14:22 (nineteen years ago)

haha

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 14:22 (nineteen years ago)

Never mind a prequel, when are they gonna do a sequel? I mean, Meltron, or whatever the dude's name is who's Sauron's master, isn't officially dead, is he? Just trapped somewhere. They could have Frodos's and Aragorn's sons confront him, or something like that.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 14:41 (nineteen years ago)

Meltron? You're making this up aren't you, sounds like a transformer.

chap who would dare to welcome our new stingray masters (chap), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 14:45 (nineteen years ago)

Also, since they aren't bound by Tolkien, they could include black and female characters too, so they can dodge the issues concerning race and gender in the original trilogy.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 14:46 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, sorry I was thinking of Megatron. I checked it in Wikipedia, it's Melkor aka Morgoth.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 14:47 (nineteen years ago)

Also: hot elfin sex scenes! Man, fuck them purists, we want a sequel!

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 14:48 (nineteen years ago)

Meltron is the reanimated cyborgified corpse of Mel Blanc, like Robocop, only with cartoon voices.

stoked for the madness (nickalicious), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 14:49 (nineteen years ago)

"PUT YOUR WEAPON DOWN"
"Hey, fuck you, buddy!"
RATATATATATATATATATATATATATATATATATAT blaBLAOW
"th-th-th-th-th-that's all folks!"

stoked for the madness (nickalicious), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 14:50 (nineteen years ago)

I wonder at what stage Peter Jackson thought his contract might not be renewed by the people he was having prosecuted for fraud?

=== temporary username === (Mark C), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 14:57 (nineteen years ago)

there is that

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 15:10 (nineteen years ago)

One of those minor points. (And let's face it, it's not like he needs the contract renewed to put bread on the table now.)

AND THE RIIIIIIIIING GOES DOOOOOOWWWWWWN TO MOR-OR-ORDOR

Nickalicious I love you.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 15:41 (nineteen years ago)

He's doing another epic fantasy trilogy now:
http://film.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,1870555,00.html

I'd never heard of it before this story came up, anyone read it?

chap who would dare to welcome our new stingray masters (chap), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 15:46 (nineteen years ago)

Hadn't heard of it either. My guess he started looking into that first when it looked like The Hobbit was doing to be (at least) massively delayed -- because The Hobbit would have given him the chance to do a really fantastic dragon. So might as well sidestep, seeing as Eragon's already been claimed.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 15:50 (nineteen years ago)

Is Meet the Feebles the only PJ film that isn't an adaptation?

stoked for the madness (nickalicious), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 15:50 (nineteen years ago)

Oh wait, just remembered Dead Alive and The Frighteners.

stoked for the madness (nickalicious), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 15:52 (nineteen years ago)

Badtaste and Braindead!

chap who would dare to welcome our new stingray masters (chap), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 15:52 (nineteen years ago)

I was about to say, he's done a slew of 'em. Hasn't for a while, though, and I am disappointed by that.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 15:53 (nineteen years ago)

seventeen years pass...

20 years!

We had thoughts on the podcast!

https://www.megaphonic.fm/bythebywater/57

(Settle it, it's about two hours long...)

Ned Raggett, Monday, 4 December 2023 16:38 (two years ago)

Settle in rather, but you could settle it too.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 4 December 2023 16:38 (two years ago)

im watching them again- some extended for the first time- an hour a week with neighbours

surprisingly they are now separate enough in my mind again from the books that the sharpness of my irritation with some of the decisions has eased-

close encounters of the third knid (darraghmac), Monday, 4 December 2023 23:50 (two years ago)

Healthy approach, that.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 5 December 2023 02:07 (two years ago)

my amazing idea: a sequel series featuring hobbits trying to escape from revived sauron's revived nazgul but this time they're after that giant ass key that unlocked mordor.

omar little, Tuesday, 5 December 2023 02:16 (two years ago)

six months pass...

doing our yearly watch of these, and my kid has been consulting this excellent atlas by Karen Wynn Fonstad which he's found totally fascinating and helpful. anyway, going thru ROTK and some of the flaws are more evident, but they're hardly an issue for me since it's such a strong, epic finish. but the thing i perhaps newly noticed is some of the slight disconnect between settings within the final battle (maybe it's a result of this being the extended cut and some awkwardness remains?), Gandalf and Pippin running around and being waylaid by the Witch-King, who then flies off to see what's up just before the Rohirrim charge. And the absolutely game-changing epic charge is never acknowledged from within the walls, even as just a confidence boost to the troops in Minas Tirith. it might as well be happening in another battle entirely. there's a bit of editing awkwardness around Eowyn after she slays the Witch-King, her crawling around looking for Merry and chased by that Orc chieftain, then bidding adieu to Theoden, then being found unconscious by Eomer. It's certain things that just ever so slightly undercut the final stretch of the battle, plus the fearsomeness of the dead army being undercut by the comical way in which they're depicted effortlessly dispatching the remaining legions of Mordor. but it's not crippling, i think just as much as the Rohan aspect of The Two Towers made it a really rich film, the Rohan storyline concluding on this field of battle is what absolutely makes it succeed. The storylines for Theoden and Eowyn are so truly well done, even if i really do wish they had preserved Tolkien's absolutely heartstopping dialogue in the latter's moment of heroism, perhaps shifting around slightly for more maximum cinematic impact...

'Begone, foul dwimmerlaik, lord of carrion! Leave the dead in peace!'

A cold voice answered: 'Come not between the Nazgûl and his prey! Or he will not slay thee in thy turn. He will bear thee away to the houses of lamentation, beyond all darkness, where thy flesh shall be devoured, and thy shrivelled mind be left naked to the Lidless Eye.'

A sword rang as it was drawn. 'Do what you will; but I will hinder it, if I may.'

'Hinder me? Thou fool. No living man may hinder me!'

Then Merry heard of all sounds in that hour the strangest. It seemed that Dernhelm laughed.... 'But no living man am I! You look upon a woman. Éowyn I am, Éomund's daughter. You stand between me and my lord and kin. Begone, if you be not deathless! For living or dark undead, I will smite you, if you touch him.'

omar little, Sunday, 9 June 2024 19:28 (one year ago)

thou fool

mark s, Sunday, 9 June 2024 19:31 (one year ago)

whomst is the fool now foul dwimmerlaik

mark s, Sunday, 9 June 2024 19:32 (one year ago)

this is the dialogue in the film

EOWYN: I will kill you if you touch him.

WITCH-KING: Do not come between
the Nazgul and his prey.

(break for army of the dead showing up at the river w/Aragorn, Legolas, Gimli)

WITCH-KING: You fool.
No man can kill me.
Die now.

EOWYN: I am no man.

considering how well they preserved much of the excellent dialogue in other areas, it's disappointing they didn't do the same here. that's a moment that deserved a bit more buildup and genuine fear and would have resulted in a better payoff (again, it would have to be altered slightly bc one couldn't hide Eowyn's identity without creating some type of secondary character as a red herring, but that would take up a lot of time.)

omar little, Sunday, 9 June 2024 19:46 (one year ago)

That scene in the animated Return of the King (1980) is more faithful to the book, including using that dialogue. It seemed so heavy on top of the death of Theoden when I first saw it as a kid age 8 or 9.

il lavoro mi rovina la giornata (PBKR), Sunday, 9 June 2024 19:58 (one year ago)

i just watched that scene for the first time last night, it was a bit less fearful maybe due to the Witch-King sounding more like Cobra Commander crossed with the Knights Who Say "Ni", but Eowyn as depicted in that was thoroughly unshakable.

omar little, Sunday, 9 June 2024 20:02 (one year ago)

Yeah the Rankin-Bass films are…uneven but have moments.

The Fonstad atlas has been a standby for me for four decades now.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 10 June 2024 00:01 (one year ago)

Yeah, I should have added that it was not as heavy watching it now at 51 but I was terrified of the witch-king as a kid. He had a crown without a head! Terryifying!

il lavoro mi rovina la giornata (PBKR), Monday, 10 June 2024 01:10 (one year ago)

"I AM NO MAN" works as a more iconic moment than the wordy banter imo

assert (matttkkkk), Monday, 10 June 2024 01:17 (one year ago)

thou fool!

not the one who's tryin' to dub your anime (Doctor Casino), Monday, 10 June 2024 01:33 (one year ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.