yeah, boring, yr nuts
― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 4 February 2016 21:18 (eight years ago) link
boring jfc
― Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 4 February 2016 21:18 (eight years ago) link
Bridge of spies is mad boring, that's what's wrong with that statement
― broderik f (darraghmac), Thursday, 4 February 2016 21:23 (eight years ago) link
yeah I haven't seen that yet
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 4 February 2016 21:25 (eight years ago) link
and by "yet" I mean "I will never see that"
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 4 February 2016 21:26 (eight years ago) link
another great ilx film thread for the blind
― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 4 February 2016 21:26 (eight years ago) link
it is an outlier, but mostly for the "fuck my family, I'm leaving with the aliens" bit at the end
― Dominique, Thursday, 4 February 2016 21:27 (eight years ago) link
Hmm I may need to rewatch I don't remember that bit
― broderik f (darraghmac), Thursday, 4 February 2016 21:27 (eight years ago) link
Morbs you don't sense saccharine with yr eyes, maybe reconsider yr 'blind' digs
― broderik f (darraghmac), Thursday, 4 February 2016 21:28 (eight years ago) link
Duel is passable at best - used as evidence of excellent early work before he went shit. But its just a 6/10 nothing to see here.
Duras' The Truck is more like it.
― xyzzzz__, Thursday, 4 February 2016 21:28 (eight years ago) link
which cut of CE3K did you see? sounds like the first (ie no interior of the ship)
Yeah, I asked upthread if I needed to seek the the other and was told no.
probably essential to see on a theater screen for full impact anyway.
Quite possible, the big scenes may have seemed more immersive, I watched it at home with the lights out but my setup isn't overly poncy.
― Jonathan Hellion Mumble, Thursday, 4 February 2016 21:29 (eight years ago) link
tbh I find Morbz' eternal defense of Spielbergo kind of endearing, an achilles heel, a lone almost random populist chink in an otherwise impregnable armor of misanthropy
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 4 February 2016 21:31 (eight years ago) link
Just that one scene in Jaws with the wean imitating his gestures seemed much more genuine (did I read somewhere improvised?) than all the weepy moppet shit in CE.
― Jonathan Hellion Mumble, Thursday, 4 February 2016 21:32 (eight years ago) link
dmac you don't sense subliterate adolescent revenge onanism with yr eyes, maybe reconsider yr Tarantella fandom
― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 4 February 2016 21:34 (eight years ago) link
lol
― Chicamaw (Ward Fowler), Thursday, 4 February 2016 21:35 (eight years ago) link
hi what's going on
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 4 February 2016 21:36 (eight years ago) link
actually haven't seen Duel or Sugarland Express, this thread inspires
Don't watch anything on my recommendation, the Great Man's films are wasted on me, of course.
― Jonathan Hellion Mumble, Thursday, 4 February 2016 21:37 (eight years ago) link
My enjoyment of tarantino's stuff on the level at which it is directed is easily more defensible than yr insistence that Spielberg's late stage mediocrity somehow transcends by virtue of nothing more than its origin tbh!
Yr still my go-to guy for movie opinion don't worry, but yeah as outic notes this is a weird drum to keep beating is all
― broderik f (darraghmac), Thursday, 4 February 2016 21:40 (eight years ago) link
― broderik f (darraghmac), Thursday, 4 February 2016 21:23 (20 minutes ago)
OTM. The guy just cant help himself when it comes to corny sentiment.
― i;m thinking about thos Beans (Michael B), Thursday, 4 February 2016 21:45 (eight years ago) link
and the The Hateful Eight was much more fun despite its flaws
― i;m thinking about thos Beans (Michael B), Thursday, 4 February 2016 21:46 (eight years ago) link
it's called loving America, you seditionist.
― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 4 February 2016 21:47 (eight years ago) link
"Catch Me If You Can" was the last Spielberg I really enjoyed
― i;m thinking about thos Beans (Michael B), Thursday, 4 February 2016 21:50 (eight years ago) link
i find CE3K strangely easy to resist, even though there's nothing actually wrong with it. my students seemed to largely feel the same way. i guess maybe compared to jaws certain set pieces feel slightly belabored? the emotional arc of the characters should be very moving, but it all seems somewhat remote.
― wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 4 February 2016 22:58 (eight years ago) link
but who knows, maybe i just need to see it in the right frame of mind. not spielberg of course, but after seeing and being unenthused by "american graffiti" possibly a dozen times, i saw it again last year and finally got it.
― wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 4 February 2016 22:59 (eight years ago) link
i guess maybe compared to jaws certain set pieces almost every other movie feels slightly belabored.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 4 February 2016 23:00 (eight years ago) link
CE3K has been one of my fave movies since I was a kid -- it never seemed remote to me, but then I think I basically *was* Roy from the movie. I wanted to get on a spaceship too, and leave behind a world alternately boring/too hard/not friendly/not accessible. This is the *only* Spielberg movie I have that kind of connection to (tho I also love Raiders abt the same, just as a fun adventure ride kind of thing), and why it's easy for me to see it as an outlier.
― Dominique, Thursday, 4 February 2016 23:03 (eight years ago) link
i definitely remember being more moved by it as a kid than i have been as an adult, back when "getting on a spaceship" didn't seem all that much more fantastical than "going to high school"
― wizzz! (amateurist), Thursday, 4 February 2016 23:06 (eight years ago) link
Isn't there a Second City bit with Rick Moraines jazzing up the Close Encounters theme?
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 4 February 2016 23:08 (eight years ago) link
― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 4 February 2016 21:47 (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
<3
― broderik f (darraghmac), Thursday, 4 February 2016 23:08 (eight years ago) link
I love Tarantino *and* Spielberg, and live a capable & happy life despite my terrible life choices
― Flamenco Drop (VegemiteGrrl), Thursday, 4 February 2016 23:47 (eight years ago) link
so unAmerican
― Οὖτις, Friday, 5 February 2016 00:10 (eight years ago) link
tbh I find Morbz' eternal defense of Spielbergo kind of endearing, an achilles heel, a lone almost random populist chink in an otherwise impregnable armor of misanthropy― Οὖτις, Thursday, February 4, 2016 3:31 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― Οὖτις, Thursday, February 4, 2016 3:31 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Somebody has to do it after this dudes "Bye Felicia"...
http://cdn.pastemagazine.com/www/articles/armondmain.jpg
― "Damn the Taquitos" (C. Grisso/McCain), Friday, 5 February 2016 00:58 (eight years ago) link
saw CE3K on VHS as a kid and found it super boring
saw a 35mm print of the remaster done for Blu-ray at Cinefamily in 2013, and fell asleep halfway through
― glandular lansbury (sic), Friday, 5 February 2016 01:00 (eight years ago) link
it feels so endless
― Οὖτις, Friday, 5 February 2016 01:02 (eight years ago) link
Jonathan Hellion Mumble: Glad you like The Sugarland Express. Whenever I mention how much I love it, here and elsewhere, there just doesn't seem to be much interest. I think Duel (which I still haven't seen), because of the novelty of it being made for TV, might be better known--Spielberg's Night Gallery episode might even be better known. (Did see that, ages ago.)
― clemenza, Friday, 5 February 2016 01:05 (eight years ago) link
i notice people who viscerally hate religion generally dislike CE3K
― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 February 2016 03:43 (eight years ago) link
I generally dislike religion, and love CE3K.
For real LOLZ re: Grisso's post, btw.
― pitchforkian at best (cryptosicko), Friday, 5 February 2016 04:02 (eight years ago) link
Like, I wanna get a t-shirt made with that picture of Armond and the caption "Bye Felicia."
― pitchforkian at best (cryptosicko), Friday, 5 February 2016 04:06 (eight years ago) link
1941This just falls completely flat. I have no problem with Spielberg (or anyone else) making this type of film but nothing here works. Ok maybe except the ferris wheel rolling, that looked nice, but overall zzzzzz...
E.T. THE EXTRA TERRESTRIALFirst time in like a quarter century I've watched this, hated it then, hated it now. Really this is where my lack of respect for Spielberg comes from, I just can't manage to care about any of these humans or that little hun. One thing I observed for the first time is that the elder brother is really good, that actor never went on to anything notable, did he? He should have.
RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARKINDIANA JONES AND THE TEMPLE OF DOOMLove both of these. Raiders is like what I was saying about Jaws, every scene seems like a set piece. The monkey plays the Drew Barrymore role in this, ie the narc. This is a case of Spielberg's default tone actually suiting the material.Temple Of Doom is almost as good, I know there's racism accusations but I don't really get that, the goofy knockabout stuff seems pretty much across the board regardless of skin tone. Not as good as Raiders because Karen Allen >>>>> Kate Capshaw, but there are so many immense sequences here.
THE COLOR PURPLEThis was a big film for My Mother, so I saw it in the background a number of times but this is maybe the first time I've properly watched it. And I can see how she relates to it, it's not about race really (that one Oprah sequence aside), it's about domestic abuse. But my problem is that with such a dark subject, why does he choose to film it as a 30's screwball comedy? Oh, Danny Glover can't find his socks! and when he does, there's a hole in them! Now he's trying to cook breakfast! This isn't gunna go well! The amount of mugging going on here gives me a pain behind my eyeballs. But in the parts where the actors are given free reign to be dramatic everyone is quite good, Whoopi especially. And the whole sequence with Danny Glover towards the end after she has left him I actually found quite powerful.
EMPIRE OF THE SUNI really liked this one at the time, but I really couldn't see much craft in the directing this time around. Nice sets, nice acting (Christian Bale is a bit too theatre kid, but otherwise), great source material, but it's just like all the recent oscarbait shit. It is shot competently, nothing more.
INDIANA JONES AND THE LAST CRUSADEI never watched this much compared with the first two, which I assumed was due to The Connery Factor, but actually this is really bad on every level. Yes, Connery is bad, but everyone else is too, and the script is just appalling, every gag signposted, everything telegraphed and then the payoffs landing THUNK on the table. In a way this is more offensive than the films where he is trying and failing to do something, this is just laziness on everyone's part.
General Observation: WHY ARE ALL THESE FILMS SO LONG?
Anyway, that's where I'm up to, I was gunna watch some more today but there is a tubby cat on my legs so I didn't want to get up to change discs, instead I jut watched the whole of P'tit Quinquin, which was better than any of this. What's next up? oh, ALWAYS, that'll be a barrel of monkeys. Then fucken HOOK, then Schindler's List, then some dinosaur films. I never would have guessed I would look forward to the holocaust so much...
― Jonathan Hellion Mumble, Monday, 22 February 2016 03:25 (eight years ago) link
I put on Hook while babysitting my niece a year or so ago mostly as an excuse to give it a re-watch, and my god are those Lost Boys sequences painful. Hoffman and Hoskins have some fun scenery-chewy moments, and Charlie Korsmo (remember him from Dick Tracy and What About Bob? ) is actually quite affecting as Williams's son--he's like the Elliott's brother of this film, I guess ('cept I love E.T. and everyone in it)--but the film really is every awful thing that Spielberg's haters accuse him of being.
And The Lost World is even worse, though for different reasons. Probably the only Spielberg film that can honestly be called lazy.
― pitchforkian at best (cryptosicko), Monday, 22 February 2016 03:35 (eight years ago) link
Close Encounters is my favorite film of his after Raiders. Apparently he's slated to direct the film adaptation of Ready Player One??!
― octobeard, Monday, 22 February 2016 05:30 (eight years ago) link
The BFG looks to be even more of a disaster than Tintin
― Chicamaw (Ward Fowler), Monday, 22 February 2016 12:34 (eight years ago) link
and bad.
― xyzzzz__, Monday, 22 February 2016 12:46 (eight years ago) link
delete thread? just til you ppl learn to watch master filmmakers. Go pick on Zulawski.
― we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 February 2016 12:57 (eight years ago) link
Wrong again, bye.
― xyzzzz__, Monday, 22 February 2016 13:15 (eight years ago) link
One for the lovers and the haters: Spielberg in 30 shots
― T.L.O.P.son (Phil D.), Friday, 4 March 2016 17:58 (eight years ago) link
Spielberg so great that even the 3 seconds of "BFG" from the goddamn trailer seems worthy among those clips.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 4 March 2016 18:14 (eight years ago) link
it's possible that some of the material shot for the trailer will be reused in the movie tho
― leet gentlemen's club (contenderizer), Friday, 4 March 2016 18:26 (eight years ago) link
"omg iconic amazing" dropoff about halfway through that thing is pretty decisive
tall hat, cgi tintin & pensive horse not quite holding up against scheider dolly zoom, etc
― leet gentlemen's club (contenderizer), Friday, 4 March 2016 18:31 (eight years ago) link
u mad, tintin chase sequence is as good as anything in the Raiders movies. Agreed that's a bad choice from War Horse, though. Better shot would be the British cavalry riding into the German machine guns and the riderless horses appearing in shot on the other side.
― T.L.O.P.son (Phil D.), Friday, 4 March 2016 19:27 (eight years ago) link